Adams, Aiken and Hall, Liability - Legal Liabilities in Higher Education: Their Scope and Management, 3:125 (1976).

A New Look at Faculty Contracts, 6:14 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Aiello and Behrens, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986).

Aiken, Adams and Hall, Liability - Legal Liabilities in Higher Education: Their Scope and Management, 3:125 (1976).

Aiken, Tort Liability of Governing Boards, Administrators and Faculty in Higher Education, 2:129 (1974-75).

Albino and Hesburgh, 1995 Symposium: Reform and Renewal in College Sports, 22:63 (1995).

Alger and Coleman, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23:91 (1996).

Alger, Book Review, The Shadow University, by Alan Charles Kors and Harvey A. Silverglate, 25:901 (1999).

Alessandro, Note, The Student-Athlete Right-to-Know Act: Legislation Would Require Colleges to Make Public Graduation Rates of Student Athletes, 16:287 (1989).

Alessandro, Murray, and Reed, Case Comment, Fox v. Board of Trustees of the State University of New York: University Regulation Faces the First Amendment, 15:443 (1989).

Allred, Note, May a Public University Restrict Faculty Expression on its Internet World Wide Web Sites? Academic Freedom and University Facility Use Restrictions, 24:325 (1997).

American Academy of Pediatrics - Guidelines for Infant Bioethics Committees, 11:433 (1985).

Anderson, Ende and Crego, Liability Insurance: A Primer for College and University Counsel, 23:609 (1997).

Anderson, Commentary, Licensing of Colleges and University Trademarks, 8:97 (1981-82).

Andrews, Note, State Legislation on Comparable Worth: Will it Bring Pay Equity to Academe?, 14:469 (1988).

Andrews, Dang, and McLean, Note, Recent Development: Church Licensed Professors: The Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987).

Antonini, Note, First Amendment Challenges to the Use of Mandatory Student Fees to Help Fund Student Abortions, 15:61 (1988).

Antonini, Fantozzi, and Pruss, Case Comment: Harvard Law School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens Under the Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First Amendment Rights of United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987).

Araujo, Ex Corde Ecclesiae and Mission-Centered Hiring in Roman Catholic Colleges and Universities: To Boldly Go Where We Have Gone Before, 25:835 (1999).

Atkinson, Note, Workers' Compensation and College Athletics: Should Universities be Responsible for Athletes Who Incur Serious Injuries?, 10:197 (1983-84).

Attanasio, Does the First Amendment Guarantee a Right to Conduct Scientific Experiments?, 14:435 (1988).

Attridge, Book Review, Up the University: Recreating Higher education in America, by Robert and Jon Solomon, 21:825 (1995).

Ayres, Commentary, Widmar v. Vincent: The Beginning of the End for the Establishment Clause, 8:511 (1981-82).

Ayres and Sagner, The Bankruptcy Reform Act and Student Loans: Unraveling New Knots, 9:361 (1982-83).

Bader, Rosman, Hemmat, and Wright, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).

Bader and Sullivan, The Application of Export Control Laws to Scientific Research at Universities, 9:451 (1982-83).

Baida, Not All Minority Scholarships are Created Equal, Part II: How to Develop a Record that Passes Constitutional Scrutiny, 21:307 (1994).

Bainbridge, Essay, Student Religious Organizations and University Policies Against Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation: Implications of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 21:369 (1994).

Balda, Not All Minority Scholarships are Created equal: Why Some May be More Constitutional than Others, 18:333 (1992).

Barber, Waivers of Academic Progress Requirements for Federal Financial Aid: A Reasonable Accommodation for Students with Learning Disabilities?, 23:231 (1996).

Barkin, Legal Implications of Office Education Criteria for the Self-Supporting Student, 2:229 (1975).

Barnes and Khorey, The Effects and Use of Administrative Determinations in Subsequent Employment Litigation, 16:189 (1989).

Barnes and Schlottman, After "Decoupling": Further Thoughts, 9:315 (1982-83).

Bartlett and Siena, Research and Development Limited Partnerships as a Device to Exploit University Owned Technology, 10:435 (1983-84).

Bassen, Synopsis of State Laws Regulating Employment of the Handicapped, 4:293 (1977).

Bassett, The American Civil Corporation, the "Incorporation Movement" and the Canon Law of the Catholic Church, 25:721 (1999).

Beach, The Management and Governance of Academic Institutions, 12:301 (1985).

Beach, Fundamental Fairness in Search of a Legal Rationale in Private College Student Discipline and Expulsions, 2:65 (1974).

Beale, Delivery of Legal Service to Institutions of Higher Education, 2:5 (1974).

Beaty, Book Review, The Dying of the Light: The Disengagement of Colleges and Universities From Their Christian Churches, by James T. Burtchaell, C.S.C., 26:177 (1999).

Beauchamp, Book Review, Games Colleges Play — Scandal and Reform in Intercollegiate Athletics, by John R. Thelin, 23:301 (1996).

Beauchamp, 1995 Symposium: Introduction and Welcome, 22:2 (1995).

Begin and Lee, Criteria for Evaluating the Managerial Status of College Faculty: Applications of Yeshiva University by the NLRB, 10:515 (1983-84).

Behrens and Aiello, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986).

Behrsin, Commentary, Housestaff Stipends and The "Fellowship" Exclusion Under Section 117 of The Internal Revenue Code, 8:131 (1981-82).

Bekavac, Book Review, Becoming Gentlemen, by Lani Guinier, et al., 25:619 (1999).

Bell and Majestic, Protection and Enforcement of College and University Trademarks, 10:63 (1983-84).

Bennett, Education and the Constitution: The Case of Citizen James Madison, 14:417 (1988).

Bennett, Book Review, Legal Ethics and Legal Education, by Michael J. Kelly, 7:353 (1980- 81).

Bergan, Grievance - Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974).

Bergan and Ferguson, Grievance - Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974).

Bhirdo, Note, The Liability and Responsibility of Institutions of Higher Education for the On-Campus Victimization of Students, 16:119 (1989).

Bhirdo, Haviland, and Warth, Case Comment, McCormack v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: Collegiate Athletics Sanctions from an Antitrust and Civil Rights Perspective, 15:459 (1989).

Bianchi, Brenna, and Shannon, Case Comment, Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp: Potential Liability for Classroom Anthologies, 18:595 (1992).

Bickel, Tort-Accident Cases: Traditional Tort Rules in the College or University Setting, 24:187 (1997).

Bickel, Torts: 1995 in Review, 23:357 (1997).

Bickel and Lake, The Emergence of New Paradigms in Student-University Relations: From In Loco Parentis to Bystander to Facilitator, 23:755 (1997).

Bickel and Lake, Reconceptualizing the University's Duty to Provide a Safe Learning Environment: A Criticism of the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis and the Restatement (Second) of Torts, 20:261 (1994).

Bickel and Vandercreek , Class Action Aspects of Federal Employment Discrimination Litigation, 2:157 (1974-75).

Bissell, Brief for Appellants in Handsome v. Rutgers University, 6:241 (1979-80).

Blackwell, The Law of Copyright and the Fair Use Doctrine, 1:222 (1974).

Bodensteiner, Student Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:331 (1998).

Bodner, Commentary, Analyzing Faculty Salaries in Class Action Sex Discrimination Cases, 10:305 (1983-84).

Bodner, Commentary, The Implications of Yeshiva University for Collective Bargaining Rights of Faculty at Private and Public Institutions of Higher Education, 7:78 (1980-81).

Bok, Commentary, Universities: Their Temptations and Tensions, 18:1 (1991).

Bompey, Decoupling Tenure and Employment Under the 1978 Amendments to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 8:425 (1981-82).

Bompey, 1979 Update: Cases and Issues in Age Discrimination, 6:195 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Bompey and Witten, Settlement of Title VII Disputes: Shifting Patterns in a Changing World, 6:317 (1979-80).

Bompey and Saltzman, The Role of Statistics in Employment Discrimination Litigation — A University Perspective, 9:263 (1982-83).

Boren and Graziano, Suing States for Copyright Infringement: An Eleventh Amendment Bar?, 15:269 (1989).

Bors, Academic Freedom Faces Learning Disabilities: Guckenberger v. Boston University, 25:581 (1999).

Bovee, Goettling, and Ritter, Case Comment, Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment Clause and Financial Aid to Students for Religious Education at Private Religious Institutions, 13:397 (1987).

Brake, Justus, and Davidson, 1995 Symposium: Title IX, 22:48 (1995).

Brammer, Lallo, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees of Boston University: The Realization of Title VII's Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991).

Branchfield and Grier, Aiken v. Lieuallen and Peterson v. Oregon State University: Defining Equity in Athletics, 8:369 (1981-82).

Brenna, Bianchi, and Shannon, Case Comment, Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp: Potential Liability for Classroom Anthologies, 18:595 (1992).

Brickley, Note, AIDS: A University's Liability for Failure to Protect its Students, 14:529 (1988).

Brickley and Ryan, Case Comment, Miller v. Rutgers and Kovats v. Rutgers: Application of the Eleventh Amendment in Suits Against State Colleges and Universities, 13:407 (1987).

Brody, The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and Sponsored Research, 19:199 (1993).

Brooks, Adequate Cause for Dismissal: The Missing Element in Academic Freedom, 22:331 (1995).

Broome, Case Comment, A Limitation on Federal Authority to Deny Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Equipment, 10:325 (1983-84).

Buckley, Perspective on Gunther, 8:433 (1981-82).

Burgoyne, The Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990: State Educational Institutions Now Face Significant Monetary Exposure for Copyright Infringement, 18:367 (1992).

Burke, University Policies on Conflict of Interest and Policy of Publication, 12:175 (1985).

Burke, Federal Taxation of State Colleges and Universities: Recent Developments Call for Reconsideration of Theories of Exemption, 4:43 (1976).

Burman, Hendricks, Madden, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Burshtein, Collegiate Licensing in Canada and the Statutory Advantage, 12:227 (1985).

Burtchaell, Out of the Heartburn of the Church, 25:653 (1999).

Cabranes, American Higher Education and the Law: Some Reflections on NACUA's Silver Anniversary, 12:261 (1985).

Cafardi, Giving Legal Life to the Ex Corde Ecclesiae Norms: Corporate Strategies and Practical Difficulties, 25:751 (1999).

Camacho and Dunn, NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS: When Will the Internal Revenue Service Consider an Activity Regularly Carried On?, 19:39 (1992).

Capano, Note, Stopping Students from Cheating: Halting the Activities of Term-Paper Mills and Enforcing Disciplinary Sanctions Against Students Who Purchase Term Papers, 18:277 (1991).

Capano, Hoey, and Zuch, Case Comment, In re Cronyn: Can Student Theses Bar Patent Applications?, 18:105 (1991).

Capron, Legal Perspectives on Institutional Ethics Committees, 11:417 (1985).

Carder, Lawton, and Weisman, Recent Governmental Action Regarding the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405 (1985).

Cardozo, To Copy or Not To Copy For Teaching and Scholarship: What Shall I Tell My Client?, 4:59 (1976-77).

Carrington, Book Review, College Crime Prevention and Personal Safety Awareness, by Max C. Bromley and Leonard Territo, 17:565 (1991).

Caruso, Book Review, Marine Scientific Research and the Law of the Sea, by Alfred H. A. Soons, 11:65 (1984).

Casey, Case Comment, Constructive Discharge under Title VII In Institutions of Higher Education, 9:191 (1982-83).

Cassou and Curran, Secular Orthodoxy and Sacred Freedoms: Accreditation of Church-Related Law Schools, 11:293 (1984).

Cerminara and Stoner, Harnessing the "Spirit of Insubordination": A Model Student Disciplinary Code, 17:89 (1990).

Cerny and Livingston, IRS Intermediate Sanctions: How They Will Impact Colleges and Universities, 25:865 (1999).

Chamberlain and Prairie, Due Process in the Accreditation Context, 21:61 (1994).

Chamblee and Wallick, Bridling the Trojan Horse: Rights and Remedies of Colleges and Universities Under Federal Grant-Type Assistance Programs, 4:241 (1977).

Chang, Note, Coercion Theory and the State Action Doctrine as Applied in NCAA v. Tarkanian and NCAA v. Miller, 22:133 (1995).

Chapman and Dickerson, Contract Law, Due Process, and the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79).

Church and Neumeister, University Control of Student-Athletes with Disabilities Under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, 25:105 (1998).

Claque, The Affirmative Action Showdown of 1986: Implications for Higher Education, 14:171 (1987).

Cleveland, The Costs and Benefits of Openness: Sunshine Laws and Higher Education, 12:127 (1985).

Cole, Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment, 13:267 (1986).

Cole and Goldblatt, Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions' Authority to Select the Lowest Responsible Bidder, 16:177 (1989).

Cole, Olswang, and Wilson, Program Elimination, Financial Emergency, and Student Rights, 9:163 (1982-83).

Coleman and Alger, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23:91 (1996).

Coleman and Jarvis, Tuition Adjustment for Law School Students: A Necessary Accommodation under the ADA?, 24:45 (1997).

Camacho and Dunn, NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS: When Will the Internal Revenue Service Consider an Activity Regularly Carried on, 19:39 (1992).

Conboy, Book Reviews, Law in Sport and Physical Activity, by Annie Clement, and Law in Sport, by Bernard Patrick Maloy, 16:171 (1989).

Conlon, Book Review, Health Care Labor Law, ed. by Iva Michael Shepard and A. Edward Doudera, 9:355 (1982- 83).

Connolly and Marshall, Sexual Harassment of University or College Students by Faculty Members, 15:381 (1989).

Consent Decree from Rajender v. University of Minnesota, 8:219 (1981-82).

Consent Decree: United States Department of Labor, Office of Contract Compliance Programs v. Regents of University of California, 8:54 (1981-82).

Corbally, University Counsel- Scope and Mission, 2:1 (1974).

Cosgrove, Note, A Survey of State Athlete-Agent Legislation: Origins and Effects, 16:433 (1990).

Cosgrove, Grundy, and Heffernan, Case Comment, Shannon v. Bepko: Public Colleges and Universities as State Agencies: Standards for Eleventh Amendment Protection, 16:151 (1989).

Cranman, Privacy and Technology: Counseling Institutions of Higher Education, 25:69 (1998).

Cranman and Ward, Book Review, The Rights and Responsibilities of the Modern University, by Robert Bickel & Peter Lake, 26:389 (1999).

Craver, The Implications of the Elimination of Mandatory Retirement for Professors, 16:343 (1990).

Crego, Ende, and Anderson, Liability Insurance: A Primer for College and University Counsel, 23:609 (1997).

Crockett, Book Review, Wrongs of Passage: Fraternities, Sororities, Hazing and Binge Drinking, by Hank Nuwer, 26:783 (2000).

Crosson, Book Review, Academic Duty, by Donald Kennedy, 25:435 (1998).

Cunningham, Leeson, and Stadler, Kahn v. Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara: The Right to Privacy and the Academic Freedom Privilege with Respect to Confidential Peer Review Materials, 15:73 (1988).

Curkovic, Accent and the University: Accent as Pretext for National Origin Discrimination in Tenure Decisions, 26:727 (2000).

Curran and Cassou, Secular Orthodoxy and Sacred Freedoms: Accreditation of Church-Related Law Schools, 11:293 (1984).

Current Tax Issues, 6:17 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Curry, Hazing and the "Rush" Toward Reform: Responses from Universities, Fraternities, State Legislatures, and the Courts, 16:93 (1989).

Curry, Manderfeld, and Sullivan, Case Comment, Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988).

Daane, Commentary, Regents of the University of Michigan v. State of Michigan: South African Divestiture and Constitutional Autonomy, A Case Commentary, 15:313 (1989).

Daane, The Role of University Counsel, 12:399 (1985).

Dang, Andrews, and McLean, Note, Recent Development: Church Licensed Professors: The Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987).

Daniel and Sun, The Sherman Act Antitrust Provisions and Collegiate Action: Should There Be a Continued Exception for the Business of the University?, 25:451 (1999).

Davenport, The Catalog in the Courtroom: From Shield to Sword?, 12:201 (1985).

Davidson, Justus, and Brake, 1995 Symposium: Title IX, 22:48 (1995).

Davis, Scaling the Ivory Tower: State Public Records Laws and University Presidential Searches, 21:353 (1994).

Davis, Commentary, University Research and the Wages of Commerce, 18:29 (1991).

Delaney, Sack, Morris, and Sperber, 1995 Symposium: Round Table Discussion on Collegiate Athletics Reform, 22:96 (1995).

Delano, Discovery in University Employment Discrimination Suits: Should Peer Review Materials be Privileged?, 14:121 (1987).

Denison and Olivas, Legalization in the Academy: Higher Education and the Supreme Court, 11:1 (1984).

Detar and Stoner, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:273 (1999).

DiBiase and Toombs, College Rules and Court Decisions: Notes on Student Dismissal, 2:355 (1975).

Dickerson and Chapman, Contract Law, Due Process, and the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79).

DiLorenzo, Gaal, and Evans, Hew’s Final “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:345 (1979-80).

DiLorenzo and Gaal, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’s Proposed “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80).

DiScala, Olswang, and Niccolls, College and University Responses to the Emotionally or Mentally Impaired Student, 19:17 (1992).

Dixon, Note, Achieving Educational Opportunity Through Freshman Ineligibility and Coaching Selection: Key Elements in the NCAA Battle for Academic Integrity of Intercollegiate Athletics, 14:383 (1987).

Dixon, Lynch, and Swem, Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas: Termination of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the Burden of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417 (1987).

Donohue, Note, First-to-File vs. First-to-Invent: Will Universities be Left Behind? 21:765 (1995).

Drier, Steinbach, Michaelson, and Routh, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26: 467 (2000).

Drier, Michaelson, Smith, and Steinbach, Board of Education of the Township of Piscataway v. Sharon Taxman, 24:671 (1998).

Drinan, Lawyer-Client Confidentiality in the Campus Setting, 19:305 (1993).

Duerr, Annotation: Reinstatement as a Remedy in Cases Involving Termination of Tenured Faculty, 7:57 (1980-81).

Duerr, Reinstatement as a Remedy in Cases Involving Termination of Tenured Faculty, 7:57 (1980-81).

Dumas, Note, Defective Buildings and Grounds — A Dangerous Condition for Colleges and Universities, 17:351 (1991).

Dumas, McIntyre, and Zelenock, Case Comment, Parate v. Isibor: Resolving the Conflict Between the Academic Freedom of the University and the Academic Freedom of University Professors, 16:713 (1990).

Dunham, Case Studies on Wrongdoing on Campus: Ethics and the Lawyer’s Role, 19:315 (1993).

Dunn and Camacho, NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS: When Will the Internal Revenue Service Consider an Activity Regularly Carried on, 19:39 (1992).

Durham and Gordon, Toward Diverse Diversity: The Legal Legitimacy of Ex Corde Ecclesiae, 25:697 (1999).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1992 in Review, 20:125 (1993).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1991 in Review, 19:73 (1992).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1990 in Review, 18:163 (1991).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1989 in Review, 17:149 (1990).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1988 in Review, 16:201 (1989).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1987 in Review, 15:87 (1988).

Dutile, God and Gays at Georgetown: Observations on Gay Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v. Georgetown University, 15:1 (1988).

Dutile, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1986 in Review, 14:303 (1987).

Dymersky and Frazier, A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Is the New Law Retroactive?, 19:259 (1993).

Edmonds, Postsecondary Athletics and the Law: A Selected Bibliography, 5:65 (1977-79).

Edwards, Usages of Copyrighted Musical Works Permissible Without Acquiring a Copyright License, Assignment, or Release, 6:363 (1979-80).

Edwards and Grossi, Student Misconduct: Historical Trends in Legislative and Judicial Decision- Making in American Universities, 23:829 (1997).

Ende, Anderson, and Crego, Liability Insurance: A Primer for College and University Counsel, 23:609 (1997).

Ende and Lane, Book Review, Contracting for Services, ed. By Lanora F. Welzenbach, 11:399 (1984).

Estes, State University Presidential Searches: Law and Practice, 26:485 (2000).

Evans, "A Stranger in a Strange Land": Responsibility and Liability for Students Enrolled in Foreign-Study Programs, 18:299 (1991).

Evans, Gaal, and DiLorenzo, Hew’s Final “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:345 (1979-80).

Evans, Hill, and Scheske, Case Comment, Knapp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Tuition Assistance or Scholarship, A Question of Taxation, 16:699 (1990).

Faccenda, Introduction to Symposium on Athletics in Higher Education, 8:291 (1981-82).

Faculty Collective Bargaining: The Yeshiva Case, 6:67 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Fantel, Irby, Milam, and Schwarz, Faculty Rights and Responsibilities in Evaluating and Dismissing Medical Students, 8:102 (1981-82).

Fantel and Olswang, Tenure and Periodic Performance Review: Compatible Legal and Administrative Principles, 7:1 (1980-81).

Fantozzi, Antonini, and Pruss, Case Comment: Harvard Law School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens Under the Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First Amendment Rights of United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987).

Fellrath, Case Comment, Coleman v. Zatechka: The ADA and Student Life, 23:285 (1996).

Ferguson and Bergan, Grievance - Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974).

Fick, Book Review, Academics in Courts: The Consequences of Faculty Discrimination Litigation, by George R. LaNoue and Barbara A. Lee, 15:239 (1988).

Fink, Taxation and Philanthropy - A 1976 Perspective, 3:1 (1975).

Finkin, Commentary, Tenure After an Uncapped ADEA: A Different View, 15:43 (1988).

Finkin, Book Review, Beyond Traditional Tenure, by Richard P. Chait and Andrew T. Ford, 10:105 (1983-84).

Finkin, Commentary, The Yeshiva Decision: A Somewhat Different View, 7:321 (1980-81).

Fishbein, New Strings on the Ivory Tower: The Growth of Accountability in Colleges and Universities, 12:381 (1985).

Fishbein, Legal Aspects of Student Activity Fees, 1:190 (1973-74).

Flaherty, Exempt Organizations and Real Estate Syndications after the Tax Reform Act of 1984, 12:61 (1985).

Flygare, Commentary, TDCA v. Burdine: The Decreasing Burden For Employers in Title VII Litigation, 8:519 (1981-82).

Flygare, Commentary, Board of Trustees of Keene State v. Sweeney: Implications for the Future of Peer Review in Faculty Personnel Decisions, 7:100 (1980-81).

Flygare, Board of Trustees of Keene State v. Sweeney: Implications for the Future of Peer Review in Faculty Personnel Decisions, 7:100 (1980-81).

Ford, The Implications of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1978 for Colleges and Universities, 5:161 (1977-79).

Foster and McCollogh, Reviewers’ Comments, 8:15 (1981-82).

Fowler, University-Industry Research Relationships: The Research Agreement, 9:515 (1982-83).

Francis, Federal Tax Problems of College and University Auxiliary Organizations, 3:72 (1975).

Frazier and Dymersky, A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Is the New Law Retroactive?, 19:259 (1993).

Friedl, Punishing Students for Non-Academic Misconduct, 26:701 (2000).

Frohnmayer, Current Developments in Federal Law Affecting Equal Employment Opportunity in Higher Education, 1:1 (1973).

Frohmayer, Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972, 2:49 (1974).

Frost, Shifting Meanings of Academic Freedom: An Analysis of University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 17:329 (1991).

Furay, Book Review, Church and Campus: Legal Issues in Religiously Affiliated Higher Education, by Phillip R. Moots and Edward McGlynn Gafney, Jr., 7:186 (1980-81).

Gaal, DiLorenzo, and Evans, Hew’s Final “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:345 (1979-80).

Gaal and DiLorenzo, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’sn Proposed “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80).

Gaffney, Tales of Two Cities: Canon Law and Constitutional Law at the Crossroads, 25:801 (1999).

Garfield, Squaring Affirmative Action Admissions Policies with Federal Judicial Guidelines: A Model for the Twenty-First Century, 22:895 (1996).

Gee, Introduction to Reflections on Higher Education in the 1970’s, 8:443 (1981-82).

Geetter, The University of Connecticut v. The University of Connecticut Chapter of the AAUP: Brief on Determining Faculty Workload in the Collective Bargaining Context, 8:254 (1981-82).

Gerberding, 1995 Symposium: Historical Perspective of Amateurism, 22:11 (1995).

Gibbs, Book Review, Creating a Safe Campus — A Guide for College and University Administrators, by David Nichols, 24:695 (1998).

Gibbs, Book Review, Choosing a College President: Opportunities and Constraints, by Judith B. McLaughlin and David Reisman, 18:329 (1991).

Giddings, Petitioner's Brief in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:58 (1981-82).

Giddings, Consent Decree in The United States Department of Labor, Office of Contract Compliance Programs v. Regents of University of California, 8:54 (1981-82).

Gillmore, Student Ratings as a Factor in Faculty Employment Decisions and Periodic Review, 10:557 (1983-84).

Goettling, Bovee, and Ritter, Case Comment, Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment Clause and Financial Aid to Students for Religious Education at Private Religious Institutions, 13:397 (1987).

Goldblatt and Cole, Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions' Authority to Select the Lowest Responsible Bidder, 16:177 (1989).

Golden, College Student Dismissals and the Eldridge Factors: What Process Is Due?, 8:495 (1981-82).

Goldrick and Rakow, Book Review, Sexual Assault on Campus: What Colleges Can Do, by Aileen Adams and Gail Abarbanel, 16:547 (1990).

Gordon and Durham, Toward Diverse Diversity: The Legal Legitimacy of Ex Corde Ecclesiae, 25:697 (1999).

Gordon, Stretton, Ong, and Ezekial, Due Process Rights of Medical Residents, 8:120 (1981-82).

Gordon and Spuehler, Questions and Answers Explaining the New Tax Rules Applicable to Tax Sheltered Annuities, 17:435 (1991).

Graff, Myers, and Tyler, Case Comment, Blair v. Washington State University: Making State ERA's a Potent Remedy for Sex Discrimination in Athletics, 14:575 (1988).

Graves, Commentary, Coaches in the Courtroom: Recovery in Actions for Breach of Employment Contracts, 12:545 (1986).

Gray, Impact of the Proposed Civil Rights and Women's Equity in Employment Act on Colleges and Universities, 18:559 (1992).

Gray and Toohey, Doing Business in the New Technology: Problems for College and University Counsel, 10:455 (1983-84).

Graziano and Boren, Suing States for Copyright Infringement: An Eleventh Amendment Bar?, 15:269 (1989).

Green, An Application of the Equal Pay Act to Higher Education, 8:203 (1981-82).

Greenawalt, Constitutional Limits on Aid to Sectarian Universities, 4:177 (1977).

Greenleaf, Academic Institutions in the Light and Shadow of the Law, 12:1 (1985).

Gregorie, Burman, Hendricks, Madden, Tyler, Hoge, and Williams, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Gregory, Making the Affirmative Action Plan Work, 1:16 (1973).

Grier and Branchfield, Aiken v. Lieuallen and Peterson v. Oregon State University: Defining Equity in Athletics, 8:369 (1981-82).

Grossi and Edwards, Student Misconduct: Historical Trends in Legislative and Judicial Decision-Making in American Universities, 23:829 (1997).

Grundy, Cosgrove, and Heffernan, Case Comment, Shannon v. Bepko: Public Colleges and Universities as State Agencies: Standards for Eleventh Amendment Protection, 16:151 (1989).

Guerre, Note, Financial Aid in Higher Education: What's Wrong, Who's Being Hurt, What's Being Done, 17:483 (1991).

Guerre, Hasty, and Paige, Case Comment, Gehling v. St. George's University School of Medicine, Ltd.: Continued Erosion of Colleges' and Universities' Duty to Students Injured in Collegiate Activities, 16:677 (1990).

Gunn, Commentary, Economic and Tax Aspects of Prepaid-Tuition Plans, 17:243 (1990).

Guthrie, Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners in University of Texas v. Camenisch, 8:68 (1981-82).

Habecker, Students, Christian Colleges, and the Law: and the Walls Come Tumbling Down, 2:369 (1975).

Hall, Aiken, and Adams, Liability - Legal Liabilities in Higher Education: Their Scope and Management, 3:125 (1976).

Hanna, Commentary, McLendon v. Morton and the Legislative Response: A Procedural Barrier to Quality Education in West Virginia?, 7:111 (1980-81).

Harding and McClellan, Unreasonable Compensation: The Hidden Issue in the IRS College and University Examination Guidelines, 20:111 (1993).

Harpool, Minimum Compliance with Minimum Standards: Managing Trustee Conflicts of Interest, 24:465 (1998).

Harpool, The Sibley Hospital Case: Trustees and Their Loyalty to the Institution, 23:255 (1996).

Harrington, Civil and Canon Law Issues Affecting American Catholic Higher Education 1948-1998: An Overview and the ACCU Perspective, 26:67 (1999).

Harris, Memorandum: Introductory Guide to Academic Risks of Copyright Infringement, 7:328 (1980-81).

Harrison, Hate Speech: Power in the Marketplace, 20:461 (1994).

Hartman, Hateful Expression and First Amendment Values: Toward a Theory of Constitutional Constraint on Hate Speech at Colleges and Universities after R.A.V. v. St. Paul, 19:343 (1993).

Hartnett, Book Review, Beyond Traditional Tenure, by Richard P. Chait and Andrew T. Ford, 10:95 (1983-84).

Harvey, Fraternities and the Constitution: University-Imposed Relationship Statements May Violate Student Associational Rights, 17:11 (1990).

Haslam, Age Discrimination in Campus Employment, 2:326 (1975).

Haslam, The Locus of Decision Making in Colleges and Universities: The Broad Perspective, 1:241 (1973).

Hasson and Kertz, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986).

Hasty, Note, Worker's Compensation: Will College and University Professors be Compensated for Mental Injuries Caused by Work-Related Stress?, 17:535 (1991).

Hasty, Guerre, and Paige, Case Comment, Gehling v. St. George's University School of Medicine, Ltd.: Continued Erosion of Colleges' and Universities' Duty to Students Injured in Collegiate Activities, 16:677 (1990).

Hauser, Intimate Associations under the Law: The Rights of Social Fraternities to Exist and to be Free From Undue Interference by Host Institutions, 24:59 (1997).

Hauserman and Lansing, Rape on Campus: Postsecondary Institutions as Third Party Defendants, 8:182 (1981-82).

Haviland, Note, Student Discriminatory Harassment, 16:311 (1989).

Haviland, Bhirdo, and Warth, Case Comment, McCormack v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: Collegiate Athletics Sanctions from an Antitrust and Civil Rights Perspective. 15:459 (1989).

Heaney and Pullin, The Use of Flagged Test Scores in College and University Admissions: Issues and Implications Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 23:797 (1997).

Heffernan, Cosgrove, and Grundy, Case Comment, Shannon v. Bepko: Public Colleges and Universities as State Agencies: Standards for Eleventh Amendment Protection, 16:151 (1989).

Helms, Patterns of Litigation in Postsecondary Education: A Case Law Study, 14:99 (1987).

Hemmat, Rosman, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).

Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Henze, Commentary, State Universities As Political Subdivisions: Where Is the Border?, 9:341 (1982-83).

Hermann, Sports and the Handicapped: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and Curricular, Intramural, Club and Intercollegiate Athletic Programs in Postsecondary Educational Institutions, 5:143 (1977-79).

Hernandez, Note, The Constitutionality of Racially Restrictive Organizations within the University Setting, 21:429 (1994).

Hesburgh and Albino, 1995 Symposium: Reform and Renewal in College Sports, 22:63 (1995).

Hiers, New Restrictions on Academic Free Speech: Jeffries v. Harleston II, 22:217 (1995).

Higgins and Zulkey, Liability Insurance Coverage: How to Avoid Unpleasant Surprises, 17:123 (1990).

Hill, Note, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Significant Overlap with Section 504 for Colleges and Universities, 18:389 (1992).

Hill, Evans, and Scheske, Case Comment, Knapp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Tuition Assistance or Scholarship, A Question of Taxation, 16:699 (1990).

Hilliard and Katz, 1995 Symposium: Government Attempts at Regulation, 22:20 (1995).

Hirschman and Thomas, Minority-Targeted Scholarships: More than a Black and White Issue, 21:555 (1995).

Hitchner, Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement of Teaching Hospitals and Faculty Physicians, 10:79 (1983-84).

Hochberg, The Four Horsement Ride Again: Cable Communications and Collegiate Athletics, 5:43 (1977-79).

Hodges, Note, Postsecondary Faculty Members' Rights to Free Speech, 9:85 (1982-83).

Hodulik, Prohibiting Discriminatory Harassment by Regulating Student Speech: A Balancing of First-Amendment and University Interests, 16:573 (1990).

Hoey, Capano, and Zuch, Case Comment, In re Cronyn: Can Student Theses Bar Patent Applications?, 18:105 (1991).

Hoge, Burman, Hendricks, Madden, Tyler, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Holland and Stacy, Legal and Statistical Problems in Litigating Sex Discrimination Claims in Higher Education, 11:107 (1984).

Hollander, An Introduction To Legal and Ethical Issues Relating to Computers in Higher Education, 11:215 (1984).

Holloway, Recent Developments in Student Affairs, 1:264 (1974).

Holloway and Tharp, Recent Developments in Student Affairs, 2:115 (1974-75).

Holway and O’Donnell, Unfair Labor Practices in the Academic Setting, 1:325 (1974).

Hoornstra and Liethen, Academic Freedom and Civil Discovery, 10:113 (1983-84).

Hopkins, Rule 144: The Applicability of the Restricted Securities Requirements to Colleges and Universities, 1:136 (1973-74).

Hopkins, Regulations of Interstate Charitable Solicitations: Implications for Colleges and Universities, 2:289 (1975).

Hopkins, Scholarships and Fellowship Grants: Current Tax Developments and Problems, 3:54 (1975).

Horger, Case Comment, Medicare Reimbursement to Provider University Hospitals for Graduate Medical Education Expenses in Light of Thomas Jefferson University v. Shalala, 23:133 (1996).

Horn, Intercollegiate Athletics: Waning Amateurism and Rising Professionalism, 5:97 (1977-79).

Hornby, Book Review, Higher Education and the Law, by Harry T. Edwards and Virginia Davis Nordin, 7:181 (1980-81).

Hornby, Book Review, The Law of Higher Education: Legal Implications of Administrative Decision Making, by William A. Kaplin, 7:181 (1980-81)

Horton, Traditional Single-Sex Fraternities on College Campuses: Will they Survive in the 1990's?, 18:419 (1992).

Hoye, Tort Litigation in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:257 (1998).

Huber and Robinson, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1993 in Review, 21:157 (1994).

Hunkler and Streitz, Note, Teaching or Learning: Are Teaching Assistants Students or Employees?, 24:349 (1997).

Hunnicutt and Page, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Policy Analysis of Student Speech Regulation at America's Twenty Largest Public Universities, 21:1 (1994).

Hunter, Collecting Defaulted Student Loans: How Much Diligence is Due?, 9:149 (1982-83).

Hustoles and Smith, Employment Discrimination: 1995 in Review, 23:403 (1997).

Hustoles, Faculty and Staff Dismissals: Developing Contract and Tort Theories, 10:479 (1983-84).

Hylden and Tayler, Judicial Review of Accrediting Agency Actions: Marlboro Corp. D/B/A The Emery School v. The Association of Independent Colleges and Schools, 4:199 (1977).

Irby, Fantel, Milam, and Schwarz, Faculty Rights and Responsibilities in Evaluating and Dismissing Medical Students, 8:102 (1981-82).

Irwin, Stotlar, and Mulrooney, A Critical Analysis of Collegiate Licensing Policies and Procedures, 20:97 (1993).

Israeloff and Walker, Historic Preservation and the Institutional Owner, 14:59 (1987).

Jarvis and Coleman, Tuition Adjustment for Law School Students: A Necessary Accommodation under the ADA?, 24:45 (1997).

Jasper, Note, Britain's Education Reform Act: A Lesson in Academic Freedom and Tenure, 16:449 (1990).

Jeddeloh, Education Program Cost Reimbursement In University Hospitals: Is There a Coherent National Policy?, 8:465 (1981-82).

Jenkins, Regulation of Colleges and Universities Under the Guaranteed Student Loan Program, 4:13 (1976).

Jennings, Breach of Contract Suits by Students Against Postsecondary Institutions: Can they Succeed?, 7:191 (1980-81).

Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:225 (1998).

Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education: A Review of 1996 and 1997 Judicial Cases, 24:161 (1997).

Johnsen, Immunity: 1995 in Review, 23:333 (1997).

Johnsen and Todd, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:221 (1998).

Johnson and Weeks, To Save a College: Independent College Trustees and Decisions on Financial Exigency, Endowment Use, and Closure, 12:455 (1986).

Johnstone, Book Review, Failing the Future: A Dean Looks at Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century, by Annette Kolodny, 25:909 (1999).

Jones, Book Review, The Tax Law of Colleges and Universities, by Bertrand M. Harding, Jr., 25:191 (1998).

Jones, Tax Exemption Issues Facing Academic Health Centers in the Managed Care Environment, 24:261 (1997).

Jones, Book Review, Ethics and Higher Education, ed. By William M. May, Crises in Higher Education and the Need for Solutions — But What Kind?, 18:621 (1992).

Judge, Student-Athletes as Employees: Income Tax Consequences, 13:285 (1986).

Justus, Brake, and Davidson, 1995 Symposium: Title IX, 22:48 (1995).

Kadaielski, Postsecondary Athletics in an Era of Equality: An Appraisal of the Effort of Title IX, 5:123 (1977-79).

Kahn, Conducting a “No-Union” Election Campaign on Campus, 1:291 (1974).

Kahn, Current and Emerging Labor Relations Issues in Higher Education, 2:123 (1974-75).

Kaplin, A Typology and Critique of Title IX Sexual Harassment Law After Gebser and Davis, 26:615 (2000).

Kaplin, Law on the Campus 1960-1985: Years of Growth and Challenge, 12:269 (1985).

Kaplin, An Overview of Legal Principles and Issues Affecting Postsecondary Athletics, 5:1 (1977-79).

Kasunic, Fair Use and the Educator's Right to Photocopy Copyrighted Material for Classroom Use, 19:271 (1993).

Katerberg, Note, Institutional Review Boards, Research on Children, and Informed Consent of Parents: Walking the Tightrope Between Emerging Vital Experimentation and Protecting Subjects’ Rights, 24:545 (1998).

Katz and Hilliard, 1995 Symposium: Government Attempts at Regulation, 22:20 (1995).

Keeling, Property Taxation of Colleges and Universities: The Dilemma Posed by the Use of Facilities for Purposes Unrelated to Education, 16:623 (1990).

Keller, Consensual Amorous Relationships Between Faculty and Students: The Constitutional Right to Privacy, 15:21 (1988).

Keller, Note, Shall the Truce Be Unbroken: New Jersey v. T.L.O. and Higher Education, 12:415 (1985).

Kelly, Financing Higher Education: Federal Income-Tax Consequences, 17:307 (1991).

Kelly, Double Prosecution of the State University Student, 1:269 (1974).

Kennan, Commentary, The Moral Functions of Higher Education in Modern Society, 20:69 (1993).

Kennard, Book Review, Education Law, ed. By James A. Rapp, 12:565 (1986).

Kennedy, The Educators’ Role in Educating the NLRB: Requirements of a Complete Record, 1:305 (1974).

Kennelly, Book Review, On Assuming A College or University Presidency, Lessons and Advice from the Field, by Estela M. Bensimon, Marian L. Gade and Joseph F. Kauffman, 16:731 (1990).

Kertz and Hasson, University Research and Development Activities: The Federal Income Tax Consequences of Research Contracts, Research Subsidiaries and Joint Ventures, 13:109 (1986).

Kertz, Tax Exempt Organizations and Commercially Sponsored Scientific Research, 9:69 (1982-83).

Kettle and McCarthy, An End Run Around the Sherman Act? Banks v. NCAA and Gaines v. NCAA, 19:295 (1993).

Keyes, Health-Care Professionals with AIDS: The Risk of Transmission Balanced Against the Interests of Professionals and Institutions, 16:589 (1990).

Khorey and Barnes, The Effects and Use of Administrative Determinations in Subsequent Employment Litigation, 16:189 (1989).

Kilby, The Discouragement of Learning: Scholarship Made for Hire, 21:455 (1995).

Kirby, Federal Antitrust Issues Affecting Institutions of Higher Education: An Overview, 11:345 (1984).

Kirk, Judicial Deference to Institutional Autonomy: The Irony of Yeshiva and the Financial Exigency Cases, 10:541 (1983-84).

Kobasic, Note, Institutional Review Boards in the University Setting: Review of Pharmaceutical Testing Protocols, Informed Consent and Ethical Considerations, 15:185 (1988).

Kobasic, Smith, and Zucker, Case Comment, Eiseman v. State of New York: The Duty of a College to Protect Its Students from Harm by Other Students Admitted under Special Programs, 14:591 (1988).

Koon, Note, United States v. Brown University and a New Proposal to Discern whether Certain Financial Aid Constitutes "Trade or Commerce," 22:191 (1995).

Kramer, Case Comment, The Free Rider Problem and First Amendment Concerns: A Balance Upset by New Limitations on Mandatory Student Fees, 21:691 (1995).

Kreiser, AAUP Perspectives on Academic Freedom and United States Intelligence Agencies, 19:251 (1993).

Kubasek, Book Review, Discrimination, Affirmative Action, and Equal Opportunity, ed. by W.E. Block and M.A. Walker, 10:331 (1983-84).

Kumin, Vinik, and O’Brien, Affirmative Action in College Admissions: Practical Advice to Public and Private Institutions for Dealing with the Changing Landscape, 26:395 (2000).

Lachs, University Patent Policy, 10:263 (1983-84).

Lacovara, How Far Can the Federal Camel Slip Under the Academic Tent?, 4:223 (1976).

Lake and Bickel, The Emergence of New Paradigms in Student-University Relations: From In Loco Parentis to Bystander to Facilitator, 23:755 (1997).

Lake and Bickel, Reconceptualizing the University's Duty to Provide a Safe Learning Environment: A Criticism of the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis and the Restatement (Second) of Torts, 20:261 (1994).

Lake and Pedulla, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation: State Agencies That Grant Educational Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default on Prior Educational Loans, 17:261 (1990).

Lallo, Brammer, and Ney, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees of Boston University: The Realization of Title VII’s Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991).

Lallo, Note, Student Challenges to Grades and Academic Dismissals: Are They Losing Battles?, 18:577 (1992).

Lam, Restrictions on Technology Transfer Among Academic Researchers: Will Recent Changes in the Export Control System Make a Difference?, 13:311 (1986).

LaManque and Sorenson, The Application of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier in College Litigation, 22:971 (1996).

Landry, Oriard, and Leonard, 1995 Symposium: College Athletics as a vehicle for Social Reform, 22:77 (1995).

Lane and Ende, Book Review, Contracting for Services, ed. By Lanora F. Welzenbach, 11:399 (1984).

La Noue, Tenure and Title VII, 1:206 (1974).

Lansing and Hauserman, Rape on Campus: Postsecondary Institutions as Third Party Defendants, 8:182 (1981-82).

Laster, State Law on Mandatory Retirement of Tenured Faculty After the 1978 Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments, 5:211 (1977-79).

Lautsch, Book Review, Computers in Education: Legal Liabilities and Ethical Issues Concerning Their Use and Misuses, by Patricia A. Hollander, 14:163 (1987).

Lautsch, Computers and the University Attorney: An Overview of Computer Law on Campus, 5:217 (1977-79).

Lawton, Carder, and Weisman, Recent Governmental Action Regarding the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405 (1985).

Laycock, The Rights of Religious Academic Communities, 20:15 (1993).

Leahy, Note, The Title Bout: A Critical Review of the Regulation and Enforcement of Title IX in Intercollegiate Athletics, 24:489 (1998).

Leduc, Note, Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: A Guide to How Courts Will Treat Future Antitrust Challenges to NCAA Regulations, 26:139 (1999).

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:291 (1999).

Lee, Employment Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:313 (1998).

Lee, Employment Discrimination Higher Education: A Review of the 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:225 (1997).

Lee, Balancing Confidentiality and Disclosure in Faculty Peer Review: Impact of Title VII Litigation, 9:279 (1982-83).

Lee, Faculty Role in Academic Governance and the Managerial Exclusion: Impact of the Yeshiva Decision, 7:222 (1980-81).

Lee and Olswang, Scientific Misconduct: Institutional Procedures and Due Process Considerations, 11:51 (1984).

Lee and Begin, Criteria for Evaluating the Managerial Status of College Faculty: Applications of Yeshiva University by the NLRB, 10:515 (1983-84).

Leeson, Note, The Drug Testing of College Athletes, 16:325 (1989).

Leeson, Cunningham, and Stadler, Kahn v. Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara: The Right to Privacy and the Academic Freedom Privilege with Respect to Confidential Peer Review Materials, 15:73 (1988).

Legal Diagnosis and Defense of An Employment Civil Rights Claim, 6:135 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Lemmer and Pompeo, "Educating" Lawyers about the Implications of Cost Accounting Standards for Government Contracts and Grants with Educational Institutions, 21:111 (1994).

Leonard, Oriard, and Landry, 1995 Symposium: College Athletics as a vehicle for Social Reform, 22:77 (1995).

Lewis and Vincler, Storming the Ivory Tower: The Competing Interests of the Public's Right to Know and the Integrity of University Research, 20:417 (1994).

Liethen and Hoornstra, Academic Freedom and Civil Discovery, 10:113 (1983-84).

Limitone and Stitt, University Fair Employment Practices Litigation Strategy and Tactics, 1:20 (1973).

Lines, Tuition Discrimination: Valid and Invalid Uses of Tuition Differentials, 9:241 (1982-83).

Livingston and Cerny, IRS Intermediate Sanctions: How They Will Impact Colleges and Universities, 25:865 (1999).

Loar and Sky, General Operating Support for Museums: Problems in Paradise, 7:267 (1980-81).

Lohman, Case Comment, The Final Frustration of Defaulting NHSC Scholars?: United States v. Hatcher, 19:385 (1993).

Long, Standard of Proof in Student Disciplinary Cases, 12:71 (1985).

Longo and Thoman, Case Comment, Haffer v. Temple University: A Reawakening of Gender Discrimination in Intercollegiate Athletics, 16:137 (1989).

Lovain, Note, Grounds for Dismissing Tenured Postsecondary Faculty for Cause, 10:419 (1983- 84).

Lowell, Judicial Review of Rule-Making in Amateur Athletics, 5:11 (1977-79).

Luzum and Pupel, Case Comment, Weinstein v. University of Illinois: The "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine and Procedural Due Process for Nontenured Faculty, 15:369 (1989).

Lynch, Dixon, and Swem, Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas: Termination of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the Burden of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417 (1987).

Lyons, EEOC v. Board of Governors of State Colleges and Universities: Collective Bargaining Agreements and Age Discrimination in Employment Act Claims: What Counts as Retaliation under ADEA Section 4(D)?, 20:241 (1993).

Lyons, Oregon v. Smith and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act: An Educational Perspective, 20:333 (1994).

MacCordy, The Threat of Proposed Patent Law Changes to the Research University, 20:295 (1994).

MacLachlan, Dangerous Traditions: Hazing Rituals on Campus and University Liability, 26:511 (2000).

Madden, Hendricks, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Madsen, New State Legislation On Informing Workers About Hazardous Substances in the Workplace — Will It Impact on University Teaching and Research?, 9:325 (1982-83).

Majestic and Bell, Protection and Enforcement of College and University Trademarks, 10:63 (1983-84).

Malloy, Book Review, Governing Tomorrow's Campus: Perspectives and Agendas, by Jack H. Schuster, Lynn H. Miller and Associates, 18:121 (1991).

Mancino and Sugarman, Tax Aspects of University Patent Policy, 3:41 (1975).

Manderfeld, Note, College and University Liability Under Superfund, 15:217 (1988).

Manderfeld, Curry, and Sullivan, Case Comment, Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988).

Marshall and Connolly, Sexual Harassment of University or College Students by Faculty Members, 15:381 (1989).

Marshall and Milam, Impact of Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing on Academic Dismissals from Graduate and Professional Schools, 13:335 (1987).

Mathews, Higher Education and Society, 8:463 (1981-82).

Mawdsley, Plagiarism Problems in Higher Education, 13:65 (1986).

McCarthy and Kettle, Case Comment, An End Run Around the Sherman Act? Banks v. NCAA and Gaines v. NCAA, 19:295 (1993).

McCaffrey, Patent Policy in Federal Government Contracts and Grants, 1:230 (1974).

McClamrock, Note, The First Amendment and Public Funding of Religiously Controlled or Affiliated Higher Education, 17:381 (1991).

McClamrock, Meyer, and Spencer, Case Comment, Alabama Student Party v. Student Government Association of the University of Alabama: The First Amendment and Student-Government Election Campaign Speech in Public Universities, 16:649 (1990).

McCollogh and Foster, Reviewers’ Comments, 8:15 (1981-82).

McClellan and Harding, Unreasonable Compensation: The Hidden Issue in the IRS College and University Examination Guidelines, 20:111 (1993).

McCusker, The Americans With Disabilities Act: Its Potential for Expanding the Scope of Reasonable Academic Accommodations, 21:619 (1995).

McDonald, Contract, A Property Right under the Fourteenth Amendment? Vail v. Board of Education, 11:445 (1985).

McGarvie, Creating Roles for Religion and Philanthropy in a Secular Nation: The Dartmouth College Case and the Design of Civil Society in the Early Republic, 25:527 (1999).

McGuire, Note, Federal Research Grant Funding at Universities: Legislative Waves from Auditors Diving into Overhead Cost Pools, 23:563 (1997).

McGuire, The NCAA- Institution Under Constitutional Seige, 2:175 (1974-75).

McHugh, Faculty Unionism and Tenure, 1:46 (1973).

McIntyre, Dumas, and Zelenock, Case Comment, Parate v. Isibor: Resolving the Conflict Between the Academic Freedom of the University and the Academic Freedom of University Professors, 16:713 (1990).

McKee, Tenure by Default: The Nonformal Acquisition of Academic Tenure, 7:31 (1980-81).

McLean, Note, Tort Liability of Colleges and Universities for Injuries Resulting from Student Alcohol Consumption, 14:399 (1987).

McLean, Andrews, and Dang, Note, Recent Development: Church Licensed Professors: The Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987).

McMillen and Padilla, 1995 Symposium: Educating the Athlete, 22:37 (1995).

Menard, May Tenure Rights of Faculty Be Bargained Away?, 2:256 (1975).

Merz, Book Review, Funding Science in America: Congress, Universities, and the Academic Pork Barrel, by James D. Savage, 26:803 (2000).

Metzger, Professional and Legal Limits to Academic Freedom, 20:1 (1993).

Meyer, McClamrock, and Spencer, Case Comment, Alabama Student Party v. Student Government Association of the University of Alabama: The First Amendment and Student-Government Election Campaign Speech in Public Universities, 16:649 (1990).

Meyers, Note, State Open-Records Acts and the NCAA Bylaw Requiring Coaches to Disclose Their "Athletically-Related" Outside Income: Emptying the Coaches' Pockets for Public Inspection?, 16:497 (1990).

Michaelson, Steinbach, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26: 467 (2000).

Michaelson, Smith, Drier, and Steinbach, Board of Education of the Township of Piscataway v. Sharon Taxman, 24:671 (1998).

Middleditch, College and University Fringe Benefits, 1:172 (1973-74).

Mikva, Commentary, How Do We Manage the Right to Hate, 19:35 (1992).

Milam and Marshall, Impact of Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing on Academic Dismissals from Graduate and Professional Schools, 13:335 (1987).

Milam, Fantel, Irby, and Schwarz, Faculty Rights and Responsibilities in Evaluating and Dismissing Medical Students, 8:102 (1981-82).

Milani, Disabled Students in Higher Education: Administrative and Judicial Enforcement of Disability Law, 22:989 (1996).

Miller, Case Comment, Coursepacks and Copyright: Fair Use in Princeton University Press v. Michigan Document Services, 23:525 (1997).

Miller, Subpoenas in Academia: Controlling Disclosure, 17:1 (1990).

Millsap and Wright, Recent Cases on Student Transcript Rights after Bankruptcy, 6:231 (1979-80).

Mingle, Book Review, The Costs and Benefits of Openness: Sunshine Laws and Higher Education, by Harlan Cleveland, 12:569 (1986).

Mitten, Book Review, Unsportsmanlike Conduct— Exploiting College Athletes, by Walter Byers (with Charles Hammer), 22:1081 (1996).

Miyamoto, Liability of Colleges and Universities for Injuries Sustained by Students While Participating in Extracurricular Activities, 15:149 (1988).

Mooney, Note, Conditioning Student Aid on Draft Registration: The Legislation and Regulations, 10:379 (1983-84).

Moran and Shepard, The Future of Faculty Collective Bargaining at Private Universities, 9:41 (1982-83).

Morris, Delaney, Sack, and Sperber, 1995 Symposium: Round Table Discussion on Collegiate Athletics Reform, 22:96 91995).

Morton, Note, Who Should Speak? Who Should Pay? The Complexities of Refunding Student Fees at Public Colleges and Universities, 11:481 (1985).

Mulderink, Case Comment, Par for the Female Course: Cohen v. Brown University Mandates an Equal Playing Field in Intercollegiate Athletics, 22:111 (1995).

Mulrooney, Irwin, and Stotlar, A Critical Analysis of Collegiate Licensing Policies and Procedures, 20:97 (1993).

Murray, Alessandro, and Reed, Case Comment, Fox v. Board of Trustees of the State University of New York: University Regulation Faces the First Amendment, 15:443 (1989).

Myers, Graff, and Tyler, Case Comment, Blair v. Washington State University: Making State ERA’s a Potent Remedy for Sex Discrimination in Athletics, 14:575 (1988).

Myers, The Law of Private Inurement and Unrelated Income Taxation: Implications for Colleges and Universities, 3:96 (1976).

Myers, Recent Federal Tax Developments Affecting Colleges, Universities, and Donors, 2:269 (1975).

Myers, Remainder Gifts Under the Tax Reform Act of 1969: A Post-Final Regulation Outline with Forms, 1:106 (1973-74).

Nagle, Note, Yeshiva's Impact on Collective Bargaining in Public-Sector Higher Education, 20:383 (1994).

Naples, Note, Reading, ‘Riting and Response: Holding Colleges and Universities Liable under CERCLA, 20:483 (1994).

Nave, Niccolls, and Olswang, Unrelated Business Income Tax and Unfair Competition: Current Status of the Law, 15:249 (1989).

Neiger, Actual Knowledge Under Gebser v. Lago Vista: Evidence of the Court’s Deliberate Indifference or an Appropriate Response for Finding Institutional Liability?, 26:1 (1999).

Neiman, Book Review, Liberal Justice and the Marxist Critique of Education, by Kenneth A. Strike, 18:125 (1991).

Nelson and Ward, Burdens of Proof Under Employment Discrimination Legislation, 6:301 (1979-80).

Neuenschwander, Oral History and Copyright: An Uncertain Relationship, 10:147 (1983-84).

Neumeister and Church, University Control of Student-Athletes with Disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, 25:105 (1998).

Newell, Use of Campus Facilities for First Amendment Activity, 9:27 (1982-83).

Newell, A Right of Access to Student Newspapers at Public Universities, 4:209 (1977).

Newman, At Work in the Marketplace of Ideas: Academic Freedom, The First Amendment, and Jeffries v. Harleston, 22:281 (1995).

Ney, Brammer, and Lallo, Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees of Boston University: The Realization of Title VII’s Legislative Intent, 17:551 (1991).

Niccolls, DiScala, and Olswang, College and University Responses to the Emotionally or Mentally Impaired Students, 19:17 (1992).

Niccolls, Nave, and Olswang, Unrelated Business Income Tax and Unfair Competition: Current Status of the Law, 15:249 (1989).

Nieman, Book Review, Liberal Justice and the Marxist Critique of Education, by Kenneth A. Strike, 18:125 (1991).

Nogay and Stoner, the Model university Coaching Contract (“MCC”): A better Starting Point for Your Next Negotiation, 16:43 (1989).

Noonan, Religious Law Schools and the First Amendment, 20:43 (1993).

Nordin, The Contract to Educate: Toward a More Workable Theory of the Student-University Relationship, 8:141 (1981-82).

Oakley, Book Review, The Opening of the American Mind: Canons, Culture, and history, by Lawrence Levine, 24:119 (1997).

Oaks, A Private University Looks at Government Regulation, 4:1 (1976).

O’Brien, Vinik, and Kumin, Affirmative Action in College Admissions: Practical Advice to Public and Private Institutions for Dealing with the Changing Landscape, 26:395 (2000).

O’Donnell and Holway, Unfair Labor Practices in the Academic Setting, 1:325 (1974).

O’Neil, Student Fees and Student Rights: Evolving Constitutional Principles, 25:569 (1999).

O’Neil, The Lawyer and the Client in the Campus Setting: Who is the Client, What does the Client Expect and how May the Attorney Respond?, 19:333 (1993).

O’Neil, Case Comment, Bishop v. Aronov: A Comment, 18:381 (1992).

O'Neil, Preferential Admissions Revisited: Some Reflections on DeFunis and Bakke, 14:423 (1988).

O'Neil, Academic Freedom and the Constitution, 11: 275 (1984).

O’Neil, Court and Campus – Striking a New Balance, 1:199 (1973).

O’Neill, Single-Sex Education After United States v. Virginia, 23:489 (1997).

Olivas, Book Reviews, The Leaning Ivory Tower, Latino Professors in American Universities, ed. By Raymond V. Padilla and Rudolfo Chavez Chavez; Race and Representation: Affirmative Action, ed. By Robert Post and Michael Rogin; Shameful Admissions, The Losing Battle to Serve Everyone in Our Universities, by Angela Browne-Miller; The University in Ruins, by Bill Readings: Race, Raza, and Ruins, 24:123 (1997).

Olivas, Commentary, Federal Law and Scholarship Policy: An Essay on the Office for Civil Rights, Title VI, and Racial Restrictions, 18:21 (1991).

Olivas and Denison, Legalization in the Academy: Higher Education and the Supreme Court, 11:1 (1984).

Olson, Copyright and Fair Use: Implications of Nation Enterprises for Higher Education, 13:489 (1986).

Olswang, Union Security Provisions, Academic Freedom and Tenure: The Implications of Chicago Teachers Union v. Hudson, 14:539 (1988).

Olswang, Planning the Unthinkable: Issues in Institutional Reorganization and Faculty Reductions, 9:431 (1982-83).

Olswang, Cole, and Wilson, Program Elimination, Financial Emergency, and Student Rights, 9:163 (1982-83).

Olswang, DiScala, and Niccolls, College and University Responses to the Emotionally or Mentally Impaired Students, 19:17 (1992).

Olswang and Fantel, Tenure and Periodic Performance Review: Compatible Legal and Administrative Principles, 7:1 (1980-81).

Olswang and Lee, Scientific Misconduct: Institutional Procedures and Due Process Considerations, 11:51 (1984).

Olswang, Niccolls, and Nave, Unrelated Business Income Tax and Unfair Competition: Current Status of the Law, 15:249 (1989).

Oriard, Landry, and Leonard, 1995 Symposium: College Athletics as a Vehicle for Social Reform, 22:77 91995).

Orleans, Book Review, Dollars and Scholars: An Inquiry into the Impact of Faculty Income Upon the Functions and Future of the Academy, ed. By R. Linnell, 11:237 (1984).

Orleans, Book Review, Partners in the Research Enterprise: University-Corporate Relations in Science and Technology, ed. by T. Langfitt, S. Hackney, A. Fishman, and A. Glowasky, 11:237 (1984).

Orleans, Book Review, Ability Testing of Handicapped People: Dilemma For Government, Science, and the Public, ed. By Susan W. Sherman and Nancy M. Robinson, 9:347 (1982-83).

Orleans, Memorandum: First Thoughts on Southeastern Community College v. Davis, 6:263 (1979-80).

Orleans and Smith, Commentary, Who Should Provide Interpreters under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act?, 9:177 (1982-83).

O’Shea, First Amendment Cases in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:193 (1999).

O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1997 in Review, 25:201 (1998).

O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1996 in Review, 24:131 (1997).

O’Shea, Book Review, Fighting Words — The Politics of Hateful Speech, by Laurence R. Marcus, 23:597 (1997).

O’Shea, The First Amendment: 1995 in Review, 23:309 (1997).

Padilla and McMillen, 1995 Symposium: Educating the Athlete, 22:37 (1995).

Page and Hunnicutt, Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Policy Analysis of Student Speech Regulation at America's Twenty Largest Public Universities, 21:1 (1994).

Paige, Guerre, and Hasty, Case Comment, Gehling v. St. George's University School of Medicine, Ltd.: Continued Erosion of Colleges' and Universities' Duty to Students Injured in Collegiate Activities, 16:677 (1990).

Pajaro Dunes Conference Draft Statement, 9:533 (1982-83).

Papandreou, Case Comment, Krebs v. Rutgers: The Potential for Disclosure of Highly Confidential Personal Information Renders Questionable the Use of Social Security Numbers as Student Identification Numbers, 20:79 (1993).

Parrish, Scientific Misconduct and the Plagiarism Cases, 21:517 (1995).

Parrish, The Federal Government and Scientific Misconduct Proceedings, Past, Present, and Future As Seen Through the Thereza Imanishi-Kari Case, 24:581 (1998)

Pauley, Case Comment, Williams v. Hamilton, 8:399 (1981-82).

Pavela, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: A Review of 1996 Judicial Decisions, 24:213 (1997).

Pavela, Applying the Power of Association on Campus: A Model Code of Academic Integrity, 24:97 (1997).

Pavela, Student Disciplinary Actions: 1995 in Review, 23:391 (1997).

Pavela, Book Review, Deconstructing Academic Freedom, ed. By William W. Van Alstyne, 22:359 (1995).

Pavela, Therapeutic Paternalism and the Misuse of Mandatory Psychiatric Withdrawals on Campus, 9:101 (1982-83).

Pavella, Limiting the “Pursuit of Perfect Justice” on Campus: A Proposed Code of Student Conduct, 6:137 (1979-80).

Pedulla and Lake, Case Comment, Elter v. Great Lakes Higher Education Corporation: State Agencies That Grant Educational Loans May Discriminate Against Student Bankrupts Who Default on Prior Educational Loans, 17:261 (1990).

Pelesh, Due Process in the Accreditation Context: A Reply, 22:175 (1995).

Perkins, Note, Sylvester v. Texas Southern University: An Exception to the Rule of Judicial Deference to Academic Decisions, 25:399 (1998).

Phelps, Book Review, Cultivating Humanity: A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education, by Martha C. Nussbaum, 25:185 (1998).

Pieronek, Book Review, The Big Test: The Secret History of the American Meritocracy, by Nicholas Lemann, 26:549 (2000).

Pieronek, Discrimination Against Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:307 (1999).

Pieronek, Book Review, Becoming Gentlemen, by Lani Guinier, et al., 25:627 (1999).

Pieronek, Note, A Clash of Titans: College Football v. Title IX, 20:351 (1994).

Pieronek and Robinson, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1994 in Review, 22:367 (1996).

Pompeo and Lemmer, "Educating" Lawyers about the Implications of Cost Accounting Standards for Government Contracts and Grants with Educational Institutions, 21:111 (1994).

Porth, Personal Liability of Trustees of Educational Institutions, 1:84 (1973).

Porth, Personal Liability of Trustees of Higher Education Institutions, 2:143 (1974-75).

Poskanzer, Spotlight on the Coaching Box: The Role of the Athletic Coach within the Academic Institution, 16:1 (1989).

Prairie and Chamberlain, Due Process in the Accreditation Context, 21:61 (1994).

Price, College and Universities as Internet Service Providers: Determining and Limiting Liability for Copyright Infringement, 23:183 (1996).

Problems in Confidentiality of Institutional Records, 6:81 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Pruss, Antonini, and Fantozzi, Case Comment: Harvard Law School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens Under the Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First Amendment Rights of United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987).

Pullin and Heaney, The Use of Flagged Test Scores in College and University Admissions: Issues and Implications under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 23:797 (1997).

Pupel and Luzum, Case Comment, Weinstein v. University of Illinois: The "Work-for-Hire" Doctrine and Procedural Due Process for Nontenured Faculty, 15:369 (1989).

Rakow and Goldrick, Book Review, Sexual Assault on Campus: What Colleges Can Do, by Aileen Adams and Gail Abarbanel, 16:547 (1990).

Ramey, The Constitutionality of the Drug Testing of College Athletes: A Brandeis Brief for a Narrowly-Intrusive Approach, 16:397 (1990).

Ramey, Note, Off-the-Air Educational Videorecording and Fair Use: An Analysis, 10:341 (1983- 84).

Ramirez, The Balance of Interests Between National Security Controls and First Amendment Interests in Academic Freedom, 13:179 (1986).

Ranney, The Constitutionality of the Drug Testing of College Athletes: A Brandeis Brief for a Narrowly-Intrusive Approach, 16:397 (1990).

Raskoff, Book Review, When Hope and Fear Collide: A Portrait of Today’s College Student, by Arthur Levine & Jeanette S. Cureton, 25:613 (1999).

Rasnic, Book Review, Fumble: Bear Bryant, Wally Butts and the Great College Football Scandal, by James Kirby, 16:165 (1989).

Reams, Revocation of Academic Degrees by Colleges and Universities, 14:283 (1987).

Reback and Steinbach, Equal Employment + Equal Pay = Multiple Problems for Colleges and Universities, 2:25 (1974).

Reback and Vogt, AAMC v. Carey: Briefs in Support of a Motion to Enjoin Enforcement of New York's Standardized Test Disclosure Law, 7:132 (1980-81).

Reed, Alessandro, and Murray, Case Comment, Fox v. Board of Trustees of the State University of New York: University Regulation Faces the First Amendment, 15:443 (1989).

Regan, ‘Tis Better to “Benefit” Than to “Receive” - The Standard Delimiting Coverage Under Title IX and Other Federal Antidiscrimination Statutes, 26:107 (1999).

Reidhaar, The Assault on the Citadel: Reflections on a Quarter Century of Change in the Relationships Between the Student and the University, 12:343 (1985).

Reidhaar, Memorandum: The Legal Implications of Divestment of University Investments in Companies Doing Business in South Africa, 7:164 (1980-81).

Reidhaar, Minority Preference in Student Admissions, 2:197 (1974).

Relihan, Means and Ends: The Evolution of Federal Administration Doctrine on Equal Employment Opportunity, 1:33 (1973).

Remington, NCAA Enforcement Procedures Including the Role of the Committee on Infractions, 10:181 (1983-84).

Renahan, Case Comment, Bob Jones University v. United States: No Tax Exemptions for Racially Discriminatory Schools — Supreme Courts Clarifies Thirteen-Year Policy Imbroglio, 11:69 (1984).

Rich, Malpractice Issues in the Academic Medical Center, 13:149 (1986).

Richards, Note, "Financial Emergency" and the Faculty Furlough: A Breach of Contract?, 10:225 (1983-84).

Richardson, A Delicate Balance: U.S. Government and Higher Education, 8:445 (1981-82).

Richmond, Private Colleges and Tuition Price-Fixing: An Antitrust Primer, 17:271 (1991).

Richmond, Students' Rights to Counsel in University Disciplinary Proceedings, 15:289 (1989).

Ritter, Goettling, and Bovee, Case Comment, Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment Clause and Financial Aid to Students for Religious Education at Private Religious Institutions, 13:397 (1987).

Robinson, Introduction to Symposium on Ex Corde Ecclesiae, 25:645 (1999).

Robinson, Introduction, Higher Education and the Courts: 1995 in Review, 23:307 (1997).

Robinson and Pieronek, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1994 in Review, 22:367 (1996).

Robinson and Huber, The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1993 in Review, 21:157 (1994).

Robison and Sanders, The Myths of Academia: Open Inquiry and Funded Research, 19:227 (1993).

Robles and Vogt, Continuing Controversy in Equal Employment Law, 6:291 (1979-80).

Rosman, Hemmat, Wright, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).

Roth, Case Comment, Rosenberger v. Rector: The First Amendment Dog Chases Its Tail, 21:723 (1995).

Roth, The Impact of Liquor Liability on Colleges and Universities, 13:45 (1986).

Rothstein, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: A Review of the 1995 Judicial Decisions, 23:475 (1997).

Rothstein, Commentary, Students, Staff and Faculty with Disabilities: Current Issues for Colleges and Universities, 17:471 (1991).

Rothstein, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Emerging Issues for Colleges and Universities, 13:229 (1986).

Rothstein, Introduction to Special Issue on the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns: Implications for University Hospitals, 11:403 (1984-85).

Rothstein, Reproductive Hazards and Sex Discrimination in the Workplace: New Legal Concerns in Industry and on Campus, 10:495 (1983-84).

Rottinghaus and Wilds, Case Comment, Wynne v. Tufts University School of Medicine, 19:185 (1992).

Routh, Steinbach, Michaelson, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26: 467 (2000).

Rowe, Case Comment, NCAA v. Board of Regents: A Broadening of the Rule of Reason, 11:377 (1984).

Ruebhausen, Commentary, The Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of 1986: Implications for Tenure and Retirement, 14:561 (1988).

Ruiz, Note, National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Smith: Must the NCAA Play By the Rules? 26:119 (1999).

Rumsey, Legal Aspects of the Relationship Between Fraternities and Public Institutions of Higher Education: Freedom of Association and Ability to Prohibit Campus Presence or Student Membership, 11:465 (1985).

Rutledge, Book Review, Wrongs of Passage: Fraternities, Sororities, Hazing, and Binge Drinking, by Hank Nuwer, 26:789 (2000).

Rutledge, Hell Night Hath No Fury Like a Pledge Scorned . . . and Injured: Hazing Litigation in U.S. Colleges and Universities, 25:361 (1998).

Ruxin, Unsportsmanlike Conduct: The Student-Athlete, the NCAA, and Agents, 8:347 (1981-82).

Ryan and Stoner, Burlington, Faragher, Oncale, and Beyond: Recent Developments in Title VII Jurisprudence, 26:645 (2000).

Ryan, Note, The First Amendment on Campus: The Rights of the Student Press v. The Rights of the Students, 14:505 (1988).

Ryan and Brickley, Case Comment, Miller v. Rutgers and Kovats v. Rutgers: Application of the Eleventh Amendment in Suits Against State Colleges and Universities, 13:407 (1987).

Sack, Delaney, Morris, and Sperber, 1995 Symposium: Round Table Discussion on Collegiate Athletics Reform, 22:96 (1995).

Sacken, Commercialization of Academic Knowledge and Judicial Deference, 19:1 (1992).

Sagner and Ayres, The Bankruptcy Reform Act and Student Loans: Unraveling New Knots, 9:361 (1982-83).

Salaway, Note, UMIFA and A Model For Endowment Investing, 22:1045 (1996).

Salsich, Book Review, Higher Education and State Governments, by Edward R. Hines, 17:429 (1991).

Saltzman and Bompey, The Role of Statistics in Employment Discrimination Litigation — A University Perspective, 9:263 (1982-83).

Sampen, Age Discrimination and Reasonable Non-Age Factors, 24:1 (1997).

Sanders and Robison, The Myths of Academia: Open Inquiry and Funded Research, 19:227 (1993).

Saurack, Note, Protecting the Student: A Critique of the Procedural Protection Afforded to American and English Students in University Disciplinary Hearings, 21:785 (1995).

Schaller, Drug Testing and the Evolution of Federal and State Regulation of Intercollegiate Athletics: A Chill Wind Blows, 18:131 (1991).

Schatken, Student Records at Institutions of Postsecondary Education: Selected Issues Under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 4:147 (1977).

Scheske, Note, Financial Aid and Antitrust: Financial-Aid Packages Subject of Justice Department Probe, 17:43 (1990).

Scheske, Hill, and Evans, Case Comment, Knapp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue: Tuition Assistance or Scholarship, A Question of Taxation, 16:699 (1990).

Schinner, Establishing a Collegiate Trademark Licensing Program: To What Extent Does An Institution Have An Exclusive Right to Its Name?, 15:405 (1989).

Schlesinger, Commentary, The Opening of the American Mind, 16:425 (1990).

Schlottman and Barnes, After "Decoupling": Further Thoughts, 9:315 (1982-83).

Schneider, Political Interference in Law School Clinical Programs: Reflections on Outside Interference and Academic Freedom, 11:179 (1984).

Schroeder, Evolving Theories in Legal Liability: How will they Affect Cooperative Extension?, 18:483 (1992).

Schupansky and Stoner, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: 1997 in Review, 25:293 (1998)

Schultz, Nontenured Faculty: Current Legal and Practical Problems in Connection with Nonrenewal of Such Appointments, 1:74 (1973).

Schwartz and Woods, Public Television and the Hearing Impaired, 9:1 (1982-83).

Schwarz, Fantel, Irby, and Milam, Faculty Rights and Responsibilities in Evaluating and Dismissing Medical Students, 8:102 (1981-82).

Schwartzman, The Administration’s Approach to Collective Bargaining, 1:351 (1974).

Scott and Weingart, Case Comment, A Professor's Choice: Employment or Religious Conviction: EEOC v. University of Detroit, 18:315 (1991).

Selected Bibliography, 3:116 (1975).

Sensenbrenner, University Counselor: Lore, Logic and Logistics, 2:13 (1974).

Sensenbrenner, Collective Bargaining Legislation for Public Higher Education From the Management Side of the Table, 4:27 (1976).

Shaffer, Review Essay: Legal Resources for Higher Education Law, 12:83 (1985).

Shannon, Bianchi, and, Brenna, Case Comment, Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp: Potential Liability for Classroom Anthologies, 18:595 (1992).

Shattuck, Secrecy on Campus, 19:217 (1993).

Shapiro, Memorandum: Early Retirement Incentives and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 7:174 (1980-81).

Shea, Case Comment, Duty of Care Owed to Universities in Light of Kleinknecht, 21:591 (1995).

Shearer, Ward, and Wattley, Case Comment, Student Government Association v. Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts: Forum and Subsidy Analysis Applied to University Funding Decisions, 17:65 (1990).

Shepard and Moran, The Future of Faculty Collective Bargaining at Private Universities, 9:41 (1982-83).

Sherman, How Free is Free Enough? Public University Presidential Searches, University Autonomy, and State Open Meeting Acts, 26:665 (2000).

Shockley, The Availability of "Trade Secret" Protection for University Research, 20:309 (1994).

Shultz, Nontenured Faculty: Current Legal and Practical Problems in Connection with Nonrenewal of Such Appointments, 1:84 (1973).

Sidbury, The Disclosure of Campus Crime: How Colleges and Universities Continue to Hide Behind the 1998 Amendment to FERPA and How Congress Can Eliminate the Loophole, 26:755 (2000).

Siena and Bartlett, Research and Development Limited Partnerships as a Device to Exploit University Owned Technology, 10:435 (1983-84).

Sims, Book Review, Academic Freedom and Tenure: Ethical Issues, by Richard T. De George, 25:443 (1998).

Simon, Faculty Writings: Are They "Works Made for Hire" under the 1976 Copyright Act?, 9:485 (1982-83).

Simon, The Application of State Sunshine Laws to Institutions of Higher Education, 4:83 (1976).

Simons, Case Comment, Avins v. White: Defamation in the Accreditation Process, 8:268 (1981- 82).

Sky and Loar, General Operating Support for Museums: Problems in Paradise, 7:267 (1980-81).

Smart, Widmar v. Vincent and the Purposes of the Establishment Clause, 9:469 (1982-83).

Smith, Cohen v. San Bernardino Valley College: The Scope of Academic Freedom Within the Context of Sexual Harassment Claims and In-Class Speech, 25:1 (1998).

Smith, Case Comment, Anderson v. University of Wisconsin: Handicap and Race Discrimination in Readmission Procedures, 15:431 (1989).

Smith, The Implications of the Uniform Patent Legislation to Colleges and Universities, 8:82 (1981-82).

Smith, Protecting the Confidentiality of Faculty Peer Review Records: Department of Labor v. The University of California, 8:20 (1981-82).

Smith, Drier, Michaelson, and Steinbach, Board of Education of the Township of Piscataway v. Sharon Taxman, 24:671 (1998).

Smith, Kobasic, and Zucker, Case Comment, Eiseman v. State of New York: The Duty of a College to Protect Its Students from Harm by Other Students Admitted under Special Programs, 14:591 (1988).

Smith and Orleans, Commentary, Who Should Provide Interpreters under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act?, 9:177 (1982-83).

Speake, Somers, and Ware, Immigration Law and Higher Education: Employment of International Employees, 20:51 (1993).

Sorenson, Impact of the Copyright Law on College Teaching, 12:509 (1986).

Sorenson and LaManque, The Application of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier In College Litigation, 22:971 (1996).

Somers, Ware, and Speake, Immigration Law and Higher Education: Employment of International Employees, 20:51 (1993).

Special Committee on Education and the Law (Association of the Bar of the City of New York), Due Process in Decisions Relating to Tenure in Higher Education, 11:323 (1984).

Spencer, Meyer, and McClamrock, Case Comment, Alabama Student Party v. Student Government Association of the University of Alabama: The First Amendment and Student-Government Election Campaign Speech in Public Universities, 16:649 (1990).

Sperber, Delaney, Sack, and Morris, 1995 Symposium: Round Table Discussion on Collegiate Athletics Reform, 22:96 91995).

Spuehler and Gordon, Questions and Answers Explaining the New Tax Rules Applicable to Tax Sheltered Annuities, 17:435 (1991).

Sroka, Discrimination Against Students: 1995 in Review, 23:431 (1997).

Stacy and Holland, Legal and Statistical Problems in Litigating Sex Discrimination Claims in Higher Education, 11:107 (1984).

Stadler, Note, Drug Testing of College and University Employees, 15:321 (1989).

Stadler, Cunningham, and Leeson, Kahn v. Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara: The Right to Privacy and the Academic Freedom Privilege with Respect to Confidential Peer Review Materials, 15:73 (1988).

Stanley, Note, The Rights of Gay Student Organizations, 10:397 (1983-84).

Staton, Note, Recent Cases Concerning the Rights of Student Athletes, 10:209 (1983-84).

Status of Quotas as a Remedy in Discrimination Cases, 6:129 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Steadman and Woods, Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner: The Psychotherapist's Duty to Warn, 10:293 (1983-84).

Steele, Mandatory Student Fees at Public Universities: Bringing the First Amendment Within the Campus Gate, 13:353 (1987).

Stein, Note, Foreign Educational Programs in Britain: Legal Issues Associated with the Establishment and Taxation of Programs Abroad, 16:521 (1990).

Steinbach, Michaelson, Routh, and Dreier, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Amici Curiae, 26: 467 (2000).

Steinbach, Michaelson, Smith, and Drier, Board of Education of the Township of Piscataway v. Sharon Taxman, 24:671 (1998).

Steinbach and Reback, Equal Employment + Equal Pay = Multiple Problems for Colleges and Universities, 2:25 (1974).

Steinberg, Rape on College Campuses: Reform Through Title IX, 18:39 (1991).

Stevens, Evaluation of Faculty Competence as a “Privileged Occasion,” 4:281 (1977).

Stitt and Limitone, University Fair Employment Practices Litigation Strategy and Tactics, 1:20 (1973).

Stoner and Cerminara, Harnessing the "Spirit of Insubordination": A Model Student Disciplinary Code, 17:89 (1990).

Stoner and Detar, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:273 (1999).

Stoner and Ryan, Burlington, Faragher, Oncale, and Beyond: Recent Developments in Title VII Jurisprudence, 26:645 (2000).

Stoner and Nogay, The Model University Coaching Contract ("MCC"): A Better Starting Point for Your Next Negotiation, 16:43 (1989).

Stoner and Schupansky, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students: 1997 in Review, 25:293 (1998).

Stotlar, Irwin, and Mulrooney, A Critical Analysis of Collegiate Licensing Policies and Procedures, 20:97 (1993).

Streitz and Hunkler, Note, Teaching or Learning: Are Teaching Assistants Students or Employees?, 24:349 (1997).

Suffern, Commentary, The Impact of the National Association of Attorneys General Model Solicitation Act on Colleges and Universities, 15:177 (1988).

Sugarman and Mancino, Tax Aspects of University Patent Policy, 3:41 (1975).

Sullivan, Note, The College or University Power to Withhold Diplomas, 15:335 (1989).

Sullivan, Curry, and Manderfeld, Case Comment, Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988).

Sullivan and Bader, The Application of Export Control Laws to Scientific Research at Universities, 9:451 (1982-83).

Sun and Daniel, The Sherman Act Antitrust Provisions and Collegiate Action: Should there be a Continued Exception for the Business of the University? 25:451 (1999).

Swan, Early Retirement Incentives with Upper Age Limits under the Older Workers Benefits Protection Act, 19:53 (1992).

Swan, Subjective Hiring and Promotion Decisions in the Wake of Fort Worth, Atonio, and Price Waterhouse, 16:553 (1990).

Swan, The Eleventh Amendment Revisited: Suits Against State Government Entities and their Employees in Federal Courts, 14:1 (1987).

Swanson, Note, Atlanta College of Medical & Dental Careers, Inc. v. Riley: The Right of a School to Appeal the Education Department's Calculation of its Loan Default Rate, 21:141 (1994).

Swem, Note, Due Process Rights in Student Disciplinary Matters, 14:359 (1987).

Swem, Dixon, and Lynch, Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas: Termination of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the Burden of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417 (1987).

Switzer, New IRS Guidelines Target College and University UBIT, 21:489 (1995).

Tashjian-Brown, Title IX: Progress Toward Program Specific Regulation of Private Academia, 10:1 (1983-84).

Teitell, Federal Tax Implications of Charitable Gift Annuities, 3:26 (1975).

Telecommunications on Campus, 6:83 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Tayler and Hylden, Judicial Review of Accrediting Agency Actions: Marlboro Corp. D/B/A The Emery School v. The Association of Independent Colleges and Schools, 4:199 (1977).

Tharp and Holloway, Recent Developments in Student Affairs, 2:115 (1974-75).

The Enrollment Contract and Its Consequences, 6:1 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Thoman and Longo, Case Comment, Haffer v. Temple University: A Reawakening of Gender Discrimination in Intercollegiate Athletics, 16:137 (1989).

Thomas and Hirschman, Minority-Targeted Scholarships: More than a Black and White Issue, 21:555 (1995).

Thomas and Wildgen, Women in Athletics: Winning the Game But Losing the Support, 8:295 (1981-82).

Thompson and Young, Taxing the Sale of Broadcast Rights to College Athletics — An Unrelated Trade or Business?, 8:331 (1981-82).

Thro, The Eleventh Amendment Revolution in the Lower Federal Courts, 25:501 (1999).

Title IX Athletics, 6:73 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Todd and Johnsen, Federal Immunity Law in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:221 (1999).

Toohey and Gray, Doing Business in the New Technology: Problems for College and University Counsel, 10:455 (1983-84).

Toombs and DiBiase, College Rules and Court Decisions: Notes on Student Dismissal, 2:355 (1975).

Torke, Book Review, Free Speech in the College Community, by Robert M. O’Neil, 24:699 (1998).

Traynor, Defamation Law: Shock Absorbers for its Ride into the Groves of Academe, 16:373 (1990).

Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:349 (1998).

Tucker, Disability Discrimination in Higher Education: 1996 Case Law in Review, 24:243 (1997).

Tucker, Application of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 to Colleges and Universities: An Overview and Discussion of Special Issues Relating to Students, 23:1 (1996).

Tucker, Perspective on Camenisch, 8:409 (1981-82).

Tucker, Financial Exigency - Rights, Responsibilities, and Recent Decisions, 2:103 (1974-75).

Tyler, Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Tyler, Note, State Open Records Laws and the NCAA: Does the NCAA Qualify as a "Governmental Body" and, if so, May Its Members Invoke the Privilege of Self-Critical Analysis?, 15:349(1989).

Tyler, Graff, and Myers, Case Comment, Blair v. Washington State University: Making State ERA’s a Potent Remedy for Sex Discrimination in Athletics, 14:575 (1988).

Tytel, Commentary, Spirt v. Long Island University: TIAA-CREF and the Sex-Based Mortality Table Controversy, 7:119 (1980-81).

Ugland, Hawkers, Thieves and Lonely Pamphleteers: Distributing Publications in the University Marketplace, 22:935 (1996).

Unemployment Insurance Problems: A Practicum, 6:43 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

University of North Carolina Council on Biotechnology Patent Task Group Report, 9:541 (1982-83).

University of Richmond v. Bell: Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement, 10:34 (1983-84).

University of Richmond v. Bell: Plaintiff’s Reply Brief to Cross-Motion for Summary Judgement, 10:36 (1983-83).

Update on Age Discrimination, 6:123 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Update on Handicap Discrimination, 6:113 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Update on Unrelated Business Income, 6:97 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Vargyas, Commentary, Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools and its Impact on Title IX Enforcement, 19:373 (1993).

Vaseleck, Stop Working and Put Down Your Pencils: The Use and Misuse of Standardized Admission Tests, 20:405 (1994).

Veazie, University Collective Bargaining: The Experience of the Montana University System, 9:51 (1982-83).

Vecchione, Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as an Alternative to Closing or Merger, 8:1 (1981-82).

Villarreal and Zacharakis, Note, "Where Did You Dig Up that Old Fossil?": Will Universities Own the Research Specimens that they Collect or Purchase?, 20:225 (1993).

Vincler and Lewis, Storming the Ivory Tower: The Competing Interests of the Public's Right to Know and the Integrity of University Research, 20:417 (1994).

Vogt and Reback, AAMC v. Carey: Briefs in Support of a Motion to Enjoin Enforcement of New York's Standardized Test Disclosure Law, 7:132 (1980-81).

.

Vogt and Robles, Continuing Controversy in Equal Employment Law, 6:291 (1979-80).

Wagner, Human Tissue Research: Who Owns the Results?, 14:259 (1987).

Walker and Israeloff, Historic Preservation and the Institutional Owner, 14:59 (1987).

Wallick and Chamblee, Bridling and Trojan Horse: Rights and Remedies of Colleges and Universities Under Federal Grant-Type Assistance Programs, 4:241 (1977).

Wallis, Case Comment, "Negligent Publishing": Implications for University Publishers, 9:209 (1982-83).

Walsh, Case Comment, Smith v. Regents of the University of California: The Marketplace Is Closed, 21:405 (1994).

Ward and Cranman, Book Review, The Rights and Responsibilities of the Modern University, by Robert Bickel & Peter Lake, 26:389 (1999).

Ward, Note, Race-Exclusive Scholarships: Do they Violate the Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?, 18:73 (1991).

Ward, Commentary, The Georgia Grind: Can the Common Law Accommodate the Problems of Title in the Art World: Observations on a Recent Case, 8:533 (1981-82).

Ward, Copyright in Museum Collections: An Overview of Some of the Problems, 7:297 (1980-81).

Ward and Nelson, Burdens of Proof Under Employment Discrimination Legislation, 6:301 (1979-80).

Ward, Diagnosing an Employment Civil Rights Claim, 6:279 (1979-80).

Ward, Shearer, and Wattley, Case Comment, Student Government Association v. Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts: Forum and Subsidy Analysis Applied to University Funding Decisions, 17:65 (1990).

Ware, Tales From the Crypt: Does Strict Scrutiny Sound the Death Knell for Affirmative Action in Higher Education?, 23:43 (1996).

Ware, Somers, and Speake, Immigration Law and Higher Education: Employment of International Employees, 20:51 (1993).

Warth, Haviland, and Bhirdo, Case Comment, McCormack v. National Collegiate Athletic Association: Collegiate Athletics Sanctions from an Antitrust and Civil Rights Perspective. 15:459 (1989).

Wattley, Shearer, and Ward, Case Comment, Student Government Association v. Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts: Forum and Subsidy Analysis Applied to University Funding Decisions, 17:65 (1990).

Weber, Disability Discrimination Litigation and Institutions of Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:351 (1999).

Weber, Disability Discrimination Litigation and Institutions of Higher Education, 1997 in Review, 25:53 (1998).

Weber, State Public Records Acts: The Need to Exempt Scientific Research Belonging to State Universities From Indiscriminate Public Disclosure, 10:129 (1983-84).

Weeks, Book Review, The Dismissal of Students with Mental Disorders: Legal Issues, Policy Considerations and Alternative Responses, by Gary Pavela, 13:429 (1987).

Weeks, Equal Pay: The Emerging Terrain, 12:41 (1985).

Weeks and Johnson, To Save a College: Independent College Trustees and Decisions on Financial Exigency, Endowment Use, and Closure, 12:455 (1986).

Weil, A Checklist of Legal Considerations for Museums, 7:346 (1980-81).

Weinberger, Reflection on the Seventies, 8:451 (1981-82).

Weingart and Scott, Case Comment, A Professor's Choice: Employment or Religious Conviction: EEOC v. University of Detroit, 18:315 (1991).

Weistart, Legal Accountability and the NCAA, 10:167 (1983-84).

Weistart, Antitrust Issues in the Regulation of College Sports, 5:77 (1977-79).

Weston, Outside Activities of Faculty Members, 7:68 (1980-81).

Weisman, Lawton, and Carder, Recent Governmental Action Regarding the Treatment of Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405 (1985).

Weithman, Book Review, One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court, by Cass R. Sunstein, 26: 379 (1999).

Whaley, Charitable Remainder Trusts and Pooled Income Funds: Internal Revenue Service Ruling Policy, 3:15 (1975).

Whaley, Interinstitutional Cooperation Among Educational Organizations, 1:93 (1973).

Wheeler, Fiduciary Responsibilities of Trustees in Relation to the Financing of Private Institutions of Higher Education, 2:210 (1975).

White, Book Review, The Rights of Teachers, by David Rubin (with Steven Greenhouse) 12:561 (1986).

White, Book Review, Dollars and Scholars: An Inquiry into the Impact of Faculty Income Upon the Functions and Future of the Academy, ed. by R. Linnell, 11:257 (1984).

White, Book Review, Partners in the Research Enterprise: University-Corporate Relations in Science and Technology, ed. by T. Langfitt, S. Hackney, A. Fishman, and A. Glowasky, 11:257 (1984).

Whitman, Affirmative Action on Campus: The Legal and Practical Challenges, 24:637 (1998).

Whitt, "What We Have Here Is a Failure to Communicate": The Mind of the Legislator in Ex Corde Ecclesiae, 25:769 (1999).

Wildgen and Thomas, Women in Athletics: Winning the Game But Losing the Support, 8:295 (1981-82).

Wilds and Rottinghaus, Case Comment, Wynne v. Tufts University School of Medicine, 19:185 (1992).

Williams, Lower Pay for Women's Coaches: Refuting Some Common Justifications, 21:643 (1995).

Williams, The Code of Professional Responsibility and the College and University Lawyer, 2:248

Williams, Hendricks, Madden, Burman, Tyler, Hoge, and Gregorie, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).

Wilson, De Funis- What Now?, 2:83 (1974).

Wilson, Admissions and Preferences: Sequel to De Funis, 1:38 (1973).

Wilson, Cole, and Olswang, Program Elimination, Financial Emergency, and Student Rights, 9:163 (1982-83).

Wilson, Financial Exigency: Examination of Recent Cases Involving Layoff of Tenured Faculty, 4:187 (1977).

Witten and Bompey, Settlement of Title VII Disputes: Shifting Patterns in a Changing World, 6:317 (1979-80).

Woodcock, Burden of Proof, Undue Hardships, and Other Arguments for the Student Debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(8)(B), 24:377 (1998).

Woods and Schwartz, Public Television and the Hearing Impaired, 9:1 (1982-83).

Woods and Steadman, Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner: The Psychotherapist's Duty to Warn, 10:293 (1983-84).

Wright, Rosman, Hemmat, and Bader, Katuria E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).

Wright, Faculty and the Law Explosion: Assessing the Impact — A Twenty-five Year Perspective (1960-85) for College and University Professors, 12:363 (1985).

Wright and MFillsap, Recent Cases on Student Transcript Rights after Bankruptcy, 6:231 (1979-80).

Vandercreek and Bickel , Class Action Aspects of Federal Employment Discrimination Litigation, 2:157 (1974-75).

Vargyas, Commentary, Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools and its Impact on Title IX Enforcement, 19:373 (1993).

Vaseleck, Stop Working and Put Down Your Pencils: The Use and Misuse of Standardized Admission Tests, 20:405 (1994).

Vecchione, Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as an Alternative to Closing or Merger, 8:1 (1981-82).

Vinik, Kumin, and O’Brien, Affirmative Action in College Admissions: Practical Advice to Public and Private Institutions for Dealing with the Changing Landscape, 26:395 (2000).

Vitality of Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Other Section 1983 Defenses, 6:53 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).

Vogt and Reback, AAMC v. Carey: Briefs in Support of a Motion to Enjoin Enforcement of New York’s Standardized Test Disclosure Law, 7:132 (1980-81).

Von Gerichten, Tort Litigation in Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:245 (1999).

Young and Thompson, Taxing the Sale of Broadcast Rights to College Athletics — An Unrelated Trade or Business?, 8:331 (1981-82).

Zacharakis and Villarreal, Note, "Where Did You Dig Up that Old Fossil?": Will Universities Own the Research Specimens that they Collect or Purchase?, 20:225 (1993).

Zelenock, Book Review, Copyright, Fair Use, and the Challenge for Universities, by Kenneth D. Crews, 21:615 (1995).

Zelenock, Book Review, Technology Transfer and the University, by Gary W. Matkin, 19:49 (1992).

Zelenock, Dumas, and McIntyre, Case Comment, Parate v. Isibor: Resolving the Conflict Between the Academic Freedom of the University and the Academic Freedom of University Professors, 16:713 (1990).

Zirkel, Copyright Law in Higher Education: Individuals, Institutions, and Innovations, 2:342 (1975).

Zuch, Capano, and Hoey, Case Comment, In re Cronyn: Can Student Theses Bar Patent Applications?, 18:105 (1991).

Zucker, Kobasic, and Smith, Case Comment, Eiseman v. State of New York: The Duty of a College to Protect Its Students from Harm by Other Students Admitted under Special Programs, 14:591 (1988).

Zuckman, Throw ‘Em to the Lions (or Bengals): The Decline and Fall of Sports Civilization as Seen Through the Eyes of a United States District Court, 5:55 (1977-79).

Zulkey and Higgins, Liability Insurance Coverage: How to Avoid Unpleasant Surprises, 17:123 (1990).