Edited by Kevin Prufer.
Foreword by Richard Howard. Southern Illinois University Press: Carbondale & Edwardsville.
2000. 243 pages.
These days editors of poetry anthologies feel burdened to justify the
publication of yet another selection of poets and poems. A quick walk through the poetry section of any
moderately adequate bookstore and one is bound to be barraged by the superabundance and (often over-
specified) diversity of anthology titles—it seems half the coffeehouses in America have gathered and
published the results of their open-mike night. These books all have their two hundred or more pages and
at least twenty or so readers to read them. To all this Kevin Prufer adds his collection with its somewhat
non-descript, but ambitious title The New Young American Poets. I never expect much from a
poetry anthology claiming to represent the "new" and the "young" American writers. These books often
are watered down in an effort to collect the full stylistic and personal diversity of the poetry populace, or
else the editors duck and hide while including only their near-kin, classmates, and lovers. The extent to
which Prufer has avoided these pitfalls likely depends upon where you drink your coffee or beer on poetry
night. I, however, was surprised to find myself re-reading many of Prufer's selections not in the work of
reviewing, but for the pleasure of reading. Whoever or whatever the poets in this book are meant to
represent; Prufer employs an exceptional ear for good writing.
It's clear after a few pages of poetry that Prufer mainly selects
entries based on the strength of every individual poem and poet. However, the only intention he makes
explicit in his brief introduction is his "goal with this anthology to sort through the piles of new poems by
the youngest generation of writers and select forty poets, all born after 1960, who seem . . . to be writing
unusual, promising poems" (xiv). Beyond this, one must infer Prufer's preferences from his quick-and-
dirty survey of what's going on in the baffling world of contemporary poetry. After describing the
confusion some readers experience when they encounter "seemingly countless movements . . . language
poetry, new formalism, spoken-word poetry, the New York school . . . [and] on and on" (xiii-xiv), Prufer
argues, in so man words, that the wheat's worth the chaff:
Selected at random—selected even from the most reputable publishers—new American
poems imply to the casual reader an
age of factionalism, mediocre writing, and the
stereotypically boring trained professional poet. But this is not
truly the case. Mixed
into this
overstimulating if, ultimately, underwhelming poetry scene are many brilliant
young writers with strange, exciting,
wholly new voices (xiv).
One voice not included is Kevin Prufer's, whose poetry (were he not the editor) would have a place in this
book--read his poems in this issue and in issue #x of NDR. Prufer's position as peer, rather than esteemed
elder and poetry judge, gives this book a newness and urgency unlike many anthologies otherwise edited.
The voices that Prufer finds "strange, exciting, [and] wholly new"
are for the most part not easily defined or assimilated into this or that poetry "movement" or "school".
Some, however, are deft at traversing these divisions—see, for example, the poems of Jeffrey McDaniel,
who slips between the worlds of page and performance with ease, or the poems of Sherman Alexie, a
successful novelist and screenwriter. Alexie, despite his professed populist aesthetic, often writes instead
a deceptive easy read like "The Exaggeration of Despair". This poem primarily lists the grievances
Indians live and die with, the on going dispossession and the absence of reparation. With its telling title,
however, and its seemingly awkward frame ("I open the door / . . . / and invite the wind inside.") even the
most "high-browed" reader will be second guessing who's been duped? Though nearly all the poets in
this book slip through the cracks of easily defined poetic style, Prufer's taste is not on the fringes or with
the so-called "experimental" poets and a shocking number of the poets represented here have received
some of the most prestigious poetry awards and fellowships available for young poets. This observed,
Prufer's book is far more ambitious than those more easily defined by ethnicity, politics, style, or
geography. The personal diversity of the included authors, however, exceeds that of many anthologies
that make diversity their first intention. Prufer claims merely to give us forty poets under forty and what
we get is a book that rarely has a false note. Though there must be other poets in America that could have
been in this book, there's not one presently included that doesn't stand up with the others as an example
of some of the best poetry of a new generation.
This generation is a hard one to name and stereotype and Prufer
doesn't bother; however, Richard Howard, who writes a short forward for the book suggests that "our
moment" is pervaded by "a dialogue between the private self and the public imagery" (xii). In contrast,
poet James Harms describes the under-forty poets in his contributor's note by their lack of or vague
memory of the 60s civic turmoil—with Kennedy and King as bench marks. Arguably, this absence
expresses itself in ideological searching, in guilt before one's elders and / or in defensive posturing before
accusations of apathy and ignorance. Adding to these observations, many of the poets arrived at sexual
maturity simultaneously with the maturation of the AIDS epidemic. See the poems of Mark Wunderlich;
Rafael Campo, AIDS physician; AIDS patient, D.A. Powell; and AIDS educator, Ruth Schwartz. These
poets write with a tonal range from the quiet lament and moan to the edgy presentation of illness and fear.
For an excellent lament and plea for peace, read Wunderlich's "The Anchorage", which begins by
addressing an unnamed (perhaps lost) lover:
I think you would like this seaside town—it makes me dream of whales.
All night they break through the dark, unhinging monstrous jaws,
their flukes stirring the surface to an oily calm
while gulls swoop to pull the krill from the great open maw
and all day I've been thinking of the twelfth-century postulant
sealed as a child in a monastery wall, sealed with her anchor.
Together the women sang the canticles, opening
only for the priest's bony fingers touching the sacrament
to their lips, then the sour sponge of Christ's blood, kissed
back.
And then, after describing one of the poet's sudden migraines while walking through the woods, a vision
of (or prayer for) peace:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . Here at the shore, I still live
with the threat of seizure, but fear it not as much,
heaven less my childhood vision of a bleached and rotating city
than a rocking and viscous zone of slow-moving figures,
our shadows sealed together, opening for the holiest sustenance.
There will be no blood there, no virus linking up its cellular chains
to consume the flesh, no houses remembered for the shapes
that move through them. Just motion, and union, and light.
For another kind of lament, one that mocks even the self-centeredness of the poet's illness, see Powell's
"[sleek mechanical dart: the syringe noses into the blue vein marking the target of me]", which ends:
how much frivolity does the hypodermic draw away: does it taste men waferthin
who
blest my tongue
does it know knees I've dandled on. I feel taken in: darts in the waist of a coat I'll
bury
in
for I have husbanded recklessly: wedding daggers. holes in my memory of holes:
danaidic vessels
the needle quivers. sickens. I spill names an alphabetsoup of hemoglobin.
someone
cracks the code
in a fortnight of waiting I draw up a will. develop false symptoms. how will I
survive
surviving
I'll throw parties where death blindfolded is spun: won't someone be stuck. and won't
I
be missed
For Powell's gallows humor on the same subject, and something between iambic and Hopkin's sprung
meter, read his brutal "[darling can you kill me: with your mickeymouse pillows]".
Many of these poets are also marked by their keen scrutiny of both
the individual and the clan—perhaps this is what Howard meant by suggesting a dialogue between the
private self and the public imagery. Many of Prufer's poets excel by riding the sharp edge where one's
biography, faith, ethnicity and public label meet persona and self. In this regard, see the poems of Julia
Kasdorf, who flourishes on the difficult business of being a "representative poet of the Mennonite and
Amish people"; Sherman Alexie, an "enrolled Spokane / Coeur d' Alene Indian"; Khaled Mattawa, first
generation Arab-American poet and translator from Libya; Rick Noguchi, the voice of the surf and board;
Nick Carbo, the Filipino-Spanish-Greek-American-Catholic poet; and the African-American poet of
"language, memory, thinking, feeling, history . . . Groovallegiance. Feet. Feet. Feet," Thomas Sayers
Ellis. Often, these poets pull the reader into a technically and intellectually difficult poem by first
tempting the voyeur, offering the reader brief admittance to an insider's community. Ellis, for example,
with "Sir Nose D'VoidofFunk", opens the door for those of us who never "got" the layers of subtext in the
lyrics of George Clinton's various versions of his funk group Parliament and his stagings of "The
Mothership Connection". We are lured into the poem by its humor and its strangeness made plain as Ellis
introduces us to the hero/villain:
[1]
That name: D'VoidofFunk.
An expressionistic thing
With do-loops
And threes in it,
Preceded by
A silly-serious
Attempt by
Old Smell-O-Vision
To cop
Some nobility.
[2]
The whole bumpnoxious,
Dark thang stanks
Of jivation
And Electric Spank.
Glory, glory, glory—
hallastoopid.
Then there's his funny
Accent—pitch
Change and delay
Looped through
Feedback, pre-spankic
Self-satisfunktion.
Nose gets harder
As his voice
Gets higher.
Nose won't take
His shoes off,
Dance, swim, or sweat,
Nose snores,
A deep snooze,
Snoozation.
In these short lines, the invention of words without presumptive arrogance, the pure joy of silly-serious
jivation, one hardly notices the subtle move from couplets to tercets or the following move from tercets to
quatrains in part three. Likewise, in part three, how easily the reader is set-up to judge the pimp, "Nose",
and those that admire him.
[3]
Syndrome tweedle dee dum. Despite
The finger-pointing profile,
False peace signs
And allergic reaction
To light, we brothers
Wanna be down
With Nose. All that!
The girls, the clothes.
Now you know Nose
Knows when to fake it
And when to fake
Faking it.
Waves
Don't mean he's gone
Or that there's going
To be a cover-up,
Very Nixonian.
You can't impeach Nose.
Where's your court-
room, your wig and robe?
You ain't Nose judge.
Somebody scream just to see
The look on our party's
Tromboneless face,
That burial ground
Of samples and clones
Jes grew. A nose
Is a nose is a nose
Is a nose,
so
Wherever the elephants
In his family
Tree untrunk
Is his home.
[4]
And that's about the only tail
Mugs can push or pin
On him.
Before we know it, we've judged ourselves "Mugs" and all that can be said of Sir Nose is "a nose is a
nose."
Not unlike "Sir Nose D'VoidofFunk", many of the poems in this
volume appeal to a broad range of readers—with or without the personal notes Prufer requested to "not
only deepen the readers' understanding of what, exactly, the issues are for the youngest generation of
talented poets but will also allow those readers who are interested in a more personal way of reading the
poems" (xv). See the world of personal intimacy and strange, haunting geography that Joshua Clover
creates in "The map room"; Denise Duhamel's entertaining "Sex with a Famous Poet"; the moving and
desperate yearning in Suzanne Gardinier's "Letter to My Mother"; or Kevin Young's encounter with the
persona and art of Jean-Michel Basquiat in, "Campbell's Black Bean Soup":
Candid, Warhol
scoffed, coined it
a nigger's loft—
not The Factory,
Basquiat's studio stood
anything but lofty—
skid rows of canvases,
paint peeling like bananas,
scabs. Bartering work
for horse, Basquiat churned
out butter, signing each
SAMO?. Sameold. Sambo's
soup. How to sell out
something bankrupt
already? How to copy
rights? Basquiat stripped
labels, opened & ate
alphabets, chicken
& noodle. Not even brown
broth left beneath, not one
black bean, he smacked
the very bottom, scraping
the uncanny, making
a tin thing sing.
With his tight lines and deft enjambments, Young gives us both a sense of the world Basquiat confronted
as well as a bit of the ambience of Basquiat's method—the label's stripped, the alphabets consumed, the
copied rights mocked.
As most poets in this book are both readable and challenging,
likewise, many have honed their talent and intelligence beyond their years—rarely making the mistakes or
showing the shortcomings of the "young" poet. Joy Katz, Rick Barot, and Greg Williamson, for example,
are three poets that, as represented in this anthology, could hold their own with contemporary poets of any
age and acclaim. Katz's poem "Taxonomy", though brief, is innovative and ambitious—examining the
life of Thomas Jefferson while simultaneously reveling in and lamenting in the inadequacies of both the
written words of Jefferson and the words of Joy Katz. The poem begins with an italicized line and
quotation from Jefferson--all of his "lines" are italicized: "Language is only an instrument for the
attainment of science". "Taxonomy" explores how much Jefferson could or could not keep to his
word. In the last section Katz brings the beauty and agony to a conclusion in the figure of the ironic poet
as a tourist (maybe even as a patriot), standing at some ridiculous overlook to see what the dead patriarch
might have seen:
You can stand on a cliff before the heave and tear
in Jefferson's mountains, in the sublime,
and not escape the awe. You can kneel above the abyss,
two hundred and seventy feet
of gouged rock and silver threads of stream, your back
to silver grilles of cars parked row on row in searing sun.
Here the eye ultimately composes itself
Jefferson added later, much later—looking away to the plain,
away from the arch that sprung
as it were, up to heaven.
Just as strong as "Taxonomy" and even more moving is her poem
"Falling" which rescues the Proserpina story from the seemingly endless parade of bad and mediocre
poems about the abducted daughter and mourning mother, Ceres. Adding to the myth a childhood
imagination of, fear of, even longing for a heroin trip, Katz recounts Proserpina's damnation in frank,
bold terms:
She got pulled down and learned to like it. It happened gradually, from the warmth
maybe, the moans . . . all those half-
years in hell and one day a murmur, almost
somnolent, all right then, fuck me in the ass.
Out of the immense clutter of Proserpina poems in contemporary poetry, this is the best one I've ever read.
Rick Barot adds to his controlled, mature line, a great sense of
humor and seeming ease—as in these self-confident, semi-flippant lines from "Three Amoretti": "The
mouth to begin with—lightly pursed, / insouciant, as if about to say insouciant". Barot writes
with the intellectual agility and meditative endurance of Auden, while following Basho to find, but with
irony, the sacred in small things. He considers himself, according to his contributor's note, a devotee of
Joseph Cornell—his world is equally strange and immensely more erotic. To begin with, read the
complex, jovial, sensual "Riffing". This poem manages to coherently include Tom, Dick, and Harry;
do, re, mi; Frost, Pound, Basho; Barot's mother's unthinking joy of planting roses . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . Just one thing and then
another, Tom says, his tongue here and then here.
Each kiss different and yet somehow the same.
To one rose how many notes can you bring?
Also read the tender, humorous "Portishead Suite", here's the last section:
In the small forest of the city park where we find ourselves talking, sunlight's half a
phenomenon of itself, half wind. One
shift of the leaves' canopy lights the wedge of
your jawline. With another, the glare of eyeglass. I think, I have
to try to remember
everything.
The light reminds me of the three goldfish I once bought in Chinatown. Feeder fish, the
clerk called them, though they grew
to the size of small ficus leaves. They lived years
even on the barest care. At night I stared at them, their
movements small cursives in the
dark.
The most metrically and formally talented poet in this book, Greg
Williamson, will be read with pleasure even by those that are oblivious to such blessings. His sequence
"Dark Days", a meditation on the seasons, war, words, and the world—is built upon a blinding symmetry
and a swirling interplay of refrain, rhyme, and quatrain. I have no doubt that this poem has helped the
author earn a number of well-deserved rewards—it's far too complex to get a good sense of by excerpting
for a review, but for what it's worth, here's the adventurous third section, "Conspectus Against
Anthropocentric Assumptions in Polemical Rhetoric":
We should have seen it. Coming back
In June, the sun achieved its northernmost
Ecliptic point, the solstice, which we post
Beforehand in the almanac
And on which day our region sees
The maximum of solar lumination.
Because the planet's axis of rotation
By 23.58
Inclines from perpendicular
To the Earth's plane of orbit, seasons change
With variations in the photic range
Of our G2, main-sequence star.
Cork-celled abscission layers grow
On petioles of leaves. As chlorophyll
Dehydrates, pigments such as xanthophyll
And carotene begin to show.
Climatic shifts that conincide
With mass migrations can contribute to,
In humans, elevated rates of flu,
Fatigue, despair, and suicide.
Still, these are biological,
Not indications of occult intent.
We are a protoplasmic accident.
That is the simple truth. Let all
Of nature's signal flags be furled.
The mysteries are over. God's dead. Nor
Should one detect some latent metaphor
In the dark days of the cold world.
There are many other poets in this book that deserve to be
mentioned and read and no doubt other readers will have other favorites. (Keep your eyes open for the
youngest poet in this book, HeidiLynn Nilsson—a poet Prufer might be credited with partly
"discovering"—having published her poems as well in the magazine he edits, Pleiades. Nilsson
is a virtuoso of enjambment and reading her work is like finding some brave mixture of Robert Creeley
and Emily Dickinson.) The New Young American Poets, however, can not be criticized for
anything much more that what anthologies are usually berated for—not including this or that poet, or
enough of certain poets to get an adequate sense of their work. In this regard, I'd have preferred more
poetry and less of the sometimes-disappointing personal statements in the contributors' notes. I certainly
wish I'd been give more of Kevin Young's work on Basquiat and more of (Yale Younger Poets Award
winner of 1996) Talvikki Ansel's poems engaging the Finnish folk epic The Kalevala—the
alchemical tone of the one poem we get from this sequence only begs for more. Likewise, I wish there
was some sign that Rick Noguchi could write about more than surf-boarding or that Nicole Cooley could
do something other than the tired subject of witch-hunts and burnings. In the end, however, this is a good
book—it'd work in the classroom as an introduction to the most contemporary of contemporary poets, it's
worth reading ragged, and no doubt it leaves many editors, poets, and publishers jealous.