FALL 2008 RESEARCH SEMINAR
Note new time and date effective August 28.

Thursdays - 3:30 p.m. in 103 Multidisciplinary Research Building
All students, staff, and visitors are welcome to attend.

Date Speaker(s) Status Advisor(s)
August 28 Ice Cream, Orientation and Lab Safety    
September 4 Philippe Sucosky, Assistant Professor AME
September 11 Matt Landrigan Ph.D. Y5 Roeder
September 18 Nathaniel Hollingsworth Ph.D. Y3 Wagner
September 25 Jackie Garrison
Ph.D. Y3
Niebur
October 2 Ryan Ross
Ph.D. Y3
Roeder
October 9 Ziheng Wu Ph.D. Y3 Niebur
October 13 Malcolm Snead, Professsor, USC
October 16 Yang Zhao Ph.D. Y3 Ovaert
October 23 Fall "Break"
October 30 Bob Kane Ph.D. Y3 Roeder
November 6 Xiutao Shi
Ph.D. Y5
Niebur
November 13 Ali Vahdati
Ph.D. Y2
Wagner
November 20 Charlie Penninger
Ph.D. Y4
Renaud
November 27
Thanksgiving Holiday
December 4
Joel Jimenez-Lozano
Ph.D. Y4
Sen

2008 Spring/Summer/Fall

2007 Spring/Summer/Fall

2006 Spring/Summer/Fall

2005 Spring/Summer/Fall

2004 Spring/Summer/Fall

2003 Spring/Summer/Fall

Participants in the BIO Research Seminar include faculty, post-doctoral associates, graduate assistants and undergraduate interns whose research falls under the broad category of bioengineering, especially in biomaterials and/or biomechanics. The Seminar includes original research presentations by participants on a rotating basis.

EXPECTATIONS:
Single speakers are expected to present his/her recent research for 20-30 minutes, allowing ample time for discussion and questions. First year students and undergraduates are scheduled with two or more speakers per meeting, and these presentations should not last longer than 10-15 minutes each. Students should always provide ample background or literature review for their projects, especially first and second year students. All students should consult with their advisor(s) prior to presenting.

GOALS:
To foster a dynamic, positively-reinforced atmosphere of research activity amongst participating graduate students by:
1) developing experience preparing and presenting conference-quality presentations in a reoccuring time-frame.
2) taking a "step back" from day to day tasks to reflect on the "big-picture" of the project and take inventory of progress.
3) receiving feedback from a wider range of peers and advisors.
4) participating in scholarly discussions.
5) developing critical thinking skills.
6) stimulating further intellectual discussion, questions and fortuitous ideas outside the meeting.
7) providing a community of sorts for those engaged in related research projects.

 
Copyright 2006 | Notre Dame Home | Notre Dame BIO Home | CoE Home | AME Home
To Notre Dame Homepage E-mail Us