Spatial Relations

A spatial relation is a distance between two substances to a certain degree. Space is a complex of shapes, lines, and points, themselves abstract geometric properties that substances may exemplify.

So I do not view space as a substance, given that space has parts that can be exemplified. Space falls under the category of ordered whole. Given that space is a complex of abstract properties, and given that these properties are essential parts of propositions, and given that propositions are necessary entities, it looks as though space is a necessary entity. Space exists necessarily.

However, spatial substances do not appear to be necessary entities. It seems perfectly possible for there to be empty space—no things standing in any spatial relations.

Axioms of spatial relations are presently treated under axioms for shapes.

Is Space Curved? 

No. Things in space exemplify curves, but given my account of space as a complex of geometric properties, it makes no sense for space itself to exemplify curves. In other words, space contains curves, though it does not itself exemplify curves.

In reply to general relativity’s alleged need for curved space, see General Relativity @ TWOW.

Is Time a Dimension of Space?

No. See temporal relations.

Are Distances Relative?

No. However, I realize that it follows from Einstein’s special theory of relativity that the distance between two objects is relative to an inertial frame. So there is no such thing as non-relative distance. This seems to me to be a mistake. A distance seems to be a two-term relation, not a three term one.

That isn’t to say that I question the equations of special relativity. It’s just that I am skeptical of Einstein’s metaphysical account of them. I think a metaphysically simpler account (simpler in terms of the quantity of kinds of entities and the quantity of members of each kind) is this: As two simple substances move more quickly, the causal interactions between them slow down. They slow down because a causal interaction takes place by virtue of a transfer of some third thing (like energy) travelling at the speed of light, say. As energy travels in the direction of motion, it takes it longer to travel from one substance to the other. Indeed, as the substances approach the speed of light, the time it takes the energy to “catch up” to the other substance approaches infinite. This is why clocks slow down to zero as their velocities approach the speed of light. In fact, you can calculate just how much they slow down at any particular velocity given this metaphysical account, and the calculations are exactly as the special theory equations predict. The advantage of this account is that it’s ontologically simpler than Einstein’s. For more on this topic, see Special Relativity @ TWOW.

 

 

Return to the Categories