ACCREDITATION
Pelesh, Due Process in the Accreditation Context: A Reply,
22:175 (1995).
Prairie and Chamberlain, Due Process in the Accreditation
Context, 21:61 (1994).
Cassou and Curran, Secular Orthodoxy and Sacred Freedoms:
Accreditation of Church-Related Law Schools, 11:293 (1984).
Simons, Case Comment, Avins v. White: Defamation in the
Accreditation Process, 8:268 (1981-82).
Tayler and Hylden, Judicial Review of Accrediting Agency
Actions: Marlboro Corp. D/B/A The Emery School v. The Association
of Independent Colleges and Schools, 4:199 (1977).
ADMINISTRATORS
Cranman and Ward, Book Review, THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
OF THE MODERN UNIVERSITY , by Robert Bickel & Peter
Lake, 26:389
Johnstone, Book Review, FAILING THE FUTURE: A DEAN LOOKS
AT HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, by Annette
Kolodny, 25:909 (1999).
Gibbs, Book Review, CREATING A SAFE CAMPUS – A GUIDE
FOR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS, by David Nichols,
24:695 (1998).
Davis, Scaling the Ivory Tower: State Public Records Laws
and University Presidential Searches, 21:353 (1994).
Gibbs, Book Review, CHOOSING A COLLEGE PRESIDENT: OPPORTUNITIES
AND CONSTRAINTS, by Judith B. McLaughlin and David Reisman,
18:329 (1991).
Kennelly, Book Review, ON ASSUMING A COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY
PRESIDENCY, LESSONS AND ADVICE FROM THE FIELD, by Estela
M. Bensimon, Marian L. Gade and Joseph F. Kauffman, 16:731
(1990).
Gee, Introduction to Reflections on Higher Education in
the 1970’s, 8:443 (1981-82).
Hornby, Book Review, HIGHER EDUCATION AND THE LAW, by
Harry T. Edwards and Virginia Davis Nordin, 7:181 (1980-81).
Hornby, Book Review, THE LAW OF HIGHER EDUCATION: LEGAL
IMPLICATIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION MAKING, by William
A. Kaplin. 7:181 (1980-81).
Haslam, The Locus of Decision Making in Colleges and Universities:
The Broad Perspective, 1:199 (1973).
Middleditch, College and University Fringe Benefits, 1:172
(1973).
Whaley, Interinstitutional Cooperation Among Educational
Organizations, 1:93 (1973).
ADMISSIONS
Pieronek, Book Review, THE BIG TEST: THE SECRET HISTORY
OF THE AMERICAN MERITOCRACY, by Nicholas Lemann, 26:549
(2000).
Steinbach, Michaelson, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith,
et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et
al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26:467 (2000).
Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and
Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of
Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees,
26: 445 (2000).
Rosman, Hemmat, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et
al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al.,
Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).
Vinik, Kumin, and O’Brien, Affirmative Action in
College Admissions: Practical Advice to Public and Private
Institutions for Dealing with the Changing Landscape, 26:395
(2000).
Olivas, Book Reviews, THE LEANING IVORY TOWER, LATINO
PROFESSORS IN AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES, ed. by Raymond V.
Padilla and Rudolfo Chavez Chavez; RACE AND REPRESENTATION:
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, ed. by Robert Post and Michael Rogin;
SHAMEFUL ADMISSIONS, THE LOSING BATTLE TO SERVE EVERYONE
IN OUR UNIVERSITIES, by Angela Browne-Miller; THE UNIVERSITY
IN RUINS, by Bill Readings: Race, Raza, and Ruins, 24:123
(1997).
Pullin and Heaney, The Use of Flagged Test Scores in College
and University Admissions: Issues and Implications Under
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans
with Disabilities Act, 23:797 (1997).
Ware, Tales From the Crypt: Does Strict Scrutiny Sound
the Death Knell for Affirmative Action in Higher Education?,
23:43 (1996).
Garfield, Squaring Affirmative Action Admissions Policies
With Federal Judicial Guidelines: A Model for the Twenty-First
Century, 22:895 (1996).
Vaseleck, Stop Working and Put Down Your Pencils: The
Use and Misuse of Standardized Admission Tests, 20:405
(1994).
Smith, Case Comment, Anderson v. University of Wisconsin:
Handicap and Race Discrimination in Readmission Procedures,
15:431 (1989).
O'Neil, Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections
on DeFunis and Bakke, 14:423 (1988).
Rothstein, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Emerging
Issues for Colleges and Universities, 13:229 (1986).
Wilson, De Funis- What Now?, 2:83 (1974).
Wilson, Admissions and Preferences: Sequel to De Funis,
1:38 (1973).
ANNUAL REVIEW
Weber, Diability Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998
in Review, 26:351 (1999).
Pieronek, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education,
1998 in Review, 26:307 (1999).
Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998
in Review, 26:291 (1999).
Stoner and Detar, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions
Pertaining to Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review,
26:273 (1999)
Von Gerichten, Tort Litigation in Higher Education, 1998
in Review, 26:245 (1999).
Johnsen and Todd, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education,
1998 in Review, 26:221 (1999).
O’Shea, First Amendment Cases in Higher Education,
1998 in Review, 26:193 (1999).
Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education:
1997 in Review, 25:349 (1998).
Bodensteiner, Student Discrimination in Higher Education:
1997 in Review, 25:331 (1998).
Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997
in Review, 25:313 (1998).
Schupansky and Stoner, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions
Pertaining to Students: 1997 in Review, 25:293 (1998).
Hoye, Tort Litigation in Higher Education: 1997 in Review,
25:257 (1998).
Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: 1997
in Review, 25:225 (1998).
O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1997 in Review, 25:201
(1998).
Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education:
1996 Case Law in Review, 24:243 (1997).
Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: A
Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:225 (1997).
Pavela, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining
to Students: A Review of 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:213
(1997).
Bickel, Tort-Accident Cases: Traditional Tort Rules in
the College or University Setting, 24:187 (1997).
Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: A Review
of 1996 and 1997 Judicial Decisions, 24:161 (1997).
O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1996 in Review, 24:131
(1997).
Robinson, Introduction, Higher Education and the Courts:
1995 in Review, 23:307 (1997).
O’Shea, First Amendment: 1995 in Review, 23:309
(1997).
Johnsen, Immunity: 1995 in Review, 23:333 (1997).
Bickel, Torts: 1995 in Review, 23:357 (1997).
Pavela, Student Disciplinary Actions: 1995 in Review,
23:391 (1997).
Hustoles and Smith, Employment Discrimination: 1995 in
Review, 23:403 (1997).
Sroka, Discrimination Against Students: 1995 in Review,
23:431 (1997).
Rothstein, Disability Discrimination: 1995 in Review,
23:475 (1997).
Robinson and Pieronek, The Law of Higher Education and
the Courts: 1994 in Review, 22:367 (1996).
Robinson and Huber, The Law of Higher Education and the
Courts: 1993 in Review, 21:157 (1994).
Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1992
in Review, 20:125 (1993).
Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1991
in Review, 19:73 (1992).
Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1990
in Review, 18:163 (1991).
Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1989
in Review, 17:149 (1990).
Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1988
in Review, 16:201 (1989).
Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1987
in Review, 15:87 (1988).
Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1986
in Review, 14:303 (1987).
ATHLETICS AND SPORTS
Leduc, Note, Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Association:
A Guide to How Courts Will Treat Future Antitrust Challenges
to NCAA Regulations, 26:139 (1999).
Ruiz, Note, National Collegiate Athletic Association v.
Smith: Must the NCAA Play By the Rules? 26: 119 (1999).
Church and Neumeister, University Control of Student-Athletes
with Disabilities Under the Americans with Disabilities
Act and the Rehabilitation Act, 25:105 (1998).
Leahy, Note, The Title Bout: A Critical Review of the
Regulation and Enforcement of Title IX in Intercollegiate
Athletics, 24:489 (1998).
Beauchamp, Book Review, GAMES COLLEGES PLAY – SCANDAL
AND REFORM IN INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS, by John R. Thelin,
23:301 (1996).
Mitten, Book Review, UNSPORTSMANLIKE CONDUCT – EXPLOITING
COLLEGE ATHLETES, by Walter Byers (with Charles Hammer),
22:1081 (1996).
Chang, Note, Coercion Theory and the State Action Doctrine
as Applied in NCAA v. Tarkanian and NCAA v. Miller, 22:133
(1995).
Mulderink, Case Comment, Par for the Female Course: Cohen
v. Brown University Mandates an Equal Playing Field in
Intercollegiate Athletics, 22:111 (1995).
Delaney, Sack, Morris, and Sperber, 1995 Symposium: Round
Table Discussion on Collegiate Athletics Reform, 22:96
(1995).
Oriard, Landry, and Leonard, 1995 Symposium: College Athletics
as a Vehicle for Social Reform, 22:77 (1995).
Hesburgh and Albino, 1995 Symposium: Reform and Renewal
in College Sports, 22:63 (1995).
Justus, Brake, and Davidson, 1995 Symposium: Title IX,
22:48 (1995).
Padilla and McMillen, 1995 Symposium: Educating the Athlete,
22:37 (1995).
Katz and Hilliard, 1995 Symposium: Government Attempts
at Regulation, 22:20 (1995).
Gerberding, 1995 Symposium: Historical Perspective of
Amateurism, 22:11 (1995).
Beauchamp, 1995 Symposium: Introduction and Welcome, 22:2
(1995).
1995 Symposium (various authors), Sports Reform: College
Athletics in Flux, 22:1 (1995).
Williams, Lower Pay for Women's Coaches: Refuting Some
Common Justifications, 21:643 (1995).
Pieronek, Note, A Clash of Titans: College Football v.
Title IX, 20:351 (1994).
Kettle and McCarthy, Case Comment, An End Run Around the
Sherman Act? Banks v. NCAA and Gaines v. NCAA, 19:295 (1993).
Schaller, Drug Testing and the Evolution of Federal and
State Regulation of Intercollegiate Athletics: A Chill
Wind Blows, 18:131 (1991).
Meyers, Note, State Open-Records Acts and the NCAA By-Law
Requiring Coaches to Disclose their "Athletically-Related" Outside
Income: Emptying the Coaches' Pockets for Public Inspection?,
16:497 (1990).
Cosgrove, Note, A Survey of State Athlete-Agent Legislation:
Origins and Effects, 16:433 (1990).
Ranney, The Constitutionality of the Drug Testing of College
Athletes: A Brandeis Brief for a Narrowly-Intrusive Approach,
16:397 (1990).
Leeson, Note, The Drug Testing of College Athletes, 16:325
(1989).
Alessandro, Note, The Student-Athlete Right-to-Know Act:
Legislation would Require Colleges to Make Public Graduation
Rates of Student Athletes, 16:287 (1989).
Conboy, Book Reviews, LAW IN SPORT AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY,
by Annie Clement, and LAW IN SPORT, by Bernard Patrick
Maloy, 16:171 (1989).
Rasnic, Book Review, FUMBLE: BEAR BRYANT, WALLY BUTTS
AND THE GREAT COLLEGE FOOTBALL SCANDAL, by James Kirby,
16:165 (1989).
Longo and Thoman, Case Comment, Haffer v. Temple University:
A Reawakening of Gender Discrimination in Intercollegiate
Athletics, 16:137 (1989).
Stoner and Nogay, The Model University Coaching Contract
("MCC"): A Better Starting Point for Your Next
Negotiation, 16:43 (1989).
Poskanzer, Spotlight on the Coaching Box: The Role of
the Athletic Coach within the Academic Institution, 16:1
(1989).
Bhirdo, Haviland, and Warth, Case Comment, McCormack v.
National Collegiate Athletic Association: Collegiate Athletics
Sanctions from an Antitrust and Civil Rights Perspective,
15:459 (1989).
Tyler, Note, State Open Records Laws and the NCAA: Does
the NCAA Qualify as a "Governmental Body" and,
if so, May its Members Invoke the Privilege of Self-Critical
Analysis?, 15:349 (1989).
Graff, Myers, and Tyler, Case Comment, Blair v. Washington
State University: Making State ERA's a Potent Remedy for
Sex Discrimination in Athletics, 14:575 (1988).
Dixon, Note, Achieving Educational Opportunity Through
Freshman Ineligibility and Coaching Selection: Key Elements
in the NCAA Battle for Academic Integrity of Intercollegiate
Athletes, 14:383 (1987).
Graves, Commentary, Coaches in the Courtroom: Recovery
in Actions for Breach of Employment Contracts, 12:545 (1986).
Judge, Student-Athletes as Employees: Income Tax Consequences,
13:285 (1986).
Rowe, Case Comment, NCAA v. Board of Regents: A Broadening
of the Rule of Reason, 11:377 (1984).
Staton, Note, Recent Cases Concerning the Rights of Student
Athletes, 10:209 (1983-84).
Atkinson, Note, Workers' Compensation and College Athletics:
Should Universities be Responsible for Athletes Who Incur
Serious Injuries?, 10:197 (1983-84).
Remington, NCAA Enforcement Procedures Including the Role
of the Committee on Infractions, 10:181 (1983-84).
Weistart, Legal Accountability and the NCAA, 10:167 (1983-84).
Pauley, Case Comment, Williams v. Hamilton, 8:399 (1981-82).
Branchfield and Grier, Aiken v. Lieuallen and Peterson
v. Oregon State University: Defining Equity in Athletics,
8:369 (1981-82).
Ruxin, Unsportsmanlike Conduct: The Student-Athlete, the
NCAA, and Agents, 8:347 (1981-82).
Thompson and Young, Taxing the Sale of Broadcast Rights
to College Athletics – An Unrelated Trade or Business?,
8:331 (1981-82).
Thomas and Wildgen, Women in Athletics: Winning the Game
But Losing the Support, 8:295 (1981-82).
Faccenda, Introduction to Symposium on Athletics in Higher
Education, 8:291 (1981-82).
Gaal, DiLorenzo, and Evans, Hew’s Final “Policy
Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics,
6:345 (1979-80).
Gaal and DiLorenzo, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’s
Proposed “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX
and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80).
Title IX Athletics, 6:73 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).
Hermann, Sports and the Handicapped: Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Curricular, Intramural,
Club and Intercollegiate Athletic Programs in Postsecondary
Educational Institutions, 5:143 (1977-79).
Kadaielski, Postsecondary Athletics in an Era of Equality:
An Appraisal of the Effect of Title IX, 5:123 (1977-79).
Dickerson and Chapman, Contract Law, Due Process, and
the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79).
Horn, Intercollegiate Athletics: Waning Amateurism and
Rising Professionalism, 5:97 (1977-79).
Weistart, Antitrust Issues in the Regulation of College
Sports, 5:77 (1977-79).
Edmonds, Postsecondary Athletics and the Law: A Selected
Bibliography, 5:65 (1977-79).
Zuckman, Throw ‘Em to the Lions (or Bengals): The
Decline and Fall of Sports Civilization as Seen Through
the Eyes of a United States District Court, 5:55 (1977-79).
Hochberg, The Four Horsemen Ride Again: Cable Communications
and Collegiate Athletics, 5:43 (1977-79).
Lowell, Judicial Review of Rule-Making in Amateur in Amateur
Athletics, 5:11 (1977-79).
Kaplin, An Overview of Legal Principles and Issues Affecting
Postsecondary Athletics, 5:1 (1977-79).
McGuire, The NCAA- Institution Under Constitutional Siege,
2:175 (1974-75).
ATTORNEYS
O’Neil, The Lawyer and the Client in the Campus
Setting: Who is the Client, What does the Client Expect
and how May the Attorney Respond?, 19:333 (1993).
Dunham, Case Studies on Wrongdoing on Campus: Ethics and
the Lawyer’s Role, 19:315 (1993).
Drinan, Lawyer-Client Confidentiality in the Campus Setting,
19:305 (1993).
Richmond, Students' Rights to Counsel in University Disciplinary
Proceedings, 15:289 (1989).
Helms, Patterns of Litigation in Postsecondary Education:
A Case Law Study, 14:99 (1987).
Kennard, Book Review, EDUCATION LAW, ed. by James A. Rapp,
12:565 (1986).
Daane, The Role of University Counsel, 12:399 (1985).
Kaplin, Law on the Campus 1960-1985: Years of Growth and
Challenge, 12:269 (1985).
Shaffer, Review Essay: Legal Resources for Higher Education
Law, 12:83 (1985).
Greenleaf, Academic Institutions in the Light and Shadow
of the Law, 12:1 (1985).
Olivas and Denison, Legalization in the Academy: Higher
Education and the Supreme Court, 11:1 (1984).
Gray and Toohey, Doing Business in the New Technology:
Problems for College and University Counsel, 10:455 (1983-84).
Hoornstra and Liethen, Academic Freedom and Civil Discovery,
10:113 (1983-84).
Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview
of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79).
Williams, The Code of Professional Responsibility and
the College and University Lawyer, 2:248 (1975).
Sensenbrenner, University Counselor: Lore, Logic and Logistics,
2:13 (1974).
Beale, Delivery of Legal Service to Institutions of Higher
Education, 2:5 (1974).
Corbally, University Counsel- Scope and Mission, 2:1 (1974).
O’Neil, Court and Campus- Striking a New Balance,
1:199 (1973).
AUXILIARY ENTERPRISES
Switzer, New IRS Guidelines Target College and University
UBIT, 21:489 (1995).
Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and
Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993).
Horton, Traditional Single-Sex Fraternities on College
Campuses: Will They Survive in the 1990's?, 18:419 (1992).
Niccolls, Nave, and Olswang, Unrelated Business Income
Tax and Unfair Competition: Current Status of the Law,
15:249 (1989).
Walker and Israeloff, Historic Preservation and the Institutional
Owner, 14:59 (1987).
Rich, Malpractice Issues in the Academic Medical Center,
13:149 (1986).
Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development
Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research
Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109
(1986).
Rumsey, Legal Aspects of the Relationship Between Fraternities
and Public Institutions of Higher Education: Freedom of
Association and Ability to Prohibit Campus Presence or
Student Membership, 11:465 (1985).
Lawton, Carder, and Weisman, Recent Governmental Action
Regarding the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405
(1985).
Schneider, Political Interference in Law School Clinical
Programs: Reflections on Outside Interference and Academic
Freedom, 11:179 (1984).
Hitchner, Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement of Teaching
Hospitals and Faculty Physicians, 10:79 (1983-84).
Wallis, Case Comment, "Negligent Publishing":
Implications for University Publishers, 9:209 (1982-83).
Ward, Commentary, The Georgia Grind: Can the Common Law
Accommodate the Problems of Title in the Art World: Observations
on a Recent Case, 8:533 (1981-82).
Weil, A Checklist of Legal Considerations for Museums,
7:346 (1980-81).
Ward, Copyright in Museum Collections: An Overview of
Some of the Problems, 7:297 (1980- 81).
Loar and Sky, General Operating Support for Museums: Problems
in Paradise, 7:267 (1980-81).
Francis, Federal Tax Problems of College and University
Auxiliary Organizations, 3:72 (1975).
BANKRUPTCY
Aiello and Behrens, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy
Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986).
Vecchione, Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as an Alternative
to Closing or Merger, 8:1 (1981-82).
Bissell, Brief for Appellants in Handsome v. Rutgers University,
6:241 (1979-80).
Millsap and Wright, Recent Cases on Student Transcript
Rights after Bankruptcy, 6:231 (1979-80).
BRIEFS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FROM COUNSEL
Steinbach, Michaelson, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith,
et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et
al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26: 467 (2000).
Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and
Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of
Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees,
26: 445 (2000).
Rosman, Hemmat, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et
al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al.,
Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).
Michaelson, Smith, Drier, and Steinbach, Board of Education
of the Township of Piscataway v. Sharon Taxman, 24:671
(1998).
University of Richmond v. Bell: Plaintiff’s Reply
Brief to Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, 10:36 (1983-84).
University of Richmond v. Bell: Plaintiff’s Motion
for Summary Judgment, 10:34 (1983-84).
University of North Carolina Council on Biotechnology
Patent Task Group Report, 9:541 (1982-83).
Pajaro Dunes Conference Draft Statement, 9:533 (1982-83).
Consent Decree, Rajender v. The University of Minnesota,
8:219 (1981-82).
Guthrie, Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners
in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:68 (1981-82).
Giddings, Petitioner’s Brief in University of Texas
v. Camenisch, 8:58 (1981-82).
Consent Decree in The United States Department of Labor,
Office of Contract Compliance Programs v. Regents of University
of California, 8:54 (1981-82).
Reback and Vogt, AAMC v. Carey: Briefs in Support of a
Motion to Enjoin Enforcement of New York’s Standardized
Test Disclosure Law, 7:132 (1980-81).
Bissell, Brief for Appellants in Handsome v. Rutgers University,
6:241 (1979-80).
COMPUTERS
Cranman, Privacy and Technology: Counseling Institutions
of Higher Education, 25:69 (1998).
Allred, Note, May a Public University Restrict Faculty
Expression on its Internet World Wide Web Sites? Academic
Freedom and University Facility Use Restrictions, 24:325
(1997).
Price, College and Universities as Internet Service Providers:
Determining and Limiting Liability for Copyright Infringement,
23:183 (1996).
Lautsch, Book Review, COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION: LEGAL LIABILITIES
AND ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING THEIR USE AND MISUSE, by
Patricia A. Hollander, 14:163 (1987).
Hollander, An Introduction to Legal and Ethical Issues
Relating to Computers in Higher Education, 11:215 (1984).
Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview
of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79).
CONTRACTS
Lemmer and Pompeo, "Educating" Lawyers about
the Implications of Cost Accounting
Standards for Government Contracts and Grants with Educational
Institutions, 21:111 (1994).
Swan, Early Retirement Incentives with Upper Age Limits
under the Older Workers Benefits Protection Act, 19:53
(1992).
Cole and Goldblatt, Award of Construction Contracts: Public
Institutions’ Authority to Select the Lowest Possible
Bidder, 16:177 (1989).
Stoner and Nogay, The Model University Coaching Contract
("MCC"): A Better Starting Point for Your Next
Negotiation, 16:43 (1989).
Sullivan, Note, The College or University Power to Withhold
Diplomas, 15:321 (1989).
Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development
Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research
Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109
(1986).
Graves, Commentary, Coaches in the Courtroom: Recovery
in Actions for Breach of Employment Contracts, 12:545 (1986).
McDonald, Contract, A Property Right under the Fourteenth
Amendment? Vail v. Board of Education, 11:445 (1985).
Ende and Lane, Book Review, CONTRACTING FOR SERVICES,
ed. by Lanora F. Welzenbach, 11:399 (1984).
Jennings, Breach of Contract Suits by Students Against
Post-secondary Institutions: Can They Succeed?, 7:191 (1980-81).
Dickerson and Chapman, Contract Law, Due Process, and
the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79).
Horn, Intercollegiate Athletics: Waning Amateurism and
Rising Professionalism, 5:97 (1977-79).
DEBT COLLECTION
Woodcock, Burden of Proof, Undue Hardships, and Other
Arguments for the Student Debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8)(B),
24:377 (1998).
Lake and Pedulla, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher
Education Corporation: State Agencies that Grant Educational
Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default
on Prior Education Loans, 17:261 (1990).
Aiello and Behrens, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy
Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986).
Ayres and Sagner, The Bankruptcy Reform Act and Student
Loans: Unraveling New Knots, 9:361 (1982-83).
Hunter, Collecting Defaulted Student Loans: How Much Diligence
is Due?, 9:149 (1982-83).
DISCRIMINATION
Curkovic, Accent and the University: Accent as Pretext
for National Origin Discrimination in Tenure Decisions,
26:727 (2000).
Stoner and Ryan, Burlington, Faragher, Oncale, and Beyond:
Recent Developments in Title VII Jurisprudence, 26:645
(2000).
Kaplin, A Typology and Critique of Title IX Sexual Harassment
Law After Gebser and Davis, 26:615 (2000).
Steinbach, Michaelson, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith,
et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et
al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26:467 (2000).
Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and
Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of
Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees,
26: 445 (2000).
Rosman, Hemmat, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et
al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al.,
Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).
Vinik, Kumin, and O’Brien, Affirmative Action in
College Admissions: Practical Advice to Public and Private
Institutions for Dealing with the Changing Landscape, 26:395
(2000).
Weber, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education,
1998 in Review, 26:351 (1999).
Pieronek, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education,
1998 in Review, 26:307 (1999).
Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998
in Review, 26:291 (1999).
Regan, ‘Tis Better to “Benefit” Than
To “Receive” - The Standard Delimiting Coverage
Under Title IX and Other Federal Antidiscrimination Statutes,
26:107 (1999).
Neiger, Actual Knowledge Under Gebser v. Lago Vista: Evidence
of the Court’s Deliberate Indifference or an Appropriate
Reponse for Finding Institutional Liability?, 26:1 (1999).
Pieronek, Book Review, BECOMING GENTLEMEN, by Lani Guinier,
et al., 25:627 (1999).
Bekavac, Book Review, BECOMING GENTLEMEN, by Lani Guinier,
et al., 25:619 (1999).
Bors, Academic Freedom Faces Learning Disabilities: Guckenberger
v. Boston University, 25:581 (1999).
Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education:
1997 in Review, 25:349 (1998).
Bodensteiner, Student Discrimination in Higher Education,
25:331 (1998).
Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education, 25:313
(1998).
Phelps, Book Review, CULTIVATING HUMANITY: A CLASSICAL
DEFENSE OF REFORM IN LIBERAL EDUCATION, by Martha C. Nussbaum,
25:185 (1998).
Weber, Disability Discrimination Litigation and Institutions
of Higher Education, 25:53 (1998).
Whitman, Affirmative Action on Campus: The Legal and Practical
Challenges, 24:637 (1998).
Lee, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education:
A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:619 (1998).
Leahy, Note, The Title Bout: A Critical Review of the
Regulation and Enforcement of Title IX in Intercollegiate
Athletics, 24:489 (1998).
Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education:
1996 Case Law in Review, 24:243 (1997).
Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: A
Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:225 (1997).
Coleman and Jarvis, Tuition Adjustment for Law School
Students: A Necessary Accommodation under the ADA?, 24:45
(1997).
Sampen, Age Discrimination and Reasonable Non-Age Factors,
24:1 (1997).
Pullin and Heaney, The Use of Flagged Test Scores in College
and University Admissions: Issues and Implications Under
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans
with Disabilities Act, 23:797 (1997).
O’Neill, Single-Sex Education after United States
v. Virginia, 23:489 (1997).
Rothstein, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education:
A Review of the 1995 Judicial Decisions, 23:475 (1997).
Sroka, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education:
1995 in Review, 23:431 (1997).
Hustoles and Smith, Employment Discrimination Cases in
Higher Education: 1995 in Review, 23:403 (1997).
Fellrath, Case Comment, Coleman v. Zatechka: The ADA and
Student Life, 23:285 (1996).
Barber, Waivers of Academic Progress Requirements for
Federal Financial Aid: A Reasonable Accommodation for Students
with Learning Disabilities?, 23:231 (1996).
Alger and Coleman, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights
of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University
Campuses, 23:91 (1996).
Ware, Tales From the Crypt: Does Strict Scrutiny Sound
the Death Knell for Affirmative Action in Higher Education?,
23:43 (1996).
Tucker, Application of the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) and Section 504 to Colleges and Universities:
An Overview and Discussion of Special Issues Relating to
Students, 23:1 (1996).
Milani, Disabled Students in Higher Education: Administrative
and Judicial Enforcement of Disability Law, 22:989 (1996).
Garfield, Squaring Affirmative Action Admissions Policies
with Federal Judicial Guidelines: A Model for the Twenty-First
Century, 22:895 (1996).
Roth, Case Comment, Rosenberger v. Rector: The First Amendment
Dog Chases its Tail, 21:723 (1995).
Williams, Lower Pay for Women's Coaches: Refuting Some
Common Justifications, 21:643 (1995).
McCusker, The Americans With Disabilities Act: Its Potential
for Expanding the Scope of Reasonable Academic Accommodations,
21:619 (1995).
Hernandez, Note, The Constitutionality of Racially Restrictive
Organizations within the University Setting, 21:429 (1994).
Bainbridge, Essay, Student Religious Organizations and
University Policies Against Discrimination on the Basis
of Sexual Orientation: Implications of the Religious Freedom
Restoration Act, 21:369 (1994).
Baida, Not All Minority Scholarships are Created Equal,
Part II: How to Develop a Record that Passes Constitutional
Scrutiny, 21:307 (1994).
Vargyas, Commentary, Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public
Schools and its Impact on Title IX Enforcement, 19:373
(1993).
Frazier and Dymersky, A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act
of 1991: Is the New Law Retroactive?, 19:259 (1993).
DiScala, Olswang, and Niccolls, College and University
Responses to the Emotionally or Mentally Impaired Students,
19:17 (1992).
Gray, Impact of the Proposed Civil Rights and Women's
Equity in Employment Act on Colleges and Universities,
18:559 (1992).
Hill, Note, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Significant
Overlap with Section 504 for Colleges and Universities,
18:389 (1992).
Scott and Weingart, Case Comment, A Professor's Choice:
Employment or Religious Conviction: EEOC v. University
of Detroit, 18:315 (1991).
Ward, Note, Race-Exclusive Scholarships: Do they Violate
the Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964?, 18:73 (1991).
Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy:
An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and
Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991).
Brammer, Lallo, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees
of Boston University: The Realization of Title VII's Legislative
Intent, 17:551 (1991).
Rothstein, Commentary, Students, Staff and Faculty with
Disabilities: Current Issues for Colleges and Universities,
17:471 (1991).
McClamrock, Note, The First Amendment and Public Funding
of Religiously Controlled or Affiliated Higher Education,
17:381 (1991).
Frost, Shifting Meanings of Academic Freedom: An Analysis
of University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 17:329 (1991).
Lake and Pedulla, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher
Education Corporation: State Agencies That Grant Educational
Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default
on Prior Educational Loans, 17:261 (1990).
Keyes, Health-Care Professionals with AIDS: The Risk of
Transmission Balanced Against the Interests of Professionals
and Institutions, 16:589 (1990).
Hodulik, Prohibiting Discriminatory Harassment by Regulating
Student Speech: A Balancing of First-Amendment and University
Interests, 16:573 (1990).
Haviland, Note, Student Discriminatory Harassment, 16:311
(1989).
Longo and Thoman, Case Comment, Haffer v. Temple University:
A Reawakening of Gender Discrimination in Intercollegiate
Athletics, 16:137 (1989).
Smith, Case Comment, Anderson v. University of Wisconsin:
Handicap and Race Discrimination in Readmission Procedures,
15:431 (1989).
Fick, Book Review, ACADEMICS IN COURTS: THE CONSEQUENCES
OF FACULTY DISCRIMINATION LITIGATION, by George R. LaNoue
and Barbara A. Lee, 15:239 (1988).
Finkin, Commentary, Tenure After an Uncapped ADEA: A Different
View, 15:43 (1988).
Dutile, God and Gays at Georgetown: Observations on Gay
Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v.
Georgetown University, 15:1 (1988).
Curry, Manderfeld, and Sullivan, Case Comment, Pime v.
Loyola University of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends
the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988).
Graff, Myers, and Tyler, Case Comment, Blair v. Washington
State University: Making State ERA’s a Potent Remedy
for Sex Discrimination in Athletics, 14:575 (1988).
Ruebhausen, Commentary, The Age Discrimination in Employment
Act Amendments of 1986: Implications for Tenure and Retirement,
14:561 (1988).
Andrews, Note, State Legislation on Comparable Worth:
Will it Bring Pay Equity to Academe?, 14:469 (1988).
O'Neil, Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections
on DeFunis and Bakke, 14:423 (1988).
Claque, The Affirmative Action Showdown of 1986: Implications
for Higher Education, 14:171 (1987).
Delano, Discovery in University Employment Discrimination
Suits: Should Peer Review Materials be Privileged?, 14:121
(1987).
Weeks, Book Review, THE DISMISSAL OF STUDENTS WITH MENTAL
DISORDERS: LEGAL ISSUES, POLICY CONSIDERATIONS AND ALTERNATIVE
RESPONSES, by Gary Pavela, 13:429 (1987).
Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment,
13:267 (1986).
Rothstein, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Emerging
Issues for Colleges and Universities, 13:229 (1986).
White, Book Review, THE RIGHTS OF TEACHERS, by David Rubin
(with Steven Greenhouse), 12:561 (1986).
Weeks, Equal Pay: The Emerging Terrain, 12:41 (1985).
Stacy and Holland, Legal and Statistical Problems in Litigating
Sex Discrimination Claims in Higher Education, 11:107 (1984).
Renahan, Case Comment, Bob Jones University v. United
States: No Tax Exemptions for Racially Discriminatory Schools
- Supreme Courts Clarifies Thirteen Year Policy Imbroglio,
11:69 (1984).
Rothstein, Reproductive Hazards and Sex Discrimination
in the Workplace: New Legal Concerns in Industry and on
Campus, 10:495 (1983-84).
Stanley, Note, The Rights of Gay Student Organizations,
10:397 (1983-84).
Kubasek, Book Review, DISCRIMINATION, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION,
AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, ed. by W. E. Block and M. A. Walker,
10:331 (1983-84).
Bodner, Commentary, Analyzing Faculty Salaries in Class
Action Sex Discrimination Cases, 10:305 (1983-84).
Tashjian-Brown, Title IX: Progress Toward Program Specific
Regulation of Private Academia, 10:1 (1983-84).
Orleans, Book Review, ABILITY TESTING OF HANDICAPPED PEOPLE:
DILEMMA FOR GOVERNMENT, SCIENCE, AND THE PUBLIC, ed. by
Susan W. Sherman and Nancy M. Robinson, 9:347 (1982-83).
Lee, Balancing Confidentiality and Disclosure in Faculty
Peer Review: Impact of Title VII Litigation, 9:279 (1982-83).
Bompey and Saltzman, The Role of Statistics in Employment
Discrimination Litigation – A University Perspective,
9:263 (1982-83).
Lines, Tuition Discrimination: Valid and Invalid Uses
of Tuition Differentials, 9:241 (1982-83).
Casey, Case Comment, Constructive Discharge under Title
VII in Institutions of Higher Education, 9:191 (1982-83).
Orleans and Smith, Commentary, Who Should Provide Interpreters
Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act?, 9:177 (1982-83).
Schwartz and Woods, Public Television and the Hearing
Impaired, 9:1 (1982-83).
Flygare, Commentary, TDCA v. Burdine: The Decreasing Burden
for Employers in Title VII Litigation, 8:519 (1981-82).
Buckley, Perspective on Gunther, 8:433 (1981-82).
Bompey, Decoupling Tenure and Employment Under the 1978
Amendments to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act,
8:425 (1981-82).
Tucker, Perspective on Camenisch, 8:409 (1981-82).
Consent Decree, Rajender v. University of Minnesota, 8:219
(1981-82).
Green, An Application of the Equal Pay Act to Higher Education,
8:203 (1981-82).
Guthrie, Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners
in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:68 (1981-82).
Giddings, Petitioners Brief in University of Texas v.
Camenisch, 8:58 (1981-82).
Tytel, Spirt v. Long Island University: TIAA-CRED and
the Sex-Based Mortality Table Controversy, 7:119 (1980-81).
Orleans, Memorandum: First Thoughts on Southeastern Community
College v. Davis, 6:263 (1979-80).
Bompey, 1979 Update: Cases and Issues in Age Discrimination,
6:195 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).
Gaal and DiLorenzo, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’s
Proposed “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX
and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80).
Legal Diagnosis and Defense of An Employment Civil Rights
Claim, 6:135 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).
Status of Quotas As A Remedy In Discrimination Cases,
6:129 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).
Update on Age Discrimination, 6:123 (1979-80) (Conference
Outline).
Update on Handicap Discrimination, 6:113 (1979-80) (Conference
Outline).
Title IX Athletics, 6:73 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).
Laster, State Law on Mandatory Retirement of Tenured Faculty
After the 1978 Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments,
5:211 (1977-79).
Ford, The Implications of the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act Amendments of 1978 for Colleges and Universities, 5:161
(1977-79).
Hermann, Sports and the Handicapped: Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Curricular, Intramural,
Club and Intercollegiate Athletic Programs in Postsecondary
Educational Institutions, 5:143 (1977-79).
Kadzielski, Postsecondary Athletics in An Era of Equality:
An Appraisal of the Effect of Title IX, 5:123 (1977-79).
Bassen, Synopsis of State Laws Regulating Employment of
the Handicapped, 4:293 (1977).
Haslam, Age Discrimination in Campus Employment, 2:326
(1975).
Reidhaar, Minority Preference in Student Admissions, 2:197
(1975).
Bickel and Vandercreek , Class Action Aspects of Federal
Employment Discrimination Litigation, 2:157 (1974-75).
Wilson, De Funis- What Now? 2:83 (1974).
Frohnmayer, Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972, 2:49
(1974).
Steinbach and Reback, Equal Employment + Equal Pay = Multiple
Problems for Colleges and Universities, 2:25 (1974).
La Noue, Tenure and Title VII, 1:206 (1974).
Wilson, Admissions and Preferences: Sequel to De Funis,
1:38 (1973).
Relihan, Means and Ends: The Evolution of Federal Administration
Doctrine on Equal Employment Opportunity, 1:33 (1973).
Stitt and Limitone, University Fair Employment Practices
Litigation Strategy and Tactics, 1:20 (1973).
Gregory, Making the Affirmative Action Plan Work, 1:16
(1973).
Frohmayer, Current Developments in Federal Law Affecting
Equal Employment Opportunity in Higher Education, 1:1 (1973).
ETHICS
O’Neil, The Lawyer and the Client in the Campus
Setting: Who is the Client, What does the Client Expect
and How May the Attorney Respond?, 19:333 (1993).
Dunham, Case Studies on Wrongdoing on Campus: Ethics and
the Lawyer’s Role, 19:315 (1993).
Drinan, Lawyer-Client Confidentiality in the Campus Setting,
19:305 (1993).
Jones, Book Review, ETHICS AND HIGHER EDUCATION, ed. by
William W. May, Crises in Higher Education and the Need
for Solutions – But What Kind?, 18:621 (1992).
American Academy of Pediatrics Guidelines for Infant Bioethics
Committees, 11:433 (1985).
Capron, Legal Perspectives on Institutional Ethics Committees,
11:417 (1985).
Bennett, Book Review, LEGAL ETHICS AND LEGAL EDUCATION,
by Michael J. Kelly, 7:353 (1980- 81).
FACULTY
Curkovic, Accent and the University: Accent as Pretext
for National Origin Discrimination in Tenure Decisions,
26:727 (2000).
Crosson, Book Review, ACADEMIC DUTY, by Donald Kennedy,
25:435 (1998).
Sims, Book Review, ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND TENURE: ETHICAL
ISSUES, by Richard T. De George, 25:443 (1998).
Smith, Cohen v. San Bernardino Valley College: The Scope
of Academic Freedom Within the Context of Sexual Harassment
Claims and In-Class Speech, 25:1 (1998).
Streitz and Hunkler, Note, Teaching or Learning: Are Teaching
Assistants Students or
Employees?, 24:349 (1997).
Allred, Note, May a Public University Restrict Faculty
Expression on its Internet World Wide Web Sites? Academic
Freedom and University Facility Use Restrictions, 24:325
(1997).
Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: A
Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:225 (1997).
Torke, Book Review, FREE SPEECH IN THE COLLEGE COMMUNITY,
by Robert M. O’Neil, 24:699 (1998).
Oakley, Book Review, THE OPENING OF THE AMERICAN MIND:
CANONS, CULTURE, AND HISTORY, by Lawrence Levine, 24:119
(1997).
Hustoles and Smith, Employment Discrimination Cases in
Higher Education: 1995 in Review, 23:403 (1997).
O’Shea, First Amendment in Higher Education: 1995
in Review, 23:307 (1997).
Alger and Coleman, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights
of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University
Campuses, 23:91 (1996).
Pavela, Book Review, DECONSTRUCTING ACADEMIC FREEDOM,
ed. by William W. Van Alstyne, 22:359 (1995).
Brooks, Adequate Cause for Dismissal: The Missing Element
in Academic Freedom, 22:331 (1995).
Newman, At Work in the Marketplace of Ideas: Academic
Freedom, the First Amendment, and Jeffries v. Harleston,
22:281 (1995).
Hiers, New Restrictions on Academic Free Speech: Jeffries
v. Harleston II, 22:217 (1995).
Kennan, Commentary, The Moral Functions of Higher Education
in Modern Society, 20:69 (1993).
Metzger, Professional and Legal Limits to Academic Freedom,
20:1 (1993).
Kreiser, AAUP Perspectives on Academic Freedom and United
States Intelligence Agencies, 19:251 (1993).
Robison and Sanders, The Myths of Academia: Open Inquiry
and Funded Research, 19:227 (1993).
Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and
Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993).
Swan, Early Retirement Incentives with Upper Age Limits
under the Older Workers Benefits Protection Act, 19:53
(1992).
Scott and Weingart, Case Comment, A Professor's Choice:
Employment or Religious Conviction: EEOC v. University
of Detroit, 18:315 (1991).
Brammer, Lallo, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees
of Boston University: The
Realization of Title VII's Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991).
Hasty, Note, Worker's Compensation: Will College and University
Professors be Compensated for Mental Injuries Caused by
Work-Related Stress?, 17:535 (1991).
Rothstein, Commentary, Students, Staff and Faculty with
Disabilities: Current Issues for
Colleges and Universities, 17:471 (1991).
Frost, Shifting Meanings of Academic Freedom: An Analysis
of University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 17:329 (1991).
Dumas, McIntyre, and Zelenock, Case Comment, Parate v.
Isibor: Resolving the Conflict
between the Academic Freedom of the University and the
Academic Freedom of University Professors, 16:713 (1990).
Swan, Subjective Hiring and Promotion Decisions in the
Wake of Fort Worth, Atonio, and Price Waterhouse, 16:553
(1990).
Jasper, Note, Britain's Education Reform Act: A Lesson
in Academic Freedom and Tenure, 16:449 (1990).
Traynor, Defamation Law Shock Absorbers for its Ride into
the Groves of Academe, 16:373 (1990).
Craver, The Implications of the Elimination of Mandatory
Retirement for Professors, 16:343 (1990).
Connolly and Marshall, Sexual Harassment of University
or College Students by Faculty
Members, 15:381 (1989).
Luzum and Pupel, Case Comment, Weinstein v. University
of Illinois: The "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine and
Procedural Due Process for Nontenured Faculty, 15:369 (1989).
Cunningham, Leeson, and Stadler, Case Comment, Kahn v.
Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara: The Right
to Privacy and the Academic Freedom Privilege with Respect
to Confidential Peer Review Materials, 15:73 (1989).
Finkin, Commentary, Tenure After an Uncapped ADEA: A Different
View, 15:43 (1988).
Keller, Consensual Amorous Relationships Between Faculty
and Students: The Constitutional Right to Privacy, 15:21
(1988).
Curry, Manderfeld, and Sullivan, Case Comment, Pime v.
Loyola University of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends
the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988).
Ruebhausen, Commentary, The Age Discrimination in Employment
Act Amendments of 1986: Implications for Tenure and Retirement,
14:561 (1988).
Olswang, Union Security Provisions, Academic Freedom and
Tenure: The Implications of Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson,
14:539 (1988).
Attanasio, Does the First Amendment Guarantee a Right
to Conduct Scientific Experiments?, 14:435 (1988).
Dixon, Lynch, and Swem, Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas: Termination
of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the
Burden of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417
(1987).
Delano, Discovery in University Employment Discrimination
Suits: Should Peer Review
Materials Be Privileged?, 14:121 (1987).
Andrews, Dang, and McLean, Note, Recent Development: Church
Licensed Professors: The Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987).
Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment,
13:267 (1986).
Ramirez, The Balance of Interests between National Security
Controls and First Amendment Interests in Academic Freedom,
13:179 (1986).
Mawdsley, Plagiarism Problems in Higher Education, 13:65
(1986).
White, Book Review, THE RIGHTS OF TEACHERS, by David Rubin
(with Steven Greenhouse) 12:561 (1986).
Wright, Faculty and Law Explosion: Assessing the Impact – A
Twenty-five Year Perspective (1960-85) for College and
University Lawyers, 12:363 (1985).
Weeks, Equal Pay: The Emerging Terrain, 12:41 (1985).
Special Committee on Education and the Law (Association
of the Bar of the City of New York), Due Process in Decisions
Relating to Tenure in Higher Education, 11:323 (1984).
White, Book Review, DOLLARS AND SCHOLARS: AN INQUIRY INTO
THE IMPACT OF FACULTY INCOME UPON THE FUNCTIONS AND FUTURE
OF THE ACADEMY, ed. by R. Linnell, 11:257 (1984).
Orleans, Book Review, DOLLARS AND SCHOLARS: AN INQUIRY
INTO THE IMPACT OF FACULTY INCOME UPON THE FUNCTIONS AND
FUTURE OF THE ACADEMY, ed. by R. Linnell, 11:237 (1984).
Lee and Olswang, Scientific Misconduct: Institutional
Procedures and Due Process
Considerations, 11:51 (1984).
Gillmore, Student Ratings as a Factor in Faculty Employment
Decisions and Periodic Review, 10:557 (1983-84).
Kirk, Judicial Deference to Institutional Autonomy: The
Irony of Yeshiva and the Financial Exigency Cases, 10:541
(1983-84).
Begin and Lee, Criteria for Evaluating the Managerial
Status of College Faculty: Applications of Yeshiva University
by the NLRB, 10:515 (1983-84).
Hustoles, Faculty and Staff Dismissals: Developing Contract
and Tort Theories, 10:479 (1983-84).
Lovain, Note, Grounds for Dismissing Tenured Postsecondary
Faculty for Cause, 10:419 (1983-84).
Bodner, Commentary, Analyzing Faculty Salaries in Class
Action Sex Discrimination Cases, 10:305 (1983-84).
Richards, Note, "Financial Emergency" and the
Faculty Furlough: A Breach of Contract?, 10:225 (1983-84).
Finkin, Book Review, BEYOND TRADITIONAL TENURE, by Richard
P. Chait and Andrew T. Ford, 10:105 (1983-84).
Hartnett, Book Review, BEYOND TRADITIONAL TENURE, by Richard
P. Chait and Andrew T. Ford, 10:95 (1983-84).
Simon, Faculty Writings: Are They "Works Made for
Hire" under the 1976 Copyright Act?, 9:485 (1982-83).
Olswang, Planning the Unthinkable: Issues in Institutional
Reorganization and Faculty
Reductions, 9:431 (1982-83).
Barnes and Schlottman, After "Decoupling": Further
Thoughts, 9:315 (1982-83).
Lee, Balancing Confidentiality and Disclosure in Faculty
Peer Review: Impact of Title VII Litigation, 9:279 (1982-83).
Hodges, Note, Postsecondary Faculty Members' Rights to
Free Speech, 9:85 (1982-83).
Moran and Shepard, The Future of Faculty Collective Bargaining
at Private Universities, 9:41 (1982-83).
Bompey, Decoupling Tenure and Employment Under the 1978
Amendments to the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act, 8:425 (1981-82).
Geetter, The University of Connecticut v. The University
of Connecticut Chapter of the AAUP: Brief on Determining
Faculty Workload in the Collective Bargaining Context,
8:254 (1981-82).
Irby, Fantel, Milam, and Schwarz, Commentary, Faculty
Rights and Responsibilities in Evaluating and Dismissing
Medical Students, 8:102 (1981-82).
Consent Decree: United States Department of Labor, Office
of Contract Compliance Programs v. Regents of University
of California, 8:54 (1981-82).
Smith, Protecting the Confidentiality of Faculty Peer
Review Records: Department of Labor v. The University of
California, 8:20 (1981-82).
Finkin, Commentary, The Yeshiva Decision: A Somewhat Different
View, 7:321 (1980-81).
Lee, Faculty Role in Academic Governance and the Managerial
Exclusion: Impact of the Yeshiva Decision, 7:222 (1980-81).
Shapiro, Memorandum: Early Retirement Incentives and the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 7:174 (1980-81).
Hanna, McLendon v. Morton and the Legislative Response:
A Procedural Barrier to Quality Education in West Virginia?
7:111 (1980-81).
Flygare, Commentary, Board of Trustees of Keene State
v. Sweeney: Implications for the Future of Peer Review
in Faculty Personnel Decisions, 7:100 (1980-81).
Bodner, Commentary, The Implications of Yeshiva University
for Collective Bargaining Rights of Faculty at Private
and Public Institutions of Higher Education, 7:78 (1980-81).
Weston, Outside Activities of Faculty Members, 7:68 (1980-81).
Duerr, Annotation: Reinstatement as a Remedy in Cases
Involving Termination of Tenured Faculty, 7:57 (1980-81).
McKee, Tenure by Default: The Nonformal Acquisition of
Academic Tenure, 7:31 (1980-81).
Olswang and Fantel, Tenure and Periodic Performance Review:
Compatible Legal and Administrative Principles, 7:1 (1980-81).
Faculty Collective Bargaining? The Yeshiva Case, 6:67
(1979-80) (Conference Outline).
A New Look at Faculty Contracts, 6:13 (1979-80) (Conference
Outline).
Laster, State Law on Mandatory Retirement of Tenured Faculty
after the 1978 Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments,
5:211 (1977-79).
Stevens, Evaluation of Faculty Competence as a “Privileged
Occasion,” 4:281 (1977).
Menard, May Tenure Rights of Faculty Be Bargained Away?,
2:256 (1975).
Bergan, Grievance- Arbitration Procedures and Contract
Administration, 1:371 (1974).
Blackwell, The Law of Copyright and Fair Use Doctrine,
1:222 (1974).
La Noue, Tenure and Title VII, 1:206 (1974).
Middleditch, College and University Fringe Benefits, 1:172
(1973-74).
Schultz, Nontenured Faculty: Current Legal and Practical
Problems in Connection with Nonrenewal of Such Appointments,
1:74 (1973).
FINANCIAL AID TO STUDENTS
Barber, Waivers of Academic Progress Requirements for
Federal Financial Aid: A Reasonable Accommodation for Students
with Learning Disabilities?, 23:231 (1996).
Koon, Note, United States v. Brown University and a New
Proposal to Discern whether Certain Financial Aid Constitutes "Trade
or Commerce," 22:191 (1995).
Thomas and Hirschman, Minority-Targeted Scholarships:
More than a Black and White Issue, 21:555 (1995).
Swanson, Note, Atlanta College of Medical & Dental
Careers, Inc. v. Riley: The Right of a School to Appeal
the Education Department's Calculation of its Loan Default
Rate, 21:141 (1994).
Lohman, Case Comment, The Final Frustration of Defaulting
NHSC Scholars?: United States v. Hatcher, 19:385 (1993).
Baida, Not All Minority Scholarships are Created Equal:
Why Some May be More Constitutional than Others, 18:333
(1992).
Ward, Note, Race-Exclusive Scholarships: Do they Violate
the Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964?, 18:73 (1991).
Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy:
An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and
Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991).
Guerre, Note, Financial Aid in Higher Education: What's
Wrong, Who's Being Hurt, What's Being Done, 17:483 (1991).
McClamrock, Note, The First Amendment and Public Funding
of Religiously Controlled or Affiliated Higher Education,
17:381 (1991).
Richmond, Private Colleges and Tuition Price-Fixing: An
Antitrust Primer, 17:271 (1991).
Lake and Pedulla, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher
Education Corporation: State Agencies That Grant Educational
Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default
on Prior Educational Loans, 17:261 (1990).
Gunn, Commentary, Economic and Tax Aspects of Prepaid-Tuition
Plans, 17:243 (1990).
Scheske, Note, Financial Aid and Antitrust: Financial-Aid
Packages Subject of Justice Department Probe, 17:43 (1990).
Bovee, Goettling, and Ritter, Case Comment, Witters v.
Washington Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment
Clause and Financial Aid to Students for Religious Education
at Private Institutions, 13:397 (1987).
Aiello and Behrens, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy
Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986).
Mooney, Note, Conditioning Student Aid on Draft Registration:
The Legislation and Regulations, 10:379 (1983-84).
Hunter, Collecting Defaulted Student Loans: How Much Diligence
is Due?, 9:149 (1982-83).
FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT
Daniel and Sun, The Sherman Act Antitrust Provisions and
Collegiate Action: Should There Be a Continued Exception
for the Business of the University?, 25:451 (1999).
McGuire, Note, Federal Research Grant Funding at Universities:
Legislative Waves from
Auditors Diving into Overhead Cost Pools, 23:563 (1997).
Salaway, Note, UMIFA and a Model for Endowment Investing,
22:1045 (1996).
Swanson, Note, Atlanta College of Medical & Dental
Careers, Inc. v. Riley: The Right of a School to Appeal
the Education Department's Calculation of its Loan Default
Rate, 21:141 (1994).
Dunn and Camacho, Case Comment, NCAA v. Commissioner of
IRS: When will the Internal Revenue Service Consider an
Activity Regularly Carried On?, 19:39 (1992).
Gordon and Spuehler, Questions and Answers Explaining
the New Tax Rules Applicable to Tax-Sheltered Annuities,
17:435 (1991).
Kelly, Financing Higher Education: Federal Income-Tax
Consequences, 17:307 (1991).
Shearer, Ward, and Wattley, Case Comment, Student Government
Association v. Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts:
Forum and Subsidy Analysis Applied to University Funding
Decisions, 17:65 (1990).
Cole and Goldblatt, Award of Construction Contracts: Public
Institutions' Authority to Select the Lowest Responsible
Bidder, 16:177 (1989).
Daane, Commentary, Regents of the University of Michigan
v. State of Michigan: South African Divestiture and Constitutional
Autonomy, A Case Commentary, 15:313 (1989).
Suffern, Commentary, The Impact of the National Association
of Attorney General Model Solicitation Act on Colleges
and Universities, 15:177 (1988).
Dixon, Lynch, and Swem, Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas: Termination
of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the
Burden of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417
(1987).
Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development
Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research
Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109
(1986).
Johnson and Weeks, To Save a College: Independent College
Trustees and Decisions on
Financial Exigency, Endowment Use, and Closure, 12:455
(1986).
Flaherty, Exempt Organizations and Real Estate Syndications
after the Tax Reform Act of 1984, 12:61 (1985).
Richards, Note, "Financial Emergency" and the
Faculty Furlough: A Breach of Contract?, 10:225 (1983-84).
McCullogh and Foster, Reviewers’ Comments, 8:15
(1981-82).
Vecchione, Chapter 11 of Bankruptcy Code as an Alternative
to Closing or Merger, 8:1 (1981- 82).
Reidhaar, Memorandum: The Legal Implications of Divestment
of University Investments in Companies Doing Business in
South Africa, 7:164 (1980-81).
Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview
of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79).
Wilson, Financial Exigency: Examination of Recent Cases
Involving Layoff of Tenured Faculty, 4:187 (1977).
Greenawalt, Constitutional Limits on Aid to Sectarian
Universities, 4:177 (1977).
Burke, Federal Taxation of State Colleges and Universities:
Recent Developments Call for Reconsideration of Theories
of Exemption, 4:43 (1976).
Teitell, Federal Tax Implications of Charitable Gift Annuities,
3:26 (1975).
Habecker, Students, Christian Colleges, and the Law: and
the Walls Come Tumbling Down, 2:369 (1975).
Hopkins, Regulations of Interstate Charitable Solicitations:
Implications for Colleges and Universities, 2:289 (1975).
Wheeler, Fiduciary Responsibilities of Trustees in Relation
to the Financing of Private Institutions of Higher Education,
2:210 (1975).
Tucker, Financial Exigency- Rights, Responsibilities,
and Recent Decisions, 2:103 (1974-75).
Hopkins, Rule 144: The Applicability of the Restricted
Securities Requirements to Colleges and Universities, 1:136
(1973-74).
GOVERNANCE
Merz, Book Review, FUNDING SCIENCE IN AMERICA: CONGRESS,
UNIVERSITIES, AND THE ACADEMIC PORK BARREL, by James D.
Savage, 26:803 (2000).
Sidbury, The Disclosure of Campus Crime: How Colleges
and Universities Continue to Hide Behind the 1998 Amendment
to FERPA and How Congress Can Eliminate the Loophole, 26:755
(2000).
Sherman, How Free is Free Enough? Public University Presidential
Searches, University Autonomy, and State Open Meeting Acts,
26:665 (2000).
Estes, State University Presidential Searches: Law and
Practice, 26:485 (2000).
Harpool, Minimum Compliance with Minimum Standards: Managing
Trustee Conflicts of Interest, 24:465 (1998).
Harpool, The Sibley Hospital Case: Trustees and Their
Loyalty to the Institution, 23:255 (1996).
Ugland; Hawkers, Thieves and Lonely Pamphleteers: Distributing
Publications in the University Marketplace, 22:935 (1996).
Attridge, Book Review, UP THE UNIVERSITY: RECREATING HIGHER
EDUCATION IN AMERICA, by Robert and Jon Solomon, 21:825
(1995).
Davis, Scaling the Ivory Tower: State Public Records Laws
and University Presidential Searches, 21:353 (1994).
Page and Hunnicutt, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate:
A Policy Analysis of Student Speech Regulation at America's
Twenty Largest Public Universities, 21:1 (1994).
Harrison, Hate Speech: Power in the Marketplace, 20:461
(1994).
Bickel and Lake, Reconceptualizing the University's Duty
to Provide a Safe Learning
Environment: A Criticism of the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis
and the Restatement (Second) of Torts, 20:261 (1994).
Mikva, Commentary, How Do We Manage the Right to Hate?,
19:35 (1992).
Gibbs, Book Review, CHOOSING A COLLEGE PRESIDENT: OPPORTUNITIES
AND CONSTRAINTS, by Judith B. McLaughlin and David Reisman,
18:329 (1991).
Neiman, Book Review, LIBERAL JUSTICE AND THE MARXIST CRITIQUE
OF EDUCATION, by Kenneth A. Strike, 18:125 (1991).
Malloy, Book Review, GOVERNING TOMORROW'S CAMPUS: PERSPECTIVES
AND AGENDAS, by Jack H. Schuster, Lynn H. Miller and Associates,
18:121 (1991).
Steinberg, Rape on College Campuses: Reform Through Title
IX, 18:39 (1991).
Bok, Commentary, Universities: Their Temptations and Tensions,
18:1 (1991).
Carrington, Book Review, COLLEGE CRIME PREVENTION AND
PERSONAL SAFETY AWARENESS, by Max C. Bromley and Leonard
Territo, 17:565 (1991).
Salsich, Book Review, HIGHER EDUCATION AND STATE GOVERNMENTS,
by Edward R. Hines, 17:429 (1991).
Shearer, Ward, and Wattley, Case Comment, Student Government
Association v. Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts:
Forum and Subsidy Analysis Applied to University Funding
Decisions, 17:65 (1990).
Kennelly, Book Review, ON ASSUMING A COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY
PRESIDENCY: LESSONS AND FROM THE FIELD, by Estela M. Bensimon,
Marian L. Gade and Joseph F. Kauffman, 16:731 (1990).
McClamrock, Meyer, and Spencer, Case Comment, Alabama
Student Party v. Student Government Association of the
University of Alabama: The First Amendment and
Student-Government Election Campaign Speech in Public Universities,
16:649 (1990).
Hodulik, Prohibiting Discriminatory Harassment By Regulating
Student Speech: A Balancing of First-Amendment and University
Interests, 16:573 (1990).
Goldrick and Rakow, Book Review, SEXUAL ASSAULT ON CAMPUS:
WHAT COLLEGES CAN DO, by Aileen Adams and Gail Abarbanel,
16:547 (1990).
Jasper, Note, Britain's Education Reform Act: A Lesson
in Academic Freedom and Tenure, 16:449 (1990).
Schlesinger, Commentary, The Opening of the American Mind,
16:425 (1990).
Bhirdo, Note, The Liability and Responsibility of Institutions
of Higher Education for the On-Campus Victimization of
Students, 16:119 (1989).
Alessandro, Murray, and Reed, Case Comment, Fox v. Board
of Trustees of the State
University of New York: University Regulation Faces the
First Amendment, 15:443 (1989).
Dutile, God and Gays at Georgetown: Observations on Gay
Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v.
Georgetown University, 15:1 (1988).
Bennett, Education and the Constitution: The Case of Citizen
James Madison, 14:417 (1988).
Antonini, Fantozzi, and Pruss, Case Comment, Harvard Law
School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens under
the Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First
Amendment Rights of United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987).
Swan, The Eleventh Amendment Revisited: Suits Against
State Government Entities and their Employees in Federal
Courts, 14:1 (1987).
Brickley and Ryan, Case Comment, Miller v. Rutgers and
Kovats v. Rutgers: Application of the Eleventh Amendment
in Suits Against State Colleges and Universities, 13:407
(1987).
Mingle, Book Review, THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF OPENNESS:
SUNSHINE LAWS AND HIGHER EDUCATION, by Harlan Cleveland,
12:569 (1986).
Johnson and Weeks, To Save a College: Independent College
Trustees and Decisions on
Financial Exigency, Endowment Use, and Closure, 12:455
(1986).
Fishbein, New Strings on the Ivory Tower: The Growth of
Accountability in Colleges and
Universities, 12:381 (1985).
Beach, The Management and Governance of Academic Institutions,
12:301 (1985).
Kaplin, Law on the Campus 1960-1985: Years of Growth and
Challenge, 12:269 (1985).
Cabranes, American Higher Education and the Law: Some
Reflections on NACUA's Silver Anniversary, 12:261 (1985).
Cleveland, The Costs and Benefits of Openness: Sunshine
Laws and Higher Education, 12:127 (1985).
Greenleaf, Academic Institutions in the Light and Shadow
of the Law, 12:1 (1985).
O'Neil, Academic Freedom and the Constitution, 11:275
(1984).
Olivas and Denison, Legalization in the Academy: Higher
Education and the Supreme Court, 11:1 (1984).
Hoornstra and Liethen, Academic Freedom and Civil Discovery,
10:113 (1983-84).
Newell, Use of Campus Facilities for First Amendment Activity,
9:27 (1982-83).
Mathews, Higher Education and Society, 8:463 (1981-82).
Weinberger, Reflection on the Seventies, 8:451 (1981-82).
Simon, The Application of State Sunshine Laws to Institutions
of Higher Education, 4:83 (1976).
HEALTH SCIENCES
Ende, Anderson, and Crego, Liability Insurance: A Primer
for College and University Counsel, 23:609 (1997).
Horger, Case Comment, Medicare Reimbursement to Provider
University Hospitals for
Graduate Medical Education Expenses in Light of Thomas
Jefferson University v. Shalala, 23:133 (1996).
Jones, Tax Exemption Issues Facing Academic Health Centers
in the Managed Care Environment, 24:261 (1997).
Keyes, Health-Care Professionals with AIDS: The Risk of
Transmission Balanced against the Interests of Professionals
and Institutions, 16:589 (1990).
Kobasic, Note, Institutional Review Boards in the University
Setting: Review of Pharmaceutical Testing Protocols, Informed
Consent and Ethical Considerations, 15:185 (1988).
Brickley, Note, AIDS: A University's Liability for Failure
to Protect its Students, 14:529 (1988).
Wagner, Human Tissues Research: Who Owns the Results?,
14:259 (1987).
Rich, Malpractice Issues in the Academic Medical Center,
13:149 (1986).
American Academy of Pediatrics, Guidelines for Infant
Bioethics Committees, 11:433 (1985).
Capron, Legal Perspectives on Institutional Ethics Committees,
11:417 (1985).
Lawton, Carder, and Weisman, Recent Governmental Action
Regarding the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405
(1985).
Rothstein, Introduction to Special Issue on the Treatment
of Seriously Ill Newborns: Implications for University
Hospitals, 11:403 (1984-85).
Conlon, Book Review, HEALTH CARE LABOR LAW, ed. by Iva
Michael Shepard and A. Edward Doudera, 9:355 (1982-83).
Pavela, Therapeutic Paternalism and the Misuse of Mandatory
Psychiatric Withdrawals on Campus, 9:101 (1982-83).
Jeddeloh, Education Program Cost Reimbursement in University
Hospitals: Is There a
Coherent National Policy?, 8:465 (1981-82).
INSURANCE
Higgins and Zulkey, Liability Insurance Coverage: How
to Avoid Unpleasant Surprises,
17:123 (1990).
Shapiro, Memorandum: Early Retirement Incentives and the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 7:174 (1980-81).
Tytel, Spirt v. Long Island University: TIAA-CREF and
the Sex-Based Mortality Table Controversy, 7:119 (1980-81).
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Cranman, Privacy and Technology: Counseling Institutions
of Higher Education, 25:69 (1998).
Miller, Case Comment, Coursepacks and Copyright: Fair
Use in Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document
Services, 23:525 (1997).
Price, College and Universities as Internet Service Providers:
Determining and Limiting Liability for Copyright Infringement,
23:183 (1996).
Donohue, Note, First-to-File vs. First-to-Invent: Will
Universities be Left Behind? 21:765 (1995).
Zelenock, Book Review, COPYRIGHT, FAIR USE, AND THE CHALLENGE
FOR UNIVERSITIES, by Kenneth D. Crews, 21:615 (1995).
Kilby, The Discouragement of Learning: Scholarship Made
for Hire, 21:455 (1995).
Irwin, Stotlar, and Mulrooney, A Critical Analysis of
Collegiate Licensing Policies and
Procedures, 20:97 (1993).
Kasunic, Fair Use and the Educator's Right to Photocopy
Copyrighted Material for Classroom Use, 19:271 (1993).
Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and
Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993).
Zelenock, Book Review, TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND THE UNIVERSITY,
by Gary W. Matkin, 19:49 (1992).
Sacken, Commercialization of Academic Knowledge and Judicial
Deference, 19:1 (1992).
Bianchi, Brenna, and Shannon, Case Comment, Basic Books,
Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp: Potential Liability for Classroom
Anthologies, 18:595 (1992).
Burgoyne, The Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990:
State Educational Institutions Now Face Significant Monetary
Exposure for Copyright Infringement, 18:367 (1992).
Capano, Hoey, and Zuch, Case Comment, In re Cronyn: Can
Student Theses Bar Patent
Applications?, 18:105 (1991).
Davis, Commentary, University Research and the Wages of
Commerce, 18:29 (1991).
Miller, Subpoenas in Academia: Controlling Disclosure,
17:1 (1990).
Schinner, Establishing a Collegiate Trademark Licensing
Program: To What Extent Does an Institution have an Exclusive
Right to its Name?, 15:405 (1989).
Luzum and Pupel, Case Comment, Weinstein v. University
of Illinois: The "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine and
Procedural Due Process for Nontenured Faculty, 15:369 (1989).
Graziano and Boren, Suing States for Copyright Infringement – An
Eleventh Amendment Bar?, 15:269 (1989).
Wagner, Human Tissue Research: Who Owns the Results?,
14:259 (1987).
Lautsch, Book Review, COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION: LEGAL LIABILITIES
AND ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING THEIR USE AND MISUSE, by
Patricia A. Hollander, 14:163 (1987).
Olson, Copyright and Fair Use: Implications of Nation
Enterprises for Higher Education, 13:489 (1986).
Sorenson, Impact of the Copyright Law on College Teaching,
12:509 (1986).
Olson, Copyright and Fair Use: Implications of Nation
Enterprises for Higher Education, 12:489 (1986).
Burshtein, Collegiate Licensing in Canada and the Statutory
Advantage, 12:227 (1985).
Lachs, University Patent Policy, 10:263 (1983-84).
Ramey, Note, Off-the-Air Educational Videorecording and
Fair Use: An Analysis, 10:341 (1983-84).
Neuenschwander, Oral History and Copyright: An Uncertain
Relationship, 10:147 (1983-84).
Bell and Majestic, Protection and Enforcement of College
and University Trademarks, 10:63 (1983-84).
Simon, Faculty Writings: Are They "Works Made For
Hire" Under the 1976 Copyright Act?, 9:485 (1982-83).
Ward, Commentary, The Georgia Grind: Can the Common Law
Accommodate the Problems of Title in the Art World: Observations
on a Recent Case, 8:533 (1981-82).
Anderson, Commentary, Licensing of Colleges and University
Trademarks, 8:97 (1981-82).
Smith, Implications of the Uniform Patent Legislation
to Colleges and Universities, 8:82 (1981-82).
Harris, Memorandum: Introductory Guide to Academic Risks
of Copyright Infringement, 7:328 (1980-81).
Ward, Copyright in Museum Collections: An Overview of
Come of the Problems, 7:297 (1980-81).
Edwards, Usages of Copyrighted Musical Works Permissible
Without Acquiring a Copyright License, Assignment, or Release,
6:363 (1979-80).
Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview
of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79).
Cardozo, To Copy or Not to Copy For Teaching and Scholarship:
What Shall I Tell My Client?, 4:59 (1976-77).
Mancino and Sugarman, Tax Aspects of University Patent
Policy, 3:41 (1975).
Zirkel, Copyright Law in Higher Education: Individuals,
Institutions, and Innovations, 2:342 (1975).
McCaffrey, Patent Policy in Federal Government Contracts
and Grants, 1:230 (1974).
Blackwell, The Law of Copyright and the Fair Use Doctrine,
1:222 (1974).
LABOR LAW
Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997
in Review, 25:313 (1998).
Streitz and Hunkler, Note, Teaching or Learning: Are Teaching
Assistants Students or Employees?, 24:349 (1997).
Lyons, Case Comment, EEOC v. Board of Governors of State
Colleges and Universities: Collective Bargaining Agreements
and Age Discrimination in Employment Act Claims: What Counts
as Retaliation under ADEA Section 4(D), 20:241 (1993).
Nagle, Note, Yeshiva's Impact on Collective Bargaining
in Public-Sector Higher Education, 20:383 (1994).
Swan, Subjective Hiring and Promotion Decisions in the
Wake of Fort Worth, Atonio, and Price Waterhouse, 16:553
(1990).
Cosgrove, Grundy, and Heffernan, Case Comment, Shannon
v. Bepko: Public Colleges and Universities as State Agencies:
Standards for Eleventh Amendment Protection, 16:151 (1989).
Barnes and Khorey, The Effects and Use of Administrative
Determinations in Subsequent Employment Litigation, 16:189
(1989).
Stadler, Note, Drug Testing of College and University
Employees, 15:321 (1989).
Olswang, Union Security Provisions, Academic Freedom and
Tenure: The Implications of Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson,
14:539 (1988).
Judge, Student-Athletes as Employees: Income Tax Consequences,
13:285 (1986).
Begin and Lee, Criteria for Evaluating the Managerial
Status of College Faculty:
Applications of Yeshiva University by the NLRB, 10:515
(1983-84).
Conlon, Book Review, HEALTH CARE LABOR LAW, ed. by Ira
Michael Shepard and A. Edward Doudera, 9:355 (1982-83).
Veazie, University Collective Bargaining: The Experience
of the Montana University System, 9:51 (1982-83).
Moran and Shepard, The Future of Faculty Collective Bargaining
at Private Universities, 9:41 (1982-83).
Geetter, The University of Connecticut v. The University
of Connecticut Chapter of the AAUP: Brief on Determining
Faculty Workload in the Collective Bargaining Context,
8:254 (1981-82).
Finkin, The Yeshiva Decision: A Somewhat Different View,
7:321 (1980-81).
Lee, Faculty Rule in Academic Governance and the Managerial
Exclusion: Impact of the Yeshiva Decision, 7:222 (1980-81).
Tytel, Commentary, Spirt v. Long Island University: TIAA-CREF
and the Sex-Based Mortality Table Controversy, 7:119 (180-81).
Bodner, The Implications of Yeshiva University for College
Bargaining Rights of Faculty at Private and Private Institutions
of Higher Education 7:78 (1980-81).
Bompey and Witten, Settlement of Title VII Disputes: Shifting
Patterns in a Changing World, 6:317 (1979-80).
Nelson and Ward, Burdens of Proof Under Employment Discrimination
Legislation, 6:301 (1979-80).
Ward, Diagnosing an Employment Civil Rights Claim, 6:279
(1979-80).
Faculty Collective Bargaining: The Yeshiva Case, 6:67
(1979-80) (Conference Outline).
Laster, State Law on Mandatory Retirement of Tenured Faculty
After the 1978 Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments,
5:211 (1977-79).
Ford, The Implications of the Age Discrimination in Employment
Act Amendments of 1978 for Colleges and Universities, 5:161
(1977-79).
Sensenbrenner, Collective Bargaining Legislation for Public
Higher Education From the Management Side of the Table,
4:27 (1976).
Menard, May Tenure Rights of Faculty Be Bargained Away?,
2:256 (1975).
Kahn, Current and Emerging Labor Relations Issues in Higher
Education, 2:123 (1974-75).
Ferguson and Bergan, Grievance- Arbitration Procedures
and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974).
Schwartzman, The Administration’s Approach to Collective
Bargaining, 1:351 (1974).
Holway and O’Donnell, Unfair Labor Practices in
the Academic Setting, 1:325 (1974).
Kennedy, The Educators’ Role in Educating the NLRB:
Requirements of a Complete Record, 1:305 (1974).
Kahn, Conducting a “No-Union” Election Campaign
on Campus, 1:291 (1974).
McHugh, Faculty Unionism and Tenure, 1:46 (1973).
LEGISLATION
Frazier and Dymersky, A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act
of 1991: Is the New Law
Retroactive?, 19:259 (1993).
Gray, Impact of the Proposed Civil Rights and Women's
Equity in Employment Act on
Colleges and Universities, 18:559 (1992).
Schaller, Drug Testing and the Evolution of Federal and
State Regulation of Intercollegiate Athletics: A Chill
Wind Blows, 18:131 (1991).
Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy:
An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and
Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991).
Brammer, Lallo, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees
of Boston University: The
Realization of Title VII's Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991).
Meyers, Note, State Open-Records Acts and the NCAA Bylaw
Requiring Coaches to Disclose their "Athletically-Related" Outside
Income: Emptying the Coaches' Pockets for Public Inspection?,
16:497 (1990).
Alessandro, Note, The Student-Athlete Right-to-Know Act:
Legislation Would Require Colleges to Make Public Graduation
Rates of Student Athletes, 16:287 (1989).
Curry, Note, Hazing and the "Rush" toward Reform:
Responses from Universities, Fraternities, State Legislatures,
and the Courts, 16:93 (1989).
Daane, Commentary, Regents of the University of Michigan
v. State of Michigan: South African Divestiture and Constitutional
Autonomy, A Case Commentary, 15:313 (1988).
Suffern, Commentary, The Impact of the National Association
of Attorneys General Model Solicitation Act on Colleges
and Universities, 15:177 (1988).
Andrews, Note, State Legislation on Comparable Worth:
Will it Bring Pay Equity to Academe?, 14:469 (1988).
Lam, Restrictions on Technology Transfer among Academic
Researchers: Will Recent Changes in the Export Control
System Make a Difference?, 13:311 (1986).
Mingle, Book Review, THE COSTS AND BENEFITS OF OPENNESS:
SUNSHINE LAWS AND HIGHER EDUCATION, by Harlan Cleveland,
12:569 (1986).
Smith, The Implications of the Uniform Patent Legislation
to Colleges and Universities, 8:82 (1981-82).
Hanna, Commentary, McLendon v. Morton and the Legislative
Response: A Procedural Barrier to Quality Education in
West Virginia?, 7:111 (1980-81).
LIABILITY
MacLachlan, Dangerous Traditions: Hazing Rituals on Campus
and University Liability, 26:511 (2000).
Von Gerichten, Tort Litigation in Higher Education, 1998
in Review, 26:245 (1999).
Johnsen and Todd, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education,
1998 in Review, 26:221 (1999).
Thro, The Eleventh Amendment Revolution in the Lower Federal
Courts, 25:501 (1999).
Hoye, Tort Litigation in Higher Education: 1997 in Review,
25:257 (1998).
Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education, 25:225
(1998).
Rutledge, Hell Night Hath No Fury Like a Pledge Scorned
. . . and Injured: Hazing Litigation in U.S. Colleges and
Universities, 25:361 (1998).
Bickel, Tort-Accident Cases: Traditional Tort Rules in
the College or University Setting,
24:187 (1997).
Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: A Review
of 1996 and 1997 Judicial Decisions, 24:161 (1997).
Bickel and Lake, The Emergence of New Paradigms in Student-University
Relations: From In Loco Parentis to Bystander to Facilitator,
23:755 (1997).
Bickel, Tort Accident Cases Involving Colleges and Universities:
A Review of the 1995 Judicial Decisions, 23:359 (1997).
Johnsen, Immunity Law in Higher Education: A Review of
the 1995 Judicial Decisions,
23:333(1997).
Shea, Case Comment, Duty of Care Owed to University Athletes
in Light of Kleinknecht, 21:591 (1995).
Naples, Note, Reading, ‘Riting and Response: Holding
Colleges and Universities Liable under CERCLA, 20:483 (1994).
Bickel and Lake, Reconceptualizing the University's Duty
to Provide a Safe Learning
Environment: A Criticism of the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis
and the Restatement (Second) of Torts, 20:261 (1994).
Schroeder, Evolving Theories in Legal Liability: How will
they Affect Cooperative Extension?, 18:483 (1992).
Evans, Note, "A Stranger in a Strange Land":
Responsibility and Liability for Students Enrolled in Foreign-Study
Programs, 18:299 (1991).
Steinberg, Rape on College Campuses: Reform Through Title
IX, 18:39 (1991).
Carrington, Book Review, COLLEGE CRIME PREVENTION AND
PERSONAL SAFETY AWARENESS, by Max C. Bromley and Leonard
Territo, 17:565 (1991).
Hasty, Note, Worker's Compensation: Will College and University
Professors Be Compensated for Mental Injuries Caused by
Work-Related Stress?, 17:535 (1991).
Dumas, Note, Defective Buildings and Grounds – A
Dangerous Condition for Colleges and Universities, 17:351
(1991).
Richmond, Private Colleges and Tuition Price-Fixing: An
Antitrust Primer, 17:271 (1991).
Higgins and Zulkey, Liability Insurance Coverage: How
to Avoid Unpleasant Surprises,
17:123 (1990).
Scheske, Note, Financial Aid and Antitrust: Financial-Aid
Packages Subject of Justice Department Probe, 17:43 (1990).
Guerre, Hasty, and Paige, Case Comment, Gehling v. St.
George's University School of Medicine, Ltd.: Continued
Erosion of Colleges' and Universities' Duty to Students
Injured in Collegiate Activities, 16:677 (1990).
Bhirdo, Note, The Liability and Responsibility of Institutions
of Higher Education for the On-Campus Victimization of
Students, 16:119 (1989).
Connolly and Marshall, Sexual Harassment of University
or College Students by Faculty
Members, 15:381 (1989).
Graziano and Boren, Suing States for Copyright Infringement:
An Eleventh Amendment Bar?, 15:269 (1989).
Manderfeld, Note, College and University Liability Under
Superfund, 15:217 (1988).
Miyamoto, Liability of Colleges and Universities for Injuries
Sustained by Students while
Participating in Extracurricular Activities, 15:149 (1988).
Kobasic, Smith, and Zucker, Case Comment, Eiseman v. State
of New York: The Duty of a College to Protect its Students
from Harm by Other Students Admitted under Special
Programs, 14:591 (1988).
Brickley, Note, AIDS: A University's Liability for Failure
to Protect its Students, 14:529 (1988).
McLean, Note, Tort Liability of Colleges and Universities
for Injuries Resulting from Student Alcohol Consumption,
14:399 (1987).
Lautsch, Book Review, COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION: LEGAL LIABILITIES
AND ETHICAL ISSUES CONCERNING THEIR USE AND MISUSE, by
Patricia A. Hollander, 14:163 (1987).
Helms, Patterns of Litigation in Postsecondary Education:
A Case Law Study, 14:99 (1987).
Swan, The Eleventh Amendment Revisited: Suits Against
State Government Entities and their Employees in Federal
Courts, 14:1 (1987).
Brickley and Ryan, Case Comment, Miller v. Rutgers and
Kovats v. Rutgers: Application of the Eleventh Amendment
in Suits Against State Colleges and Universities, 13:407
(1987).
Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment,
13:267 (1986).
Rich, Malpractice Issues in the Academic Medical Center,
13:149 (1986).
Roth, The Impact of Liquor Liability on Colleges and Universities,
13:45 (1986).
Steadman and Woods, Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner: The
Psychotherapist's Duty to Warn, 10:293 (1983-84).
Lansing and Hauserman, Rape on Campus: Postsecondary Institutions
as Third Party Defendants, 8:182 (1981-82).
Vitality of Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Other Section
1983 et seq.Defenses, 6:53 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).
Sensenbrenner, Collective Bargaining Legislation for Public
Higher Education From the Management Side of the Table,
4:27 (1976). | 
