SUMMER 2009 RESEARCH SEMINAR
Note new time and date effective May 12.

Tuesdays - 11:00 a.m. in 103 Multidisciplinary Research Building
All students, staff, and visitors are welcome to attend.

Date Speaker(s) Status Advisor(s)
May 12 Holly Weiss Ph.D. Y2 Wagner
May 19 Michael Giordano
Ph.D. Y2
Schmid
May 26 Raman Mitra, M.D., Ph.D., Memorial Advanced Cardiovascular Institute
June 2 Jackie Garrison Ph.D. Y3 Niebur
June 9 ASME SBC Practice Presentations (too many to list)
Ovaert, Wagner
June 16 Ryan Ross
Ph.D. Y3
Roeder
June 23 Ziheng Wu Ph.D. Y3 Niebur
June 30 Bob Kane
Ph.D. Y3
Roeder
July 7 Nathaniel Hollingsworth Ph.D. Y3 Wagner
July 14 Xiutao Shi
Ph.D. Y5
Niebur
July 21 Travis Turnbull Ph.D. Y1 Roeder
July 28 Daniel Hoehn
Ph.D. Y1
Sucosky
August 4 Christina Merrill
Ph.D. Y1
Roeder

2009 Spring/Summer/Fall

2008 Spring/Summer/Fall

2007 Spring/Summer/Fall

2006 Spring/Summer/Fall

2005 Spring/Summer/Fall

2004 Spring/Summer/Fall

2003 Spring/Summer/Fall

Participants in the BIO Research Seminar include faculty, post-doctoral associates, graduate assistants and undergraduate interns whose research falls under the broad category of bioengineering, especially in biomaterials and/or biomechanics. The Seminar includes original research presentations by participants on a rotating basis.

EXPECTATIONS:
Single speakers are expected to present his/her recent research for 20-30 minutes, allowing ample time for discussion and questions. First year students and undergraduates are scheduled with two or more speakers per meeting, and these presentations should not last longer than 10-15 minutes each. Students should always provide ample background or literature review for their projects, especially first and second year students. All students should consult with their advisor(s) prior to presenting.

GOALS:
To foster a dynamic, positively-reinforced atmosphere of research activity amongst participating graduate students by:
1) developing experience preparing and presenting conference-quality presentations in a reoccuring time-frame.
2) taking a "step back" from day to day tasks to reflect on the "big-picture" of the project and take inventory of progress.
3) receiving feedback from a wider range of peers and advisors.
4) participating in scholarly discussions.
5) developing critical thinking skills.
6) stimulating further intellectual discussion, questions and fortuitous ideas outside the meeting.
7) providing a community of sorts for those engaged in related research projects.

 
Copyright 2006 | Notre Dame Home | Notre Dame BIO Home | CoE Home | AME Home
To Notre Dame Homepage E-mail Us