|
| |
|
Research |
|
|
|
Focus Area 1:
Mobile Sensor Swarms |
|
This focus
area explores new methods and platforms to perform multi-modality sensing based on mobile swarm agents.
We study ways to improve
sensing performance by letting the swarm find areas of interest using
emergent behavior and autonomous navigation.
We have developed a novel method
for mobile agent navigation based on potential fields generated using radio
beacons, without the use of GPS or other localization methods. This simple,
yet robust, navigation scheme has been successfully implemented on a mobile
robot platform using wireless nodes equipped with IEEE 802.15.4 / Zigbee
based radios. The mobile agents are also equipped with multiple sensors to
detect various signal modalities, towards obtaining more complete
information on the scenario under observation. Processing such information
concurrently over multiple sensor modalities is studied under the focus area
2 described below.
Our research interests in this
area include swarm robustness, contaminant detection and tracking algorithms,
spatio-temporal sampling, and formation forming using mobile agents. This
work ranges from theoretical analysis and computer simulations to actual
implementations on real-world mobile sensor platforms.
|
| |
|
Focus Area 2:
Wireless
Sensor-Actuator Networks |
|
We study wireless sensor and
actuator networks with a special focus on distributed sensing, information
processing, and control. An important problem is the handling of
heterogeneous signal sources and sensor data in a notoriously unreliable and
uncertain wireless sensing environments.
Areas of particular interest are
the Dempster-Schafer theory of evidence and its generalizations,
spatio-temporally selective fusion, and energy efficient transport and
distributed processing of sensor information. A typical application of this
work is the "needle in a hay stack" problem in real-time data mining in
sensor networks. In this direction, we developed a novel method named
"Evidence Filtering" that can directly process imperfect sensor data over
multiple signal modalities.
Also we have developed a simple and modular
state-space model for
distributed sensing and actuation in grid sensor networks where nodes are
placed in a regular
spatial grid.
In this direction, we study local multidimensional (m-D) state-space models for distributed operations.
|
| |
|
Focus Area 3:
Networked Control Systems |
|
During synchronization of
networked dynamical systems, the problem of drifting clocks and
non-identical sampling times is known to cause problems regarding stability
and performance. We concentrate on accurate modeling of
these systems as well as analyzing their behavior. A particular focus is the
problem of robust stability with respect to sampling rates. Methods for
robust design and fault detection in such systems in the presence of
synchronization errors are also a key concern.
Network
congestion control using control theoretic methods are also been investigated
under this
area. Most of the work has concentrated on explicit rate feedback in ATM networks (ABR
option). A particular focus of this work is the accurate modeling of the
communication link using dynamical system models.
|
|
|
|
Focus Area 4: Sensor
Fusion |
|
This focus area presents a
framework for the combination of evidence in an environment where data are
generated from heterogeneous sources possessing partial or incomplete
knowledge about the global network scenario. The approach taken is based on
the conditional belief and plausibility notions in Dempster–Shafer evidence
theory that allow one to condition these partial knowledge bases so that
only that portion of the incoming evidence that is relevant is utilized for
updating an existing knowledge base. The strategy proposed enables one to
accommodate some of the most challenging, yet essential, features that are
encountered when evidence is generated from possibly a large numbers of
sources. These include heterogeneity and reliability of incoming evidence,
inertia and integrity of evidence already gathered, and potentially limited
resources at the nodes where evidence updating is carried out. The proposed
framework is applied in robot map discovery using ultrasonic sensors and a
real-world scenario where sensor data generated by heterogeneous sensors are
used for potential threat carrier-type detection. |
|