|
|
|
|
1995 Symposium (various authors), Sports Reform: College Athletics in
Flux, 22:1 (1995).
Adams,
Aiken and Hall, Liability - Legal Liabilities in Higher Education: Their Scope
and Management, 3:125 (1976).
A
New Look at Faculty Contracts, 6:14 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).
Aiello
and Behrens,
Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984 Bankruptcy
Amendments, 13:1 (1986).
Aiken,
Adams and Hall, Liability - Legal Liabilities in Higher Education: Their Scope
and Management, 3:125 (1976).
Aiken,
Tort Liability of Governing Boards, Administrators and Faculty in Higher
Education, 2:129 (1974-75).
Albino
and Hesburgh, 1995 Symposium: Reform and Renewal in College Sports, 22:63
(1995).
Alger
and Coleman, Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and
Freedom from Discrimination on University Campuses, 23:91 (1996).
Alger,
Book Review, The Shadow University, by Alan Charles Kors and Harvey A.
Silverglate, 25:901 (1999).
Alessandro,
Note, The Student-Athlete Right-to-Know Act: Legislation Would Require
Colleges to Make Public Graduation Rates of Student Athletes, 16:287 (1989).
Alessandro,
Murray, and Reed, Case Comment, Fox v.
Board of Trustees of the State University of New York: University
Regulation Faces the First Amendment, 15:443 (1989).
Allred,
Note, May a Public University Restrict Faculty Expression on its Internet
World Wide Web Sites? Academic
Freedom and University Facility Use Restrictions, 24:325 (1997).
American
Academy of Pediatrics - Guidelines for Infant Bioethics Committees, 11:433
(1985).
Anderson,
Ende and Crego, Liability Insurance: A Primer for College and University
Counsel, 23:609 (1997).
Anderson,
Commentary, Licensing of Colleges and University Trademarks, 8:97 (1981-82).
Andrews,
Note, State Legislation on Comparable Worth: Will it Bring Pay Equity to
Academe?, 14:469 (1988).
Andrews,
Dang, and McLean, Note, Recent Development: Church Licensed Professors: The
Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987).
Antonini,
Note, First Amendment Challenges to the Use of Mandatory Student Fees to Help
Fund Student Abortions, 15:61 (1988).
Antonini,
Fantozzi, and Pruss, Case Comment: Harvard
Law School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens Under the
Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First Amendment Rights of
United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987).
Araujo,
Ex Corde Ecclesiae and
Mission-Centered Hiring in Roman Catholic Colleges and Universities: To Boldly
Go Where We Have Gone Before, 25:835 (1999).
Atkinson,
Note, Workers' Compensation and College Athletics: Should Universities be
Responsible for Athletes Who Incur Serious Injuries?, 10:197 (1983-84).
Attanasio,
Does the First Amendment Guarantee a Right to Conduct Scientific Experiments?,
14:435 (1988).
Attridge,
Book Review, Up the University:
Recreating Higher education in America, by Robert and Jon Solomon,
21:825 (1995).
Ayres,
Commentary, Widmar v. Vincent: The
Beginning of the End for the Establishment Clause, 8:511 (1981-82).
Ayres
and
Sagner,
The Bankruptcy Reform Act and Student Loans: Unraveling New Knots, 9:361
(1982-83).
Bader,
Rosman, Hemmat, and Wright, Katuria E.
Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief
of Plaintiffs-Appellants, 26: 429 (2000).
Bader
and
Sullivan,
The Application of Export Control Laws to Scientific Research at Universities,
9:451 (1982-83).
Baida,
Not All Minority Scholarships are Created Equal, Part II: How to Develop a
Record that Passes Constitutional Scrutiny, 21:307 (1994).
Bainbridge,
Essay, Student Religious Organizations and University Policies Against
Discrimination on the Basis of Sexual Orientation: Implications of the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 21:369 (1994).
Balda,
Not All Minority Scholarships are Created equal: Why Some May be More
Constitutional than Others, 18:333 (1992).
Barber,
Waivers of Academic Progress Requirements for Federal Financial Aid: A
Reasonable Accommodation for Students with Learning Disabilities?, 23:231
(1996).
Barkin,
Legal Implications of Office Education Criteria for the Self-Supporting
Student, 2:229 (1975).
Barnes
and
Khorey,
The Effects and Use of Administrative Determinations in Subsequent Employment
Litigation, 16:189 (1989).
Barnes
and
Schlottman,
After "Decoupling": Further Thoughts, 9:315 (1982-83).
Bartlett
and
Siena,
Research and Development Limited Partnerships as a Device to Exploit
University Owned Technology, 10:435 (1983-84).
Bassen,
Synopsis of State Laws Regulating Employment of the Handicapped, 4:293 (1977).
Bassett,
The American Civil Corporation, the "Incorporation Movement" and the
Canon Law of the Catholic Church, 25:721 (1999).
Beach,
The Management and Governance of Academic Institutions, 12:301 (1985).
Beach,
Fundamental Fairness in Search of a Legal Rationale in Private College Student
Discipline and Expulsions, 2:65 (1974).
Beale,
Delivery of Legal Service to Institutions of Higher Education, 2:5 (1974).
Beaty,
Book Review, The Dying of the Light: The Disengagement of Colleges and
Universities From Their Christian Churches, by James T. Burtchaell,
C.S.C., 26:177 (1999).
Beauchamp,
Book Review, Games Colleges Play — Scandal and Reform in Intercollegiate
Athletics, by John R. Thelin, 23:301 (1996).
Beauchamp,
1995 Symposium: Introduction and Welcome, 22:2 (1995).
Begin
and
Lee,
Criteria for Evaluating the Managerial Status of College Faculty: Applications of Yeshiva
University by the NLRB, 10:515 (1983-84).
Behrens
and Aiello, Student Loans, Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and the 1984
Bankruptcy Amendments, 13:1 (1986).
Behrsin,
Commentary, Housestaff Stipends and The "Fellowship" Exclusion Under
Section 117 of The Internal Revenue Code, 8:131 (1981-82).
Bekavac,
Book Review, Becoming Gentlemen, by Lani Guinier, et al., 25:619 (1999).
Bell
and
Majestic,
Protection and Enforcement of College and University Trademarks, 10:63
(1983-84).
Bennett,
Education and the Constitution: The Case of Citizen James Madison, 14:417
(1988).
Bennett,
Book Review, Legal Ethics and Legal
Education, by Michael J. Kelly, 7:353 (1980- 81).
Bergan,
Grievance - Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration, 1:371 (1974).
Bergan
and Ferguson, Grievance - Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration,
1:371 (1974).
Bhirdo,
Note, The Liability and Responsibility of Institutions of Higher Education for
the On-Campus Victimization of Students, 16:119 (1989).
Bhirdo,
Haviland,
and
Warth,
Case Comment, McCormack v. National
Collegiate Athletic Association: Collegiate
Athletics Sanctions from an Antitrust and Civil Rights Perspective, 15:459
(1989).
Bianchi,
Brenna, and Shannon,
Case Comment, Basic Books, Inc. v.
Kinko's Graphic Corp: Potential Liability for Classroom Anthologies,
18:595 (1992).
Bickel,
Tort-Accident Cases: Traditional Tort Rules in the College or University
Setting, 24:187 (1997).
Bickel,
Torts: 1995 in Review, 23:357 (1997).
Bickel and Lake, The
Emergence of New Paradigms in Student-University Relations: From In Loco
Parentis to Bystander to Facilitator, 23:755 (1997).
Bickel
and Lake,
Reconceptualizing the University's Duty to Provide a Safe Learning
Environment: A Criticism of the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis and the
Restatement (Second) of Torts, 20:261 (1994).
Bickel
and Vandercreek , Class Action Aspects of Federal Employment Discrimination
Litigation, 2:157 (1974-75).
Bissell,
Brief for Appellants in Handsome v.
Rutgers University, 6:241 (1979-80).
Blackwell,
The Law of Copyright and the Fair Use Doctrine, 1:222 (1974).
Bodensteiner,
Student Discrimination in Higher Education: 1997 in Review, 25:331 (1998).
Bodner,
Commentary, Analyzing Faculty Salaries in Class Action Sex Discrimination
Cases, 10:305 (1983-84).
Bodner,
Commentary, The Implications of Yeshiva
University for Collective Bargaining Rights of Faculty at Private and
Public Institutions of Higher Education, 7:78 (1980-81).
Bok,
Commentary, Universities: Their Temptations and Tensions, 18:1 (1991).
Bompey,
Decoupling Tenure and Employment Under the 1978 Amendments to the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act, 8:425 (1981-82).
Bompey,
1979 Update: Cases and Issues in Age Discrimination, 6:195 (1979-80)
(Conference Outline).
Bompey
and Witten, Settlement of Title VII Disputes:
Shifting Patterns in a Changing World, 6:317 (1979-80).
Bompey
and Saltzman,
The Role of Statistics in Employment Discrimination Litigation — A
University Perspective, 9:263 (1982-83).
Boren
and Graziano, Suing States for Copyright Infringement: An Eleventh Amendment
Bar?, 15:269 (1989).
Bors,
Academic Freedom Faces Learning Disabilities: Guckenberger
v. Boston University, 25:581 (1999).
Bovee,
Goettling, and Ritter,
Case Comment, Witters v. Washington
Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment Clause and
Financial Aid to Students for Religious Education at Private Religious
Institutions, 13:397 (1987).
Brake,
Justus, and Davidson, 1995 Symposium: Title IX, 22:48 (1995).
Brammer,
Lallo, and Ney,
Case Comment, Brown v. Trustees of
Boston University: The Realization of Title VII's Legislative Intent,
17:551 (1991).
Branchfield
and Grier,
Aiken v. Lieuallen and
Peterson v. Oregon State University: Defining Equity in Athletics, 8:369
(1981-82).
Brenna,
Bianchi, and Shannon, Case Comment, Basic
Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphic Corp: Potential Liability for Classroom
Anthologies, 18:595 (1992).
Brickley,
Note, AIDS: A University's Liability for Failure to Protect its Students,
14:529 (1988).
Brickley
and Ryan,
Case Comment, Miller v. Rutgers and Kovats
v. Rutgers: Application of the Eleventh Amendment in Suits Against State
Colleges and Universities, 13:407 (1987).
Brody,
The First Amendment, Governmental Censorship, and Sponsored Research, 19:199
(1993).
Brooks,
Adequate Cause for Dismissal: The Missing Element in Academic Freedom, 22:331
(1995).
Broome,
Case Comment, A Limitation on Federal Authority to Deny Duty-Free Entry of
Scientific Equipment, 10:325 (1983-84).
Buckley,
Perspective on Gunther, 8:433
(1981-82).
Burgoyne,
The Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of 1990: State Educational Institutions
Now Face Significant Monetary Exposure for Copyright Infringement, 18:367
(1992).
Burke,
University Policies on Conflict of Interest and Policy of Publication, 12:175
(1985).
Burke,
Federal Taxation of State Colleges and Universities: Recent Developments Call
for Reconsideration of Theories of Exemption, 4:43 (1976).
Burman,
Hendricks, Madden, Tyler, Hoge, Williams, and Gregorie, Katuria
E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief
of Defendants-Appellees, 26: 445 (2000).
Burshtein,
Collegiate Licensing in Canada and the Statutory Advantage, 12:227 (1985).
Burtchaell,
Out of the Heartburn of the Church, 25:653 (1999).
Cabranes,
American Higher Education and the Law: Some
Reflections on NACUA's Silver Anniversary, 12:261 (1985).
Cafardi,
Giving Legal Life to the Ex Corde
Ecclesiae Norms: Corporate Strategies and Practical Difficulties, 25:751
(1999).
Camacho
and Dunn, NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS: When Will the Internal Revenue Service
Consider an Activity Regularly Carried On?, 19:39 (1992).
Capano,
Note, Stopping Students from Cheating: Halting the Activities of Term-Paper
Mills and Enforcing Disciplinary Sanctions Against Students Who Purchase Term
Papers, 18:277 (1991).
Capano,
Hoey, and Zuch,
Case Comment, In re Cronyn: Can
Student Theses Bar Patent Applications?, 18:105 (1991).
Capron,
Legal Perspectives on Institutional Ethics Committees, 11:417 (1985).
Carder,
Lawton, and Weisman, Recent Governmental Action Regarding the Treatment of
Seriously Ill Newborns, 11:405 (1985).
Cardozo,
To Copy or Not To Copy For Teaching and Scholarship: What Shall I Tell My
Client?, 4:59 (1976-77).
Carrington,
Book Review, College Crime Prevention
and Personal Safety Awareness, by Max C. Bromley and Leonard Territo,
17:565 (1991).
Caruso,
Book Review, Marine Scientific Research
and the Law of the Sea, by Alfred H. A. Soons, 11:65 (1984).
Casey,
Case Comment, Constructive Discharge under Title VII In Institutions of Higher
Education, 9:191 (1982-83).
Cassou
and Curran,
Secular Orthodoxy and Sacred Freedoms: Accreditation of Church-Related Law
Schools, 11:293 (1984).
Cerminara
and Stoner, Harnessing the "Spirit of Insubordination": A Model
Student Disciplinary Code, 17:89 (1990).
Cerny
and Livingston, IRS Intermediate Sanctions: How They Will Impact Colleges and
Universities, 25:865 (1999).
Chamberlain
and Prairie, Due Process in the Accreditation Context, 21:61 (1994).
Chamblee
and Wallick, Bridling the Trojan Horse: Rights and Remedies of Colleges and
Universities Under Federal Grant-Type Assistance Programs, 4:241 (1977).
Chang,
Note, Coercion Theory and the State Action Doctrine as Applied in NCAA v. Tarkanian and NCAA v.
Miller, 22:133 (1995).
Chapman
and Dickerson, Contract Law, Due Process, and the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79).
Church
and Neumeister, University Control of Student-Athletes with Disabilities Under
the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, 25:105 (1998).
Claque,
The Affirmative Action Showdown of 1986: Implications for Higher Education,
14:171 (1987).
Cleveland,
The Costs and Benefits of Openness: Sunshine Laws and Higher Education, 12:127
(1985).
Cole,
Recent Legal Developments in Sexual Harassment, 13:267 (1986).
Cole
and Goldblatt,
Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions' Authority to Select the
Lowest Responsible Bidder, 16:177 (1989).
Cole,
Olswang, and Wilson, Program Elimination, Financial Emergency, and Student
Rights, 9:163 (1982-83).
Coleman
and Alger,
Beyond Speech Codes: Harmonizing Rights of Free Speech and Freedom from
Discrimination on University Campuses, 23:91 (1996).
Coleman
and Jarvis, Tuition Adjustment for Law School Students: A Necessary
Accommodation under the ADA?, 24:45 (1997).
Camacho
and Dunn, NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS:
When Will the Internal Revenue Service Consider an Activity Regularly Carried
on, 19:39 (1992).
Conboy,
Book Reviews, Law in Sport and Physical
Activity, by Annie Clement, and Law
in Sport, by Bernard Patrick Maloy, 16:171 (1989).
Conlon,
Book Review, Health Care Labor Law,
ed. by Iva Michael Shepard and A. Edward Doudera, 9:355 (1982- 83).
Connolly
and Marshall,
Sexual Harassment of University or College Students by Faculty Members, 15:381
(1989).
Consent
Decree from Rajender v. University of Minnesota, 8:219 (1981-82).
Consent
Decree: United States Department of Labor, Office of Contract Compliance
Programs v. Regents of University of California, 8:54 (1981-82).
Corbally,
University Counsel- Scope and Mission, 2:1 (1974).
Cosgrove,
Note, A Survey of State Athlete-Agent Legislation:
Origins and Effects, 16:433 (1990).
Cosgrove,
Grundy, and Heffernan, Case Comment, Shannon
v. Bepko: Public Colleges and Universities as State Agencies: Standards
for Eleventh Amendment Protection, 16:151 (1989).
Cranman,
Privacy and Technology: Counseling Institutions of Higher Education, 25:69
(1998).
Cranman
and Ward, Book Review, The Rights and
Responsibilities of the Modern University, by Robert Bickel & Peter
Lake, 26:389 (1999).
Craver,
The Implications of the Elimination of Mandatory Retirement for Professors,
16:343 (1990).
Crego,
Ende, and Anderson, Liability
Insurance: A Primer for College and University Counsel, 23:609 (1997).
Crockett,
Book Review, Wrongs of Passage: Fraternities, Sororities, Hazing and Binge
Drinking, by Hank Nuwer, 26:783 (2000).
Crosson,
Book Review, Academic Duty, by Donald Kennedy, 25:435 (1998).
Cunningham,
Leeson, and Stadler,
Kahn v. Superior Court of the County of
Santa Clara: The Right to Privacy and the Academic Freedom Privilege with
Respect to Confidential Peer Review Materials, 15:73 (1988).
Curkovic,
Accent and the University: Accent as Pretext for National Origin
Discrimination in Tenure Decisions, 26:727 (2000).
Curran
and Cassou,
Secular Orthodoxy and Sacred Freedoms: Accreditation of Church-Related Law
Schools, 11:293 (1984).
Current
Tax Issues, 6:17 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).
Curry,
Hazing and the "Rush" Toward Reform: Responses from Universities,
Fraternities, State Legislatures, and the Courts, 16:93 (1989).
Curry,
Manderfeld, and Sullivan,
Case Comment, Pime v. Loyola University
of Chicago: The Seventh Circuit Extends the BFOQ Defense, 14:607 (1988).
Daane,
Commentary, Regents of the University of
Michigan v. State of Michigan: South African Divestiture and
Constitutional Autonomy, A Case Commentary, 15:313 (1989).
Daane,
The Role of University Counsel, 12:399 (1985).
Dang,
Andrews, and McLean, Note, Recent Development: Church Licensed Professors: The
Curran Controversy, 13:375 (1987).
Daniel
and Sun, The Sherman Act Antitrust Provisions and Collegiate Action: Should
There Be a Continued Exception for the Business of the University?, 25:451
(1999).
Davenport,
The Catalog in the Courtroom: From Shield to Sword?, 12:201 (1985).
Davidson,
Justus, and Brake, 1995 Symposium: Title IX, 22:48 (1995).
Davis,
Scaling the Ivory Tower: State Public Records Laws and University Presidential
Searches, 21:353 (1994).
Davis,
Commentary, University Research and the Wages of Commerce, 18:29 (1991).
Delaney,
Sack, Morris, and Sperber, 1995 Symposium: Round Table Discussion on
Collegiate Athletics Reform, 22:96 (1995).
Delano,
Discovery in University Employment Discrimination Suits: Should Peer Review
Materials be Privileged?, 14:121 (1987).
Denison
and Olivas,
Legalization in the Academy: Higher Education and the Supreme Court, 11:1
(1984).
Detar
and Stoner, Disciplinary and Academic Decisions Pertaining to Students in
Higher Education, 1998 in Review, 26:273 (1999).
DiBiase
and Toombs, College Rules and Court Decisions: Notes on Student Dismissal,
2:355 (1975).
Dickerson
and Chapman, Contract Law, Due Process, and the NCAA, 5:107 (1977-79).
DiLorenzo,
Gaal, and Evans, Hew’s Final “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and
Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:345 (1979-80).
DiLorenzo
and Gaal, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’s Proposed “Policy
Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80).
DiScala,
Olswang, and Niccolls,
College and University Responses to the Emotionally or Mentally Impaired
Student, 19:17 (1992).
Dixon,
Note, Achieving Educational Opportunity Through Freshman Ineligibility and
Coaching Selection: Key Elements in the NCAA Battle for Academic Integrity of
Intercollegiate Athletics, 14:383 (1987).
Dixon,
Lynch, and Swem,
Case Comment, Pace v. Hymas:
Termination of Tenured University Faculty: Financial Exigency and the Burden
of Proof in a Substantive Due Process Claim, 13:417 (1987).
Donohue,
Note, First-to-File vs. First-to-Invent: Will Universities be Left Behind?
21:765 (1995).
Drier,
Steinbach, Michaelson, and Routh, Katuria
E. Smith, et al., v. The University of Washington Law School, et al., Brief
of Amici Curiae, 26: 467 (2000).
Drier,
Michaelson, Smith, and Steinbach, Board
of Education of the Township of Piscataway v. Sharon Taxman, 24:671
(1998).
Drinan,
Lawyer-Client Confidentiality in the Campus Setting, 19:305 (1993).
Duerr,
Annotation: Reinstatement as a Remedy in Cases Involving Termination of
Tenured Faculty, 7:57 (1980-81).
Duerr,
Reinstatement as a Remedy in Cases Involving Termination of Tenured Faculty,
7:57 (1980-81).
Dumas,
Note, Defective Buildings and Grounds — A Dangerous Condition for Colleges
and Universities, 17:351 (1991).
Dumas,
McIntyre, and Zelenock,
Case Comment, Parate v. Isibor:
Resolving the Conflict Between the Academic Freedom of the University and the
Academic Freedom of University Professors, 16:713 (1990).
Dunham,
Case Studies on Wrongdoing on Campus: Ethics and the Lawyer’s Role, 19:315
(1993).
Dunn
and Camacho,
NCAA v. Commissioner of IRS: When Will the Internal Revenue Service
Consider an Activity Regularly Carried on, 19:39 (1992).
Durham
and Gordon, Toward Diverse Diversity: The Legal Legitimacy of Ex
Corde Ecclesiae, 25:697 (1999).
Dutile,
The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1992 in Review, 20:125 (1993).
Dutile,
The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1991 in Review, 19:73 (1992).
Dutile,
The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1990 in Review, 18:163 (1991).
Dutile,
The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1989 in Review, 17:149 (1990).
Dutile,
The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1988 in Review, 16:201 (1989).
Dutile,
The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1987 in Review, 15:87 (1988).
Dutile,
God and Gays at Georgetown: Observations on Gay
Rights Coalition of Georgetown University Law Center v. Georgetown University,
15:1 (1988).
Dutile,
The Law of Higher Education and the Courts: 1986 in Review, 14:303 (1987).
Dymersky
and Frazier, A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Is the New Law
Retroactive?, 19:259 (1993).
Edmonds,
Postsecondary Athletics and the Law: A Selected Bibliography, 5:65 (1977-79).
Edwards,
Usages of Copyrighted Musical Works Permissible Without Acquiring a Copyright
License, Assignment, or Release, 6:363 (1979-80).
Edwards
and Grossi, Student Misconduct: Historical Trends in Legislative and Judicial
Decision- Making in American Universities, 23:829 (1997).
Ende,
Anderson, and Crego, Liability Insurance: A Primer for College and University
Counsel, 23:609 (1997).
Ende
and Lane,
Book Review, Contracting for Services,
ed. By Lanora F. Welzenbach, 11:399 (1984).
Estes,
State University Presidential Searches: Law and Practice, 26:485 (2000).
Evans,
"A Stranger in a Strange Land": Responsibility and Liability for
Students Enrolled in Foreign-Study Programs, 18:299 (1991).
Evans,
Gaal, and DiLorenzo, Hew’s Final “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX and
Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:345 (1979-80).
Evans,
Hill, and Scheske,
Case Comment, Knapp v. Commissioner of
Internal Revenue: Tuition Assistance or Scholarship, A Question of
Taxation, 16:699 (1990).
Faccenda,
Introduction to Symposium on Athletics in Higher Education, 8:291 (1981-82).
Faculty
Collective Bargaining: The Yeshiva
Case, 6:67 (1979-80) (Conference Outline).
Fantel,
Irby, Milam, and Schwarz,
Faculty Rights and Responsibilities in Evaluating and Dismissing Medical
Students, 8:102 (1981-82).
Fantel
and Olswang, Tenure and Periodic Performance Review: Compatible Legal and
Administrative Principles, 7:1 (1980-81).
Fantozzi,
Antonini, and Pruss, Case Comment: Harvard
Law School Forum v. Schultz: When Exclusion of Aliens Under the
Immigration and Naturalization Act Conflicts with First Amendment Rights of
United States Citizens, 14:153 (1987).
Fellrath,
Case Comment, Coleman v. Zatechka: The ADA and Student Life, 23:285 (1996).
Ferguson
and Bergan, Grievance - Arbitration Procedures and Contract Administration,
1:371 (1974).
Fick,
Book Review, Academics in Courts: The
Consequences of Faculty Discrimination Litigation, by George R. LaNoue
and Barbara A. Lee, 15:239 (1988).
Fink,
Taxation and Philanthropy - A 1976 Perspective, 3:1 (1975).
Finkin,
Commentary, Tenure After an Uncapped ADEA: A Different View, 15:43 (1988).
Finkin,
Book Review, Beyond Traditional Tenure,
by Richard P. Chait and Andrew T. Ford, 10:105 (1983-84).
Finkin,
Commentary, The Yeshiva Decision: A
Somewhat Different View, 7:321 (1980-81).
Fishbein,
New Strings on the Ivory Tower: The Growth of Accountability in Colleges and
Universities, 12:381 (1985).
Fishbein,
Legal Aspects of Student Activity Fees, 1:190 (1973-74).
Flaherty,
Exempt Organizations and Real Estate Syndications after the Tax Reform Act of
1984, 12:61 (1985).
Flygare,
Commentary, TDCA v. Burdine: The
Decreasing Burden For Employers in Title VII Litigation, 8:519 (1981-82).
Flygare,
Commentary, Board of Trustees of Keene
State v. Sweeney: Implications for the Future of Peer Review in Faculty
Personnel Decisions, 7:100 (1980-81).
Flygare,
Board of Trustees of Keene State v.
Sweeney: Implications for the Future of Peer Review in Faculty Personnel
Decisions, 7:100 (1980-81).
Ford,
The Implications of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act Amendments of
1978 for Colleges and Universities, 5:161 (1977-79).
Foster
and McCollogh, Reviewers’ Comments, 8:15 (1981-82).
Fowler,
University-Industry Research Relationships: The Research Agreement, 9:515
(1982-83).
Francis,
Federal Tax Problems of College and University Auxiliary Organizations, 3:72
(1975).
Frazier
and Dymersky,
A Quandary of the Civil Rights Act of 1991: Is the New Law Retroactive?,
19:259 (1993).
Friedl,
Punishing Students for Non-Academic Misconduct, 26:701 (2000).
Frohnmayer,
Current Developments in Federal Law Affecting Equal Employment Opportunity in
Higher Education, 1:1 (1973).
Frohmayer,
Title IX, Education Amendments of 1972, 2:49 (1974).
Frost,
Shifting Meanings of Academic Freedom: An Analysis of University
of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 17:329
(1991).
Furay,
Book Review, Church and Campus: Legal Issues in Religiously Affiliated Higher
Education, by Phillip R. Moots and Edward McGlynn Gafney, Jr., 7:186
(1980-81).
Gaal,
DiLorenzo, and Evans, Hew’s Final “Policy Interpretation” of Title IX
and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:345 (1979-80).
Gaal
and DiLorenzo, The Legality and Requirements of HEW’sn Proposed “Policy
Interpretation” of Title IX and Intercollegiate Athletics, 6:161 (1979-80).
Gaffney,
Tales of Two Cities: Canon Law and Constitutional Law at the Crossroads,
25:801 (1999).
Garfield,
Squaring Affirmative Action Admissions Policies with Federal Judicial
Guidelines: A Model for the
Twenty-First Century, 22:895 (1996).
Gee,
Introduction to Reflections on Higher Education in the 1970’s, 8:443
(1981-82).
Geetter,
The University of Connecticut v. The University of Connecticut Chapter
of the AAUP: Brief on Determining Faculty Workload in the Collective
Bargaining Context, 8:254 (1981-82).
Gerberding,
1995 Symposium: Historical Perspective of Amateurism, 22:11 (1995).
Gibbs,
Book Review, Creating a Safe Campus —
A Guide for College and University Administrators, by David Nichols,
24:695 (1998).
Gibbs,
Book Review, Choosing a College
President: Opportunities and Constraints, by Judith B. McLaughlin and
David Reisman, 18:329 (1991).
Giddings,
Petitioner's Brief in University of
Texas v. Camenisch, 8:58 (1981-82).
Giddings,
Consent Decree in The United States
Department of Labor, Office of Contract Compliance Programs v. Regents of
University of California, 8:54 (1981-82).
Gillmore,
Student Ratings as a Factor in Faculty Employment Decisions and Periodic
Review, 10:557 (1983-84).
Goettling,
Bovee, and Ritter, Case Comment, Witters
v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind: The Establishment
Clause and Financial Aid to Students for Religious Education at Private
Religious Institutions, 13:397 (1987).
Goldblatt
and Cole, Award of Construction Contracts: Public Institutions' Authority to
Select the Lowest Responsible Bidder, 16:177 (1989).
Golden,
College Student Dismissals and the Eldridge
Factors: What Process Is Due?, 8:495 (1981-82).
Goldrick
and Rakow,
Book Review, Sexual Assault on Campus:
What Colleges Can Do, by Aileen Adams and Gail Abarbanel, 16:547
(1990).
Gordon
and Durham, Toward Diverse Diversity: The Legal Legitimacy of Ex
Corde Ecclesiae, 25:697 (1999).
Gordon,
Stretton, Ong, and Ezekial,
Due Process Rights of Medical Residents, 8:120 (1981-82).
Gordon
and Spuehler,
Questions and Answers Explaining the New Tax Rules Applicable to Tax Sheltered
Annuities, 17:435 (1991). |