<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="projects.xsl"?>
 
<labprojects>
 <project>
  <type>project</type>
  <name>Annie's First Year Project</name>
  <authors>Gomberg, A.</authors>
  <stage>Completed and Presented on: Wednesday, August 25th, 2004</stage>
  <abstract>Moral thinking is a combination of two forces, moral judgment and the 
cultural influences that shape ideology (Narvaez, Getz, Rest &amp; Thoma, 
1999). To measure cultural tolerance and intolerance, the present study 
employed the ATHRI-2 (Narvaez, 2004) to evaluate attitudes toward human 
rights. Factor analysis of the ATHRI-2 identified two formerly unidentified 
factors within the scale, namely Cultural Intolerance and Cultural 
Tolerance. Extending prior research, the study sought to examine the 
connections between other cultural and personality characteristics and 
these two orientations, namely interpersonal connectedness and 
relationality, ethical identity, fundamentalism, political conservatism &amp; 
liberalism. Cultural tolerance was significantly predicted by relational 
commitment whereas cultural intolerance was not. </abstract>
  <contact>agomberg@nd.edu</contact>
 </project>
 
 <project>
  <type>project</type>
  <name>Amanda's First Year Project</name>
  <authors>Matthews, A.</authors>
  <stage>Completed and Presented on: Wednesday, August 25th, 2004</stage>
  <abstract>Some suggest that persons with postconventional moral reasoning are 
"unfriendly, insensitive, selfish, indifferent, phony, inconsiderate, 
inhumane" (Wygant, 1995). Other research has demonstrated that high scores 
in moral judgment are related to more positive attitudes towards human 
rights (Narvaez et al, 1999) and more professional ethical behavior (Rest &amp; 
Narvaez, 1994). But are postconventional thinkers less likely to be warm 
and caring in interpersonal relationships? We tested the relation of moral 
judgment to measures of concern for others, including reasons for avoiding 
drug use. We tested 167 college students and found that moral judgment was 
related to higher scores in relational commitment and interpersonal 
responsibility but not priority of family. Moral judgment was related to 
moral reasons for avoiding drug use. </abstract>
  <contact>amatthew@nd.edu</contact>
 </project>
 
 <project>
  <type></type>
  <name></name>
  <authors></authors>
  <stage></stage>
  <abstract></abstract>
  <contact></contact>
 </project>
</labprojects>
