How
I came to write this book
The project that eventually
became this book began in December of 1993, when I was preparing
to teach a graduate course on Lie groups at the University of
Virginia. The question confronting me was, "What book should
I use?" A key pedagogical issue underlying this question
was, "What to do about manifold theory?" Since a Lie
group is a group that is also a manifold, manifold theory naturally
plays a prominent role in most books on Lie groups. Unfortunately,
however, it is not reasonable to assume that the students in a
Lie groups course will be proficient in manifold theory. Certainly,
I was not when I took my first Lie groups course and I knew that
my students at Virginia would not be. I knew, then, that if I
followed the approach in most books on Lie groups, I would have
to spend considerable time at the beginning of the course covering
manifold theory, including (ideally) the Frobenius theorem and
integration of differential forms. My own first course on Lie
groups was of this sort. We used the book of Frank Warner, "Foundations
of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups." I learned a
lot about manifolds (for which I am glad!) and I learned some
of the foundational parts of Lie group theory (such as the relationship
between the group and the Lie algebra). But by then our one-semester
course was almost over, so we weren't able to get much into representation
theory or the theory of semisimple Lie groups.
Meanwhile, another pedagogical
issue I faced as I prepared for my course at Virginia was how
to make the theory of semisimple Lie groups digestible. In my
second course on Lie groups, I finally met the machinery of semisimple
Lie groups and Lie algebras: Cartan subalgebras, roots, weights,
the Weyl group, the fundamental Weyl chamber, and all that. I
found this overwhelming. I didn't really grasp what the roots
really were or why I should care, and so the seemingly
endless list of properties that the roots satisfy meant little
to me. I was looking for a way to provide my students with some
motivation for and perspective on this machinery before getting
into all the gritty details. Since I could not find a book that
addressed these two pedagogical issues in a way that seemed appropriate
for my audience at Virginia, I did the only sensible thing: I
wrote my own book.
Well, actually, what
happened is that I began to write my own book. It took
almost a decade from the time I began writing (December 1993)
until my project became an honest-to-goodness published book (August
2003). I distributed some notes to my students during the spring
semester of 1994, and in the years that followed, I revised and
expanded the notes several times. Eventually, I posted a version
of them on the web [http://www.arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0005032].
Around the beginning of 2002, Springer-Verlag contacted me asking
me if I was interested in having them publish the notes in book
form. Given Springer's reputation and given that the timing was
good for me, I agreed enthusiastically. By May of 2002, I had
a signed contract with Springer and began working in earnest to
turn the notes into a complete book. I sent the first complete
draft of the book to Springer in December of 2002 and sent the
final version to them in early summer of 2003. By August, I had
a copy (with its nice yellow cover!) in my hands.
Features of
the book
On the issue of manifold
theory, my approach is to consider what I call "matrix Lie
groups," that is, closed subgroups of GL(n,C). Most familiar
examples of Lie groups, such as the special linear, orthogonal,
and unitary groups, are of this sort. As the name suggests, every
matrix Lie group is a Lie group, and while not every Lie group
is a matrix Lie group, most of the interesting ones are. To define
the Lie algebra of a matrix Lie group, I consider the exponential
of an n x n matrix, which is defined by the usual power
series (and which is described in many standard textbooks on differential
equations). The Lie algebra of a matrix Lie group G is
then defined as the set of matrices X such that exp(tX)
lies in G for all real numbers t. The Lie algebra
defined in this way is a real subspace of the space of all n
x n matrices and is closed under the bracket (or commutator),
[X,Y]:=XY-YX. This bracket operation makes the
Lie algebra of a matrix Lie group into a Lie algebra in the abstract
sense. In this way, one can study matrix Lie groups, their Lie
algebras, and the exponential mapping from the Lie algebra to
the Lie group, all without saying a word about manifolds.
Of course, having avoided
manifold theory, I did not have at my disposal the Frobenius theorem
when it came time to consider the "hard direction" of
the correspondences between Lie groups and Lie algebras. An example
of the hard direction is this: Under what conditions does a Lie
algebra homomorphism give rise to a Lie group homomorphism? (Answer:
If the domain group is simply connected.) This is to be compared
to the "easy direction," namely, the easy result that
every Lie group homomorphism gives rise to a Lie algebra homomorphism.
Instead of using the Frobenius theorem to address the hard direction,
I use the Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff formula.
I should point out that
the recent book "Lie
Groups: An Introduction Through Linear Groups," by Wulf
Rossmann (Oxford Univ. Press, 2002), takes a similar approach
using matrix (= linear) groups and the Baker--Campbell--Hausdorff
formula. Thus there is considerable overlap between the first
two chapters of Rossmann's book and the first three chapters of
my book. Although there are some technical differences, I think
our approaches (in these chapters) are essentially equivalent.
Furthermore, I recently (6/04) had pointed out to me the book
of J. Hilgert and K.-H. Neeb, "Lie-Gruppen
und Lie-Algebren" (German) [Vieweg, 1991, ISBN 3-528-06432-3/pbk].
Based on my limited knowledge of German, it appears that Section
I of that book is also quite similar to the first three chapters
of my book.
Meanwhile, on the issue
of the semisimple theory, my approach is to consider in detail
the representation theory of SU(2) and SU(3) (or, at the level
of complex Lie algebras, sl(2,C) and sl(3,C)) before going on
to the general case. The example of SU(3) (more so than just the
obligatory example of SU(2)) allows the reader to see roots, weights
and Cartan subalgebras "in action" in a simple, concrete
setting. This, I hope, leaves the reader emotionally prepared
for the general case. In this respect, my book is similar to "Representation
Theory: A First Course," by William Fulton and Joe Harris.
That book is actually even more example-oriented than mine, in
that after treating sl(3,C) it goes on to study the other classical
Lie algebras, whereas my book turns at that point to the general
case.
Even once I begin the
general semisimple theory, I defer a detailed examination of root
systems until the last chapter. I prefer to get to the "theorem
of the highest weight" (the classification of the representations
of a semisimple group, also known as "Cartan--Weyl theory"),
as quickly as possible. Thus, in Chapters 6 and 7 I quote without
proof those results on root systems needed to state the theorem
of the highest weight, and then return to root systems in greater
detail in Chapter 8, by which point the reader should have a greater
appreciation for their importance. I include many pictures for
the rank-two case in Chapter 5 (for the SU(3) case) and in Chapter
8 (for the remaining rank-two cases). I also include several color
pictures for the rank-three case---these, I hope, earn the book
some "coolness" points, whether or not the rest of the
book succeeds. The models in the pictures were built using the
(very cool) Zome system---see the Zome link at left for more information.
Many more rank-three images, which could not be included in the
book, can be seen by clicking here. The
color pictures were generated using the vZome software, available
from its creator, Scott Vorthmann, here.
In writing this book,
I have tried to make the presentation accessible to physicists
as well as mathematicians. While there are many useful books on
Lie group methods in physics, I believe that graduate students
in physics might benefit from a book that treats the mathematical
constructions in a more systematic way. I have tried to give precise
definitions and theorems---and, in most cases, complete proofs---while
still maintaining a writing style and a level of concreteness
that physicists will feel comfortable with. Time will tell whether
I have succeeded.
I welcome comments and
feedback of all sorts, at bhall@nd.edu.
A pdf file at the top of this page lists all known typos in the
first printing of the book. These have been corrected in the second
printing,
which is available as
of September, 2004. Please send me any additional corrections
that you may
discover.
|