spire and logo fade    
University of Notre DameLaw School
spacer
Current Students and Community
spacer


Published by the National Association of College and University Attorneys and the Notre Dame Law School

The Journal of College and University Law
Room B3, Notre Dame Law School
Notre Dame, IN 46556
Phone: (574) 631-6749
Fax: (574) 631-9299
E-mail: jcul@nd.edu


Last modified: January 31, 2008
Comments about this site:
webmaster
Copyright © 2003
University of Notre Dame

Author Index
1995 Symposium (various authors), Sports Reform: College Athletics in Flux, 22:1 (1995).

Adams, Aiken and Hall, Liability - Legal Liabilities in Higher Education: Their Scope and Management, 3:125 (1976).

A New Look at Faculty Contracts, 6:14 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Aiello and Behrens, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986).

Aiken, Adams and Hall, Liability - Legal Liabilities in Higher Education: Their Scope and Management, 3:125 (1976).

Aiken, Tort Liability of Governing Boards, Administrators and Faculty in Higher Education, 2:129 (1974-75).

Albino and Hesburgh, 1995 Symposium: Reform and Renewal in College Sports, 22:63 (1995).

Alger and Coleman, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23:91 (1996).

Alger, Book Review, The Shadow University, by Alan Charles Kors and Harvey A. Silverglate, 25:901 (1999).

Alessandro, Note, The Student-Athlete Right-to-Know Act: Legislation Would Require Colleges to Make Public Graduation Rates of Student Athletes, 16:287 (1989).

Alessandro, Murray, and Reed, Case Comment, Fox v. Board of Trustees of the State University of New York: University Regulation Faces the First Amendment, 15:443 (1989).

Allred, Note, May a Public University Restrict Faculty Expression on its Internet World Wide Web Sites? Academic Freedom and University Facility Use Restrictions, 24:325 (1997).

American Academy of Pediatrics - Guidelines for Infant Bioethics Committees, 11:433 (1985).

Anderson, Ende and Crego, Liability Insurance: A Primer for College and University Counsel, 23:609 (1997).

Anderson, Commentary, Licensing of Colleges and University Trademarks, 8:97 (1981-82).

Andrews, Note, State Legislation on Comparable Worth: Will it Bring Pay Equity to Academe?, 14:469 (1988).

Andrews, Dang, and McLean, Note, Recent Development: Church Licensed Professors: The Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987).

Antonini, Note, First Amendment Challenges to the Use of Mandatory Student Fees to Help Fund Student Abortions, 15:61 (1988).

Antonini, Fantozzi, and Pruss, Case Comment: Harvard Law School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens Under the Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First Amendment Rights of United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987).

Araujo, Ex Corde Ecclesiae and Mission-Centered Hiring in Roman Catholic Colleges and Universities: To Boldly Go Where We Have Gone Before, 25:835 (1999).

Atkinson, Note, Workers' Compensation and College Athletics: Should Universities be Responsible for Athletes Who Incur Serious Injuries?, 10:197 (1983-84).

Attanasio, Does the First Amendment Guarantee a Right to Conduct Scientific Experiments?, 14:435 (1988).

Attridge, Book Review, Up the University: Recreating Higher education in America, by Robert and Jon Solomon, 21:825 (1995).

Ayres, Commentary, Widmar v. Vincent: The Beginning of the End for the Establishment Clause, 8:511 (1981-82).

Ayres and Sagner, The Bankruptcy Reform Act and Student Loans: Unraveling New Knots, 9:361 (1982-83).

Bader, Rosman, Hemmat, and Wright, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).

Bader and Sullivan, The Application of Export Control Laws to Scientific Research at Universities, 9:451 (1982-83).

Baida, Not All Minority Scholarships are Created Equal, Part II: How to Develop a Record that Passes Constitutional Scrutiny, 21:307 (1994).

Bainbridge, Essay, Student Religious Organizations and University Policies Against Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation: Implications of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 21:369 (1994).

Balda, Not All Minority Scholarships are Created equal: Why Some May be More Constitutional than Others, 18:333 (1992).

Barber, Waivers of Academic Progress Requirements for Federal Financial Aid: A Reasonable Accommodation for Students with Learning Disabilities?, 23:231 (1996).

Barkin, Legal Implications of Office Education Criteria for the Self-Supporting Student, 2:229 (1975).

Barnes and Khorey, The Effects and Use of Administrative Determinations in Subsequent Employment Litigation, 16:189 (1989).

Barnes and Schlottman, After "Decoupling": Further Thoughts, 9:315 (1982-83).

Bartlett and Siena, Research and Development Limited Partnerships as a Device to Exploit University Owned Technology, 10:435 (1983-84).

Bassen, Synopsis of State Laws Regulating Employment of the Handicapped, 4:293 (1977).

Bassett, The American Civil Corporation, the "Incorporation Movement" and the Canon Law of the Catholic Church, 25:721 (1999).

Beach, The Management and Governance of Academic Institutions, 12:301 (1985).

Beach, Fundamental Fairness in Search of a Legal Rationale in Private College Student Discipline and Expulsions, 2:65 (1974).

Beale, Delivery of Legal Service to Institutions of Higher Education, 2:5 (1974).

Beaty, Book Review, The Dying of the Light: The Disengagement of Colleges and Universities From Their Christian Churches, by James T. Burtchaell, C.S.C., 26:177 (1999).

Beauchamp, Book Review, Games Colleges Play — Scandal and Reform in Intercollegiate Athletics, by John R. Thelin, 23:301 (1996).

Beauchamp, 1995 Symposium: Introduction and Welcome, 22:2 (1995).

Begin and Lee, Criteria for Evaluating the Managerial Status of College Faculty: Applications of Yeshiva University by the NLRB, 10:515 (1983-84).

Behrens and Aiello, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986).

Behrsin, Commentary, Housestaff Stipends and The "Fellowship" Exclusion Under Section 117 of The Internal Revenue Code, 8:131 (1981-82).

Bekavac, Book Review, Becoming Gentlemen, by Lani Guinier, et al., 25:619 (1999).

Bell and Majestic, Protection and Enforcement of College and University Trademarks, 10:63 (1983-84).

Bennett, Education and the Constitution: The Case of Citizen James Madison, 14:417 (1988).

Bennett, Book Review, Legal Ethics and Legal Education, by Michael J. Kelly, 7:353 (1980- 81).

Bergan, Grievance - Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974).

Bergan and Ferguson, Grievance - Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974).

Bhirdo, Note, The Liability and Responsibility of Institutions of Higher Education for the On-Campus Victimization of Students, 16:119 (1989).

Bhirdo, Haviland, and Warth, Case Comment, McCormack v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: Collegiate Athletics Sanctions from an Antitrust and Civil Rights Perspective, 15:459 (1989).

Bianchi, Brenna, and Shannon, Case Comment, Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp: Potential Liability for Classroom Anthologies, 18:595 (1992).

Bickel, Tort-Accident Cases: Traditional Tort Rules in the College or University Setting, 24:187 (1997).

Bickel, Torts: 1995 in Review, 23:357 (1997).

Bickel and Lake, The Emergence of New Paradigms in Student-University Relations: From In Loco Parentis to Bystander to Facilitator, 23:755 (1997).

Bickel and Lake, Reconceptualizing the University's Duty to Provide a Safe Learning Environment: A Criticism of the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis and the Restatement (Second) of Torts, 20:261 (1994).

Bickel and Vandercreek , Class Action Aspects of Federal Employment Discrimination Litigation, 2:157 (1974-75).

Bissell, Brief for Appellants in Handsome v. Rutgers University, 6:241 (1979-80).

Blackwell, The Law of Copyright and the Fair Use Doctrine, 1:222 (1974).

Bodensteiner, Student Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:331 (1998).

Bodner, Commentary, Analyzing Faculty Salaries in Class Action Sex Discrimination Cases, 10:305 (1983-84).

Bodner, Commentary, The Implications of Yeshiva University for Collective Bargaining Rights of Faculty at Private and Public Institutions of Higher Education, 7:78 (1980-81).

Bok, Commentary, Universities: Their Temptations and Tensions, 18:1 (1991).

Bompey, Decoupling Tenure and Employment Under the 1978 Amendments to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 8:425 (1981-82).

Bompey, 1979 Update: Cases and Issues in Age Discrimination, 6:195 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Bompey and Witten, Settlement of Title VII Disputes: Shifting Patterns in a Changing World, 6:317 (1979-80).

Bompey and Saltzman, The Role of Statistics in Employment Discrimination Litigation — A University Perspective, 9:263 (1982-83).

Boren and Graziano, Suing States for Copyright Infringement: An Eleventh Amendment Bar?, 15:269 (1989).

Bors, Academic Freedom Faces Learning Disabilities: Guckenberger v. Boston University, 25:581 (1999).

Bovee, Goettling, and Ritter, Case Comment, Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment Clause and Financial Aid to Students for Religious Education at Private Religious Institutions, 13:397 (1987).

Brake, Justus, and Davidson, 1995 Symposium: Title IX, 22:48 (1995).

Brammer, Lallo, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees of Boston University: The Realization of Title VII's Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991).

Branchfield and Grier, Aiken v. Lieuallen and Peterson v. Oregon State University: Defining Equity in Athletics, 8:369 (1981-82).

Brenna, Bianchi, and Shannon, Case Comment, Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp: Potential Liability for Classroom Anthologies, 18:595 (1992).

Brickley, Note, AIDS: A University's Liability for Failure to Protect its Students, 14:529 (1988).

Brickley and Ryan, Case Comment, Miller v. Rutgers and Kovats v. Rutgers: Application of the Eleventh Amendment in Suits Against State Colleges and Universities, 13:407 (1987).

Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993).

Brooks, Adequate Cause for Dismissal: The Missing Element in Academic Freedom, 22:331 (1995).

Broome, Case Comment, A Limitation on Federal Authority to Deny Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Equipment, 10:325 (1983-84).

Buckley, Perspective on Gunther, 8:433 (1981-82).

Burgoyne, The Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990: State Educational Institutions Now Face Significant Monetary Exposure for Copyright Infringement, 18:367 (1992).

Burke, University Policies on Conflict of Interest and Policy of Publication, 12:175 (1985).

Burke, Federal Taxation of State Colleges and Universities: Recent Developments Call for Reconsideration of Theories of Exemption, 4:43 (1976).

Burman, Hendricks, Madden, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Burshtein, Collegiate Licensing in Canada and the Statutory Advantage, 12:227 (1985).

Burtchaell, Out of the Heartburn of the Church, 25:653 (1999).

Cabranes, American Higher Education and the Law: Some Reflections on NACUA's Silver Anniversary, 12:261 (1985).

Cafardi, Giving Legal Life to the Ex Corde Ecclesiae Norms: Corporate Strategies and Practical Difficulties, 25:751 (1999).

Camacho and Dunn, NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS: When Will the Internal Revenue Service Consider an Activity Regularly Carried On?, 19:39 (1992).

Capano, Note, Stopping Students from Cheating: Halting the Activities of Term-Paper Mills and Enforcing Disciplinary Sanctions Against Students Who Purchase Term Papers, 18:277 (1991).

Capano, Hoey, and Zuch, Case Comment, In re Cronyn: Can Student Theses Bar Patent Applications?, 18:105 (1991).

Capron, Legal Perspectives on Institutional Ethics Committees, 11:417 (1985).

Carder, Lawton, and Weisman, Recent Governmental Action Regarding the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405 (1985).

Cardozo, To Copy or Not To Copy For Teaching and Scholarship: What Shall I Tell My Client?, 4:59 (1976-77).

Carrington, Book Review, College Crime Prevention and Personal Safety Awareness, by Max C. Bromley and Leonard Territo, 17:565 (1991).

Caruso, Book Review, Marine Scientific Research and the Law of the Sea, by Alfred H. A. Soons, 11:65 (1984).

Casey, Case Comment, Constructive Discharge under Title VII In Institutions of Higher Education, 9:191 (1982-83).

Cassou and Curran, Secular Orthodoxy and Sacred Freedoms: Accreditation of Church-Related Law Schools, 11:293 (1984).

Cerminara and Stoner, Harnessing the "Spirit of Insubordination": A Model Student Disciplinary Code, 17:89 (1990).

Cerny and Livingston, IRS Intermediate Sanctions: How They Will Impact Colleges and Universities, 25:865 (1999).

Chamberlain and Prairie, Due Process in the Accreditation Context, 21:61 (1994).

Chamblee and Wallick, Bridling the Trojan Horse: Rights and Remedies of Colleges and Universities Under Federal Grant-Type Assistance Programs, 4:241 (1977).

Chang, Note, Coercion Theory and the State Action Doctrine as Applied in NCAA v. Tarkanian and NCAA v. Miller, 22:133 (1995).

Chapman and Dickerson, Contract Law, Due Process, and the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79).

Church and Neumeister, University Control of Student-Athletes with Disabilities Under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, 25:105 (1998).

Claque, The Affirmative Action Showdown of 1986: Implications for Higher Education, 14:171 (1987).

Cleveland, The Costs and Benefits of Openness: Sunshine Laws and Higher Education, 12:127 (1985).

Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment, 13:267 (1986).

Cole and Goldblatt, Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions' Authority to Select the Lowest Responsible Bidder, 16:177 (1989).

Cole, Olswang, and Wilson, Program Elimination, Financial Emergency, and Student Rights, 9:163 (1982-83).

Coleman and Alger, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23:91 (1996).

Coleman and Jarvis, Tuition Adjustment for Law School Students: A Necessary Accommodation under the ADA?, 24:45 (1997).

Camacho and Dunn, NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS: When Will the Internal Revenue Service Consider an Activity Regularly Carried on, 19:39 (1992).

Conboy, Book Reviews, Law in Sport and Physical Activity, by Annie Clement, and Law in Sport, by Bernard Patrick Maloy, 16:171 (1989).

Conlon, Book Review, Health Care Labor Law, ed. by Iva Michael Shepard and A. Edward Doudera, 9:355 (1982- 83).

Connolly and Marshall, Sexual Harassment of University or College Students by Faculty Members, 15:381 (1989).

Consent Decree from Rajender v. University of Minnesota, 8:219 (1981-82).

Consent Decree: United States Department of Labor, Office of Contract Compliance Programs v. Regents of University of California, 8:54 (1981-82).

Corbally, University Counsel- Scope and Mission, 2:1 (1974).

Cosgrove, Note, A Survey of State Athlete-Agent Legislation: Origins and Effects, 16:433 (1990).

Cosgrove, Grundy, and Heffernan, Case Comment, Shannon v. Bepko: Public Colleges and Universities as State Agencies: Standards for Eleventh Amendment Protection, 16:151 (1989).

Cranman, Privacy and Technology: Counseling Institutions of Higher Education, 25:69 (1998).

Cranman and Ward, Book Review, The Rights and Responsibilities of the Modern University, by Robert Bickel & Peter Lake, 26:389 (1999).

Craver, The Implications of the Elimination of Mandatory Retirement for Professors, 16:343 (1990).

Crego, Ende, and Anderson, Liability Insurance: A Primer for College and University Counsel, 23:609 (1997).

Crockett, Book Review, Wrongs of Passage: Fraternities, Sororities, Hazing and Binge Drinking, by Hank Nuwer, 26:783 (2000).

Crosson, Book Review, Academic Duty, by Donald Kennedy, 25:435 (1998).

Cunningham, Leeson, and Stadler, Kahn v. Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara: The Right to Privacy and the Academic Freedom Privilege with Respect to Confidential Peer Review Materials, 15:73 (1988).

Curkovic, Accent and the University: Accent as Pretext for National Origin Discrimination in Tenure Decisions, 26:727 (2000).

Curran and Cassou, Secular Orthodoxy and Sacred Freedoms: Accreditation of Church-Related Law Schools, 11:293 (1984).

Current Tax Issues, 6:17 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Curry, Hazing and the "Rush" Toward Reform: Responses from Universities, Fraternities, State Legislatures, and the Courts, 16:93 (1989).

Curry, Manderfeld, and Sullivan, Case Comment, Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988).

Daane, Commentary, Regents of the University of Michigan v. State of Michigan: South African Divestiture and Constitutional Autonomy, A Case Commentary, 15:313 (1989).

Daane, The Role of University Counsel, 12:399 (1985).

Dang, Andrews, and McLean, Note, Recent Development: Church Licensed Professors: The Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987).

Daniel and Sun, The Sherman Act Antitrust Provisions and Collegiate Action: Should There Be a Continued Exception for the Business of the University?, 25:451 (1999).

Davenport, The Catalog in the Courtroom: From Shield to Sword?, 12:201 (1985).

Davidson, Justus, and Brake, 1995 Symposium: Title IX, 22:48 (1995).

Davis, Scaling the Ivory Tower: State Public Records Laws and University Presidential Searches, 21:353 (1994).

Davis, Commentary, University Research and the Wages of Commerce, 18:29 (1991).

Delaney, Sack, Morris, and Sperber, 1995 Symposium: Round Table Discussion on Collegiate Athletics Reform, 22:96 (1995).

Delano, Discovery in University Employment Discrimination Suits: Should Peer Review Materials be Privileged?, 14:121 (1987).

Denison and Olivas, Legalization in the Academy: Higher Education and the Supreme Court, 11:1 (1984).

Detar and Stoner, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:273 (1999).

DiBiase and Toombs, College Rules and Court Decisions: Notes on Student Dismissal, 2:355 (1975).

Dickerson and Chapman, Contract Law, Due Process, and the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79).

DiLorenzo, Gaal, and Evans, Hew’s Final “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:345 (1979-80).

DiLorenzo and Gaal, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’s Proposed “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80).

DiScala, Olswang, and Niccolls, College and University Responses to the Emotionally or Mentally Impaired Student, 19:17 (1992).

Dixon, Note, Achieving Educational Opportunity Through Freshman Ineligibility and Coaching Selection: Key Elements in the NCAA Battle for Academic Integrity of Intercollegiate Athletics, 14:383 (1987).

Dixon, Lynch, and Swem, Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas: Termination of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the Burden of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417 (1987).

Donohue, Note, First-to-File vs. First-to-Invent: Will Universities be Left Behind? 21:765 (1995).

Drier, Steinbach, Michaelson, and Routh, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26: 467 (2000).

Drier, Michaelson, Smith, and Steinbach, Board of Education of the Township of Piscataway v. Sharon Taxman, 24:671 (1998).

Drinan, Lawyer-Client Confidentiality in the Campus Setting, 19:305 (1993).

Duerr, Annotation: Reinstatement as a Remedy in Cases Involving Termination of Tenured Faculty, 7:57 (1980-81).

Duerr, Reinstatement as a Remedy in Cases Involving Termination of Tenured Faculty, 7:57 (1980-81).

Dumas, Note, Defective Buildings and Grounds — A Dangerous Condition for Colleges and Universities, 17:351 (1991).

Dumas, McIntyre, and Zelenock, Case Comment, Parate v. Isibor: Resolving the Conflict Between the Academic Freedom of the University and the Academic Freedom of University Professors, 16:713 (1990).

Dunham, Case Studies on Wrongdoing on Campus: Ethics and the Lawyer’s Role, 19:315 (1993).

Dunn and Camacho, NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS: When Will the Internal Revenue Service Consider an Activity Regularly Carried on, 19:39 (1992).

Durham and Gordon, Toward Diverse Diversity: The Legal Legitimacy of Ex Corde Ecclesiae, 25:697 (1999).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1992 in Review, 20:125 (1993).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1991 in Review, 19:73 (1992).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1990 in Review, 18:163 (1991).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1989 in Review, 17:149 (1990).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1988 in Review, 16:201 (1989).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1987 in Review, 15:87 (1988).

Dutile, God and Gays at Georgetown: Observations on Gay Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v. Georgetown University, 15:1 (1988).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1986 in Review, 14:303 (1987).

Dymersky and Frazier, A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Is the New Law Retroactive?, 19:259 (1993).

Edmonds, Postsecondary Athletics and the Law: A Selected Bibliography, 5:65 (1977-79).

Edwards, Usages of Copyrighted Musical Works Permissible Without Acquiring a Copyright License, Assignment, or Release, 6:363 (1979-80).

Edwards and Grossi, Student Misconduct: Historical Trends in Legislative and Judicial Decision- Making in American Universities, 23:829 (1997).

Ende, Anderson, and Crego, Liability Insurance: A Primer for College and University Counsel, 23:609 (1997).

Ende and Lane, Book Review, Contracting for Services, ed. By Lanora F. Welzenbach, 11:399 (1984).

Estes, State University Presidential Searches: Law and Practice, 26:485 (2000).

Evans, "A Stranger in a Strange Land": Responsibility and Liability for Students Enrolled in Foreign-Study Programs, 18:299 (1991).

Evans, Gaal, and DiLorenzo, Hew’s Final “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:345 (1979-80).

Evans, Hill, and Scheske, Case Comment, Knapp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Tuition Assistance or Scholarship, A Question of Taxation, 16:699 (1990).

Faccenda, Introduction to Symposium on Athletics in Higher Education, 8:291 (1981-82).

Faculty Collective Bargaining: The Yeshiva Case, 6:67 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Fantel, Irby, Milam, and Schwarz, Faculty Rights and Responsibilities in Evaluating and Dismissing Medical Students, 8:102 (1981-82).

Fantel and Olswang, Tenure and Periodic Performance Review: Compatible Legal and Administrative Principles, 7:1 (1980-81).

Fantozzi, Antonini, and Pruss, Case Comment: Harvard Law School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens Under the Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First Amendment Rights of United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987).

Fellrath, Case Comment, Coleman v. Zatechka: The ADA and Student Life, 23:285 (1996).

Ferguson and Bergan, Grievance - Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974).

Fick, Book Review, Academics in Courts: The Consequences of Faculty Discrimination Litigation, by George R. LaNoue and Barbara A. Lee, 15:239 (1988).

Fink, Taxation and Philanthropy - A 1976 Perspective, 3:1 (1975).

Finkin, Commentary, Tenure After an Uncapped ADEA: A Different View, 15:43 (1988).

Finkin, Book Review, Beyond Traditional Tenure, by Richard P. Chait and Andrew T. Ford, 10:105 (1983-84).

Finkin, Commentary, The Yeshiva Decision: A Somewhat Different View, 7:321 (1980-81).

Fishbein, New Strings on the Ivory Tower: The Growth of Accountability in Colleges and Universities, 12:381 (1985).

Fishbein, Legal Aspects of Student Activity Fees, 1:190 (1973-74).

Flaherty, Exempt Organizations and Real Estate Syndications after the Tax Reform Act of 1984, 12:61 (1985).

Flygare, Commentary, TDCA v. Burdine: The Decreasing Burden For Employers in Title VII Litigation, 8:519 (1981-82).

Flygare, Commentary, Board of Trustees of Keene State v. Sweeney: Implications for the Future of Peer Review in Faculty Personnel Decisions, 7:100 (1980-81).

Flygare, Board of Trustees of Keene State v. Sweeney: Implications for the Future of Peer Review in Faculty Personnel Decisions, 7:100 (1980-81).

Ford, The Implications of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1978 for Colleges and Universities, 5:161 (1977-79).

Foster and McCollogh, Reviewers’ Comments, 8:15 (1981-82).

Fowler, University-Industry Research Relationships: The Research Agreement, 9:515 (1982-83).

Francis, Federal Tax Problems of College and University Auxiliary Organizations, 3:72 (1975).

Frazier and Dymersky, A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Is the New Law Retroactive?, 19:259 (1993).

Friedl, Punishing Students for Non-Academic Misconduct, 26:701 (2000).

Frohnmayer, Current Developments in Federal Law Affecting Equal Employment Opportunity in Higher Education, 1:1 (1973).

Frohmayer, Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972, 2:49 (1974).

Frost, Shifting Meanings of Academic Freedom: An Analysis of University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 17:329 (1991).

Furay, Book Review, Church and Campus: Legal Issues in Religiously Affiliated Higher Education, by Phillip R. Moots and Edward McGlynn Gafney, Jr., 7:186 (1980-81).

Gaal, DiLorenzo, and Evans, Hew’s Final “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:345 (1979-80).

Gaal and DiLorenzo, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’sn Proposed “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80).

Gaffney, Tales of Two Cities: Canon Law and Constitutional Law at the Crossroads, 25:801 (1999).

Garfield, Squaring Affirmative Action Admissions Policies with Federal Judicial Guidelines: A Model for the Twenty-First Century, 22:895 (1996).

Gee, Introduction to Reflections on Higher Education in the 1970’s, 8:443 (1981-82).

Geetter, The University of Connecticut v. The University of Connecticut Chapter of the AAUP: Brief on Determining Faculty Workload in the Collective Bargaining Context, 8:254 (1981-82).

Gerberding, 1995 Symposium: Historical Perspective of Amateurism, 22:11 (1995).

Gibbs, Book Review, Creating a Safe Campus — A Guide for College and University Administrators, by David Nichols, 24:695 (1998).

Gibbs, Book Review, Choosing a College President: Opportunities and Constraints, by Judith B. McLaughlin and David Reisman, 18:329 (1991).

Giddings, Petitioner's Brief in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:58 (1981-82).

Giddings, Consent Decree in The United States Department of Labor, Office of Contract Compliance Programs v. Regents of University of California, 8:54 (1981-82).

Gillmore, Student Ratings as a Factor in Faculty Employment Decisions and Periodic Review, 10:557 (1983-84).

Goettling, Bovee, and Ritter, Case Comment, Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment Clause and Financial Aid to Students for Religious Education at Private Religious Institutions, 13:397 (1987).

Goldblatt and Cole, Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions' Authority to Select the Lowest Responsible Bidder, 16:177 (1989).

Golden, College Student Dismissals and the Eldridge Factors: What Process Is Due?, 8:495 (1981-82).

Goldrick and Rakow, Book Review, Sexual Assault on Campus: What Colleges Can Do, by Aileen Adams and Gail Abarbanel, 16:547 (1990).

Gordon and Durham, Toward Diverse Diversity: The Legal Legitimacy of Ex Corde Ecclesiae, 25:697 (1999).

Gordon, Stretton, Ong, and Ezekial, Due Process Rights of Medical Residents, 8:120 (1981-82).

Gordon and Spuehler, Questions and Answers Explaining the New Tax Rules Applicable to Tax Sheltered Annuities, 17:435 (1991).

Graff, Myers, and Tyler, Case Comment, Blair v. Washington State University: Making State ERA's a Potent Remedy for Sex Discrimination in Athletics, 14:575 (1988).

Graves, Commentary, Coaches in the Courtroom: Recovery in Actions for Breach of Employment Contracts, 12:545 (1986).

Gray, Impact of the Proposed Civil Rights and Women's Equity in Employment Act on Colleges and Universities, 18:559 (1992).

Gray and Toohey, Doing Business in the New Technology: Problems for College and University Counsel, 10:455 (1983-84).

Graziano and Boren, Suing States for Copyright Infringement: An Eleventh Amendment Bar?, 15:269 (1989).

Green, An Application of the Equal Pay Act to Higher Education, 8:203 (1981-82).

Greenawalt, Constitutional Limits on Aid to Sectarian Universities, 4:177 (1977).

Greenleaf, Academic Institutions in the Light and Shadow of the Law, 12:1 (1985).

Gregorie, Burman, Hendricks, Madden, Tyler, Hoge, and Williams, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Gregory, Making the Affirmative Action Plan Work, 1:16 (1973).

Grier and Branchfield, Aiken v. Lieuallen and Peterson v. Oregon State University: Defining Equity in Athletics, 8:369 (1981-82).

Grossi and Edwards, Student Misconduct: Historical Trends in Legislative and Judicial Decision-Making in American Universities, 23:829 (1997).

Grundy, Cosgrove, and Heffernan, Case Comment, Shannon v. Bepko: Public Colleges and Universities as State Agencies: Standards for Eleventh Amendment Protection, 16:151 (1989).

Guerre, Note, Financial Aid in Higher Education: What's Wrong, Who's Being Hurt, What's Being Done, 17:483 (1991).

Guerre, Hasty, and Paige, Case Comment, Gehling v. St. George's University School of Medicine, Ltd.: Continued Erosion of Colleges' and Universities' Duty to Students Injured in Collegiate Activities, 16:677 (1990).

Gunn, Commentary, Economic and Tax Aspects of Prepaid-Tuition Plans, 17:243 (1990).

Guthrie, Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:68 (1981-82).

Habecker, Students, Christian Colleges, and the Law: and the Walls Come Tumbling Down, 2:369 (1975).

Hall, Aiken, and Adams, Liability - Legal Liabilities in Higher Education: Their Scope and Management, 3:125 (1976).

Hanna, Commentary, McLendon v. Morton and the Legislative Response: A Procedural Barrier to Quality Education in West Virginia?, 7:111 (1980-81).

Harding and McClellan, Unreasonable Compensation: The Hidden Issue in the IRS College and University Examination Guidelines, 20:111 (1993).

Harpool, Minimum Compliance with Minimum Standards: Managing Trustee Conflicts of Interest, 24:465 (1998).

Harpool, The Sibley Hospital Case: Trustees and Their Loyalty to the Institution, 23:255 (1996).

Harrington, Civil and Canon Law Issues Affecting American Catholic Higher Education 1948-1998: An Overview and the ACCU Perspective, 26:67 (1999).

Harris, Memorandum: Introductory Guide to Academic Risks of Copyright Infringement, 7:328 (1980-81).

Harrison, Hate Speech: Power in the Marketplace, 20:461 (1994).

Hartman, Hateful Expression and First Amendment Values: Toward a Theory of Constitutional Constraint on Hate Speech at Colleges and Universities after R.A.V. v. St. Paul, 19:343 (1993).

Hartnett, Book Review, Beyond Traditional Tenure, by Richard P. Chait and Andrew T. Ford, 10:95 (1983-84).

Harvey, Fraternities and the Constitution: University-Imposed Relationship Statements May Violate Student Associational Rights, 17:11 (1990).

Haslam, Age Discrimination in Campus Employment, 2:326 (1975).

Haslam, The Locus of Decision Making in Colleges and Universities: The Broad Perspective, 1:241 (1973).

Hasson and Kertz, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986).

Hasty, Note, Worker's Compensation: Will College and University Professors be Compensated for Mental Injuries Caused by Work-Related Stress?, 17:535 (1991).

Hasty, Guerre, and Paige, Case Comment, Gehling v. St. George's University School of Medicine, Ltd.: Continued Erosion of Colleges' and Universities' Duty to Students Injured in Collegiate Activities, 16:677 (1990).

Hauser, Intimate Associations under the Law: The Rights of Social Fraternities to Exist and to be Free From Undue Interference by Host Institutions, 24:59 (1997).

Hauserman and Lansing, Rape on Campus: Postsecondary Institutions as Third Party Defendants, 8:182 (1981-82).

Haviland, Note, Student Discriminatory Harassment, 16:311 (1989).

Haviland, Bhirdo, and Warth, Case Comment, McCormack v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: Collegiate Athletics Sanctions from an Antitrust and Civil Rights Perspective. 15:459 (1989).

Heaney and Pullin, The Use of Flagged Test Scores in College and University Admissions: Issues and Implications Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 23:797 (1997).

Heffernan, Cosgrove, and Grundy, Case Comment, Shannon v. Bepko: Public Colleges and Universities as State Agencies: Standards for Eleventh Amendment Protection, 16:151 (1989).

Helms, Patterns of Litigation in Postsecondary Education: A Case Law Study, 14:99 (1987).

Hemmat, Rosman, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).

Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Henze, Commentary, State Universities As Political Subdivisions: Where Is the Border?, 9:341 (1982-83).

Hermann, Sports and the Handicapped: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Curricular, Intramural, Club and Intercollegiate Athletic Programs in Postsecondary Educational Institutions, 5:143 (1977-79).

Hernandez, Note, The Constitutionality of Racially Restrictive Organizations within the University Setting, 21:429 (1994).

Hesburgh and Albino, 1995 Symposium: Reform and Renewal in College Sports, 22:63 (1995).

Hiers, New Restrictions on Academic Free Speech: Jeffries v. Harleston II, 22:217 (1995).

Higgins and Zulkey, Liability Insurance Coverage: How to Avoid Unpleasant Surprises, 17:123 (1990).

Hill, Note, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Significant Overlap with Section 504 for Colleges and Universities, 18:389 (1992).

Hill, Evans, and Scheske, Case Comment, Knapp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Tuition Assistance or Scholarship, A Question of Taxation, 16:699 (1990).

Hilliard and Katz, 1995 Symposium: Government Attempts at Regulation, 22:20 (1995).

Hirschman and Thomas, Minority-Targeted Scholarships: More than a Black and White Issue, 21:555 (1995).

Hitchner, Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement of Teaching Hospitals and Faculty Physicians, 10:79 (1983-84).

Hochberg, The Four Horsement Ride Again: Cable Communications and Collegiate Athletics, 5:43 (1977-79).

Hodges, Note, Postsecondary Faculty Members' Rights to Free Speech, 9:85 (1982-83).

Hodulik, Prohibiting Discriminatory Harassment by Regulating Student Speech: A Balancing of First-Amendment and University Interests, 16:573 (1990).

Hoey, Capano, and Zuch, Case Comment, In re Cronyn: Can Student Theses Bar Patent Applications?, 18:105 (1991).

Hoge, Burman, Hendricks, Madden, Tyler, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Holland and Stacy, Legal and Statistical Problems in Litigating Sex Discrimination Claims in Higher Education, 11:107 (1984).

Hollander, An Introduction To Legal and Ethical Issues Relating to Computers in Higher Education, 11:215 (1984).

Holloway, Recent Developments in Student Affairs, 1:264 (1974).

Holloway and Tharp, Recent Developments in Student Affairs, 2:115 (1974-75).

Holway and O’Donnell, Unfair Labor Practices in the Academic Setting, 1:325 (1974).

Hoornstra and Liethen, Academic Freedom and Civil Discovery, 10:113 (1983-84).

Hopkins, Rule 144: The Applicability of the Restricted Securities Requirements to Colleges and Universities, 1:136 (1973-74).

Hopkins, Regulations of Interstate Charitable Solicitations: Implications for Colleges and Universities, 2:289 (1975).

Hopkins, Scholarships and Fellowship Grants: Current Tax Developments and Problems, 3:54 (1975).

Horger, Case Comment, Medicare Reimbursement to Provider University Hospitals for Graduate Medical Education Expenses in Light of Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala, 23:133 (1996).

Horn, Intercollegiate Athletics: Waning Amateurism and Rising Professionalism, 5:97 (1977-79).

Hornby, Book Review, Higher Education and the Law, by Harry T. Edwards and Virginia Davis Nordin, 7:181 (1980-81).

Hornby, Book Review, The Law of Higher Education: Legal Implications of Administrative Decision Making, by William A. Kaplin, 7:181 (1980-81)

Horton, Traditional Single-Sex Fraternities on College Campuses: Will they Survive in the 1990's?, 18:419 (1992).

Hoye, Tort Litigation in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:257 (1998).

Huber and Robinson, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1993 in Review, 21:157 (1994).

Hunkler and Streitz, Note, Teaching or Learning: Are Teaching Assistants Students or Employees?, 24:349 (1997).

Hunnicutt and Page, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Policy Analysis of Student Speech Regulation at America's Twenty Largest Public Universities, 21:1 (1994).

Hunter, Collecting Defaulted Student Loans: How Much Diligence is Due?, 9:149 (1982-83).

Hustoles and Smith, Employment Discrimination: 1995 in Review, 23:403 (1997).

Hustoles, Faculty and Staff Dismissals: Developing Contract and Tort Theories, 10:479 (1983-84).

Hylden and Tayler, Judicial Review of Accrediting Agency Actions: Marlboro Corp. D/B/A The Emery School v. The Association of Independent Colleges and Schools, 4:199 (1977).

Irby, Fantel, Milam, and Schwarz, Faculty Rights and Responsibilities in Evaluating and Dismissing Medical Students, 8:102 (1981-82).

Irwin, Stotlar, and Mulrooney, A Critical Analysis of Collegiate Licensing Policies and Procedures, 20:97 (1993).

Israeloff and Walker, Historic Preservation and the Institutional Owner, 14:59 (1987).

Jarvis and Coleman, Tuition Adjustment for Law School Students: A Necessary Accommodation under the ADA?, 24:45 (1997).

Jasper, Note, Britain's Education Reform Act: A Lesson in Academic Freedom and Tenure, 16:449 (1990).

Jeddeloh, Education Program Cost Reimbursement In University Hospitals: Is There a Coherent National Policy?, 8:465 (1981-82).

Jenkins, Regulation of Colleges and Universities Under the Guaranteed Student Loan Program, 4:13 (1976).

Jennings, Breach of Contract Suits by Students Against Postsecondary Institutions: Can they Succeed?, 7:191 (1980-81).

Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:225 (1998).

Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: A Review of 1996 and 1997 Judicial Cases, 24:161 (1997).

Johnsen, Immunity: 1995 in Review, 23:333 (1997).

Johnsen and Todd, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:221 (1998).

Johnson and Weeks, To Save a College: Independent College Trustees and Decisions on Financial Exigency, Endowment Use, and Closure, 12:455 (1986).

Johnstone, Book Review, Failing the Future: A Dean Looks at Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century, by Annette Kolodny, 25:909 (1999).

Jones, Book Review, The Tax Law of Colleges and Universities, by Bertrand M. Harding, Jr., 25:191 (1998).

Jones, Tax Exemption Issues Facing Academic Health Centers in the Managed Care Environment, 24:261 (1997).

Jones, Book Review, Ethics and Higher Education, ed. By William M. May, Crises in Higher Education and the Need for Solutions — But What Kind?, 18:621 (1992).

Judge, Student-Athletes as Employees: Income Tax Consequences, 13:285 (1986).

Justus, Brake, and Davidson, 1995 Symposium: Title IX, 22:48 (1995).

Kadaielski, Postsecondary Athletics in an Era of Equality: An Appraisal of the Effort of Title IX, 5:123 (1977-79).

Kahn, Conducting a “No-Union” Election Campaign on Campus, 1:291 (1974).

Kahn, Current and Emerging Labor Relations Issues in Higher Education, 2:123 (1974-75).

Kaplin, A Typology and Critique of Title IX Sexual Harassment Law After Gebser and Davis, 26:615 (2000).

Kaplin, Law on the Campus 1960-1985: Years of Growth and Challenge, 12:269 (1985).

Kaplin, An Overview of Legal Principles and Issues Affecting Postsecondary Athletics, 5:1 (1977-79).

Kasunic, Fair Use and the Educator's Right to Photocopy Copyrighted Material for Classroom Use, 19:271 (1993).

Katerberg, Note, Institutional Review Boards, Research on Children, and Informed Consent of Parents: Walking the Tightrope Between Emerging Vital Experimentation and Protecting Subjects’ Rights, 24:545 (1998).

Katz and Hilliard, 1995 Symposium: Government Attempts at Regulation, 22:20 (1995).

Keeling, Property Taxation of Colleges and Universities: The Dilemma Posed by the Use of Facilities for Purposes Unrelated to Education, 16:623 (1990).

Keller, Consensual Amorous Relationships Between Faculty and Students: The Constitutional Right to Privacy, 15:21 (1988).

Keller, Note, Shall the Truce Be Unbroken: New Jersey v. T.L.O. and Higher Education, 12:415 (1985).

Kelly, Financing Higher Education: Federal Income-Tax Consequences, 17:307 (1991).

Kelly, Double Prosecution of the State University Student, 1:269 (1974).

Kennan, Commentary, The Moral Functions of Higher Education in Modern Society, 20:69 (1993).

Kennard, Book Review, Education Law, ed. By James A. Rapp, 12:565 (1986).

Kennedy, The Educators’ Role in Educating the NLRB: Requirements of a Complete Record, 1:305 (1974).

Kennelly, Book Review, On Assuming A College or University Presidency, Lessons and Advice from the Field, by Estela M. Bensimon, Marian L. Gade and Joseph F. Kauffman, 16:731 (1990).

Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986).

Kertz, Tax Exempt Organizations and Commercially Sponsored Scientific Research, 9:69 (1982-83).

Kettle and McCarthy, An End Run Around the Sherman Act? Banks v. NCAA and Gaines v. NCAA, 19:295 (1993).

Keyes, Health-Care Professionals with AIDS: The Risk of Transmission Balanced Against the Interests of Professionals and Institutions, 16:589 (1990).

Khorey and Barnes, The Effects and Use of Administrative Determinations in Subsequent Employment Litigation, 16:189 (1989).

Kilby, The Discouragement of Learning: Scholarship Made for Hire, 21:455 (1995).

Kirby, Federal Antitrust Issues Affecting Institutions of Higher Education: An Overview, 11:345 (1984).

Kirk, Judicial Deference to Institutional Autonomy: The Irony of Yeshiva and the Financial Exigency Cases, 10:541 (1983-84).

Kobasic, Note, Institutional Review Boards in the University Setting: Review of Pharmaceutical Testing Protocols, Informed Consent and Ethical Considerations, 15:185 (1988).

Kobasic, Smith, and Zucker, Case Comment, Eiseman v. State of New York: The Duty of a College to Protect Its Students from Harm by Other Students Admitted under Special Programs, 14:591 (1988).

Koon, Note, United States v. Brown University and a New Proposal to Discern whether Certain Financial Aid Constitutes "Trade or Commerce," 22:191 (1995).

Kramer, Case Comment, The Free Rider Problem and First Amendment Concerns: A Balance Upset by New Limitations on Mandatory Student Fees, 21:691 (1995).

Kreiser, AAUP Perspectives on Academic Freedom and United States Intelligence Agencies, 19:251 (1993).

Kubasek, Book Review, Discrimination, Affirmative Action, and Equal Opportunity, ed. by W.E. Block and M.A. Walker, 10:331 (1983-84).

Kumin, Vinik, and O’Brien, Affirmative Action in College Admissions: Practical Advice to Public and Private Institutions for Dealing with the Changing Landscape, 26:395 (2000).

Lachs, University Patent Policy, 10:263 (1983-84).

Lacovara, How Far Can the Federal Camel Slip Under the Academic Tent?, 4:223 (1976).

Lake and Bickel, The Emergence of New Paradigms in Student-University Relations: From In Loco Parentis to Bystander to Facilitator, 23:755 (1997).

Lake and Bickel, Reconceptualizing the University's Duty to Provide a Safe Learning Environment: A Criticism of the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis and the Restatement (Second) of Torts, 20:261 (1994).

Lake and Pedulla, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation: State Agencies That Grant Educational Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default on Prior Educational Loans, 17:261 (1990).

Lallo, Brammer, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees of Boston University: The Realization of Title VII’s Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991).

Lallo, Note, Student Challenges to Grades and Academic Dismissals: Are They Losing Battles?, 18:577 (1992).

Lam, Restrictions on Technology Transfer Among Academic Researchers: Will Recent Changes in the Export Control System Make a Difference?, 13:311 (1986).

LaManque and Sorenson, The Application of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier in College Litigation, 22:971 (1996).

Landry, Oriard, and Leonard, 1995 Symposium: College Athletics as a vehicle for Social Reform, 22:77 (1995).

Lane and Ende, Book Review, Contracting for Services, ed. By Lanora F. Welzenbach, 11:399 (1984).

La Noue, Tenure and Title VII, 1:206 (1974).

Lansing and Hauserman, Rape on Campus: Postsecondary Institutions as Third Party Defendants, 8:182 (1981-82).

Laster, State Law on Mandatory Retirement of Tenured Faculty After the 1978 Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments, 5:211 (1977-79).

Lautsch, Book Review, Computers in Education: Legal Liabilities and Ethical Issues Concerning Their Use and Misuses, by Patricia A. Hollander, 14:163 (1987).

Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79).

Lawton, Carder, and Weisman, Recent Governmental Action Regarding the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405 (1985).

Laycock, The Rights of Religious Academic Communities, 20:15 (1993).

Leahy, Note, The Title Bout: A Critical Review of the Regulation and Enforcement of Title IX in Intercollegiate Athletics, 24:489 (1998).

Leduc, Note, Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: A Guide to How Courts Will Treat Future Antitrust Challenges to NCAA Regulations, 26:139 (1999).

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:291 (1999).

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:313 (1998).

Lee, Employment Discrimination Higher Education: A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:225 (1997).

Lee, Balancing Confidentiality and Disclosure in Faculty Peer Review: Impact of Title VII Litigation, 9:279 (1982-83).

Lee, Faculty Role in Academic Governance and the Managerial Exclusion: Impact of the Yeshiva Decision, 7:222 (1980-81).

Lee and Olswang, Scientific Misconduct: Institutional Procedures and Due Process Considerations, 11:51 (1984).

Lee and Begin, Criteria for Evaluating the Managerial Status of College Faculty: Applications of Yeshiva University by the NLRB, 10:515 (1983-84).

Leeson, Note, The Drug Testing of College Athletes, 16:325 (1989).

Leeson, Cunningham, and Stadler, Kahn v. Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara: The Right to Privacy and the Academic Freedom Privilege with Respect to Confidential Peer Review Materials, 15:73 (1988).

Legal Diagnosis and Defense of An Employment Civil Rights Claim, 6:135 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Lemmer and Pompeo, "Educating" Lawyers about the Implications of Cost Accounting Standards for Government Contracts and Grants with Educational Institutions, 21:111 (1994).

Leonard, Oriard, and Landry, 1995 Symposium: College Athletics as a vehicle for Social Reform, 22:77 (1995).

Lewis and Vincler, Storming the Ivory Tower: The Competing Interests of the Public's Right to Know and the Integrity of University Research, 20:417 (1994).

Liethen and Hoornstra, Academic Freedom and Civil Discovery, 10:113 (1983-84).

Limitone and Stitt, University Fair Employment Practices Litigation Strategy and Tactics, 1:20 (1973).

Lines, Tuition Discrimination: Valid and Invalid Uses of Tuition Differentials, 9:241 (1982-83).

Livingston and Cerny, IRS Intermediate Sanctions: How They Will Impact Colleges and Universities, 25:865 (1999).

Loar and Sky, General Operating Support for Museums: Problems in Paradise, 7:267 (1980-81).

Lohman, Case Comment, The Final Frustration of Defaulting NHSC Scholars?: United States v. Hatcher, 19:385 (1993).

Long, Standard of Proof in Student Disciplinary Cases, 12:71 (1985).

Longo and Thoman, Case Comment, Haffer v. Temple University: A Reawakening of Gender Discrimination in Intercollegiate Athletics, 16:137 (1989).

Lovain, Note, Grounds for Dismissing Tenured Postsecondary Faculty for Cause, 10:419 (1983- 84).

Lowell, Judicial Review of Rule-Making in Amateur Athletics, 5:11 (1977-79).

Luzum and Pupel, Case Comment, Weinstein v. University of Illinois: The "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine and Procedural Due Process for Nontenured Faculty, 15:369 (1989).

Lynch, Dixon, and Swem, Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas: Termination of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the Burden of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417 (1987).

Lyons, EEOC v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities: Collective Bargaining Agreements and Age Discrimination in Employment Act Claims: What Counts as Retaliation under ADEA Section 4(D)?, 20:241 (1993).

Lyons, Oregon v. Smith and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act: An Educational Perspective, 20:333 (1994).

MacCordy, The Threat of Proposed Patent Law Changes to the Research University, 20:295 (1994).

MacLachlan, Dangerous Traditions: Hazing Rituals on Campus and University Liability, 26:511 (2000).

Madden, Hendricks, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Madsen, New State Legislation On Informing Workers About Hazardous Substances in the Workplace — Will It Impact on University Teaching and Research?, 9:325 (1982-83).

Majestic and Bell, Protection and Enforcement of College and University Trademarks, 10:63 (1983-84).

Malloy, Book Review, Governing Tomorrow's Campus: Perspectives and Agendas, by Jack H. Schuster, Lynn H. Miller and Associates, 18:121 (1991).

Mancino and Sugarman, Tax Aspects of University Patent Policy, 3:41 (1975).

Manderfeld, Note, College and University Liability Under Superfund, 15:217 (1988).

Manderfeld, Curry, and Sullivan, Case Comment, Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988).

Marshall and Connolly, Sexual Harassment of University or College Students by Faculty Members, 15:381 (1989).

Marshall and Milam, Impact of Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing on Academic Dismissals from Graduate and Professional Schools, 13:335 (1987).

Mathews, Higher Education and Society, 8:463 (1981-82).

Mawdsley, Plagiarism Problems in Higher Education, 13:65 (1986).

McCarthy and Kettle, Case Comment, An End Run Around the Sherman Act? Banks v. NCAA and Gaines v. NCAA, 19:295 (1993).

McCaffrey, Patent Policy in Federal Government Contracts and Grants, 1:230 (1974).

McClamrock, Note, The First Amendment and Public Funding of Religiously Controlled or Affiliated Higher Education, 17:381 (1991).

McClamrock, Meyer, and Spencer, Case Comment, Alabama Student Party v. Student Government Association of the University of Alabama: The First Amendment and Student-Government Election Campaign Speech in Public Universities, 16:649 (1990).

McCollogh and Foster, Reviewers’ Comments, 8:15 (1981-82).

McClellan and Harding, Unreasonable Compensation: The Hidden Issue in the IRS College and University Examination Guidelines, 20:111 (1993).

McCusker, The Americans With Disabilities Act: Its Potential for Expanding the Scope of Reasonable Academic Accommodations, 21:619 (1995).

McDonald, Contract, A Property Right under the Fourteenth Amendment? Vail v. Board of Education, 11:445 (1985).

McGarvie, Creating Roles for Religion and Philanthropy in a Secular Nation: The Dartmouth College Case and the Design of Civil Society in the Early Republic, 25:527 (1999).

McGuire, Note, Federal Research Grant Funding at Universities: Legislative Waves from Auditors Diving into Overhead Cost Pools, 23:563 (1997).

McGuire, The NCAA- Institution Under Constitutional Seige, 2:175 (1974-75).

McHugh, Faculty Unionism and Tenure, 1:46 (1973).

McIntyre, Dumas, and Zelenock, Case Comment, Parate v. Isibor: Resolving the Conflict Between the Academic Freedom of the University and the Academic Freedom of University Professors, 16:713 (1990).

McKee, Tenure by Default: The Nonformal Acquisition of Academic Tenure, 7:31 (1980-81).

McLean, Note, Tort Liability of Colleges and Universities for Injuries Resulting from Student Alcohol Consumption, 14:399 (1987).

McLean, Andrews, and Dang, Note, Recent Development: Church Licensed Professors: The Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987).

McMillen and Padilla, 1995 Symposium: Educating the Athlete, 22:37 (1995).

Menard, May Tenure Rights of Faculty Be Bargained Away?, 2:256 (1975).

Merz, Book Review, Funding Science in America: Congress, Universities, and the Academic Pork Barrel, by James D. Savage, 26:803 (2000).

Metzger, Professional and Legal Limits to Academic Freedom, 20:1 (1993).

Meyer, McClamrock, and Spencer, Case Comment, Alabama Student Party v. Student Government Association of the University of Alabama: The First Amendment and Student-Government Election Campaign Speech in Public Universities, 16:649 (1990).

Meyers, Note, State Open-Records Acts and the NCAA Bylaw Requiring Coaches to Disclose Their "Athletically-Related" Outside Income: Emptying the Coaches' Pockets for Public Inspection?, 16:497 (1990).

Michaelson, Steinbach, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26: 467 (2000).

Michaelson, Smith, Drier, and Steinbach, Board of Education of the Township of Piscataway v. Sharon Taxman, 24:671 (1998).

Middleditch, College and University Fringe Benefits, 1:172 (1973-74).

Mikva, Commentary, How Do We Manage the Right to Hate, 19:35 (1992).

Milam and Marshall, Impact of Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing on Academic Dismissals from Graduate and Professional Schools, 13:335 (1987).

Milam, Fantel, Irby, and Schwarz, Faculty Rights and Responsibilities in Evaluating and Dismissing Medical Students, 8:102 (1981-82).

Milani, Disabled Students in Higher Education: Administrative and Judicial Enforcement of Disability Law, 22:989 (1996).

Miller, Case Comment, Coursepacks and Copyright: Fair Use in Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, 23:525 (1997).

Miller, Subpoenas in Academia: Controlling Disclosure, 17:1 (1990).

Millsap and Wright, Recent Cases on Student Transcript Rights after Bankruptcy, 6:231 (1979-80).

Mingle, Book Review, The Costs and Benefits of Openness: Sunshine Laws and Higher Education, by Harlan Cleveland, 12:569 (1986).

Mitten, Book Review, Unsportsmanlike Conduct— Exploiting College Athletes, by Walter Byers (with Charles Hammer), 22:1081 (1996).

Miyamoto, Liability of Colleges and Universities for Injuries Sustained by Students While Participating in Extracurricular Activities, 15:149 (1988).

Mooney, Note, Conditioning Student Aid on Draft Registration: The Legislation and Regulations, 10:379 (1983-84).

Moran and Shepard, The Future of Faculty Collective Bargaining at Private Universities, 9:41 (1982-83).

Morris, Delaney, Sack, and Sperber, 1995 Symposium: Round Table Discussion on Collegiate Athletics Reform, 22:96 91995).

Morton, Note, Who Should Speak? Who Should Pay? The Complexities of Refunding Student Fees at Public Colleges and Universities, 11:481 (1985).

Mulderink, Case Comment, Par for the Female Course: Cohen v. Brown University Mandates an Equal Playing Field in Intercollegiate Athletics, 22:111 (1995).

Mulrooney, Irwin, and Stotlar, A Critical Analysis of Collegiate Licensing Policies and Procedures, 20:97 (1993).

Murray, Alessandro, and Reed, Case Comment, Fox v. Board of Trustees of the State University of New York: University Regulation Faces the First Amendment, 15:443 (1989).

Myers, Graff, and Tyler, Case Comment, Blair v. Washington State University: Making State ERA’s a Potent Remedy for Sex Discrimination in Athletics, 14:575 (1988).

Myers, The Law of Private Inurement and Unrelated Income Taxation: Implications for Colleges and Universities, 3:96 (1976).

Myers, Recent Federal Tax Developments Affecting Colleges, Universities, and Donors, 2:269 (1975).

Myers, Remainder Gifts Under the Tax Reform Act of 1969: A Post-Final Regulation Outline with Forms, 1:106 (1973-74).

Nagle, Note, Yeshiva's Impact on Collective Bargaining in Public-Sector Higher Education, 20:383 (1994).

Naples, Note, Reading, ‘Riting and Response: Holding Colleges and Universities Liable under CERCLA, 20:483 (1994).

Nave, Niccolls, and Olswang, Unrelated Business Income Tax and Unfair Competition: Current Status of the Law, 15:249 (1989).

Neiger, Actual Knowledge Under Gebser v. Lago Vista: Evidence of the Court’s Deliberate Indifference or an Appropriate Response for Finding Institutional Liability?, 26:1 (1999).

Neiman, Book Review, Liberal Justice and the Marxist Critique of Education, by Kenneth A. Strike, 18:125 (1991).

Nelson and Ward, Burdens of Proof Under Employment Discrimination Legislation, 6:301 (1979-80).

Neuenschwander, Oral History and Copyright: An Uncertain Relationship, 10:147 (1983-84).

Neumeister and Church, University Control of Student-Athletes with Disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, 25:105 (1998).

Newell, Use of Campus Facilities for First Amendment Activity, 9:27 (1982-83).

Newell, A Right of Access to Student Newspapers at Public Universities, 4:209 (1977).

Newman, At Work in the Marketplace of Ideas: Academic Freedom, The First Amendment, and Jeffries v. Harleston, 22:281 (1995).

Ney, Brammer, and Lallo, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees of Boston University: The Realization of Title VII’s Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991).

Niccolls, DiScala, and Olswang, College and University Responses to the Emotionally or Mentally Impaired Students, 19:17 (1992).

Niccolls, Nave, and Olswang, Unrelated Business Income Tax and Unfair Competition: Current Status of the Law, 15:249 (1989).

Nieman, Book Review, Liberal Justice and the Marxist Critique of Education, by Kenneth A. Strike, 18:125 (1991).

Nogay and Stoner, the Model university Coaching Contract (“MCC”): A better Starting Point for Your Next Negotiation, 16:43 (1989).

Noonan, Religious Law Schools and the First Amendment, 20:43 (1993).

Nordin, The Contract to Educate: Toward a More Workable Theory of the Student-University Relationship, 8:141 (1981-82).

Oakley, Book Review, The Opening of the American Mind: Canons, Culture, and history, by Lawrence Levine, 24:119 (1997).

Oaks, A Private University Looks at Government Regulation, 4:1 (1976).

O’Brien, Vinik, and Kumin, Affirmative Action in College Admissions: Practical Advice to Public and Private Institutions for Dealing with the Changing Landscape, 26:395 (2000).

O’Donnell and Holway, Unfair Labor Practices in the Academic Setting, 1:325 (1974).

O’Neil, Student Fees and Student Rights: Evolving Constitutional Principles, 25:569 (1999).

O’Neil, The Lawyer and the Client in the Campus Setting: Who is the Client, What does the Client Expect and how May the Attorney Respond?, 19:333 (1993).

O’Neil, Case Comment, Bishop v. Aronov: A Comment, 18:381 (1992).

O'Neil, Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on DeFunis and Bakke, 14:423 (1988).

O'Neil, Academic Freedom and the Constitution, 11: 275 (1984).

O’Neil, Court and Campus – Striking a New Balance, 1:199 (1973).

O’Neill, Single-Sex Education After United States v. Virginia, 23:489 (1997).

Olivas, Book Reviews, The Leaning Ivory Tower, Latino Professors in American Universities, ed. By Raymond V. Padilla and Rudolfo Chavez Chavez; Race and Representation: Affirmative Action, ed. By Robert Post and Michael Rogin; Shameful Admissions, The Losing Battle to Serve Everyone in Our Universities, by Angela Browne-Miller; The University in Ruins, by Bill Readings: Race, Raza, and Ruins, 24:123 (1997).

Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy: An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991).

Olivas and Denison, Legalization in the Academy: Higher Education and the Supreme Court, 11:1 (1984).

Olson, Copyright and Fair Use: Implications of Nation Enterprises for Higher Education, 13:489 (1986).

Olswang, Union Security Provisions, Academic Freedom and Tenure: The Implications of Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 14:539 (1988).

Olswang, Planning the Unthinkable: Issues in Institutional Reorganization and Faculty Reductions, 9:431 (1982-83).

Olswang, Cole, and Wilson, Program Elimination, Financial Emergency, and Student Rights, 9:163 (1982-83).

Olswang, DiScala, and Niccolls, College and University Responses to the Emotionally or Mentally Impaired Students, 19:17 (1992).

Olswang and Fantel, Tenure and Periodic Performance Review: Compatible Legal and Administrative Principles, 7:1 (1980-81).

Olswang and Lee, Scientific Misconduct: Institutional Procedures and Due Process Considerations, 11:51 (1984).

Olswang, Niccolls, and Nave, Unrelated Business Income Tax and Unfair Competition: Current Status of the Law, 15:249 (1989).

Oriard, Landry, and Leonard, 1995 Symposium: College Athletics as a Vehicle for Social Reform, 22:77 91995).

Orleans, Book Review, Dollars and Scholars: An Inquiry into the Impact of Faculty Income Upon the Functions and Future of the Academy, ed. By R. Linnell, 11:237 (1984).

Orleans, Book Review, Partners in the Research Enterprise: University-Corporate Relations in Science and Technology, ed. by T. Langfitt, S. Hackney, A. Fishman, and A. Glowasky, 11:237 (1984).

Orleans, Book Review, Ability Testing of Handicapped People: Dilemma For Government, Science, and the Public, ed. By Susan W. Sherman and Nancy M. Robinson, 9:347 (1982-83).

Orleans, Memorandum: First Thoughts on Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 6:263 (1979-80).

Orleans and Smith, Commentary, Who Should Provide Interpreters under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act?, 9:177 (1982-83).

O’Shea, First Amendment Cases in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:193 (1999).

O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1997 in Review, 25:201 (1998).

O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1996 in Review, 24:131 (1997).

O’Shea, Book Review, Fighting Words — The Politics of Hateful Speech, by Laurence R. Marcus, 23:597 (1997).

O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1995 in Review, 23:309 (1997).

Padilla and McMillen, 1995 Symposium: Educating the Athlete, 22:37 (1995).

Page and Hunnicutt, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Policy Analysis of Student Speech Regulation at America's Twenty Largest Public Universities, 21:1 (1994).

Paige, Guerre, and Hasty, Case Comment, Gehling v. St. George's University School of Medicine, Ltd.: Continued Erosion of Colleges' and Universities' Duty to Students Injured in Collegiate Activities, 16:677 (1990).

Pajaro Dunes Conference Draft Statement, 9:533 (1982-83).

Papandreou, Case Comment, Krebs v. Rutgers: The Potential for Disclosure of Highly Confidential Personal Information Renders Questionable the Use of Social Security Numbers as Student Identification Numbers, 20:79 (1993).

Parrish, Scientific Misconduct and the Plagiarism Cases, 21:517 (1995).

Parrish, The Federal Government and Scientific Misconduct Proceedings, Past, Present, and Future As Seen Through the Thereza Imanishi-Kari Case, 24:581 (1998)

Pauley, Case Comment, Williams v. Hamilton, 8:399 (1981-82).

Pavela, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: A Review of 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:213 (1997).

Pavela, Applying the Power of Association on Campus: A Model Code of Academic Integrity, 24:97 (1997).

Pavela, Student Disciplinary Actions: 1995 in Review, 23:391 (1997).

Pavela, Book Review, Deconstructing Academic Freedom, ed. By William W. Van Alstyne, 22:359 (1995).

Pavela, Therapeutic Paternalism and the Misuse of Mandatory Psychiatric Withdrawals on Campus, 9:101 (1982-83).

Pavella, Limiting the “Pursuit of Perfect Justice” on Campus: A Proposed Code of Student Conduct, 6:137 (1979-80).

Pedulla and Lake, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation: State Agencies That Grant Educational Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default on Prior Educational Loans, 17:261 (1990).

Pelesh, Due Process in the Accreditation Context: A Reply, 22:175 (1995).

Perkins, Note, Sylvester v. Texas Southern University: An Exception to the Rule of Judicial Deference to Academic Decisions, 25:399 (1998).

Phelps, Book Review, Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education, by Martha C. Nussbaum, 25:185 (1998).

Pieronek, Book Review, The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy, by Nicholas Lemann, 26:549 (2000).

Pieronek, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:307 (1999).

Pieronek, Book Review, Becoming Gentlemen, by Lani Guinier, et al., 25:627 (1999).

Pieronek, Note, A Clash of Titans: College Football v. Title IX, 20:351 (1994).

Pieronek and Robinson, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1994 in Review, 22:367 (1996).

Pompeo and Lemmer, "Educating" Lawyers about the Implications of Cost Accounting Standards for Government Contracts and Grants with Educational Institutions, 21:111 (1994).

Porth, Personal Liability of Trustees of Educational Institutions, 1:84 (1973).

Porth, Personal Liability of Trustees of Higher Education Institutions, 2:143 (1974-75).

Poskanzer, Spotlight on the Coaching Box: The Role of the Athletic Coach within the Academic Institution, 16:1 (1989).

Prairie and Chamberlain, Due Process in the Accreditation Context, 21:61 (1994).

Price, College and Universities as Internet Service Providers: Determining and Limiting Liability for Copyright Infringement, 23:183 (1996).

Problems in Confidentiality of Institutional Records, 6:81 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Pruss, Antonini, and Fantozzi, Case Comment: Harvard Law School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens Under the Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First Amendment Rights of United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987).

Pullin and Heaney, The Use of Flagged Test Scores in College and University Admissions: Issues and Implications under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 23:797 (1997).

Pupel and Luzum, Case Comment, Weinstein v. University of Illinois: The "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine and Procedural Due Process for Nontenured Faculty, 15:369 (1989).

Rakow and Goldrick, Book Review, Sexual Assault on Campus: What Colleges Can Do, by Aileen Adams and Gail Abarbanel, 16:547 (1990).

Ramey, The Constitutionality of the Drug Testing of College Athletes: A Brandeis Brief for a Narrowly-Intrusive Approach, 16:397 (1990).

Ramey, Note, Off-the-Air Educational Videorecording and Fair Use: An Analysis, 10:341 (1983- 84).

Ramirez, The Balance of Interests Between National Security Controls and First Amendment Interests in Academic Freedom, 13:179 (1986).

Ranney, The Constitutionality of the Drug Testing of College Athletes: A Brandeis Brief for a Narrowly-Intrusive Approach, 16:397 (1990).

Raskoff, Book Review, When Hope and Fear Collide: A Portrait of Today’s College Student, by Arthur Levine & Jeanette S. Cureton, 25:613 (1999).

Rasnic, Book Review, Fumble: Bear Bryant, Wally Butts and the Great College Football Scandal, by James Kirby, 16:165 (1989).

Reams, Revocation of Academic Degrees by Colleges and Universities, 14:283 (1987).

Reback and Steinbach, Equal Employment + Equal Pay = Multiple Problems for Colleges and Universities, 2:25 (1974).

Reback and Vogt, AAMC v. Carey: Briefs in Support of a Motion to Enjoin Enforcement of New York's Standardized Test Disclosure Law, 7:132 (1980-81).

Reed, Alessandro, and Murray, Case Comment, Fox v. Board of Trustees of the State University of New York: University Regulation Faces the First Amendment, 15:443 (1989).

Regan, ‘Tis Better to “Benefit” Than to “Receive” - The Standard Delimiting Coverage Under Title IX and Other Federal Antidiscrimination Statutes, 26:107 (1999).

Reidhaar, The Assault on the Citadel: Reflections on a Quarter Century of Change in the Relationships Between the Student and the University, 12:343 (1985).

Reidhaar, Memorandum: The Legal Implications of Divestment of University Investments in Companies Doing Business in South Africa, 7:164 (1980-81).

Reidhaar, Minority Preference in Student Admissions, 2:197 (1974).

Relihan, Means and Ends: The Evolution of Federal Administration Doctrine on Equal Employment Opportunity, 1:33 (1973).

Remington, NCAA Enforcement Procedures Including the Role of the Committee on Infractions, 10:181 (1983-84).

Renahan, Case Comment, Bob Jones University v. United States: No Tax Exemptions for Racially Discriminatory Schools — Supreme Courts Clarifies Thirteen-Year Policy Imbroglio, 11:69 (1984).

Rich, Malpractice Issues in the Academic Medical Center, 13:149 (1986).

Richards, Note, "Financial Emergency" and the Faculty Furlough: A Breach of Contract?, 10:225 (1983-84).

Richardson, A Delicate Balance: U.S. Government and Higher Education, 8:445 (1981-82).

Richmond, Private Colleges and Tuition Price-Fixing: An Antitrust Primer, 17:271 (1991).

Richmond, Students' Rights to Counsel in University Disciplinary Proceedings, 15:289 (1989).

Ritter, Goettling, and Bovee, Case Comment, Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment Clause and Financial Aid to Students for Religious Education at Private Religious Institutions, 13:397 (1987).

Robinson, Introduction to Symposium on Ex Corde Ecclesiae, 25:645 (1999).

Robinson, Introduction, Higher Education and the Courts: 1995 in Review, 23:307 (1997).

Robinson and Pieronek, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1994 in Review, 22:367 (1996).

Robinson and Huber, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1993 in Review, 21:157 (1994).

Robison and Sanders, The Myths of Academia: Open Inquiry and Funded Research, 19:227 (1993).

Robles and Vogt, Continuing Controversy in Equal Employment Law, 6:291 (1979-80).

Rosman, Hemmat, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).

Roth, Case Comment, Rosenberger v. Rector: The First Amendment Dog Chases Its Tail, 21:723 (1995).

Roth, The Impact of Liquor Liability on Colleges and Universities, 13:45 (1986).

Rothstein, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: A Review of the 1995 Judicial Decisions, 23:475 (1997).

Rothstein, Commentary, Students, Staff and Faculty with Disabilities: Current Issues for Colleges and Universities, 17:471 (1991).

Rothstein, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Emerging Issues for Colleges and Universities, 13:229 (1986).

Rothstein, Introduction to Special Issue on the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns: Implications for University Hospitals, 11:403 (1984-85).

Rothstein, Reproductive Hazards and Sex Discrimination in the Workplace: New Legal Concerns in Industry and on Campus, 10:495 (1983-84).

Rottinghaus and Wilds, Case Comment, Wynne v. Tufts University School of Medicine, 19:185 (1992).

Routh, Steinbach, Michaelson, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26: 467 (2000).

Rowe, Case Comment, NCAA v. Board of Regents: A Broadening of the Rule of Reason, 11:377 (1984).

Ruebhausen, Commentary, The Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1986: Implications for Tenure and Retirement, 14:561 (1988).

Ruiz, Note, National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Smith: Must the NCAA Play By the Rules? 26:119 (1999).

Rumsey, Legal Aspects of the Relationship Between Fraternities and Public Institutions of Higher Education: Freedom of Association and Ability to Prohibit Campus Presence or Student Membership, 11:465 (1985).

Rutledge, Book Review, Wrongs of Passage: Fraternities, Sororities, Hazing, and Binge Drinking, by Hank Nuwer, 26:789 (2000).

Rutledge, Hell Night Hath No Fury Like a Pledge Scorned . . . and Injured: Hazing Litigation in U.S. Colleges and Universities, 25:361 (1998).

Ruxin, Unsportsmanlike Conduct: The Student-Athlete, the NCAA, and Agents, 8:347 (1981-82).

Ryan and Stoner, Burlington, Faragher, Oncale, and Beyond: Recent Developments in Title VII Jurisprudence, 26:645 (2000).

Ryan, Note, The First Amendment on Campus: The Rights of the Student Press v. The Rights of the Students, 14:505 (1988).

Ryan and Brickley, Case Comment, Miller v. Rutgers and Kovats v. Rutgers: Application of the Eleventh Amendment in Suits Against State Colleges and Universities, 13:407 (1987).

Sack, Delaney, Morris, and Sperber, 1995 Symposium: Round Table Discussion on Collegiate Athletics Reform, 22:96 (1995).

Sacken, Commercialization of Academic Knowledge and Judicial Deference, 19:1 (1992).

Sagner and Ayres, The Bankruptcy Reform Ac