Topic Index

ACCREDITATION

Pelesh, Due Process in the Accreditation Context: A Reply, 22:175 (1995).

Prairie and Chamberlain, Due Process in the Accreditation Context, 21:61 (1994).

Cassou and Curran, Secular Orthodoxy and Sacred Freedoms: Accreditation of Church-Related Law Schools, 11:293 (1984).

Simons, Case Comment, Avins v. White: Defamation in the Accreditation Process, 8:268 (1981-82).

Tayler and Hylden, Judicial Review of Accrediting Agency Actions: Marlboro Corp. D/B/A The Emery School v. The Association of Independent Colleges and Schools, 4:199 (1977).

ADMINISTRATORS

Cranman and Ward, Book Review, THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE MODERN UNIVERSITY , by Robert Bickel & Peter Lake, 26:389

Johnstone, Book Review, FAILING THE FUTURE: A DEAN LOOKS AT HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, by Annette Kolodny, 25:909 (1999).

Gibbs, Book Review, CREATING A SAFE CAMPUS – A GUIDE FOR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS, by David Nichols, 24:695 (1998).

Davis, Scaling the Ivory Tower: State Public Records Laws and University Presidential Searches, 21:353 (1994).

Gibbs, Book Review, CHOOSING A COLLEGE PRESIDENT: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS, by Judith B. McLaughlin and David Reisman, 18:329 (1991).

Kennelly, Book Review, ON ASSUMING A COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY PRESIDENCY, LESSONS AND ADVICE FROM THE FIELD, by Estela M. Bensimon, Marian L. Gade and Joseph F. Kauffman, 16:731 (1990).

Gee, Introduction to Reflections on Higher Education in the 1970’s, 8:443 (1981-82).

Hornby, Book Review, HIGHER EDUCATION AND THE LAW, by Harry T. Edwards and Virginia Davis Nordin, 7:181 (1980-81).

Hornby, Book Review, THE LAW OF HIGHER EDUCATION: LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION MAKING, by William A. Kaplin. 7:181 (1980-81).

Haslam, The Locus of Decision Making in Colleges and Universities: The Broad Perspective, 1:199 (1973).

Middleditch, College and University Fringe Benefits, 1:172 (1973).

Whaley, Interinstitutional Cooperation Among Educational Organizations, 1:93 (1973).

ADMISSIONS

Pieronek, Book Review, THE BIG TEST: THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN MERITOCRACY, by Nicholas Lemann, 26:549 (2000).

Steinbach, Michaelson, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26:467 (2000).

Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Rosman, Hemmat, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).

Vinik, Kumin, and O’Brien, Affirmative Action in College Admissions: Practical Advice to Public and Private Institutions for Dealing with the Changing Landscape, 26:395 (2000).

Olivas, Book Reviews, THE LEANING IVORY TOWER, LATINO PROFESSORS IN AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES, ed. by Raymond V. Padilla and Rudolfo Chavez Chavez; RACE AND REPRESENTATION: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, ed. by Robert Post and Michael Rogin; SHAMEFUL ADMISSIONS, THE LOSING BATTLE TO SERVE EVERYONE IN OUR UNIVERSITIES, by Angela Browne-Miller; THE UNIVERSITY IN RUINS, by Bill Readings: Race, Raza, and Ruins, 24:123 (1997).

Pullin and Heaney, The Use of Flagged Test Scores in College and University Admissions: Issues and Implications Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 23:797 (1997).

Ware, Tales From the Crypt: Does Strict Scrutiny Sound the Death Knell for Affirmative Action in Higher Education?, 23:43 (1996).

Garfield, Squaring Affirmative Action Admissions Policies With Federal Judicial Guidelines: A Model for the Twenty-First Century, 22:895 (1996).

Vaseleck, Stop Working and Put Down Your Pencils: The Use and Misuse of Standardized Admission Tests, 20:405 (1994).

Smith, Case Comment, Anderson v. University of Wisconsin: Handicap and Race Discrimination in Readmission Procedures, 15:431 (1989).

O'Neil, Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on DeFunis and Bakke, 14:423 (1988).

Rothstein, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Emerging Issues for Colleges and Universities, 13:229 (1986).

Wilson, De Funis- What Now?, 2:83 (1974).

Wilson, Admissions and Preferences: Sequel to De Funis, 1:38 (1973).

ANNUAL REVIEW

Weber, Diability Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:351 (1999).

Pieronek, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:307 (1999).

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:291 (1999).

Stoner and Detar, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:273 (1999)

Von Gerichten, Tort Litigation in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:245 (1999).

Johnsen and Todd, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:221 (1999).

O’Shea, First Amendment Cases in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:193 (1999).

Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:349 (1998).

Bodensteiner, Student Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:331 (1998).

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:313 (1998).

Schupansky and Stoner, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: 1997 in Review, 25:293 (1998).

Hoye, Tort Litigation in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:257 (1998).

Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:225 (1998).

O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1997 in Review, 25:201 (1998).

Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: 1996 Case Law in Review, 24:243 (1997).

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:225 (1997).

Pavela, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: A Review of 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:213 (1997).

Bickel, Tort-Accident Cases: Traditional Tort Rules in the College or University Setting, 24:187 (1997).

Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: A Review of 1996 and 1997 Judicial Decisions, 24:161 (1997).

O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1996 in Review, 24:131 (1997).

Robinson, Introduction, Higher Education and the Courts: 1995 in Review, 23:307 (1997).

O’Shea, First Amendment: 1995 in Review, 23:309 (1997).

Johnsen, Immunity: 1995 in Review, 23:333 (1997).

Bickel, Torts: 1995 in Review, 23:357 (1997).

Pavela, Student Disciplinary Actions: 1995 in Review, 23:391 (1997).

Hustoles and Smith, Employment Discrimination: 1995 in Review, 23:403 (1997).

Sroka, Discrimination Against Students: 1995 in Review, 23:431 (1997).

Rothstein, Disability Discrimination: 1995 in Review, 23:475 (1997).

Robinson and Pieronek, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1994 in Review, 22:367 (1996).

Robinson and Huber, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1993 in Review, 21:157 (1994).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1992 in Review, 20:125 (1993).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1991 in Review, 19:73 (1992).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1990 in Review, 18:163 (1991).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1989 in Review, 17:149 (1990).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1988 in Review, 16:201 (1989).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1987 in Review, 15:87 (1988).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1986 in Review, 14:303 (1987).

ATHLETICS AND SPORTS

Leduc, Note, Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: A Guide to How Courts Will Treat Future Antitrust Challenges to NCAA Regulations, 26:139 (1999).

Ruiz, Note, National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Smith: Must the NCAA Play By the Rules? 26: 119 (1999).

Church and Neumeister, University Control of Student-Athletes with Disabilities Under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, 25:105 (1998).

Leahy, Note, The Title Bout: A Critical Review of the Regulation and Enforcement of Title IX in Intercollegiate Athletics, 24:489 (1998).

Beauchamp, Book Review, GAMES COLLEGES PLAY – SCANDAL AND REFORM IN INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS, by John R. Thelin, 23:301 (1996).

Mitten, Book Review, UNSPORTSMANLIKE CONDUCT – EXPLOITING COLLEGE ATHLETES, by Walter Byers (with Charles Hammer), 22:1081 (1996).

Chang, Note, Coercion Theory and the State Action Doctrine as Applied in NCAA v. Tarkanian and NCAA v. Miller, 22:133 (1995).

Mulderink, Case Comment, Par for the Female Course: Cohen v. Brown University Mandates an Equal Playing Field in Intercollegiate Athletics, 22:111 (1995).

Delaney, Sack, Morris, and Sperber, 1995 Symposium: Round Table Discussion on Collegiate Athletics Reform, 22:96 (1995).

Oriard, Landry, and Leonard, 1995 Symposium: College Athletics as a Vehicle for Social Reform, 22:77 (1995).

Hesburgh and Albino, 1995 Symposium: Reform and Renewal in College Sports, 22:63 (1995).

Justus, Brake, and Davidson, 1995 Symposium: Title IX, 22:48 (1995).

Padilla and McMillen, 1995 Symposium: Educating the Athlete, 22:37 (1995).

Katz and Hilliard, 1995 Symposium: Government Attempts at Regulation, 22:20 (1995).

Gerberding, 1995 Symposium: Historical Perspective of Amateurism, 22:11 (1995).

Beauchamp, 1995 Symposium: Introduction and Welcome, 22:2 (1995).

1995 Symposium (various authors), Sports Reform: College Athletics in Flux, 22:1 (1995).

Williams, Lower Pay for Women's Coaches: Refuting Some Common Justifications, 21:643 (1995).

Pieronek, Note, A Clash of Titans: College Football v. Title IX, 20:351 (1994).

Kettle and McCarthy, Case Comment, An End Run Around the Sherman Act? Banks v. NCAA and Gaines v. NCAA, 19:295 (1993).

Schaller, Drug Testing and the Evolution of Federal and State Regulation of Intercollegiate Athletics: A Chill Wind Blows, 18:131 (1991).

Meyers, Note, State Open-Records Acts and the NCAA By-Law Requiring Coaches to Disclose their "Athletically-Related" Outside Income: Emptying the Coaches' Pockets for Public Inspection?, 16:497 (1990).

Cosgrove, Note, A Survey of State Athlete-Agent Legislation: Origins and Effects, 16:433 (1990).

Ranney, The Constitutionality of the Drug Testing of College Athletes: A Brandeis Brief for a Narrowly-Intrusive Approach, 16:397 (1990).

Leeson, Note, The Drug Testing of College Athletes, 16:325 (1989).

Alessandro, Note, The Student-Athlete Right-to-Know Act: Legislation would Require Colleges to Make Public Graduation Rates of Student Athletes, 16:287 (1989).

Conboy, Book Reviews, LAW IN SPORT AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, by Annie Clement, and LAW IN SPORT, by Bernard Patrick Maloy, 16:171 (1989).

Rasnic, Book Review, FUMBLE: BEAR BRYANT, WALLY BUTTS AND THE GREAT COLLEGE FOOTBALL SCANDAL, by James Kirby, 16:165 (1989).

Longo and Thoman, Case Comment, Haffer v. Temple University: A Reawakening of Gender Discrimination in Intercollegiate Athletics, 16:137 (1989).

Stoner and Nogay, The Model University Coaching Contract ("MCC"): A Better Starting Point for Your Next Negotiation, 16:43 (1989).

Poskanzer, Spotlight on the Coaching Box: The Role of the Athletic Coach within the Academic Institution, 16:1 (1989).

Bhirdo, Haviland, and Warth, Case Comment, McCormack v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: Collegiate Athletics Sanctions from an Antitrust and Civil Rights Perspective, 15:459 (1989).

Tyler, Note, State Open Records Laws and the NCAA: Does the NCAA Qualify as a "Governmental Body" and, if so, May its Members Invoke the Privilege of Self-Critical Analysis?, 15:349 (1989).

Graff, Myers, and Tyler, Case Comment, Blair v. Washington State University: Making State ERA's a Potent Remedy for Sex Discrimination in Athletics, 14:575 (1988).

Dixon, Note, Achieving Educational Opportunity Through Freshman Ineligibility and Coaching Selection: Key Elements in the NCAA Battle for Academic Integrity of Intercollegiate Athletes, 14:383 (1987).

Graves, Commentary, Coaches in the Courtroom: Recovery in Actions for Breach of Employment Contracts, 12:545 (1986).

Judge, Student-Athletes as Employees: Income Tax Consequences, 13:285 (1986).

Rowe, Case Comment, NCAA v. Board of Regents: A Broadening of the Rule of Reason, 11:377 (1984).

Staton, Note, Recent Cases Concerning the Rights of Student Athletes, 10:209 (1983-84).

Atkinson, Note, Workers' Compensation and College Athletics: Should Universities be Responsible for Athletes Who Incur Serious Injuries?, 10:197 (1983-84).

Remington, NCAA Enforcement Procedures Including the Role of the Committee on Infractions, 10:181 (1983-84).

Weistart, Legal Accountability and the NCAA, 10:167 (1983-84).

Pauley, Case Comment, Williams v. Hamilton, 8:399 (1981-82).

Branchfield and Grier, Aiken v. Lieuallen and Peterson v. Oregon State University: Defining Equity in Athletics, 8:369 (1981-82).

Ruxin, Unsportsmanlike Conduct: The Student-Athlete, the NCAA, and Agents, 8:347 (1981-82).

Thompson and Young, Taxing the Sale of Broadcast Rights to College Athletics – An Unrelated Trade or Business?, 8:331 (1981-82).

Thomas and Wildgen, Women in Athletics: Winning the Game But Losing the Support, 8:295 (1981-82).

Faccenda, Introduction to Symposium on Athletics in Higher Education, 8:291 (1981-82).

Gaal, DiLorenzo, and Evans, Hew’s Final “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:345 (1979-80).

Gaal and DiLorenzo, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’s Proposed “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80).

Title IX Athletics, 6:73 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Hermann, Sports and the Handicapped: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Curricular, Intramural, Club and Intercollegiate Athletic Programs in Postsecondary Educational Institutions, 5:143 (1977-79).

Kadaielski, Postsecondary Athletics in an Era of Equality: An Appraisal of the Effect of Title IX, 5:123 (1977-79).

Dickerson and Chapman, Contract Law, Due Process, and the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79).

Horn, Intercollegiate Athletics: Waning Amateurism and Rising Professionalism, 5:97 (1977-79).

Weistart, Antitrust Issues in the Regulation of College Sports, 5:77 (1977-79).

Edmonds, Postsecondary Athletics and the Law: A Selected Bibliography, 5:65 (1977-79).

Zuckman, Throw ‘Em to the Lions (or Bengals): The Decline and Fall of Sports Civilization as Seen Through the Eyes of a United States District Court, 5:55 (1977-79).

Hochberg, The Four Horsemen Ride Again: Cable Communications and Collegiate Athletics, 5:43 (1977-79).

Lowell, Judicial Review of Rule-Making in Amateur in Amateur Athletics, 5:11 (1977-79).

Kaplin, An Overview of Legal Principles and Issues Affecting Postsecondary Athletics, 5:1 (1977-79).

McGuire, The NCAA- Institution Under Constitutional Siege, 2:175 (1974-75).

ATTORNEYS

O’Neil, The Lawyer and the Client in the Campus Setting: Who is the Client, What does the Client Expect and how May the Attorney Respond?, 19:333 (1993).

Dunham, Case Studies on Wrongdoing on Campus: Ethics and the Lawyer’s Role, 19:315 (1993).

Drinan, Lawyer-Client Confidentiality in the Campus Setting, 19:305 (1993).

Richmond, Students' Rights to Counsel in University Disciplinary Proceedings, 15:289 (1989).

Helms, Patterns of Litigation in Postsecondary Education: A Case Law Study, 14:99 (1987).

Kennard, Book Review, EDUCATION LAW, ed. by James A. Rapp, 12:565 (1986).

Daane, The Role of University Counsel, 12:399 (1985).

Kaplin, Law on the Campus 1960-1985: Years of Growth and Challenge, 12:269 (1985).

Shaffer, Review Essay: Legal Resources for Higher Education Law, 12:83 (1985).

Greenleaf, Academic Institutions in the Light and Shadow of the Law, 12:1 (1985).

Olivas and Denison, Legalization in the Academy: Higher Education and the Supreme Court, 11:1 (1984).

Gray and Toohey, Doing Business in the New Technology: Problems for College and University Counsel, 10:455 (1983-84).

Hoornstra and Liethen, Academic Freedom and Civil Discovery, 10:113 (1983-84).

Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79).

Williams, The Code of Professional Responsibility and the College and University Lawyer, 2:248 (1975).

Sensenbrenner, University Counselor: Lore, Logic and Logistics, 2:13 (1974).

Beale, Delivery of Legal Service to Institutions of Higher Education, 2:5 (1974).

Corbally, University Counsel- Scope and Mission, 2:1 (1974).

O’Neil, Court and Campus- Striking a New Balance, 1:199 (1973).

AUXILIARY ENTERPRISES

Switzer, New IRS Guidelines Target College and University UBIT, 21:489 (1995).

Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993).

Horton, Traditional Single-Sex Fraternities on College Campuses: Will They Survive in the 1990's?, 18:419 (1992).

Niccolls, Nave, and Olswang, Unrelated Business Income Tax and Unfair Competition: Current Status of the Law, 15:249 (1989).

Walker and Israeloff, Historic Preservation and the Institutional Owner, 14:59 (1987).

Rich, Malpractice Issues in the Academic Medical Center, 13:149 (1986).

Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986).

Rumsey, Legal Aspects of the Relationship Between Fraternities and Public Institutions of Higher Education: Freedom of Association and Ability to Prohibit Campus Presence or Student Membership, 11:465 (1985).

Lawton, Carder, and Weisman, Recent Governmental Action Regarding the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405 (1985).

Schneider, Political Interference in Law School Clinical Programs: Reflections on Outside Interference and Academic Freedom, 11:179 (1984).

Hitchner, Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement of Teaching Hospitals and Faculty Physicians, 10:79 (1983-84).

Wallis, Case Comment, "Negligent Publishing": Implications for University Publishers, 9:209 (1982-83).

Ward, Commentary, The Georgia Grind: Can the Common Law Accommodate the Problems of Title in the Art World: Observations on a Recent Case, 8:533 (1981-82).

Weil, A Checklist of Legal Considerations for Museums, 7:346 (1980-81).

Ward, Copyright in Museum Collections: An Overview of Some of the Problems, 7:297 (1980- 81).

Loar and Sky, General Operating Support for Museums: Problems in Paradise, 7:267 (1980-81).

Francis, Federal Tax Problems of College and University Auxiliary Organizations, 3:72 (1975).

BANKRUPTCY

Aiello and Behrens, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986).

Vecchione, Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as an Alternative to Closing or Merger, 8:1 (1981-82).

Bissell, Brief for Appellants in Handsome v. Rutgers University, 6:241 (1979-80).

Millsap and Wright, Recent Cases on Student Transcript Rights after Bankruptcy, 6:231 (1979-80).

BRIEFS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FROM COUNSEL

Steinbach, Michaelson, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26: 467 (2000).

Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Rosman, Hemmat, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).

Michaelson, Smith, Drier, and Steinbach, Board of Education of the Township of Piscataway v. Sharon Taxman, 24:671 (1998).

University of Richmond v. Bell: Plaintiff’s Reply Brief to Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, 10:36 (1983-84).

University of Richmond v. Bell: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, 10:34 (1983-84).

University of North Carolina Council on Biotechnology Patent Task Group Report, 9:541 (1982-83).

Pajaro Dunes Conference Draft Statement, 9:533 (1982-83).

Consent Decree, Rajender v. The University of Minnesota, 8:219 (1981-82).

Guthrie, Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:68 (1981-82).

Giddings, Petitioner’s Brief in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:58 (1981-82).

Consent Decree in The United States Department of Labor, Office of Contract Compliance Programs v. Regents of University of California, 8:54 (1981-82).

Reback and Vogt, AAMC v. Carey: Briefs in Support of a Motion to Enjoin Enforcement of New York’s Standardized Test Disclosure Law, 7:132 (1980-81).

Bissell, Brief for Appellants in Handsome v. Rutgers University, 6:241 (1979-80).

COMPUTERS

Cranman, Privacy and Technology: Counseling Institutions of Higher Education, 25:69 (1998).

Allred, Note, May a Public University Restrict Faculty Expression on its Internet World Wide Web Sites? Academic Freedom and University Facility Use Restrictions, 24:325 (1997).

Price, College and Universities as Internet Service Providers: Determining and Limiting Liability for Copyright Infringement, 23:183 (1996).

Lautsch, Book Review, COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION: LEGAL LIABILITIES AND ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING THEIR USE AND MISUSE, by Patricia A. Hollander, 14:163 (1987).

Hollander, An Introduction to Legal and Ethical Issues Relating to Computers in Higher Education, 11:215 (1984).

Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79).

CONTRACTS

Lemmer and Pompeo, "Educating" Lawyers about the Implications of Cost Accounting
Standards for Government Contracts and Grants with Educational Institutions, 21:111 (1994).

Swan, Early Retirement Incentives with Upper Age Limits under the Older Workers Benefits Protection Act, 19:53 (1992).

Cole and Goldblatt, Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions’ Authority to Select the Lowest Possible Bidder, 16:177 (1989).

Stoner and Nogay, The Model University Coaching Contract ("MCC"): A Better Starting Point for Your Next Negotiation, 16:43 (1989).

Sullivan, Note, The College or University Power to Withhold Diplomas, 15:321 (1989).

Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986).

Graves, Commentary, Coaches in the Courtroom: Recovery in Actions for Breach of Employment Contracts, 12:545 (1986).

McDonald, Contract, A Property Right under the Fourteenth Amendment? Vail v. Board of Education, 11:445 (1985).

Ende and Lane, Book Review, CONTRACTING FOR SERVICES, ed. by Lanora F. Welzenbach, 11:399 (1984).

Jennings, Breach of Contract Suits by Students Against Post-secondary Institutions: Can They Succeed?, 7:191 (1980-81).

Dickerson and Chapman, Contract Law, Due Process, and the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79).

Horn, Intercollegiate Athletics: Waning Amateurism and Rising Professionalism, 5:97 (1977-79).

DEBT COLLECTION

Woodcock, Burden of Proof, Undue Hardships, and Other Arguments for the Student Debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8)(B), 24:377 (1998).

Lake and Pedulla, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation: State Agencies that Grant Educational Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default on Prior Education Loans, 17:261 (1990).

Aiello and Behrens, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986).

Ayres and Sagner, The Bankruptcy Reform Act and Student Loans: Unraveling New Knots, 9:361 (1982-83).

Hunter, Collecting Defaulted Student Loans: How Much Diligence is Due?, 9:149 (1982-83).

DISCRIMINATION

Curkovic, Accent and the University: Accent as Pretext for National Origin Discrimination in Tenure Decisions, 26:727 (2000).

Stoner and Ryan, Burlington, Faragher, Oncale, and Beyond: Recent Developments in Title VII Jurisprudence, 26:645 (2000).

Kaplin, A Typology and Critique of Title IX Sexual Harassment Law After Gebser and Davis, 26:615 (2000).

Steinbach, Michaelson, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26:467 (2000).

Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Rosman, Hemmat, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).

Vinik, Kumin, and O’Brien, Affirmative Action in College Admissions: Practical Advice to Public and Private Institutions for Dealing with the Changing Landscape, 26:395 (2000).

Weber, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:351 (1999).

Pieronek, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:307 (1999).

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:291 (1999).

Regan, ‘Tis Better to “Benefit” Than To “Receive” - The Standard Delimiting Coverage Under Title IX and Other Federal Antidiscrimination Statutes, 26:107 (1999).

Neiger, Actual Knowledge Under Gebser v. Lago Vista: Evidence of the Court’s Deliberate Indifference or an Appropriate Reponse for Finding Institutional Liability?, 26:1 (1999).

Pieronek, Book Review, BECOMING GENTLEMEN, by Lani Guinier, et al., 25:627 (1999).

Bekavac, Book Review, BECOMING GENTLEMEN, by Lani Guinier, et al., 25:619 (1999).

Bors, Academic Freedom Faces Learning Disabilities: Guckenberger v. Boston University, 25:581 (1999).

Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:349 (1998).

Bodensteiner, Student Discrimination in Higher Education, 25:331 (1998).

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education, 25:313 (1998).

Phelps, Book Review, CULTIVATING HUMANITY: A CLASSICAL DEFENSE OF REFORM IN LIBERAL EDUCATION, by Martha C. Nussbaum, 25:185 (1998).

Weber, Disability Discrimination Litigation and Institutions of Higher Education, 25:53 (1998).

Whitman, Affirmative Action on Campus: The Legal and Practical Challenges, 24:637 (1998).

Lee, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education: A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:619 (1998).

Leahy, Note, The Title Bout: A Critical Review of the Regulation and Enforcement of Title IX in Intercollegiate Athletics, 24:489 (1998).

Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: 1996 Case Law in Review, 24:243 (1997).

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:225 (1997).

Coleman and Jarvis, Tuition Adjustment for Law School Students: A Necessary Accommodation under the ADA?, 24:45 (1997).

Sampen, Age Discrimination and Reasonable Non-Age Factors, 24:1 (1997).

O’Neill, Single-Sex Education after United States v. Virginia, 23:489 (1997).

Rothstein, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: A Review of the 1995 Judicial Decisions, 23:475 (1997).

Sroka, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education: 1995 in Review, 23:431 (1997).

Hustoles and Smith, Employment Discrimination Cases in Higher Education: 1995 in Review, 23:403 (1997).

Fellrath, Case Comment, Coleman v. Zatechka: The ADA and Student Life, 23:285 (1996).

Barber, Waivers of Academic Progress Requirements for Federal Financial Aid: A Reasonable Accommodation for Students with Learning Disabilities?, 23:231 (1996).

Alger and Coleman, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23:91 (1996).

Ware, Tales From the Crypt: Does Strict Scrutiny Sound the Death Knell for Affirmative Action in Higher Education?, 23:43 (1996).

Tucker, Application of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 to Colleges and Universities: An Overview and Discussion of Special Issues Relating to Students, 23:1 (1996).

Milani, Disabled Students in Higher Education: Administrative and Judicial Enforcement of Disability Law, 22:989 (1996).

Garfield, Squaring Affirmative Action Admissions Policies with Federal Judicial Guidelines: A Model for the Twenty-First Century, 22:895 (1996).

Roth, Case Comment, Rosenberger v. Rector: The First Amendment Dog Chases its Tail, 21:723 (1995).

Williams, Lower Pay for Women's Coaches: Refuting Some Common Justifications, 21:643 (1995).

McCusker, The Americans With Disabilities Act: Its Potential for Expanding the Scope of Reasonable Academic Accommodations, 21:619 (1995).

Hernandez, Note, The Constitutionality of Racially Restrictive Organizations within the University Setting, 21:429 (1994).

Bainbridge, Essay, Student Religious Organizations and University Policies Against Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation: Implications of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 21:369 (1994).

Baida, Not All Minority Scholarships are Created Equal, Part II: How to Develop a Record that Passes Constitutional Scrutiny, 21:307 (1994).

Vargyas, Commentary, Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools and its Impact on Title IX Enforcement, 19:373 (1993).

Frazier and Dymersky, A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Is the New Law Retroactive?, 19:259 (1993).

DiScala, Olswang, and Niccolls, College and University Responses to the Emotionally or Mentally Impaired Students, 19:17 (1992).

Gray, Impact of the Proposed Civil Rights and Women's Equity in Employment Act on Colleges and Universities, 18:559 (1992).

Hill, Note, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Significant Overlap with Section 504 for Colleges and Universities, 18:389 (1992).

Scott and Weingart, Case Comment, A Professor's Choice: Employment or Religious Conviction: EEOC v. University of Detroit, 18:315 (1991).

Ward, Note, Race-Exclusive Scholarships: Do they Violate the Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?, 18:73 (1991).

Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy: An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991).

Brammer, Lallo, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees of Boston University: The Realization of Title VII's Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991).

Rothstein, Commentary, Students, Staff and Faculty with Disabilities: Current Issues for Colleges and Universities, 17:471 (1991).

McClamrock, Note, The First Amendment and Public Funding of Religiously Controlled or Affiliated Higher Education, 17:381 (1991).

Frost, Shifting Meanings of Academic Freedom: An Analysis of University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 17:329 (1991).

Lake and Pedulla, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation: State Agencies That Grant Educational Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default on Prior Educational Loans, 17:261 (1990).

Keyes, Health-Care Professionals with AIDS: The Risk of Transmission Balanced Against the Interests of Professionals and Institutions, 16:589 (1990).

Hodulik, Prohibiting Discriminatory Harassment by Regulating Student Speech: A Balancing of First-Amendment and University Interests, 16:573 (1990).

Haviland, Note, Student Discriminatory Harassment, 16:311 (1989).

Longo and Thoman, Case Comment, Haffer v. Temple University: A Reawakening of Gender Discrimination in Intercollegiate Athletics, 16:137 (1989).

Smith, Case Comment, Anderson v. University of Wisconsin: Handicap and Race Discrimination in Readmission Procedures, 15:431 (1989).

Fick, Book Review, ACADEMICS IN COURTS: THE CONSEQUENCES OF FACULTY DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION, by George R. LaNoue and Barbara A. Lee, 15:239 (1988).

Finkin, Commentary, Tenure After an Uncapped ADEA: A Different View, 15:43 (1988).

Dutile, God and Gays at Georgetown: Observations on Gay Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v. Georgetown University, 15:1 (1988).

Curry, Manderfeld, and Sullivan, Case Comment, Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988).

Graff, Myers, and Tyler, Case Comment, Blair v. Washington State University: Making State ERA’s a Potent Remedy for Sex Discrimination in Athletics, 14:575 (1988).

Ruebhausen, Commentary, The Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1986: Implications for Tenure and Retirement, 14:561 (1988).

Andrews, Note, State Legislation on Comparable Worth: Will it Bring Pay Equity to Academe?, 14:469 (1988).

O'Neil, Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on DeFunis and Bakke, 14:423 (1988).

Claque, The Affirmative Action Showdown of 1986: Implications for Higher Education, 14:171 (1987).

Delano, Discovery in University Employment Discrimination Suits: Should Peer Review Materials be Privileged?, 14:121 (1987).

Weeks, Book Review, THE DISMISSAL OF STUDENTS WITH MENTAL DISORDERS: LEGAL ISSUES, POLICY CONSIDERATIONS AND ALTERNATIVE RESPONSES, by Gary Pavela, 13:429 (1987).

Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment, 13:267 (1986).

Rothstein, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Emerging Issues for Colleges and Universities, 13:229 (1986).

White, Book Review, THE RIGHTS OF TEACHERS, by David Rubin (with Steven Greenhouse), 12:561 (1986).

Weeks, Equal Pay: The Emerging Terrain, 12:41 (1985).

Stacy and Holland, Legal and Statistical Problems in Litigating Sex Discrimination Claims in Higher Education, 11:107 (1984).

Renahan, Case Comment, Bob Jones University v. United States: No Tax Exemptions for Racially Discriminatory Schools - Supreme Courts Clarifies Thirteen Year Policy Imbroglio, 11:69 (1984).

Rothstein, Reproductive Hazards and Sex Discrimination in the Workplace: New Legal Concerns in Industry and on Campus, 10:495 (1983-84).

Stanley, Note, The Rights of Gay Student Organizations, 10:397 (1983-84).

Kubasek, Book Review, DISCRIMINATION, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, ed. by W. E. Block and M. A. Walker, 10:331 (1983-84).

Bodner, Commentary, Analyzing Faculty Salaries in Class Action Sex Discrimination Cases, 10:305 (1983-84).

Tashjian-Brown, Title IX: Progress Toward Program Specific Regulation of Private Academia, 10:1 (1983-84).

Orleans, Book Review, ABILITY TESTING OF HANDICAPPED PEOPLE: DILEMMA FOR GOVERNMENT, SCIENCE, AND THE PUBLIC, ed. by Susan W. Sherman and Nancy M. Robinson, 9:347 (1982-83).

Lee, Balancing Confidentiality and Disclosure in Faculty Peer Review: Impact of Title VII Litigation, 9:279 (1982-83).

Bompey and Saltzman, The Role of Statistics in Employment Discrimination Litigation – A University Perspective, 9:263 (1982-83).

Lines, Tuition Discrimination: Valid and Invalid Uses of Tuition Differentials, 9:241 (1982-83).

Casey, Case Comment, Constructive Discharge under Title VII in Institutions of Higher Education, 9:191 (1982-83).

Orleans and Smith, Commentary, Who Should Provide Interpreters Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act?, 9:177 (1982-83).

Schwartz and Woods, Public Television and the Hearing Impaired, 9:1 (1982-83).

Flygare, Commentary, TDCA v. Burdine: The Decreasing Burden for Employers in Title VII Litigation, 8:519 (1981-82).

Buckley, Perspective on Gunther, 8:433 (1981-82).

Bompey, Decoupling Tenure and Employment Under the 1978 Amendments to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 8:425 (1981-82).

Tucker, Perspective on Camenisch, 8:409 (1981-82).

Consent Decree, Rajender v. University of Minnesota, 8:219 (1981-82).

Green, An Application of the Equal Pay Act to Higher Education, 8:203 (1981-82).

Guthrie, Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:68 (1981-82).

Giddings, Petitioners Brief in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:58 (1981-82).

Tytel, Spirt v. Long Island University: TIAA-CRED and the Sex-Based Mortality Table Controversy, 7:119 (1980-81).

Orleans, Memorandum: First Thoughts on Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 6:263 (1979-80).

Bompey, 1979 Update: Cases and Issues in Age Discrimination, 6:195 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Gaal and DiLorenzo, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’s Proposed “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80).

Legal Diagnosis and Defense of An Employment Civil Rights Claim, 6:135 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Status of Quotas As A Remedy In Discrimination Cases, 6:129 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Update on Age Discrimination, 6:123 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Update on Handicap Discrimination, 6:113 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Title IX Athletics, 6:73 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Laster, State Law on Mandatory Retirement of Tenured Faculty After the 1978 Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments, 5:211 (1977-79).

Ford, The Implications of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1978 for Colleges and Universities, 5:161 (1977-79).

Kadzielski, Postsecondary Athletics in An Era of Equality: An Appraisal of the Effect of Title IX, 5:123 (1977-79).

Bassen, Synopsis of State Laws Regulating Employment of the Handicapped, 4:293 (1977).

Haslam, Age Discrimination in Campus Employment, 2:326 (1975).

Reidhaar, Minority Preference in Student Admissions, 2:197 (1975).

Bickel and Vandercreek , Class Action Aspects of Federal Employment Discrimination Litigation, 2:157 (1974-75).

Wilson, De Funis- What Now? 2:83 (1974).

Frohnmayer, Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972, 2:49 (1974).

Steinbach and Reback, Equal Employment + Equal Pay = Multiple Problems for Colleges and Universities, 2:25 (1974).

La Noue, Tenure and Title VII, 1:206 (1974).

Wilson, Admissions and Preferences: Sequel to De Funis, 1:38 (1973).

Relihan, Means and Ends: The Evolution of Federal Administration Doctrine on Equal Employment Opportunity, 1:33 (1973).

Stitt and Limitone, University Fair Employment Practices Litigation Strategy and Tactics, 1:20 (1973).

Gregory, Making the Affirmative Action Plan Work, 1:16 (1973).

Frohmayer, Current Developments in Federal Law Affecting Equal Employment Opportunity in Higher Education, 1:1 (1973).

ETHICS

O’Neil, The Lawyer and the Client in the Campus Setting: Who is the Client, What does the Client Expect and How May the Attorney Respond?, 19:333 (1993).

Dunham, Case Studies on Wrongdoing on Campus: Ethics and the Lawyer’s Role, 19:315 (1993).

Drinan, Lawyer-Client Confidentiality in the Campus Setting, 19:305 (1993).

Jones, Book Review, ETHICS AND HIGHER EDUCATION, ed. by William W. May, Crises in Higher Education and the Need for Solutions – But What Kind?, 18:621 (1992).

American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines for Infant Bioethics Committees, 11:433 (1985).

Capron, Legal Perspectives on Institutional Ethics Committees, 11:417 (1985).

Bennett, Book Review, LEGAL ETHICS AND LEGAL EDUCATION, by Michael J. Kelly, 7:353 (1980- 81).

FACULTY

Curkovic, Accent and the University: Accent as Pretext for National Origin Discrimination in Tenure Decisions, 26:727 (2000).

Crosson, Book Review, ACADEMIC DUTY, by Donald Kennedy, 25:435 (1998).

Sims, Book Review, ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND TENURE: ETHICAL ISSUES, by Richard T. De George, 25:443 (1998).

Smith, Cohen v. San Bernardino Valley College: The Scope of Academic Freedom Within the Context of Sexual Harassment Claims and In-Class Speech, 25:1 (1998).

Streitz and Hunkler, Note, Teaching or Learning: Are Teaching Assistants Students or
Employees?, 24:349 (1997).

Allred, Note, May a Public University Restrict Faculty Expression on its Internet World Wide Web Sites? Academic Freedom and University Facility Use Restrictions, 24:325 (1997).

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:225 (1997).

Torke, Book Review, FREE SPEECH IN THE COLLEGE COMMUNITY, by Robert M. O’Neil, 24:699 (1998).

Oakley, Book Review, THE OPENING OF THE AMERICAN MIND: CANONS, CULTURE, AND HISTORY, by Lawrence Levine, 24:119 (1997).

Hustoles and Smith, Employment Discrimination Cases in Higher Education: 1995 in Review, 23:403 (1997).

O’Shea, First Amendment in Higher Education: 1995 in Review, 23:307 (1997).

Alger and Coleman, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23:91 (1996).

Pavela, Book Review, DECONSTRUCTING ACADEMIC FREEDOM, ed. by William W. Van Alstyne, 22:359 (1995).

Brooks, Adequate Cause for Dismissal: The Missing Element in Academic Freedom, 22:331 (1995).

Newman, At Work in the Marketplace of Ideas: Academic Freedom, the First Amendment, and Jeffries v. Harleston, 22:281 (1995).

Hiers, New Restrictions on Academic Free Speech: Jeffries v. Harleston II, 22:217 (1995).

Kennan, Commentary, The Moral Functions of Higher Education in Modern Society, 20:69 (1993).

Metzger, Professional and Legal Limits to Academic Freedom, 20:1 (1993).

Kreiser, AAUP Perspectives on Academic Freedom and United States Intelligence Agencies, 19:251 (1993).

Robison and Sanders, The Myths of Academia: Open Inquiry and Funded Research, 19:227 (1993).

Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993).

Swan, Early Retirement Incentives with Upper Age Limits under the Older Workers Benefits Protection Act, 19:53 (1992).

Scott and Weingart, Case Comment, A Professor's Choice: Employment or Religious Conviction: EEOC v. University of Detroit, 18:315 (1991).

Brammer, Lallo, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees of Boston University: The
Realization of Title VII's Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991).

Hasty, Note, Worker's Compensation: Will College and University Professors be Compensated for Mental Injuries Caused by Work-Related Stress?, 17:535 (1991).

Rothstein, Commentary, Students, Staff and Faculty with Disabilities: Current Issues for
Colleges and Universities, 17:471 (1991).

Frost, Shifting Meanings of Academic Freedom: An Analysis of University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 17:329 (1991).

Dumas, McIntyre, and Zelenock, Case Comment, Parate v. Isibor: Resolving the Conflict
between the Academic Freedom of the University and the Academic Freedom of University Professors, 16:713 (1990).

Swan, Subjective Hiring and Promotion Decisions in the Wake of Fort Worth, Atonio, and Price Waterhouse, 16:553 (1990).

Jasper, Note, Britain's Education Reform Act: A Lesson in Academic Freedom and Tenure, 16:449 (1990).

Traynor, Defamation Law Shock Absorbers for its Ride into the Groves of Academe, 16:373 (1990).

Craver, The Implications of the Elimination of Mandatory Retirement for Professors, 16:343 (1990).

Connolly and Marshall, Sexual Harassment of University or College Students by Faculty
Members, 15:381 (1989).

Luzum and Pupel, Case Comment, Weinstein v. University of Illinois: The "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine and Procedural Due Process for Nontenured Faculty, 15:369 (1989).

Cunningham, Leeson, and Stadler, Case Comment, Kahn v. Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara: The Right to Privacy and the Academic Freedom Privilege with Respect to Confidential Peer Review Materials, 15:73 (1989).

Finkin, Commentary, Tenure After an Uncapped ADEA: A Different View, 15:43 (1988).

Keller, Consensual Amorous Relationships Between Faculty and Students: The Constitutional Right to Privacy, 15:21 (1988).

Curry, Manderfeld, and Sullivan, Case Comment, Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988).

Ruebhausen, Commentary, The Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1986: Implications for Tenure and Retirement, 14:561 (1988).

Olswang, Union Security Provisions, Academic Freedom and Tenure: The Implications of Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 14:539 (1988).

Attanasio, Does the First Amendment Guarantee a Right to Conduct Scientific Experiments?, 14:435 (1988).

Dixon, Lynch, and Swem, Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas: Termination of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the Burden of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417 (1987).

Delano, Discovery in University Employment Discrimination Suits: Should Peer Review
Materials Be Privileged?, 14:121 (1987).

Andrews, Dang, and McLean, Note, Recent Development: Church Licensed Professors: The Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987).

Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment, 13:267 (1986).

Ramirez, The Balance of Interests between National Security Controls and First Amendment Interests in Academic Freedom, 13:179 (1986).

Mawdsley, Plagiarism Problems in Higher Education, 13:65 (1986).

White, Book Review, THE RIGHTS OF TEACHERS, by David Rubin (with Steven Greenhouse) 12:561 (1986).

Wright, Faculty and Law Explosion: Assessing the Impact – A Twenty-five Year Perspective (1960-85) for College and University Lawyers, 12:363 (1985).

Weeks, Equal Pay: The Emerging Terrain, 12:41 (1985).

Special Committee on Education and the Law (Association of the Bar of the City of New York), Due Process in Decisions Relating to Tenure in Higher Education, 11:323 (1984).

White, Book Review, DOLLARS AND SCHOLARS: AN INQUIRY INTO THE IMPACT OF FACULTY INCOME UPON THE FUNCTIONS AND FUTURE OF THE ACADEMY, ed. by R. Linnell, 11:257 (1984).

Orleans, Book Review, DOLLARS AND SCHOLARS: AN INQUIRY INTO THE IMPACT OF FACULTY INCOME UPON THE FUNCTIONS AND FUTURE OF THE ACADEMY, ed. by R. Linnell, 11:237 (1984).

Lee and Olswang, Scientific Misconduct: Institutional Procedures and Due Process
Considerations, 11:51 (1984).

Gillmore, Student Ratings as a Factor in Faculty Employment Decisions and Periodic Review, 10:557 (1983-84).

Kirk, Judicial Deference to Institutional Autonomy: The Irony of Yeshiva and the Financial Exigency Cases, 10:541 (1983-84).

Begin and Lee, Criteria for Evaluating the Managerial Status of College Faculty: Applications of Yeshiva University by the NLRB, 10:515 (1983-84).

Hustoles, Faculty and Staff Dismissals: Developing Contract and Tort Theories, 10:479 (1983-84).

Lovain, Note, Grounds for Dismissing Tenured Postsecondary Faculty for Cause, 10:419 (1983-84).

Bodner, Commentary, Analyzing Faculty Salaries in Class Action Sex Discrimination Cases, 10:305 (1983-84).

Richards, Note, "Financial Emergency" and the Faculty Furlough: A Breach of Contract?, 10:225 (1983-84).

Finkin, Book Review, BEYOND TRADITIONAL TENURE, by Richard P. Chait and Andrew T. Ford, 10:105 (1983-84).

Hartnett, Book Review, BEYOND TRADITIONAL TENURE, by Richard P. Chait and Andrew T. Ford, 10:95 (1983-84).

Simon, Faculty Writings: Are They "Works Made for Hire" under the 1976 Copyright Act?, 9:485 (1982-83).

Olswang, Planning the Unthinkable: Issues in Institutional Reorganization and Faculty
Reductions, 9:431 (1982-83).

Barnes and Schlottman, After "Decoupling": Further Thoughts, 9:315 (1982-83).

Lee, Balancing Confidentiality and Disclosure in Faculty Peer Review: Impact of Title VII Litigation, 9:279 (1982-83).

Hodges, Note, Postsecondary Faculty Members' Rights to Free Speech, 9:85 (1982-83).

Moran and Shepard, The Future of Faculty Collective Bargaining at Private Universities, 9:41 (1982-83).

Bompey, Decoupling Tenure and Employment Under the 1978 Amendments to the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act, 8:425 (1981-82).

Geetter, The University of Connecticut v. The University of Connecticut Chapter of the AAUP: Brief on Determining Faculty Workload in the Collective Bargaining Context, 8:254 (1981-82).

Irby, Fantel, Milam, and Schwarz, Commentary, Faculty Rights and Responsibilities in Evaluating and Dismissing Medical Students, 8:102 (1981-82).

Consent Decree: United States Department of Labor, Office of Contract Compliance Programs v. Regents of University of California, 8:54 (1981-82).

Smith, Protecting the Confidentiality of Faculty Peer Review Records: Department of Labor v. The University of California, 8:20 (1981-82).

Finkin, Commentary, The Yeshiva Decision: A Somewhat Different View, 7:321 (1980-81).

Lee, Faculty Role in Academic Governance and the Managerial Exclusion: Impact of the Yeshiva Decision, 7:222 (1980-81).

Shapiro, Memorandum: Early Retirement Incentives and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 7:174 (1980-81).

Hanna, McLendon v. Morton and the Legislative Response: A Procedural Barrier to Quality Education in West Virginia? 7:111 (1980-81).

Flygare, Commentary, Board of Trustees of Keene State v. Sweeney: Implications for the Future of Peer Review in Faculty Personnel Decisions, 7:100 (1980-81).

Bodner, Commentary, The Implications of Yeshiva University for Collective Bargaining Rights of Faculty at Private and Public Institutions of Higher Education, 7:78 (1980-81).

Weston, Outside Activities of Faculty Members, 7:68 (1980-81).

Duerr, Annotation: Reinstatement as a Remedy in Cases Involving Termination of Tenured Faculty, 7:57 (1980-81).

McKee, Tenure by Default: The Nonformal Acquisition of Academic Tenure, 7:31 (1980-81).

Olswang and Fantel, Tenure and Periodic Performance Review: Compatible Legal and Administrative Principles, 7:1 (1980-81).

Faculty Collective Bargaining? The Yeshiva Case, 6:67 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

A New Look at Faculty Contracts, 6:13 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Laster, State Law on Mandatory Retirement of Tenured Faculty after the 1978 Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments, 5:211 (1977-79).

Stevens, Evaluation of Faculty Competence as a “Privileged Occasion,” 4:281 (1977).

Menard, May Tenure Rights of Faculty Be Bargained Away?, 2:256 (1975).

Bergan, Grievance- Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974).

Blackwell, The Law of Copyright and Fair Use Doctrine, 1:222 (1974).

La Noue, Tenure and Title VII, 1:206 (1974).

Middleditch, College and University Fringe Benefits, 1:172 (1973-74).

Schultz, Nontenured Faculty: Current Legal and Practical Problems in Connection with Nonrenewal of Such Appointments, 1:74 (1973).

FINANCIAL AID TO STUDENTS

Barber, Waivers of Academic Progress Requirements for Federal Financial Aid: A Reasonable Accommodation for Students with Learning Disabilities?, 23:231 (1996).

Koon, Note, United States v. Brown University and a New Proposal to Discern whether Certain Financial Aid Constitutes "Trade or Commerce," 22:191 (1995).

Thomas and Hirschman, Minority-Targeted Scholarships: More than a Black and White Issue, 21:555 (1995).

Swanson, Note, Atlanta College of Medical & Dental Careers, Inc. v. Riley: The Right of a School to Appeal the Education Department's Calculation of its Loan Default Rate, 21:141 (1994).

Lohman, Case Comment, The Final Frustration of Defaulting NHSC Scholars?: United States v. Hatcher, 19:385 (1993).

Baida, Not All Minority Scholarships are Created Equal: Why Some May be More Constitutional than Others, 18:333 (1992).

Ward, Note, Race-Exclusive Scholarships: Do they Violate the Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?, 18:73 (1991).

Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy: An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991).

Guerre, Note, Financial Aid in Higher Education: What's Wrong, Who's Being Hurt, What's Being Done, 17:483 (1991).

McClamrock, Note, The First Amendment and Public Funding of Religiously Controlled or Affiliated Higher Education, 17:381 (1991).

Richmond, Private Colleges and Tuition Price-Fixing: An Antitrust Primer, 17:271 (1991).

Gunn, Commentary, Economic and Tax Aspects of Prepaid-Tuition Plans, 17:243 (1990).

Scheske, Note, Financial Aid and Antitrust: Financial-Aid Packages Subject of Justice Department Probe, 17:43 (1990).

Bovee, Goettling, and Ritter, Case Comment, Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment Clause and Financial Aid to Students for Religious Education at Private Institutions, 13:397 (1987).

Aiello and Behrens, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986).

Mooney, Note, Conditioning Student Aid on Draft Registration: The Legislation and Regulations, 10:379 (1983-84).

Hunter, Collecting Defaulted Student Loans: How Much Diligence is Due?, 9:149 (1982-83).

FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT

Daniel and Sun, The Sherman Act Antitrust Provisions and Collegiate Action: Should There Be a Continued Exception for the Business of the University?, 25:451 (1999).

McGuire, Note, Federal Research Grant Funding at Universities: Legislative Waves from
Auditors Diving into Overhead Cost Pools, 23:563 (1997).

Salaway, Note, UMIFA and a Model for Endowment Investing, 22:1045 (1996).

Swanson, Note, Atlanta College of Medical & Dental Careers, Inc. v. Riley: The Right of a School to Appeal the Education Department's Calculation of its Loan Default Rate, 21:141 (1994).

Dunn and Camacho, Case Comment, NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS: When will the Internal Revenue Service Consider an Activity Regularly Carried On?, 19:39 (1992).

Gordon and Spuehler, Questions and Answers Explaining the New Tax Rules Applicable to Tax-Sheltered Annuities, 17:435 (1991).

Kelly, Financing Higher Education: Federal Income-Tax Consequences, 17:307 (1991).

Shearer, Ward, and Wattley, Case Comment, Student Government Association v. Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts: Forum and Subsidy Analysis Applied to University Funding Decisions, 17:65 (1990).

Cole and Goldblatt, Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions' Authority to Select the Lowest Responsible Bidder, 16:177 (1989).

Daane, Commentary, Regents of the University of Michigan v. State of Michigan: South African Divestiture and Constitutional Autonomy, A Case Commentary, 15:313 (1989).

Suffern, Commentary, The Impact of the National Association of Attorney General Model Solicitation Act on Colleges and Universities, 15:177 (1988).

Dixon, Lynch, and Swem, Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas: Termination of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the Burden of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417 (1987).

Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986).

Johnson and Weeks, To Save a College: Independent College Trustees and Decisions on
Financial Exigency, Endowment Use, and Closure, 12:455 (1986).

Flaherty, Exempt Organizations and Real Estate Syndications after the Tax Reform Act of 1984, 12:61 (1985).

Richards, Note, "Financial Emergency" and the Faculty Furlough: A Breach of Contract?, 10:225 (1983-84).

McCullogh and Foster, Reviewers’ Comments, 8:15 (1981-82).

Vecchione, Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code as an Alternative to Closing or Merger, 8:1 (1981- 82).

Reidhaar, Memorandum: The Legal Implications of Divestment of University Investments in Companies Doing Business in South Africa, 7:164 (1980-81).

Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79).

Wilson, Financial Exigency: Examination of Recent Cases Involving Layoff of Tenured Faculty, 4:187 (1977).

Greenawalt, Constitutional Limits on Aid to Sectarian Universities, 4:177 (1977).

Burke, Federal Taxation of State Colleges and Universities: Recent Developments Call for Reconsideration of Theories of Exemption, 4:43 (1976).

Teitell, Federal Tax Implications of Charitable Gift Annuities, 3:26 (1975).

Habecker, Students, Christian Colleges, and the Law: and the Walls Come Tumbling Down, 2:369 (1975).

Hopkins, Regulations of Interstate Charitable Solicitations: Implications for Colleges and Universities, 2:289 (1975).

Wheeler, Fiduciary Responsibilities of Trustees in Relation to the Financing of Private Institutions of Higher Education, 2:210 (1975).

Tucker, Financial Exigency- Rights, Responsibilities, and Recent Decisions, 2:103 (1974-75).

Hopkins, Rule 144: The Applicability of the Restricted Securities Requirements to Colleges and Universities, 1:136 (1973-74).

GOVERNANCE

Merz, Book Review, FUNDING SCIENCE IN AMERICA: CONGRESS, UNIVERSITIES, AND THE ACADEMIC PORK BARREL, by James D. Savage, 26:803 (2000).

Sidbury, The Disclosure of Campus Crime: How Colleges and Universities Continue to Hide Behind the 1998 Amendment to FERPA and How Congress Can Eliminate the Loophole, 26:755 (2000).

Sherman, How Free is Free Enough? Public University Presidential Searches, University Autonomy, and State Open Meeting Acts, 26:665 (2000).

Estes, State University Presidential Searches: Law and Practice, 26:485 (2000).

Harpool, Minimum Compliance with Minimum Standards: Managing Trustee Conflicts of Interest, 24:465 (1998).

Harpool, The Sibley Hospital Case: Trustees and Their Loyalty to the Institution, 23:255 (1996).

Ugland; Hawkers, Thieves and Lonely Pamphleteers: Distributing Publications in the University Marketplace, 22:935 (1996).

Attridge, Book Review, UP THE UNIVERSITY: RECREATING HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA, by Robert and Jon Solomon, 21:825 (1995).

Davis, Scaling the Ivory Tower: State Public Records Laws and University Presidential Searches, 21:353 (1994).

Page and Hunnicutt, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Policy Analysis of Student Speech Regulation at America's Twenty Largest Public Universities, 21:1 (1994).

Harrison, Hate Speech: Power in the Marketplace, 20:461 (1994).

Bickel and Lake, Reconceptualizing the University's Duty to Provide a Safe Learning
Environment: A Criticism of the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis and the Restatement (Second) of Torts, 20:261 (1994).

Mikva, Commentary, How Do We Manage the Right to Hate?, 19:35 (1992).

Gibbs, Book Review, CHOOSING A COLLEGE PRESIDENT: OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS, by Judith B. McLaughlin and David Reisman, 18:329 (1991).

Neiman, Book Review, LIBERAL JUSTICE AND THE MARXIST CRITIQUE OF EDUCATION, by Kenneth A. Strike, 18:125 (1991).

Malloy, Book Review, GOVERNING TOMORROW'S CAMPUS: PERSPECTIVES AND AGENDAS, by Jack H. Schuster, Lynn H. Miller and Associates, 18:121 (1991).

Steinberg, Rape on College Campuses: Reform Through Title IX, 18:39 (1991).

Bok, Commentary, Universities: Their Temptations and Tensions, 18:1 (1991).

Carrington, Book Review, COLLEGE CRIME PREVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY AWARENESS, by Max C. Bromley and Leonard Territo, 17:565 (1991).

Salsich, Book Review, HIGHER EDUCATION AND STATE GOVERNMENTS, by Edward R. Hines, 17:429 (1991).

Kennelly, Book Review, ON ASSUMING A COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY PRESIDENCY: LESSONS AND FROM THE FIELD, by Estela M. Bensimon, Marian L. Gade and Joseph F. Kauffman, 16:731 (1990).

McClamrock, Meyer, and Spencer, Case Comment, Alabama Student Party v. Student Government Association of the University of Alabama: The First Amendment and
Student-Government Election Campaign Speech in Public Universities, 16:649 (1990).

Hodulik, Prohibiting Discriminatory Harassment By Regulating Student Speech: A Balancing of First-Amendment and University Interests, 16:573 (1990).

Goldrick and Rakow, Book Review, SEXUAL ASSAULT ON CAMPUS: WHAT COLLEGES CAN DO, by Aileen Adams and Gail Abarbanel, 16:547 (1990).

Jasper, Note, Britain's Education Reform Act: A Lesson in Academic Freedom and Tenure, 16:449 (1990).

Schlesinger, Commentary, The Opening of the American Mind, 16:425 (1990).

Bhirdo, Note, The Liability and Responsibility of Institutions of Higher Education for the On-Campus Victimization of Students, 16:119 (1989).

Alessandro, Murray, and Reed, Case Comment, Fox v. Board of Trustees of the State
University of New York: University Regulation Faces the First Amendment, 15:443 (1989).

Dutile, God and Gays at Georgetown: Observations on Gay Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v. Georgetown University, 15:1 (1988).

Bennett, Education and the Constitution: The Case of Citizen James Madison, 14:417 (1988).

Antonini, Fantozzi, and Pruss, Case Comment, Harvard Law School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens under the Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First Amendment Rights of United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987).

Swan, The Eleventh Amendment Revisited: Suits Against State Government Entities and their Employees in Federal Courts, 14:1 (1987).

Brickley and Ryan, Case Comment, Miller v. Rutgers and Kovats v. Rutgers: Application of the Eleventh Amendment in Suits Against State Colleges and Universities, 13:407 (1987).

Mingle, Book Review, THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF OPENNESS: SUNSHINE LAWS AND HIGHER EDUCATION, by Harlan Cleveland, 12:569 (1986).

Johnson and Weeks, To Save a College: Independent College Trustees and Decisions on
Financial Exigency, Endowment Use, and Closure, 12:455 (1986).

Fishbein, New Strings on the Ivory Tower: The Growth of Accountability in Colleges and
Universities, 12:381 (1985).

Beach, The Management and Governance of Academic Institutions, 12:301 (1985).

Kaplin, Law on the Campus 1960-1985: Years of Growth and Challenge, 12:269 (1985).

Cabranes, American Higher Education and the Law: Some Reflections on NACUA's Silver Anniversary, 12:261 (1985).

Cleveland, The Costs and Benefits of Openness: Sunshine Laws and Higher Education, 12:127 (1985).

Greenleaf, Academic Institutions in the Light and Shadow of the Law, 12:1 (1985).

O'Neil, Academic Freedom and the Constitution, 11:275 (1984).

Olivas and Denison, Legalization in the Academy: Higher Education and the Supreme Court, 11:1 (1984).

Hoornstra and Liethen, Academic Freedom and Civil Discovery, 10:113 (1983-84).

Newell, Use of Campus Facilities for First Amendment Activity, 9:27 (1982-83).

Mathews, Higher Education and Society, 8:463 (1981-82).

Weinberger, Reflection on the Seventies, 8:451 (1981-82).

Simon, The Application of State Sunshine Laws to Institutions of Higher Education, 4:83 (1976).

HEALTH SCIENCES

Ende, Anderson, and Crego, Liability Insurance: A Primer for College and University Counsel, 23:609 (1997).

Horger, Case Comment, Medicare Reimbursement to Provider University Hospitals for
Graduate Medical Education Expenses in Light of Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala, 23:133 (1996).

Jones, Tax Exemption Issues Facing Academic Health Centers in the Managed Care Environment, 24:261 (1997).

Keyes, Health-Care Professionals with AIDS: The Risk of Transmission Balanced against the Interests of Professionals and Institutions, 16:589 (1990).

Kobasic, Note, Institutional Review Boards in the University Setting: Review of Pharmaceutical Testing Protocols, Informed Consent and Ethical Considerations, 15:185 (1988).

Brickley, Note, AIDS: A University's Liability for Failure to Protect its Students, 14:529 (1988).

Wagner, Human Tissues Research: Who Owns the Results?, 14:259 (1987).

Rich, Malpractice Issues in the Academic Medical Center, 13:149 (1986).

American Academy of Pediatrics, Guidelines for Infant Bioethics Committees, 11:433 (1985).

Capron, Legal Perspectives on Institutional Ethics Committees, 11:417 (1985).

Lawton, Carder, and Weisman, Recent Governmental Action Regarding the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405 (1985).

Rothstein, Introduction to Special Issue on the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns: Implications for University Hospitals, 11:403 (1984-85).

Conlon, Book Review, HEALTH CARE LABOR LAW, ed. by Iva Michael Shepard and A. Edward Doudera, 9:355 (1982-83).

Pavela, Therapeutic Paternalism and the Misuse of Mandatory Psychiatric Withdrawals on Campus, 9:101 (1982-83).

Jeddeloh, Education Program Cost Reimbursement in University Hospitals: Is There a
Coherent National Policy?, 8:465 (1981-82).

INSURANCE

Higgins and Zulkey, Liability Insurance Coverage: How to Avoid Unpleasant Surprises,
17:123 (1990).

Shapiro, Memorandum: Early Retirement Incentives and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 7:174 (1980-81).

Tytel, Spirt v. Long Island University: TIAA-CREF and the Sex-Based Mortality Table Controversy, 7:119 (1980-81).

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

Cranman, Privacy and Technology: Counseling Institutions of Higher Education, 25:69 (1998).

Miller, Case Comment, Coursepacks and Copyright: Fair Use in Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, 23:525 (1997).

Price, College and Universities as Internet Service Providers: Determining and Limiting Liability for Copyright Infringement, 23:183 (1996).

Donohue, Note, First-to-File vs. First-to-Invent: Will Universities be Left Behind? 21:765 (1995).

Zelenock, Book Review, COPYRIGHT, FAIR USE, AND THE CHALLENGE FOR UNIVERSITIES, by Kenneth D. Crews, 21:615 (1995).

Kilby, The Discouragement of Learning: Scholarship Made for Hire, 21:455 (1995).

Irwin, Stotlar, and Mulrooney, A Critical Analysis of Collegiate Licensing Policies and
Procedures, 20:97 (1993).

Kasunic, Fair Use and the Educator's Right to Photocopy Copyrighted Material for Classroom Use, 19:271 (1993).

Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993).

Zelenock, Book Review, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND THE UNIVERSITY, by Gary W. Matkin, 19:49 (1992).

Sacken, Commercialization of Academic Knowledge and Judicial Deference, 19:1 (1992).

Bianchi, Brenna, and Shannon, Case Comment, Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp: Potential Liability for Classroom Anthologies, 18:595 (1992).

Burgoyne, The Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990: State Educational Institutions Now Face Significant Monetary Exposure for Copyright Infringement, 18:367 (1992).

Capano, Hoey, and Zuch, Case Comment, In re Cronyn: Can Student Theses Bar Patent
Applications?, 18:105 (1991).

Davis, Commentary, University Research and the Wages of Commerce, 18:29 (1991).

Miller, Subpoenas in Academia: Controlling Disclosure, 17:1 (1990).

Schinner, Establishing a Collegiate Trademark Licensing Program: To What Extent Does an Institution have an Exclusive Right to its Name?, 15:405 (1989).

Luzum and Pupel, Case Comment, Weinstein v. University of Illinois: The "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine and Procedural Due Process for Nontenured Faculty, 15:369 (1989).

Graziano and Boren, Suing States for Copyright Infringement – An Eleventh Amendment Bar?, 15:269 (1989).

Wagner, Human Tissue Research: Who Owns the Results?, 14:259 (1987).

Lautsch, Book Review, COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION: LEGAL LIABILITIES AND ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING THEIR USE AND MISUSE, by Patricia A. Hollander, 14:163 (1987).

Olson, Copyright and Fair Use: Implications of Nation Enterprises for Higher Education, 13:489 (1986).

Sorenson, Impact of the Copyright Law on College Teaching, 12:509 (1986).

Olson, Copyright and Fair Use: Implications of Nation Enterprises for Higher Education, 12:489 (1986).

Burshtein, Collegiate Licensing in Canada and the Statutory Advantage, 12:227 (1985).

Lachs, University Patent Policy, 10:263 (1983-84).

Ramey, Note, Off-the-Air Educational Videorecording and Fair Use: An Analysis, 10:341 (1983-84).

Neuenschwander, Oral History and Copyright: An Uncertain Relationship, 10:147 (1983-84).

Bell and Majestic, Protection and Enforcement of College and University Trademarks, 10:63 (1983-84).

Simon, Faculty Writings: Are They "Works Made For Hire" Under the 1976 Copyright Act?, 9:485 (1982-83).

Ward, Commentary, The Georgia Grind: Can the Common Law Accommodate the Problems of Title in the Art World: Observations on a Recent Case, 8:533 (1981-82).

Anderson, Commentary, Licensing of Colleges and University Trademarks, 8:97 (1981-82).

Smith, Implications of the Uniform Patent Legislation to Colleges and Universities, 8:82 (1981-82).

Harris, Memorandum: Introductory Guide to Academic Risks of Copyright Infringement, 7:328 (1980-81).

Ward, Copyright in Museum Collections: An Overview of Come of the Problems, 7:297 (1980-81).

Edwards, Usages of Copyrighted Musical Works Permissible Without Acquiring a Copyright License, Assignment, or Release, 6:363 (1979-80).

Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79).

Cardozo, To Copy or Not to Copy For Teaching and Scholarship: What Shall I Tell My Client?, 4:59 (1976-77).

Mancino and Sugarman, Tax Aspects of University Patent Policy, 3:41 (1975).

Zirkel, Copyright Law in Higher Education: Individuals, Institutions, and Innovations, 2:342 (1975).

McCaffrey, Patent Policy in Federal Government Contracts and Grants, 1:230 (1974).

Blackwell, The Law of Copyright and the Fair Use Doctrine, 1:222 (1974).

LABOR LAW

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:313 (1998).

Streitz and Hunkler, Note, Teaching or Learning: Are Teaching Assistants Students or Employees?, 24:349 (1997).

Lyons, Case Comment, EEOC v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities: Collective Bargaining Agreements and Age Discrimination in Employment Act Claims: What Counts as Retaliation under ADEA Section 4(D), 20:241 (1993).

Nagle, Note, Yeshiva's Impact on Collective Bargaining in Public-Sector Higher Education, 20:383 (1994).

Swan, Subjective Hiring and Promotion Decisions in the Wake of Fort Worth, Atonio, and Price Waterhouse, 16:553 (1990).

Cosgrove, Grundy, and Heffernan, Case Comment, Shannon v. Bepko: Public Colleges and Universities as State Agencies: Standards for Eleventh Amendment Protection, 16:151 (1989).

Barnes and Khorey, The Effects and Use of Administrative Determinations in Subsequent Employment Litigation, 16:189 (1989).

Stadler, Note, Drug Testing of College and University Employees, 15:321 (1989).

Olswang, Union Security Provisions, Academic Freedom and Tenure: The Implications of Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 14:539 (1988).

Judge, Student-Athletes as Employees: Income Tax Consequences, 13:285 (1986).

Begin and Lee, Criteria for Evaluating the Managerial Status of College Faculty:
Applications of Yeshiva University by the NLRB, 10:515 (1983-84).

Conlon, Book Review, HEALTH CARE LABOR LAW, ed. by Ira Michael Shepard and A. Edward Doudera, 9:355 (1982-83).

Veazie, University Collective Bargaining: The Experience of the Montana University System, 9:51 (1982-83).

Moran and Shepard, The Future of Faculty Collective Bargaining at Private Universities, 9:41 (1982-83).

Geetter, The University of Connecticut v. The University of Connecticut Chapter of the AAUP: Brief on Determining Faculty Workload in the Collective Bargaining Context, 8:254 (1981-82).

Finkin, The Yeshiva Decision: A Somewhat Different View, 7:321 (1980-81).

Lee, Faculty Rule in Academic Governance and the Managerial Exclusion: Impact of the Yeshiva Decision, 7:222 (1980-81).

Tytel, Commentary, Spirt v. Long Island University: TIAA-CREF and the Sex-Based Mortality Table Controversy, 7:119 (180-81).

Bodner, The Implications of Yeshiva University for College Bargaining Rights of Faculty at Private and Private Institutions of Higher Education 7:78 (1980-81).

Bompey and Witten, Settlement of Title VII Disputes: Shifting Patterns in a Changing World, 6:317 (1979-80).

Nelson and Ward, Burdens of Proof Under Employment Discrimination Legislation, 6:301 (1979-80).

Ward, Diagnosing an Employment Civil Rights Claim, 6:279 (1979-80).

Faculty Collective Bargaining: The Yeshiva Case, 6:67 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Laster, State Law on Mandatory Retirement of Tenured Faculty After the 1978 Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments, 5:211 (1977-79).

Ford, The Implications of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1978 for Colleges and Universities, 5:161 (1977-79).

Sensenbrenner, Collective Bargaining Legislation for Public Higher Education From the Management Side of the Table, 4:27 (1976).

Menard, May Tenure Rights of Faculty Be Bargained Away?, 2:256 (1975).

Kahn, Current and Emerging Labor Relations Issues in Higher Education, 2:123 (1974-75).

Ferguson and Bergan, Grievance- Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974).

Schwartzman, The Administration’s Approach to Collective Bargaining, 1:351 (1974).

Holway and O’Donnell, Unfair Labor Practices in the Academic Setting, 1:325 (1974).

Kennedy, The Educators’ Role in Educating the NLRB: Requirements of a Complete Record, 1:305 (1974).

Kahn, Conducting a “No-Union” Election Campaign on Campus, 1:291 (1974).

McHugh, Faculty Unionism and Tenure, 1:46 (1973).

LEGISLATION

Frazier and Dymersky, A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Is the New Law
Retroactive?, 19:259 (1993).

Gray, Impact of the Proposed Civil Rights and Women's Equity in Employment Act on
Colleges and Universities, 18:559 (1992).

Schaller, Drug Testing and the Evolution of Federal and State Regulation of Intercollegiate Athletics: A Chill Wind Blows, 18:131 (1991).

Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy: An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991).

Brammer, Lallo, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees of Boston University: The
Realization of Title VII's Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991).

Meyers, Note, State Open-Records Acts and the NCAA Bylaw Requiring Coaches to Disclose their "Athletically-Related" Outside Income: Emptying the Coaches' Pockets for Public Inspection?, 16:497 (1990).

Alessandro, Note, The Student-Athlete Right-to-Know Act: Legislation Would Require Colleges to Make Public Graduation Rates of Student Athletes, 16:287 (1989).
Curry, Note, Hazing and the "Rush" toward Reform: Responses from Universities, Fraternities, State Legislatures, and the Courts, 16:93 (1989).

Daane, Commentary, Regents of the University of Michigan v. State of Michigan: South African Divestiture and Constitutional Autonomy, A Case Commentary, 15:313 (1988).

Suffern, Commentary, The Impact of the National Association of Attorneys General Model Solicitation Act on Colleges and Universities, 15:177 (1988).

Andrews, Note, State Legislation on Comparable Worth: Will it Bring Pay Equity to Academe?, 14:469 (1988).

Lam, Restrictions on Technology Transfer among Academic Researchers: Will Recent Changes in the Export Control System Make a Difference?, 13:311 (1986).

Mingle, Book Review, THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF OPENNESS: SUNSHINE LAWS AND HIGHER EDUCATION, by Harlan Cleveland, 12:569 (1986).

Smith, The Implications of the Uniform Patent Legislation to Colleges and Universities, 8:82 (1981-82).

Hanna, Commentary, McLendon v. Morton and the Legislative Response: A Procedural Barrier to Quality Education in West Virginia?, 7:111 (1980-81).

LIABILITY

MacLachlan, Dangerous Traditions: Hazing Rituals on Campus and University Liability, 26:511 (2000).

Von Gerichten, Tort Litigation in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:245 (1999).

Johnsen and Todd, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:221 (1999).

Thro, The Eleventh Amendment Revolution in the Lower Federal Courts, 25:501 (1999).

Hoye, Tort Litigation in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:257 (1998).

Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education, 25:225 (1998).

Rutledge, Hell Night Hath No Fury Like a Pledge Scorned . . . and Injured: Hazing Litigation in U.S. Colleges and Universities, 25:361 (1998).

Bickel, Tort-Accident Cases: Traditional Tort Rules in the College or University Setting,
24:187 (1997).

Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: A Review of 1996 and 1997 Judicial Decisions, 24:161 (1997).

Bickel and Lake, The Emergence of New Paradigms in Student-University Relations: From In Loco Parentis to Bystander to Facilitator, 23:755 (1997).

Bickel, Tort Accident Cases Involving Colleges and Universities: A Review of the 1995 Judicial Decisions, 23:359 (1997).

Johnsen, Immunity Law in Higher Education: A Review of the 1995 Judicial Decisions,
23:333(1997).

Shea, Case Comment, Duty of Care Owed to University Athletes in Light of Kleinknecht, 21:591 (1995).

Naples, Note, Reading, ‘Riting and Response: Holding Colleges and Universities Liable under CERCLA, 20:483 (1994).

Bickel and Lake, Reconceptualizing the University's Duty to Provide a Safe Learning
Environment: A Criticism of the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis and the Restatement (Second) of Torts, 20:261 (1994).

Schroeder, Evolving Theories in Legal Liability: How will they Affect Cooperative Extension?, 18:483 (1992).

Evans, Note, "A Stranger in a Strange Land": Responsibility and Liability for Students Enrolled in Foreign-Study Programs, 18:299 (1991).

Steinberg, Rape on College Campuses: Reform Through Title IX, 18:39 (1991).

Carrington, Book Review, COLLEGE CRIME PREVENTION AND PERSONAL SAFETY AWARENESS, by Max C. Bromley and Leonard Territo, 17:565 (1991).

Hasty, Note, Worker's Compensation: Will College and University Professors Be Compensated for Mental Injuries Caused by Work-Related Stress?, 17:535 (1991).

Dumas, Note, Defective Buildings and Grounds – A Dangerous Condition for Colleges and Universities, 17:351 (1991).

Richmond, Private Colleges and Tuition Price-Fixing: An Antitrust Primer, 17:271 (1991).

Higgins and Zulkey, Liability Insurance Coverage: How to Avoid Unpleasant Surprises,
17:123 (1990).

Scheske, Note, Financial Aid and Antitrust: Financial-Aid Packages Subject of Justice Department Probe, 17:43 (1990).

Guerre, Hasty, and Paige, Case Comment, Gehling v. St. George's University School of Medicine, Ltd.: Continued Erosion of Colleges' and Universities' Duty to Students Injured in Collegiate Activities, 16:677 (1990).

Bhirdo, Note, The Liability and Responsibility of Institutions of Higher Education for the On-Campus Victimization of Students, 16:119 (1989).

Connolly and Marshall, Sexual Harassment of University or College Students by Faculty
Members, 15:381 (1989).

Graziano and Boren, Suing States for Copyright Infringement: An Eleventh Amendment Bar?, 15:269 (1989).

Manderfeld, Note, College and University Liability Under Superfund, 15:217 (1988).

Miyamoto, Liability of Colleges and Universities for Injuries Sustained by Students while
Participating in Extracurricular Activities, 15:149 (1988).

Kobasic, Smith, and Zucker, Case Comment, Eiseman v. State of New York: The Duty of a College to Protect its Students from Harm by Other Students Admitted under Special
Programs, 14:591 (1988).

Brickley, Note, AIDS: A University's Liability for Failure to Protect its Students, 14:529 (1988).

McLean, Note, Tort Liability of Colleges and Universities for Injuries Resulting from Student Alcohol Consumption, 14:399 (1987).

Lautsch, Book Review, COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION: LEGAL LIABILITIES AND ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING THEIR USE AND MISUSE, by Patricia A. Hollander, 14:163 (1987).

Helms, Patterns of Litigation in Postsecondary Education: A Case Law Study, 14:99 (1987).

Swan, The Eleventh Amendment Revisited: Suits Against State Government Entities and their Employees in Federal Courts, 14:1 (1987).

Brickley and Ryan, Case Comment, Miller v. Rutgers and Kovats v. Rutgers: Application of the Eleventh Amendment in Suits Against State Colleges and Universities, 13:407 (1987).

Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment, 13:267 (1986).

Rich, Malpractice Issues in the Academic Medical Center, 13:149 (1986).

Roth, The Impact of Liquor Liability on Colleges and Universities, 13:45 (1986).

Steadman and Woods, Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner: The Psychotherapist's Duty to Warn, 10:293 (1983-84).

Lansing and Hauserman, Rape on Campus: Postsecondary Institutions as Third Party Defendants, 8:182 (1981-82).

Vitality of Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Other Section 1983 et seq.Defenses, 6:53 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Sensenbrenner, Collective Bargaining Legislation for Public Higher Education From the Management Side of the Table, 4:27 (1976).

Aiken, Adams and Hall, Liability- Legal Liabilities in Higher Education: Their Scope and Management, 3:125 (1976).

Porth, Personal Liability of Trustees of Higher Education Institutions, 2:143 (1974-75).

Aiken, Tort Liability of Governing Boards, Administrators and Faculty in Higher Education, 2:129 (1974-75).

Porth, Personal Liability of Trustees of Educational Institutions, 1:84 (1973).

MUSEUMS

Weil, A Checklist of Legal Considerations for Museums, 7:346 (1980-81).

Ward, Copyright in Museum Collections: An Overview of Some of the Problems 7:297 (1980-81).

Loar and Sky, General Operating Support for Museums: Problems in Paradise, 7:267 (1980-81).

PERSONNEL

Ware, Somers, and Speake, Immigration Law and Higher Education: Employment of
International Employees, 20:51 (1993).

Hasty, Note, Worker's Compensation: Will College and University Professors be Compensated for Mental Injuries Caused by Work-Related Stress?, 17:535 (1991).

Barnes and Khorey, The Effects and Use of Administrative Determinations in Subsequent Employment Litigation, 16:189 (1989).

Stadler, Note, Drug Testing of College and University Employees, 15:321 (1989).

Rothstein, Reproductive Hazards and Sex Discrimination in the Workplace: New Legal Concerns in Industry and on Campus, 10:495 (1983-84).

Hustoles, Faculty and Staff Dismissals: Developing Contract and Tort Theories, 10:479
(1983-84).

Madsen, New State Legislation on Informing Workers about Hazardous Substances in the
Workplace – Will it Impact on University Teaching and Research?, 9:325 (1982-83).

Unemployment Insurance Problems: A Practicum, 6:43 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Middleditch, College and University Fringe Benefits, 1:172 (1973-74).

REAL PROPERTY

Dumas, Note, Defective Buildings and Grounds- A Dangerous Condition for Colleges and Universities, 17:351 (1991).

Cole and Goldblatt, Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions’ Authority to Select the Lowest Responsible Bidder, 16:177 (1989).

Walker and Israeloff, Historic Preservation and the Institutional Owner, 14:59 (1987).

Flaherty, Exempt Organizations and Real Estate Syndications After the Tax Reform Act of 1984, 12:61 (1985).

REGULATORY MEASURES