|
Chapter
14
ANCIENT HISTORY
| a.
The first women faculty at Notre Dame |
The
University of Notre Dame has had an all male faculty since its
inception in 1842, when in 1965, the late Father Albert Schlitzer,
Chair of the Theology Department, made a momentous decision.
With the support of Professor John Noonan, Professor in Law,
a Jewish professor from Oxford and Bishop Beck from Great Britain,
Fr. Schlitzer offered a tenure-track teaching position to a
woman, Josephine Ford, who, at that time, was teaching at Makerere
University College in the University of East Africa. The hire
was made "sight unseen". No interview was possible.
Rumors spread. Some of the priests in Corby expressed the opinion
that "she" could not know Theology for "she"
was a woman. After all had not Aquinas averred that women were
imperfect males? Did not those studying human anatomy exhume
female bodies because they were "less human" than
males? Others priests argued that the prospective candidate
had passed her examinations and procured that necessary degrees.
She had also published in respectable academic journals. Nevertheless,
the male faculty discussed her physiognomy and sartorial features.
"She will be stocky. She will wear a tweed suit and a broad
belt. Her hair will be cut in an Eton crop. She will smoke cigars."
The students were stunned when Father Schlitzer took the first
week's classes and reported to the students, "the professor
is late because she was waiting for her visa."
She
arrived in early October 1965 to find that Fr. Schlitzer had
found her a suitable apartment. Her next door neighbor was
Mrs. Elizabeth Lynch, who was the very first woman to teach
at Notre Dame. Elizabeth Lynch taught speech therapy and assisted
many priests and students, but no one realized that she should
had been given faculty status. (Her portrait is now in South
Bend's hall of fame.) Dr. Alberta Ross was also teaching at
Notre Dame at the time, as a research professional specialist
in the Radiation Laboratory, but the Administration had refused
her a tenure track line.
In
1965, the constituency of all undergraduate classes was entirely
male, although there were a few women graduate students and
flocks of nuns in full habit, exhausted by teaching school
all year and expected to be successful in their MA or science
degrees, seethed around the campus. The only other woman placed
on the teaching faculty was Dr. Suzanne Kelly, who had left
her Benedictine Order but always remained as a dedicated woman
of God. She attempted to form a religious community, primarily
for professional women, but failed, as the women lived too
far from each other. Suzanne was, however, a great success
at Notre Dame. Her background was the history of science and
she was appointed to the General Program, now the Program
of the Liberal Studies, the syllabus of which was Suzanne's
creation. Unfortunately she never received tenure and left,
but later returned to preside over the Sabbatical Program
for Religious ( ). She was a woman who had the courage of
her convictions and tended to be bold, creative and assertive.
She practiced a deep but innovative spirituality sometimes
walking round the lakes as 2 am. Suzanne and Josephine joined
a colorful group for daily Mass in Morrissey Hall, which included
David Burrell, Ernie Bartel, John Gerber, Henri Nouwen and
other vocal personages, who engaged in merry dialogue homilies.
This was usually followed by supper at the South Dining Hall.
Suzanne was very sociable and organized parties for football
fans and cooked dinner for the sisters in Lewis Hall every
other week.
Six of the teaching women formed "Committee W" to
enquire into equity between men and women's rank, promotion
and tenure. Eventually, they brought a class action suit designed
to probe the alleged bias in the promotion and tenure of women
faculty. The case was settled out of court and one woman gained
promotion and tenure and another full professorship.
On
the whole the students accepted these women well. Perhaps
their dedication to teaching and research paved the way for
more and more women being appointed. Courses on feminism
especially for the MDiv students began to be offered,
particularly due to the influence of Elisabeth Schlussler-Fiorenza.
The Chair Persons and the Administration normally supported
the women when there were complaints against them from students.
A football player asserted that his (woman) professor had
lost his paper. After this, no other football players were
encouraged to enroll in that course. An MFA student challenged
his (women) professor to a mediaeval dispute because she had
criticized his paper.
Send
comments
(back
to contents)
| b.
Early Childhood Development Center |
An
important addition to the Notre Dame campus in the fall of 1994
was the Early Childhood Development Center, an on-campus, top
quality child care facility. In what follows, I will attempt
to describe some of the efforts that led to its establishment.
In
1971, Notre Dame was very concerned about the childcare needs
of its faculty, students and staff. It therefore helped establish
the Early Childhood Development Center, located on St. Mary's
campus, first with a $10,000 annual grant, (later $15,000,
even later in the early 1980's with the interest from a $50,000
endowment given by Father Hesburgh.) For twenty years the
University of Notre Dame has cooperated with and supported
that program which is still the case today. The Graduate School,
for example, provided between $10,000 and $20,000 per year
to help subsidize tuition of children of graduate students;
faculty served on the Board of Directors and lent expertise
in various areas; students worked in the Center. For the first
15 years of its existence, enrollment was open only to faculty
of St. Mary's and Notre Dame. In the mid-1980's low enrollment
prompted the Board to expand this opportunity to all employees
of Holy Cross institutions and Notre Dame/St. Mary's alumni/ae.
In the next few years, the enrollment picture changed dramatically
and not only was ECDC fully enrolled, it had a growing waiting
list for admittance. By 1993, the waiting list exceeded 150
staff, faculty and student families.
Because
I had the opportunity to serve on the ECDC Board of Directors,
I was aware of its rapidly growing waiting list but it was
also clear that demographic trends and its own popularity
and success had brought about a significant change in the
composition of the waiting list. Prior to 1990 the waiting
list was dominated by children of alums and CSC affiliates
but by 1992-93 the waiting list consisted primarily of Notre
Dame students and faculty and a small number of staff. Since
preference was given to families with children already enrolled
in ECDC, new faculty and staff were the least likely to be
able to use it. After some conversations with the Provost
about the need for an immediate review of the issue, I formed
a faculty committee to study the matter and to make appropriate
recommendations to the Officers Group. The members of this
original committee were Georgine Resick (music), Richard Williams
(sociology), Todd Whitmore (theology); we also invited Rita
Francis, a graduate student in the college of Science to work
with the committee. The beginning seeds of interest in a child
care center on the Notre Dame campus were planted in the work
of two earlier committees.. The Task Force on Marriage, Family
and Other Life Commitments (March 1988) and the Committee
on the Status of Women at Notre Dame (January 1989) made recommendations
to build an on campus center and to fund the cost of child
care within employee benefits. The administration did incorporate
several options for provision of tax free or tax exempt child
care through flex benefits (Summer 1988).
But
at the time, the need for a center was not pressing since
the ECDC facility at St. Mary's suited the needs of both institutions.
The change in that situation as well as the reports of several
Colloquy 2000 committees and the emergence of Give Kids a
Chance Coalition, prompted the reevaluation of the problem
and the creation of the faculty committee. In the spring of
1992, the faculty committee investigated issues such as the
need for child care, liability, fee scales and operator alternatives
and it issued a report to the officers of the University that
summer. One of its recommendations was for the University
to conduct a comprehensive child care needs survey Hewitt
Associates was engaged for the project (at a cost of $10,000)
and that October 6000 surveys were mailed to faculty, staff,
and graduate students. When the results indicated that there
was a significant need for an on campus child care program,
several staff members joined the faculty committee (Sue Brandt,
financial aid; Jesse Huerta, maintenance; Joel Preston, Hessert
Center; Liz Rosencrantz, registrar's office) to form a joint
task force. This group was to review the survey results and
to make recommendations about the desired characteristics
of a program. In the winter and spring (1992-93) the task
force conducted focus groups in which more than 150 individuals
participated; it also did a follow-up survey of approximately
200 individuals who were most likely to use the center. The
outcome of the these efforts was a strong preference for the
ECDC program and an endorsement to work with ECDC to establish
a second branch on the Notre Dame campus.
A
proposal for the expansion of the ECDC program to the Notre
Dame campus was sent to the ECDC Board. Included in the proposal
was a request to accept children younger than 2 and to expand
the number of weeks per year and hours per day the center
would operate. For its part, the ECDC Board had already been
meeting weekly for well over a semester to address the growing
demands on its program and plant. Indeed, the Board, had,
almost two years earlier, forwarded a similar proposal to
Notre Dame for consideration. When the ECDC Board and Notre
Dame had reached an agreement in principle, Father Malloy
asked to make an announcement of that at the President's dinner
in May, 1993. But one member of the ECDC Board would not give
consent until all details were clearly specified in a written
contract. That was accomplished in July of 1993 and the announcement
sent to the Notre Dame community in August 1993. Work on the
facility began immediately and the building was completed
in August 1994. It opened with a full enrollment just a few
weeks later.
The
facility on Bulla Road was built by the University at a cost
of $1.8 million dollars. The terms of the agreement call for
Notre Dame to own, maintain, and pay utilities of the building
while renting the facility to ECDC for $1. a year. It also
provided $25,000 toward the cost of a new bus for field trips
and $55,000 in start-up costs. The cost of the program is
tied to a sliding fee schedule based on income. It was anticipated
that the fee scale would have to be buttressed by a subsidy
from the University for the first two years of operation.
In fact, the University's subsidy over the past 6 years has
doubled. This is part of the University's ongoing commitment
to make ECDC available to all members of the Notre Dame community.
Features such as the sliding fee scale, the 49 week schedule
and the expanded hours of operation (all of which add to operating
expenses) go a long way towards making it an excellent, attractive
and accessible facility for all faculty, staff and students
with children.
The
relative speed with which this entire project was accomplished
should not be overlooked. The original faculty committee began
its work in early spring of 1992 and the new facility opened
its doors in the fall of 1994. It required a tremendous amount
of effort and sacrifice on the part of many individuals to
make this dream come true. In addition to the persons named
above, a special word of recognition mut be given to Terri
Kosik, Director of ECDC, and Jennifer Warlick, ECDC Board
and Notre Dame faculty member. They spent untold hours hammering
out budgets and sliding fee scales, interviewing and hiring
staff; obtaining licenses and approval by outside agencies;
and arranging schedules, calendar, and menus. Many families
will benefit from their work and from ECDC's superb program
for many years to come.
In comparison to other projects at Notre Dame, ECDC may seem
like a small one but I believe it was one of the most important.
The peace of mind that it brings to parents who know their
children are being well cared for is a priceless asset. Moreover,
the center is a reaffirmation to Notre Dame's commitment to
family values and to its Catholic identity.
Some
further comments from another early ECDC supporter
The previous history of the gorgeous, state-of-the-art, ECDC
center on the edge of the ND campus is most accurate. But
let me add a few words about the pre-history about
how, in the late 1980's, our desperation over the child care
situation in South Bend provoked political action by faculty
and staff, most of whom were in various states of pregnancy,
or caring for infants, or sending toddlers off to private-home
day care centers (the best were safe, warm places to watch
TV). THE STORY IS INSTRUCTIVE.
In
1985, during his annual address to the Faculty Senate, President
Theodore Hesburgh, stated that Notre Dame's child care policy
was to simply provide sufficient wages with which families
could buy their own. In other words, ND's child care policy
was the same as ND's grocery and automobile policy - the marketplace
was presumed to meet our needs. However, Indiana's standards
for private child care centers was among the nation's worst.
The only effective regulation seem to concern fire safety.
Child care workers were paid less than parking lot attendants
and football concession workers. A shining star in this otherwise
desolate arena was the St. Mary's ECDC center, whose waiting
list was a mile long.
Before
Kathleen Cannon was hired, and before she was given the task
to get a center on campus a task which she conducted
with deliberation and care - we parents had to find ways to
make our voices heard. In 1985, female faculty, an obvious
natural interest group, were as scarce as hen's teeth at the
University of Notre Dame. However, we (mostly women) formed
the Give Kids A Chance Coalition, which engaged in guerilla
theater, public hearings, and research while working through
official channels the Task Force on Marriage, Family
and Other Life Commitments (March 1988) and the Committee
on the Status of Women at Notre Dame (January 1989)
to correct the situation. At our afternoon meetings (at a
faculty member's house where kids could play and squirm) we
planned a series of "Meet Our Kids Days", a publicity
and fund-raising strategy. On various days throughout the
year, but especially on football weekends, we brought our
kids to campus and marched with them all over - but especially
to the administration building and into mobbed cafeterias.
We also had a fundraising booth at one of the student's annual
carnivals and we collected donations of toys and games in
boxes around the then fairly new Decio faculty office building.
As
the pressure built, the administration first floated the idea
that they would contract out child care services to a private,
for-profit center (one that provides services to Memorial
Hospital workers.) But early one morning, Richard Williams,
an assistant professor Dad, took off for Indianapolis, where,
in a dingy government office he found the documentation that
this for-profit child care center had high rates of staff
turnover, numerous health code violations, and often tolerated
staff to child ratios that exceeded legal limits. That same
day, he brought back the findings (seven hours of driving)
to the special committee considering the center. Soon afterwards,
ND agreed to build their own center on terms consistent with
the Give Our Kid's a Chance Coalition's blueprint, which stated
that the center's workers would be well paid; that staff-child
ratios would exceed state standards, and importantly, that
fees for parents would be on a sliding scale.
As
the Administration had argued, and we acknowledged, the center
would have to be subsidized by the University, reflecting
the cold sad economics of caring in this country, i.e., that
decent caring services are not affordable by many of the people
who need it most. Initially, the University said the subsidy
would last for two years. I feel they knew then that the cost
to the University would only grow as it has.
It
took five years, from the formation of the Give our Kid's
A Chance Coalition to the opening of the ECDC building. By
that time, most of the initiating faculty's children were
too old to attend, or were in other places. But, it was worth
the struggle and worth waiting for. Notre Dame's financial
commitment to subsidize lower income users and to pay for
top-notch staff makes ECDC an unusual high-quality and affordable
child care center, and we are grateful for it.
The
last task of the Give Our Kid's A Chance Coalition was to
collect money for a bouquet of flowers for Kathleen Cannon.
And that is the story of how some problems get solved at Notre
Dame.
Send
comments
(back
to contents)
Early
Childcare Development Center, Inc. (ECDC)
18680 Bulla Road, Notre Dame, IN 46556
(219) 631-3344
ECDC,
founded in 1971, is a nonprofit, licensed child care center
partially funded by the University of Notre Dame and Saint
Mary's College. Both full and part time programs are provided
at two sites--one at Saint Mary's College and one on the Notre
Dame campus. Both sites are governed by one board of directors
and operate with the same philosophy, curriculum, parent involvement
and college student involvement. Both sites are staffed by
teachers educated and experienced in child development and
early childhood education.
ECDC
enrolls children with differing social and ethnic backgrounds
from the Saint Mary's and Notre Dame communities. ECDC is
committed to providing all children enrolled with multicultural
curriculum and experiences. ECDC welcomes students of any
race, color, religion, gender, and national or ethnic origin.
Programs:
ECDC, Inc. at Saint Mary's College, Havican Hall
· Ages 3 through 6 during the 35-week school year program
· Ages 3 through 9 during the 8-week summer day camp
program
· Hours - 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday
ECDC,
Inc. at Notre Dame, Bulla Road
· Ages 2 through 6 during the 35-week school year program
· Ages 2 through 9 during the 8-week summer day camp
program
· Hours - 6:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday
Eligibility:
At least one parent must be affiliated with the University
of Notre Dame or Saint Mary's College (i.e. administration,
faculty, staff, student or alumni), or an employee of the
Holy Cross Order Community.
ECDC-ND
Tuition Schedule:
please see the ECDC website at http://www.nd.edu/~hr/oef_child_parent_ecdc.shtml
ECDC-SMC
Scholarships
SMC students and SMC staff with financial need may apply for
scholarships funded by Saint Mary's College. ND graduate students
with financial need may apply for scholarships funded by the
University of Notre Dame. Families with documented financial
need, not affiliated in one of the three categories listed
above, may apply for
scholarship assistance through the ECDC board of directors.
If you are interested in further information regarding scholarships
or need an application for one of the scholarships described
above (i.e. SMC, ND or ECDC Board Scholarship), please contact
Terri Kosik, Executive Director, at 631-3345.
Planning
early for enrollment
The
November/December before your child turns 2 years old, call
ECDC (631-3344) to be placed on their mailing list. In January,
a parent
information packet will be mailed to you. It describes ECDC,
the programs, the classrooms, teachers, and the like. It also
describes parent meetings and the enrollment process.
If
your child will be 2.5 years old by the beginning of the summer,
he/she can be enrolled in the summer program. Registration
for the summer program is due March 1st. Information (including
registration forms) about this program is mailed in February.
If
your child will be 2 years old by the Fall, he/she can be
enrolled in
the school-year program. Registration for the school-year
program is due April 1st. Information (including registration
forms) about this program is mailed in March. Notification
of confirmed enrollment is given May 1st.
There
is a $25 registration fee.
All
the registration forms and fees collected by April 1st are
used to
create an enrollment list. For the two-year-old classroom,
there is room
for 15 children. If there are more than 15 children on the
enrollment
list, positions are filled through a lottery (each child is
assigned a
number and numbers are randomly chosen until the positions
are filled).
Families
with children already enrolled at ECDC will receive first
priority for the positions. The priorities then move through
the list as
described elsewhere in this section.
Advice
given from staff at ECDC is to be flexible in terms of the
schedule required for your child's enrollment. It may be harder
to enroll your child for an all-day, every-day schedule relative
to a MWF morning
schedule (for example). Once you get into ECDC, you will receive
the
highest priority for enrollment the next year. So getting
your (child's)
foot in the door helps tremendously for future enrollment.
After
all classroom positions are filled, a waiting list is formed.
The
2001-02 waiting list for the 2-year-old classroom contained
approximately 35 names. It is highly unlikely that the entire
classroom enrollment would turnover twice to allow Name 35
to be enrolled. But you are notified of your wait-list position
so that you can find other childcare alternatives if your
number is high.
Enrollment
Process at ECDC-ND
1) A random selection process (lottery) is used providing
current ECDC families with first priority.
2) The second enrollment priority at ECDC-ND is given ND faculty,
staff and student families.
3) The third enrollment priority at ECDC-ND is given to SMC
faculty, staff and student families.
4) Fourth enrollment priority at ECDC-ND is given to ND alum
families.
5) Fifth enrollment priority at ECDC-ND is given to SMC alum
families.
6) Last enrollment priority at ECDC-ND is given to staff members
of a Holy Cross Institutions.
Families
from the Michiana community are not eligible to enroll children
in the ECDC-ND program.
Enrollment
Process at ECDC-SMC
1) A random selection process (lottery) is used providing
current ECDC families with first priority.
2) The second enrollment priority at ECDC-SMC is given SMC
faculty, staff and student families.
3) The third enrollment priority at ECDC-SMC is given to ND
faculty, staff and student families.
4) Fourth enrollment priority at ECDC-SMC is given to SMC
alum families.
5) Fifth enrollment priority at ECDC-SMC is given to ND alum
families.
6) Sixth enrollment priority at ECDC-SMC is given to staff
members of a Holy Cross Institutions.
7) Last enrollment priority at ECDC-SMC is given to families
from the
outside community.
ECDC-SMC
& ECDC-ND registration selection process
A. A random selection process within each Priority Category,
beginning with Category #1, will be used to fill available
openings. Selection will proceed in order through the respective
Priority Categories identified in I above (either ECDC-SMC
or ECDC-ND) moving to a lower Priority only after children
in a higher Priority Category have been enrolled, if openings
exist and requested schedules are available.
B.
Children not successfully registered as a result of the selection
process will automatically be placed on the appropriate activity
room Waiting List according to their position or standing
(e.g., First, Fifth, etc.) resulting from the random selection
process within each Priority Category. Families placed on
a Waiting List will be notified promptly and their Registration
Fee(s) returned.
Send
comments
(back
to contents)
|