Jack Amariglio, David F. Ruccio.Postmodernism, Marxism, and the Critique of Modern Economic Thought. RM 7(3):7-35 Examines postmodern moments of mainstream and Marxian modes of economic thought. Three conceptual contrasts are identified as foundational axes that comprise the common modernity of these otherwise different theoretical approaches: order and disorder, centering and decentering, and certainty and uncertainty. It is argued that these dualities are unstable and in fact comprise the postmodern moments whose nihilistic potential allows critics to uncover the weak links in the totalizing stories offered by these theories. It is demonstrated that the Marxian distinctions between production and circulation, market and plan, and capitalism and socialism are built on these contrasts and therefore similarly unstable. A postmodern Marxism is advocated that refuses the distinction between markets and planning, instead focusing on how both participate in determining and satisfying needs and desires in particular settings. This Marxism prioritizes disorder while it builds off of Marxian notions of knowledge that eschew the premises and consequences of classical epistemology. It is concluded that these postmodern elements are not the obstacles for creating a socialist economy that classical Marxism has claimed.