|
SPAM COMPETITION
RULES May 1, 2007-September
1, 2007, 11:59 p.m. A. Three levels
of score keeping. 1. Team Level. For each submission by a member of the team, the contribution to the team score is 1/(number of authors) for each member of the team on the submission. In other words, if there are three authors and one is on the team, the "score" is .33. If two are on the team, it would be .67. Since teams vary in size, the winning team will be determined by dividing the total score by the number of team members. The winning team members will each get a Caffeine Molecule mug this year!
B. What Counts
as a Submission? This is always a thorny issue and I would urge you not to
get too worked up about this. But, the following norms have evolved
over time: 5. Editorials, Op-eds, Letters to the editor, etc. do not count. Internal reports (that will not be published in that form) to grant agencies, etc. do not count. Working paper Series, conference submissions/papers, translations of previous published work, reprints (for example of a journal article in an edited volume) all do not count. 6. MA Theses and Dissertations count, but only if they are successfully defended during the competition (submitting a draft to your advisor or committee does not count). 7. Internal work (class papers, department/college reports, etc.) do not count. 8. You can only count an item once during a particular
competition. Sending basically the same proposal to more than one grant
agency only counts once. Sending an article in counts, but if you get
an R&R or a rejection and send it out again during the competition
period, these subsequent submissions will not count. 9. Co-authored works count, but your contribution to the team score is 1/(number of authors). No differentials for being first author versus second, etc. Don't try to drive me crazy!
C. Arguing about
the Rules. 1. There will be no arguing about the rules. 2. For more on this issue, see C.1. |